| Re: When was the "Edit" time-limit increased? [message #481688 is a reply to message #481666] |
Thu, 06 June 2013 13:51   |
InternetThug
Messages: 1036
Registered: October 2005
Location: vagina
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Jerad Gray wrote on Thu, 06 June 2013 09:59 |
| havoc9826 wrote on Wed, 02 January 2008 14:15 |
| IronWarrior wrote on Wed, 02 January 2008 13:00 |
The next thing that needs to be removed is the "this post was edited at what so time", don't really that option, should be a option not forced.
|
I wholeheartedly disagree with that. Admins already have the power to invisibly edit any user's post (such as this one that I had reported before the edit: post), and there's no good reason to allow moderators access to that ability. The next time there's a 20-page renedrama, it would be horrible if posts contained things that the actual poster never said, and then the threads were locked before that poster could defend him/herself. Leave the timestamps on.
|
Moderators have the option to not show the edited by time stamp when they edit someone else's post as is.
|
Replying to posts from 2008. lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
