Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » locking policy
| locking policy [message #455355] |
Tue, 20 September 2011 13:55  |
 |
MUDKIPS
Messages: 214
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
why are threads about atomix and st0rm allowed to rage on for page after page with everybody flaming and insulting eachother, more than half of which are lies
but when i make a thread about jarhead being the faggot that he is, and everyone agrees (except cocksucker azazel) the thread gets locked for "slander"
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455459 is a reply to message #455357] |
Wed, 21 September 2011 06:46  |
Sean
Messages: 822
Registered: February 2009
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Because it is slander.
Head admin at TmX (The Matrix Sniper server)
irc.thematrixserver.com
The Matrix Sniper: 188.138.84.134:4576
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455464 is a reply to message #455459] |
Wed, 21 September 2011 07:26 |
|
MUDKIPS
Messages: 214
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Azazel wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 06:46 |
Because it is slander.
|
You still don't understand why nobody remotely values your opinion do you?
You're a weak faggot, and always will be.
Firstly, you cheated, because you cant take it that other people are better at the game than you, so you have to go fuck it up simply because your pathetic mind cannot accept it. While cheating you try to take part in a feud between two communities you knew (and still dont know) absolutely nothing about, just adding fuel to the fire so you could drive your tongue deeper into the anuses of the n00bstories admins. You sad little gayboy.
Then you got caught, and instead of coming completely clean and apologizing, you come up with some bullshit excuse (what a man you are) and when people dont buy it, instead of facing up to it, you just run away, HA. Coward.
Then when you come back you act as if nothing happened and like your posts aren't a complete waste of space.
Go bother some other game community, where there's abundant room for faggots like you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455522 is a reply to message #455464] |
Wed, 21 September 2011 13:09 |
Sean
Messages: 822
Registered: February 2009
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| MUDKIPS wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 07:26 |
| Azazel wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 06:46 |
Because it is slander.
|
Rageeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh
|
I have to be honest, that made me smile.
It's still slander though.
Head admin at TmX (The Matrix Sniper server)
irc.thematrixserver.com
The Matrix Sniper: 188.138.84.134:4576
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455531 is a reply to message #455527] |
Wed, 21 September 2011 13:28 |
Sean
Messages: 822
Registered: February 2009
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| R315r4z0r wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 13:16 |
| Azazel wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 16:09 |
| MUDKIPS wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 07:26 |
| Azazel wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 06:46 |
Because it is slander.
|
Rageeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh
|
I have to be honest, that made me smile.
It's still slander though.
|
Duh...
MUD's point is that the other threads are ALSO slander.. so why weren't THEY locked as well?
|
Probably because it wasn't as personal as starting a thread about a single indivigual? I don't know. 
Head admin at TmX (The Matrix Sniper server)
irc.thematrixserver.com
The Matrix Sniper: 188.138.84.134:4576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455557 is a reply to message #455355] |
Wed, 21 September 2011 16:59 |
 |
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
If the accusations were false, then it'd be slander.
However, they weren't at all false, and are backed up by proof. Also, it wasn't just one or two people complaining. There are a lot of complaints, and they have gone on for years.
And there are tons of threads about certain individuals, and communities, that did involve a lot of lies and false accusations, yet they were not locked.
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455623 is a reply to message #455355] |
Thu, 22 September 2011 07:17 |
 |
ChewML
Messages: 918
Registered: June 2008
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Lol, this shit is why Renegade is almost dead.
Everybody loves the gameplay, we always try to come back, BUT WE CAN'T STAND THE FUCKING MORONS.
And sadly the stupid people are everywhere in this game, there is no avoiding them, they could be a regular player, mod, admin or the owner of the community.
Sadly 4.0 can't fix the fucking retards, and so there is no true hope for this game. I actually can't wait till it completely dies, means to an end... and this community needs a fucking end.
Anyone wanna measure e-peens and then go piss into the wind? That's about all that is left here.
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455625 is a reply to message #455355] |
Thu, 22 September 2011 07:26 |
Gohax
Messages: 738
Registered: January 2009
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
This topic is slander!!!!!!! LOCK IT!
 | Quote: |
·OTBot·Gohax killed beerfull4 (Black Hand Sniper/Sniper Rifle Vs. Deadeye/Sniper Rifle).
·OTBot·beerfull4: see that for sure a auto aim
·OTBot·beerfull4: u know how i can tell
·OTBot·Gohax: LOL
·OTBot·Gohax: how can you tell?
·OTBot·beerfull4: becuz your american and americans are like that
·OTBot·Gohax: LOL!
·OTBot·beerfull4 has left the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455638 is a reply to message #455602] |
Thu, 22 September 2011 08:58 |
Sean
Messages: 822
Registered: February 2009
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| danpaul88 wrote on Thu, 22 September 2011 01:35 |
Based on the forum rules I would speculate that the thread in question broke the following rule;
| Quote: |
Harassment/Racism/Flaming: Harassment of other members, racism, or any hate speech in general will not be tolerated. Moderators will be the judge of what is intolerable, and what is not. Also, please refrain from flaming other members. If you really must, keep it inside of the Hot Issues forum.
|
Creating a thread to abuse an individual clearly breaks this rule and is therefore a clear candidate for locking.
But, to reiterate, I am not a moderator and therefore this is pure speculation on my part.
FYI: Forum rules: http://www.renegadeforums.com/index.php?t=msg&th=22550&start=0&rid=2 893
|
Hit the nail on the head.
| MUDKIPS wrote on Thu, 22 September 2011 02:05 |
also, when ns takes 4.0, unban DrasticDR/Gonzalez
mainly because jarhead banned him without a shred of evidence (apart from the evidence that jarhead just sucked as a sniper and hated getting pwned by him all the time)
|
See, this isn't about Jarhead or any locking policy, it's about your personal hatred of NS, as you keep showing. I think you need to move on sir. When NS starts running 4.0 all the "!forcerg" will obviously be removed, so those players that you've listed will be able to join anyways, as both was forcerg'd if I recall correctly.
Head admin at TmX (The Matrix Sniper server)
irc.thematrixserver.com
The Matrix Sniper: 188.138.84.134:4576
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455647 is a reply to message #455638] |
Thu, 22 September 2011 10:44 |
|
MUDKIPS
Messages: 214
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Azazel wrote on Thu, 22 September 2011 08:58 |
See, this isn't about Jarhead or any locking policy, it's about your personal hatred of NS, as you keep showing. I think you need to move on sir. When NS starts running 4.0 all the "!forcerg" will obviously be removed, so those players that you've listed will be able to join anyways, as both was forcerg'd if I recall correctly.
|
You're the one who needs to move on kid. If you did any reading at all you'd have seen that I thought ns was doing a great job, and I was playing there quite a bit recently because of the excellent new settings, and some of the moderators have become actually capable of doing their job.
Then jarhead banned me because he has some grudge and he's just a stupid fuckface like you, and removed my posting permissions on ns forums when i made appeal threads. So I posted here about how much of a waste of space he really is, like you are.
You werent even around when DrasticDR got BANNED by Jarhead, neither for Mike, nor how he reacted on the forums. You don't know a shit azazel, keep trying to play it off like you know everything lol.
The whole renegade-exodus thing is so 2009. Everybody has already moved on a thousand miles man. You are seriously the only person I've seen it bringing up since 2010.
[Updated on: Thu, 22 September 2011 10:46] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455648 is a reply to message #455647] |
Thu, 22 September 2011 10:45 |
|
MUDKIPS
Messages: 214
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| MUDKIPS wrote on Thu, 22 September 2011 10:44 |
| Azazel wrote on Thu, 22 September 2011 08:58 |
See, this isn't about Jarhead or any locking policy, it's about your personal hatred of NS, as you keep showing. I think you need to move on sir. When NS starts running 4.0 all the "!forcerg" will obviously be removed, so those players that you've listed will be able to join anyways, as both was forcerg'd if I recall correctly.
|
You're the one who needs to move on kid. If you did any reading at all you'd have seen that I thought ns was doing a great job, and I was playing there quite a bit recently because of the excellent new settings, and some of the moderators have become actually capable of doing their job.
Then jarhead banned me because he has some grudge and he's just a stupid fuckface like you, and removed my posting permissions on ns forums when i made appeal threads. So I posted here about how much of a waste of space he really is, like you are.
You werent even around when DrasticDR got BANNED by Jarhead, neither for Mike, nor how he reacted on the forums. You don't know a shit azazel, keep trying to play it off like you know everything lol.
The whole renegade-exodus thing is so 2009. Everybody has already moved on a thousand miles man. You are seriously the only person I've seen it bringing up since 2010.
|
I also forgot to mention that you love cocks more than anybody I've ever seen. You should put one in your mouth immediately, maybe it will shut you up.
[Updated on: Thu, 22 September 2011 10:46] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: locking policy [message #455653 is a reply to message #455557] |
Thu, 22 September 2011 11:32 |
|
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| nikki6ixx wrote on Wed, 21 September 2011 16:59 |
If the accusations were false, then it'd be slander.
However, they weren't at all false, and are backed up by proof. Also, it wasn't just one or two people complaining. There are a lot of complaints, and they have gone on for years.
And there are tons of threads about certain individuals, and communities, that did involve a lot of lies and false accusations, yet they were not locked.
|
And again, it's only slander if the accusations are false. But they aren't. Complaints stretch back years, primarily on NS' website, but one or two here, too.
http://www.renegadeforums.com/index.php?t=msg&goto=324537&rid=23108& srch=jarhead#msg_num_7
Also, the line from this post strikes me as odd:
| Quote: |
Above all, I demand, yes DEMAND, that the people who we select to be moderators (actually we call them "n00b kickers") be treated with respect that they richly deserve. They sacrifice a bit of their own game time and fun to help keep things running smoothly and I will NOT tolerate them being treated like crap by the likes of you. Period.
|
That's a rule that should only pertain to the NS forums. Not here. Defamation is one thing, but actually bringing up a viewpoint, backed with evidence, and supported by a large group of people, is another.
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
[Updated on: Thu, 22 September 2011 11:36] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 24 12:16:12 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01200 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
