Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared
() 1 Vote
|
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438628 is a reply to message #438525] |
Sat, 30 October 2010 13:56 |
|
liquidv2
Messages: 3407 Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
i'm trying to understand the creature known as Spoony
it's difficult for me because he's severely british
Toggle Spoiler
Quote: | it's interesting you're immovably focused on this part of the statement as opposed to either of the two more important parts, 1: the anti-pointsfix crowd had already been caught rigging these polls, 2: nobody important at clanwars ever said that poll was worth a damn thing, whereas it was made clear that the debate thread was central in determining policy.
|
what i still can't understand is why you would do something that everyone disagreed with
for example the soul case, had he just been allowed to play then clanwars.cc wouldn't have been breathing down your neck about the Renegade league
Quote: | this is because you're a fucking idiot who can't or won't understand a really simple but really crucial point.
|
you don't care whether or not your playerbase is happy
you care about what you'd rather have based on what you think is right, even if that means hosting an empty league
what do you think i don't understand?
Quote: | the longer your list is of people who want a pointsbugged ladder, the sadder it is that not a single one of them could give enough of a shit to provide one themselves. you keep calling me a douche for running the league the way i think it should go... how stupid are you? why have you never called EVERYBODY ELSE ON RENEGADE a douche for not giving enough of a shit to provide a league at all? you really are thick if this has never occurred to you, even if i hadn't carefully tried to spell it out to your dumb ass over and over and over and over again.
|
you're rude!
they're douchebags because they would rather you run the original points than the pointmod in your league?
Quote: | i'd rather call it a fact than a law.
|
why is everything you say fact?
Quote: | again, this is a really sad attempt to shift the fault. the reason nobody other than me hosted a league is because nobody could give a shit about the clan community. even when they admit to not being able to care enough - as simpee said - or even when they say that they would not lower themselves to hosting something for renegade - as orca said - you seem intent on thinking that what's easily explained by apathy and selfishness is actually caused by something noble.
|
if that's the way it actually was then i'd agree with you
i just have a very hard time believing that everyone in cw.cc was like that
and i think that had that been the case you wouldn't have hosted it at all
Quote: | i know you're probably having a hard time grasping the unbelievably pathetic low to which the clanwars.cc community sunk during the Soul episode, and i understand that. still, everything i've said about it is true. it was me and blkst0rm vs the entire clanwars community on an issue, we were dead right and they were dead wrong. this is a much sharper divide than the pointsfix poll you're talking about. and they were so catastrophically wrong that if they'd been "listened to" (obeyed), there's a very real chance the entire league would have been shut down.
and, as i've said, because they weren't obeyed they actively tried to sabotage the league by using an exploit to get as many people banned as possible. getting the entire league banned seemed preferable to them than allowing spoony and blkst0rm to ban someone who was pointpushing and photoshopping screenshots. remember this when you talk about how it's spoony vs everyone else at clanwars, cos whenever this happens i have a history of being right and they have a history of being crashingly wrong.
|
would it have been the end of the world had you let the clanwars players play with their pointpushing best friend and avoided the whole scenario altogether? you fought the good fight but was it worth it?
Quote: | i've purposely left my original statement in the quote box, so everyone can see the point i made illustrated again by your reply to it. look at the point i made, about how i just can't get you to show the slightest reaction to incredibly important things, and yet all you can focus on is counting how many people are on which side.
|
it's because i don't believe you when you say the only people against using the pointmod in clanwars were simpee and his named band of rapist cheaters
Quote: | then perhaps you can explain the Yes and Don't Care votes to the poll, given the fact that added together they outnumbered the No votes (and also given the fact that I didn't waste my time voting at all). we're being very generous and assuming that the anti-pointsfix crowd DIDN'T rig that poll, which would make a change. the result would be the majority either liking it or not minding it.
|
hmm?
Quote: | i would think it sad you fell for that lie, but you fell for all the others.
|
i didn't think either way about whether whiskey liked the pointmod or not, i just understood how they could be correct
Quote: | whiskey was originally against the pointsfix, then changed his mind. the anti-pointsfix crowd were simply intolerant of anyone who disagreed with them (just look at the pathetic way they've continually treated me). there'd just HAVE to be some other explanation for whiskey's opinion than "he thinks this is a good thing for the league"
|
i understand that
that's why i said it could have gone either way, i didn't know for sure
Quote: | i certainly gave them every opportunity.
|
if every clanwars.cc member enjoyed openly engaging in debates on the forums it would have worked more the way you'd intended it to
Quote: | much, much less of a douchebag than you, as i've tried over and over and over again to explain
|
how rude!
if i ran a league and everyone was telling me one thing i'd more likely than not side with them
though if what you tell me is true it's further from everyone than i thought
and i may be mistaken
Quote: | consider how many times you've called me a douche for running the league in the best way i can, and then look at your own wheedling excuses for why you haven't said anything bad about some extraordinarily fucked up behaviour from the people you've been defending.
|
you've said enough about them yourself, and they haven't drawn any hate from me
i don't agree with how they did things but i wasn't there for any of it
had i been i'd probably say the same thing you are
Quote: | yes, since at no point from the beginning of the episode until now has it been demonstrated that they even existed
|
clanwars.cc members that didn't rig polls? i'm sure they existed
Quote: | you surely realise that there was a point in time at which i went from not being a clanwars admin to being a clanwars admin, and therefore a point in time when i was a clanwars admin who had zero practical experience.
|
it's because you wrote strategy guides for maps like Field
Quote: | no assumptions are necessary, you can just look at the facts. i attempted to recruit for renadmins many times, and the overwhelming majority of the community either didn't apply or did apply and turned out not be diligent enough to spend the very small amount of time it takes to do the AR's. i can count on one hand the number of people from the clanwars community who turned out to be good admins willing to put the effort in. i'm also more aware than most of the extraordinarily pathetic way the clanwars.cc community treats the admins; most of your moderators would quit within a week or so.
|
most of my moderators probably wouldn't even want to be in that environment because they're from a public community
but that's probably true
Quote: | this is just plain wrong. clanwars died when *i* stopped playing, and i stopped playing because i eventually reached the point at which the unbelievably pathetic nature of the clanwars.cc community made me not want to spend any more effort on them (putting me down to the same level as everyone else who didn't run a league for them)
|
i think it would have been swell of you to keep doing it, despite their abuse, because it was the right thing
at least something you could honestly argue was the right thing, and eventually they would have realized it and some would have it in them to thank you
you would have been a Renesaint
Quote: | and the need to lie to everybody for about a week when he was under investigation, including his own clan. i'd call lying to your own clan about the worst thing you can do in the clan world, and that wasn't even the first time he'd pointpushed.
|
yet they still loved and forgave him
if it's an unforgivable sin why did they almost unanimously want him allowed back in?
Quote: | it's not strange at all, why would someone continue to spend their resources for such a cesspool of a community?
|
that line made me laugh
it doesn't seem like such a cesspool to me, lots of people enjoyed the years they spent there and the fun they had
i'm sure it had low points but i don't think they would have been reason enough to close it down, based on what i've heard and seen
then again IM STILL NO CW.CC ADMIN SO IDK
Quote: | that thing i kept telling you about some maps being blatantly unfair, so unfair that certain players would leave if they got the bad side.
|
aren't there still some maps like that with the pointmod on? like, say, mesa
Quote: | then these exact same people later turn up crying about how they think mesa is unfair with the pointsfix, it's enough to make a cat laugh
|
why wouldn't you just play simpee then and shut him up, your cat would have been laffin
Quote: | apology accepted. you realise that everything you just said could be said about the soul episode?
|
sure, but had you just said Ok you guys are stupid, but at least you've accepted it so we're allowing this pointpushing baby-rapist scumbag Soul to play
Quote: | let's be clear that in being so encouraging of debate on the subject i was doing the community yet another favour they didn't deserve. the fact that they either couldn't say why their point bug would be better for the league's fairness than the original renegade points system, or that they were too scared of losing an argument if they had said so (jesus, how pathetic is that) is all on them. it's not a criticism to say that i was so diligent in reading everything everybody said about the issue and responding to every single post; you can make it sound bad but it isn't.
|
clanwars people are overly competitive, and a lot of them take losing pretty hard
thus the struggles you've had over the years
no they couldn't post why it would increase fairness, but they did try anyways
had the entire league wanted it left on you wouldn't have because they can't prove it increases fairness
what do you lose by letting them play that way? it makes them happy
you're right and everyone is happy at the same time
i think that's what i would have done, but history has shown that that would have made me a bad cw.cc admin
Quote: | no, it wasn't. i kept saying that it was bollock-brainedly stupid to get points when you're doing fuck all damage; he said actually yes havocs do do damage, just not very much, and that explains why they get such massive points.
|
he got you good, you just didn't realize it
Quote: | i'm glad that after mentioning these sort of tactics again and again and again, you've finally managed to acknowledge it.
|
i don't agree; just because some polls in the history of cw.cc were rigged doesn't mean they were all rigged
Quote: | still, i wouldn't say that. you're the one putting all your faith in that poll thread
|
too much perhaps
Quote: | and yet even with your dumbass poll thread, you can add up the Yes and the Don't Mind Either Way votes to outnumber the Nos. but like i said, my argument never relied on counting the number of people who agreed with me; it's not so weak as yours.
|
i wasn't aware of the overall indifference
that or i just forgot or neglected to remember it
and it's not my poll thread, i never made a poll on cw.cc
Quote: | yes, it does. the one and only person from clanwars.cc who actually did do what i kept suggesting was whiskey, and he got no end of contempt for doing so.
|
what does that have to do with you saying no one gave a shit about clanwars.cc
Quote: | ...that they like playing clanwars? that doesn't demonstrate a generous nature.
|
who said anything about generous? if they didn't give a shit they wouldn't post or ask things or participate at all
Quote: | i know nothing about coding at all, never stopped me. i've always found there to be two kinds of people in this world, people who get the fucking job done whatever the obstacles, and people who come back to you with excuses for why they didn't do it.
|
what about the people that die trying
Quote: | i might add that i offered several times to sell people a league and help them set it up.
|
there is no clanwars without spoony
if you haven't noticed people seem to want you around, even if they disagree with you
Quote: | if they don't even dare say so in the debate thread that's specifically there for the purpose, i don't think i can persuade myself to do what they want.
|
pfft, have a heart
Quote: | you're right about one thing, you're not me. you know fuck all about how to run a ladder, and you've never shown that you care enough about the clan community to put the effort into trying. yes, if nobody can explain why X is better than Y for a rule, nor can anybody refute my detailed assertions on why Y is better than X, we're going with Y and if this makes cheaters and compulsive liars angry, so much the better. if the league becoming more fair has the added effect of angering people who prefer the game not to be fair, this is a bonus rather than a drawback.
|
if that reduced the league to nothing would it be worth it in your eyes?
Quote: | again, anyone can see i did not say that. i suppose it's easier for you to pretend i said something i never said, than to face your own stupidity in placing all your faith in a poll by and for people who'd already proven their willingness to rig them.
|
erm
Quote: | i'm glad that after mentioning these sort of tactics again and again and again, you've finally managed to acknowledge it.
|
i feel like your statements contradict each other
Quote: | my position, by contrast, is very simple and has always been consistent: those polls are worth jack shit to me and always were. debate is what matters. if people lose the debate then i'm not likely to do what they say; and if people are too scared to participate in the debate for fear of losing (my god, how sad is that) then i'm even less likely to do what they say.
|
a lot of people don't enjoy debating or are no good at it
because they can't win you over with essays because they're incapable of writing them their opinions mean jack shit to you
seems kind of shitty to me
Quote: | you're better than this... deal with what i actually say, don't lower yourself into pretending i said things i obviously did not say.
|
trying to say and actually saying are two different things
from what i gather by your statements you're claiming that they are douchebags because they'd like their preferred settings used in clanwars over your proposed settings but won't actually go out and make their own league to do it
Quote: | and yet i'd be far less of a douchebag than everyone who wanted a pointbugged ladder and couldn't be bothered hosting one, and there's nothing you can say that'll change that. do yourself a favour, just admit you've lost this debate. there is no overcoming that argument.
|
i'm just trying to better understand you, call it what you want
i don't agree with that argument
Quote: | then what a pity that in all the overwhelming majority that supposedly wanted the point bug, not a single one could give enough of a shit to make that happen. they couldn't even pull together and do it. meanwhile the people who actually DID deliver the goods - me and whiskey - have gotten nothing but contempt for doing so.
|
that's untrue
from some people sure, but not all people
you believe that someone asking you to change what you're doing is a douchebag move if they're not willing to do it themselves? or is there more to it than that
Quote: | if you still haven't figured out by now that i couldn't give a shit which side of the argument majority is on, i don't think you ever will
|
back to the soul case, if it's everyone vs. you what do you lose by going with everyone
i'm actually interested in your thinking on that
Quote: | no, it doesn't. i'm doing them a favour by hosting them a league at all; they have no reason to expect to be run the way they like.
|
yeah but does it hurt to ask?
Quote: | this sentence is two words too long.
|
rude
and also mean
Quote: | oh dear, you're still under the impression that it was simpee and clearshot not playing any more than killed the league, as opposed to me not playing any more. if the events of the time when they were banned didn't convince you of the reality, how about when a new admin tried to revitalise the league recently with simpee and clearshot unbanned? i didn't play, despite being asked to all the time... and the league didn't fire up. the admin even gave people votes and choices on whether to use the point bug or not, and the league didn't fire up.
ouch.
|
did they play either? probably not
and also, there is no clanwars without spoony
you're embedded in peoples' brains
Quote: | what a dumb thing to say
|
just because people don't post doesn't mean they don't have an opinion on something
if everyone is of the same opinion on something i don't get what you gain by dismissing all of them because you disagree with it
what are you left with then?
Quote: | nobody needed to, i was doing a perfectly good job winning the argument despite it being 1v7 or whatever.
|
write a strategy guide!
that or you were all alone, though like you said that does not matter
Quote: | i know you don't want to admit the simple fact that everyone who did speak up against it in the thread were cheaters and pointpushers and rulebreakers and compulsive liars, but it would be better if you just faced that simple fact.
|
you named everyone that posted in that topic and took a shit on them - this is the band of rapists i keep referring to
i have a hard time believing they're the only ones from cw.cc that wanted to use the original points over the pointmod
Quote: | what i said about him was true.
|
poor zell
i don't remember what it was but it seemed less bad than the rest
Quote: | you're dangerously close to a good point there
|
i think you're ignoring the point i made about expecting everyone to be respectable and mature in such a competitive environment
that's ok though
Quote: | no, clear and simpee on the jelly forum.
|
it doesn't seem like that serious of an assertion if you can easily deflect it
|
|
|
|
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438658 is a reply to message #438525] |
Sun, 31 October 2010 02:59 |
|
Gen_Blacky
Messages: 3250 Registered: September 2006
Karma: 1
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
Clanwars .cc Presents Command & Conquer Renegade Essay Wars. Essay wars brings a new gameplay experience like never before. The point system for each essay has been greatly enhanced.
[Updated on: Sun, 31 October 2010 03:08] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438674 is a reply to message #438628] |
Sun, 31 October 2010 09:23 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
EWD, have you summoned up enough decency and honesty to apologise to me yet, or are you still cuddling up to your friend 0x90 despite the fact he's still making and releasing stuff that harms renegade, exactly as I tried to convince your dumb ass that he would?
liquid:
Toggle Spoiler
Quote: | it's interesting you're immovably focused on this part of the statement as opposed to either of the two more important parts, 1: the anti-pointsfix crowd had already been caught rigging these polls, 2: nobody important at clanwars ever said that poll was worth a damn thing, whereas it was made clear that the debate thread was central in determining policy.
|
what i still can't understand is why you would do something that everyone disagreed with[/quote]
i don't know why not. if you can understand why you - for example - didn't host a pointbugged ladder for everybody who wanted one, it isn't such a big step to realising that someone else might not want to either, especially when that someone has always been the most vocal opponent of the point bug.
of course, on that basis you might think that i deserve some credit for hosting a pointbugged ladder for such a long time despite my contempt for the bug, but no. no thanks are due there, only being called a "douche" when the problem is finally fixable.
Quote: | for example the soul case, had he just been allowed to play then clanwars.cc wouldn't have been breathing down your neck about the Renegade league
|
you've lost me there.
Quote: |
Quote: | this is because you're a fucking idiot who can't or won't understand a really simple but really crucial point.
|
you don't care whether or not your playerbase is happy
you care about what you'd rather have based on what you think is right, even if that means hosting an empty league
what do you think i don't understand?
|
the fact that you have no credibility at all in criticising the way clanwars was run, because nobody else could be bothered running a clan ladder at all.
Quote: |
Quote: | the longer your list is of people who want a pointsbugged ladder, the sadder it is that not a single one of them could give enough of a shit to provide one themselves. you keep calling me a douche for running the league the way i think it should go... how stupid are you? why have you never called EVERYBODY ELSE ON RENEGADE a douche for not giving enough of a shit to provide a league at all? you really are thick if this has never occurred to you, even if i hadn't carefully tried to spell it out to your dumb ass over and over and over and over again.
|
you're rude!
they're douchebags because they would rather you run the original points than the pointmod in your league?
|
i'd rather be rude than a bald-faced liar, liquid. why do you keep ignoring what i say and then deliberately pretending i said things i absolutely did not say? i'd respect you more if you just admitted you lost the argument instead of trying to lie your way out of it.
Quote: |
Quote: | i'd rather call it a fact than a law.
|
why is everything you say fact?
|
and there you go again. why do you keep lying? when did i say "everything i say is a fact"? why are you lying by claiming i said or think this?
Quote: |
Quote: | again, this is a really sad attempt to shift the fault. the reason nobody other than me hosted a league is because nobody could give a shit about the clan community. even when they admit to not being able to care enough - as simpee said - or even when they say that they would not lower themselves to hosting something for renegade - as orca said - you seem intent on thinking that what's easily explained by apathy and selfishness is actually caused by something noble.
|
if that's the way it actually was then i'd agree with you
|
i suppose i'm glad to hear you would agree with me if only you were perceptive enough to see what's right in front of you.
Quote: | i just have a very hard time believing that everyone in cw.cc was like that
and i think that had that been the case you wouldn't have hosted it at all
|
eh? one of the main reasons i hosted the clanwars ladder is because no fucker else on renegade could be bothered.
Quote: | would it have been the end of the world had you let the clanwars players play with their pointpushing best friend and avoided the whole scenario altogether?
|
there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. no rebuttal necessary, the quote speaks for itself.
Quote: | i've purposely left my original statement in the quote box, so everyone can see the point i made illustrated again by your reply to it. look at the point i made, about how i just can't get you to show the slightest reaction to incredibly important things, and yet all you can focus on is counting how many people are on which side.
|
it's because i don't believe you when you say the only people against using the pointmod in clanwars were simpee and his named band of rapist cheaters[/quote]
oh dear, you completely changed the subject.
Quote: |
Quote: | whiskey was originally against the pointsfix, then changed his mind. the anti-pointsfix crowd were simply intolerant of anyone who disagreed with them (just look at the pathetic way they've continually treated me). there'd just HAVE to be some other explanation for whiskey's opinion than "he thinks this is a good thing for the league"
|
i understand that
that's why i said it could have gone either way, i didn't know for sure
|
translation: you blindly swallowed what a small number of cheaters and compulsive liars told you, despite the fact that at the time i was carefully pointing out the simple truth of the matter
Quote: |
Quote: | i certainly gave them every opportunity.
|
if every clanwars.cc member enjoyed openly engaging in debates on the forums it would have worked more the way you'd intended it to
|
who gives a shit whether anybody "enjoys" debates? if you want a rule changed, explain why. if you can't, don't expect it to be changed. who cares whether you enjoy trying to explain why?
Quote: |
Quote: | much, much less of a douchebag than you, as i've tried over and over and over again to explain
|
how rude!
if i ran a league and everyone was telling me one thing i'd more likely than not side with them
though if what you tell me is true it's further from everyone than i thought
and i may be mistaken
|
the "if i ran a league" is the critical bit. if you gave enough of a shit about clan gaming to host a league, here's how you'd run it! well, i suppose we have to take you at your word, such as it is, because you didn't give enough of a shit about clan gaming to host a league, though you've got plenty of criticism to aim at the only person who DID host one because it wasn't exactly as you wanted it to be.
your parents must have had a hell of time
Quote: |
Quote: | this is just plain wrong. clanwars died when *i* stopped playing, and i stopped playing because i eventually reached the point at which the unbelievably pathetic nature of the clanwars.cc community made me not want to spend any more effort on them (putting me down to the same level as everyone else who didn't run a league for them)
|
i think it would have been swell of you to keep doing it, despite their abuse, because it was the right thing
at least something you could honestly argue was the right thing, and eventually they would have realized it and some would have it in them to thank you
you would have been a Renesaint
|
as would anyone who could be bothered hosting a pointbugged ladder when, according to you, everyone except me and whiskey wanted one.
what a pity that not a single person on the planet could, so instead you direct your anger at the only person who hosts a league and the only person who helps him run it.
if you can't see how phenomenally stupid you are being here, i just don't know how many more times i need to repeat it.
Quote: |
Quote: | and the need to lie to everybody for about a week when he was under investigation, including his own clan. i'd call lying to your own clan about the worst thing you can do in the clan world, and that wasn't even the first time he'd pointpushed.
|
yet they still loved and forgave him
if it's an unforgivable sin why did they almost unanimously want him allowed back in?
|
because they're a bunch of idiots? that's the short answer.
Quote: |
Quote: | it's not strange at all, why would someone continue to spend their resources for such a cesspool of a community?
|
that line made me laugh
it doesn't seem like such a cesspool to me, lots of people enjoyed the years they spent there and the fun they had
i'm sure it had low points but i don't think they would have been reason enough to close it down, based on what i've heard and seen
|
i'm specifically talking about a specific period in its history (the Soul episode) - and at this point, the community truly was a cesspool.
Quote: | then again IM STILL NO CW.CC ADMIN SO IDK
|
you're almost on to something here. you don't run a clanwars league for these people so you don't know? indeed. so you know what it's like to not host a league for a bunch of idiots... so you ought to understand what might drive someone else to decide not to as well.
Quote: |
Quote: | that thing i kept telling you about some maps being blatantly unfair, so unfair that certain players would leave if they got the bad side.
|
aren't there still some maps like that with the pointmod on? like, say, mesa
|
not with mesa2... guess who solved that problem?
again?
Quote: |
Quote: | then these exact same people later turn up crying about how they think mesa is unfair with the pointsfix, it's enough to make a cat laugh
|
why wouldn't you just play simpee then and shut him up, your cat would have been laffin
|
why didn't you read my detailed and repeated explanations of why i wouldn't play him at the time?
Quote: |
Quote: | apology accepted. you realise that everything you just said could be said about the soul episode?
|
sure, but had you just said Ok you guys are stupid, but at least you've accepted it so we're allowing this pointpushing baby-rapist scumbag Soul to play
|
again, i'll just leave this quote to stand on its own, it says a lot more than you meant it to
Quote: | no they couldn't post why it would increase fairness, but they did try anyways
|
you seem reluctant to finish your sentence. the last words that belong on the end are "but they were wrong"
Quote: | had the entire league wanted it left on you wouldn't have because they can't prove it increases fairness
what do you lose by letting them play that way? it makes them happy
|
it might be the same thing you thought you would lose by hosting a pointbugged clan ladder for them?
Quote: | you're right and everyone is happy at the same time
i think that's what i would have done, but history has shown that that would have made me a bad cw.cc admin
|
the fact you don't give enough of a shit about the clan world to host a league at all is enough to demonstrate you wouldn't be a good admin, we don't need much more evidence than that. we don't even need to notice your contempt for the only person who actually did and the renadmin at the time, though that helps form the picture too.
Quote: |
Quote: | i'm glad that after mentioning these sort of tactics again and again and again, you've finally managed to acknowledge it.
|
i don't agree; just because some polls in the history of cw.cc were rigged doesn't mean they were all rigged
|
nobody said they were, though you lied and tried to make it sound like i did.
Quote: |
Quote: | and yet even with your dumbass poll thread, you can add up the Yes and the Don't Mind Either Way votes to outnumber the Nos. but like i said, my argument never relied on counting the number of people who agreed with me; it's not so weak as yours.
|
i wasn't aware of the overall indifference
that or i just forgot or neglected to remember it
|
or you were just overly focused on the small group of cheaters and pointpushers
Quote: |
Quote: | yes, it does. the one and only person from clanwars.cc who actually did do what i kept suggesting was whiskey, and he got no end of contempt for doing so.
|
what does that have to do with you saying no one gave a shit about clanwars.cc
|
i can't tell if that's a serious question or not
Quote: |
Quote: | ...that they like playing clanwars? that doesn't demonstrate a generous nature.
|
who said anything about generous? if they didn't give a shit they wouldn't post or ask things or participate at all
|
is there anything praiseworthy here?
Quote: |
Quote: | i know nothing about coding at all, never stopped me. i've always found there to be two kinds of people in this world, people who get the fucking job done whatever the obstacles, and people who come back to you with excuses for why they didn't do it.
|
what about the people that die trying
|
never mind them, we're talking about the enormous number of people who never tried at all, for whom you're very quick to make excuses.
Quote: |
Quote: | i might add that i offered several times to sell people a league and help them set it up.
|
there is no clanwars without spoony
if you haven't noticed people seem to want you around, even if they disagree with you
|
would that explain the general enthusiasm when i was suspended because a cheater lied his way into my clan?
still, carry on making excuses for these people if you like. the fact remains that none of them came up with the goods, and you attacked the only person who did.
Quote: |
Quote: | if they don't even dare say so in the debate thread that's specifically there for the purpose, i don't think i can persuade myself to do what they want.
|
pfft, have a heart
|
having a debate thread at all is more generous than they have a reason to expect; i could just say "here's spoony's decision the madder, live with it" and lock the thread, as i was advised by quite a few people to do instead of actually talking to these idiots.
Quote: |
Quote: | you're right about one thing, you're not me. you know fuck all about how to run a ladder, and you've never shown that you care enough about the clan community to put the effort into trying. yes, if nobody can explain why X is better than Y for a rule, nor can anybody refute my detailed assertions on why Y is better than X, we're going with Y and if this makes cheaters and compulsive liars angry, so much the better. if the league becoming more fair has the added effect of angering people who prefer the game not to be fair, this is a bonus rather than a drawback.
|
if that reduced the league to nothing would it be worth it in your eyes?
|
i've been asked the same question before, but in a more threatening tone.
Quote: |
Quote: | again, anyone can see i did not say that. i suppose it's easier for you to pretend i said something i never said, than to face your own stupidity in placing all your faith in a poll by and for people who'd already proven their willingness to rig them.
|
erm
Quote: | i'm glad that after mentioning these sort of tactics again and again and again, you've finally managed to acknowledge it.
|
i feel like your statements contradict each other
|
no? that was the first time you seemed to acknowledge the fact that the anti-pointsfix crowd at clanwars had been caught rigging polls like that before, despite the innumerable times i kept pointing it out to you and you obviously didn't care.
Quote: |
Quote: | my position, by contrast, is very simple and has always been consistent: those polls are worth jack shit to me and always were. debate is what matters. if people lose the debate then i'm not likely to do what they say; and if people are too scared to participate in the debate for fear of losing (my god, how sad is that) then i'm even less likely to do what they say.
|
a lot of people don't enjoy debating or are no good at it
because they can't win you over with essays because they're incapable of writing them their opinions mean jack shit to you
seems kind of shitty to me
|
i suspect this is wilful dishonesty on your part rather than simple stupidity. i didn't say you have to crafted a beautifully worded essay, i just said you had to actually be right.
Quote: |
Quote: | you're better than this... deal with what i actually say, don't lower yourself into pretending i said things i obviously did not say.
|
trying to say and actually saying are two different things
from what i gather by your statements you're claiming that they are douchebags because they'd like their preferred settings used in clanwars over your proposed settings but won't actually go out and make their own league to do it
|
this one seems more like simple stupidity than wilful dishonesty. i can only advise you to actually read and understand what i say before replying to it.
Quote: |
Quote: | and yet i'd be far less of a douchebag than everyone who wanted a pointbugged ladder and couldn't be bothered hosting one, and there's nothing you can say that'll change that. do yourself a favour, just admit you've lost this debate. there is no overcoming that argument.
|
i'm just trying to better understand you, call it what you want
i don't agree with that argument
|
i know you don't, because it logically makes you much more of a douche than i could ever be, and given the sheer number of times you've called me a douche for this reason it would make you the most colossal douche in the world.
Quote: |
Quote: | then what a pity that in all the overwhelming majority that supposedly wanted the point bug, not a single one could give enough of a shit to make that happen. they couldn't even pull together and do it. meanwhile the people who actually DID deliver the goods - me and whiskey - have gotten nothing but contempt for doing so.
|
that's untrue
from some people sure, but not all people
|
from you and from the people you were so enthusiastically defending, it was absolutely true.
Quote: | you believe that someone asking you to change what you're doing is a douchebag move if they're not willing to do it themselves?
|
no. but your standards for meeting the label "douche" are much lower than mine; they apply to someone who's going to great lengths to do you a favour if that favour isn't exactly the way you'd like it.
Quote: |
Quote: | if you still haven't figured out by now that i couldn't give a shit which side of the argument majority is on, i don't think you ever will
|
back to the soul case, if it's everyone vs. you what do you lose by going with everyone
i'm actually interested in your thinking on that
|
i see you've already forgotten about the whole "CLAN WARS would have shut the league down" bit, maybe because - as i said several times before - it's not something you are at all bothered by.
at one point shortbus (global admin) said that blkst0rm and i were the only good things about the renegade community (he was specifically talking about the clanwars section, before anybody here objects), precisely because we were actually going by rules and fairness and honesty instead of caving in to a bunch of idiots.
that's one thing we could have lost - the entire league.
aside from that, what a great precedent to set. "here's a situation where you can get away with pointpushing and photoshopping screenshots for fake wins, guys". tell me, do you think that would lead to more cheating or less? but maybe you don't care about rules being applied fairly, maybe you think punishments should not be decided by what your offence was but how many people like you instead. well, i don't give a shit about pleasing people, i'd rather be honest. so under your system, me - maybe the fairest and most honest player you could find - would come off much worse than someone with such a colourful history of cheating and pointpushing and lying to everyone about it (the admins, his opponents, his own clan).
i suppose if you could give enough of a shit to actually run a clan league, this is what it might look like.
what could i lose? dignity, for one thing. ever heard of it? where there is a question of cheating or fairplay or honesty, you will always find me on the right side. there are quite a lot of people in the renegade community for whom this can't be said.
Quote: |
Quote: | oh dear, you're still under the impression that it was simpee and clearshot not playing any more than killed the league, as opposed to me not playing any more. if the events of the time when they were banned didn't convince you of the reality, how about when a new admin tried to revitalise the league recently with simpee and clearshot unbanned? i didn't play, despite being asked to all the time... and the league didn't fire up. the admin even gave people votes and choices on whether to use the point bug or not, and the league didn't fire up.
ouch.
|
did they play either? probably not
|
nothing stopped them. they had a pretty good deal - a clanwars league with an admin other than spoony, and the chance to have votes and choices on whether to play with the point bug or not. if you believe everything simpee and clearshot ever said about clanwars, you would think they would have leapt at the chance. but maybe, like me, you don't believe everything simpee and clearshot say.
Quote: | just because people don't post doesn't mean they don't have an opinion on something
if everyone is of the same opinion on something i don't get what you gain by dismissing all of them because you disagree with it
what are you left with then?
|
"dismissing all of them because you disagree with it" is a dishonest way to phrase it. it's not as bad as "didn't listen to them", which was an outright lie you should be ashamed of yourself for saying as often as you did, but it's still dishonest. "dismissing them because you disagreed with them", no. i read everything they said and replied to them all. shame they were all WRONG. perhaps you don't like to think that anybody's opinion could actually be WRONG, liquid.
Quote: |
Quote: | what i said about him was true.
|
poor zell
i don't remember what it was but it seemed less bad than the rest
|
yes, it was. not everyone is as bad as robo or simpee.
Quote: |
Quote: | you're dangerously close to a good point there
|
i think you're ignoring the point i made about expecting everyone to be respectable and mature in such a competitive environment
that's ok though
|
i don't remember saying i EXPECTED anyone from clanwars to behave maturely?
Quote: |
Quote: | no, clear and simpee on the jelly forum.
|
it doesn't seem like that serious of an assertion if you can easily deflect it
|
it was obvious they didn't think i'd have such an easy time proving they were lying.
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
|
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438707 is a reply to message #438525] |
Sun, 31 October 2010 17:23 |
|
liquidv2
Messages: 3407 Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
troop shouldn't bother you, he doesn't bother me
he's just mistaken, that's all
Spoony
Toggle SpoilerQuote: | i don't know why not. if you can understand why you - for example - didn't host a pointbugged ladder for everybody who wanted one, it isn't such a big step to realising that someone else might not want to either, especially when that someone has always been the most vocal opponent of the point bug.
|
you assume i didn't want to because i can't be bothered or wouldn't lower myself to paying or running anything for renegade
not saying i did, but what if i really liked the idea, but didn't do it because i felt it would be pointless trying to make a ladder for renegade that spoony did not endorse? i think it's possible other people felt the same way
Quote: | of course, on that basis you might think that i deserve some credit for hosting a pointbugged ladder for such a long time despite my contempt for the bug, but no. no thanks are due there, only being called a "douche" when the problem is finally fixable.
|
now you finally understand!
i guess my thinking is skewed
i figure that since you're the only person that can really run a renegade ladder (whether you'll openly admit this or not) you would do
Quote: | you've lost me there.
|
how would allowing soul to play have nearly jeopardized the ren league at cw.cc? the uproar was caused by him being banned
you acted correctly but that nearly resulted in clanwars.cc cutting Renegade off of their site
Quote: | the fact that you have no credibility at all in criticising the way clanwars was run, because nobody else could be bothered running a clan ladder at all.
|
i'm not so sure it's that they couldn't be bothered
i think people realize that you do a better job than they actually could (minus a select few people like trooprm02 - i've read clanwars.cc a handful of times and each time he was trying to tell you why you suck at what you're doing and how he could do better) and figured there was no point in trying
like i've said Spoony is clanwars.cc; people do not believe clanwars can succeed without you at this point
and because i didn't run a clan ladder for renegade means i have no credibility on the subject? i'm not saying i do have credibility on the subject, but that thinking is flawed
you should not criticize politicians or what they do because you've never been one yourself - you have no credibility on the subject
Quote: | i'd rather be rude than a bald-faced liar, liquid. why do you keep ignoring what i say and then deliberately pretending i said things i absolutely did not say? i'd respect you more if you just admitted you lost the argument instead of trying to lie your way out of it.
|
i have facial hair
sorry
it looks to me that you're insinuating things about people but when i mention it or point it out you call me a liar
it's a trap
here's what i got from what you were saying: "these people want me to change my ladder but aren't willing to go make their own community to have the proposed changes to my ladder - that makes them douchebags"
i also got this: "these people want me to change what i'm doing to cater to their wants instead of thanking me for hosting it - that makes them douchebags"
am i incorrect in saying this?
Quote: | and there you go again. why do you keep lying? when did i say "everything i say is a fact"? why are you lying by claiming i said or think this?
|
i didn't say that you said "everything you say is a fact"
you're lying in saying i said that...stop lying you big liar
in the past other people have made claims and you dismissed them, but when you made claims you treated them as fact
i noticed it in religious debates but didn't think i'd have to pinpoint and save it
one time i remember is when you accused MSGTPain of hating you due to you catching his friends cheating in a community war, and when i asked if you had proof of that you never responded
i never said this, i'm just asking you if it's something you believe to be true, because from watching it's a question i had myself
Quote: | i suppose i'm glad to hear you would agree with me if only you were perceptive enough to see what's right in front of you.
|
it seems to me you've decided that clanwars.cc is entirely represented by simpee and orca
one "couldn't be bothered" to host a league whereas the other "wouldn't lower himself to that"
i don't believe that all of clanwars.cc can be described by either of these two players
how do you know simpee was telling the truth? it's possible he would have liked to but felt it would not work and didn't want to get flak for it
Quote: | eh? one of the main reasons i hosted the clanwars ladder is because no fucker else on renegade could be bothered.
|
well that was very kind of you
didn't people host it before yourself? perhaps someone else would have had you not stepped in
you must have done a good job because after you came along no one else really wanted to try
perhaps they thought they could not do a better job than you do or did and that their efforts would be pointless
you said yourself that clanwars.cc died because you stopped playing - perhaps there's some validity to my words
Quote: | there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. no rebuttal necessary, the quote speaks for itself.
|
it's a simple question - you claimed that banning soul almost killed renegade at cw.cc
i don't disagree with you banning him for breaking a rule but i simply raised a question - do you think the uproar may have been averted had you just let it go and made everyone else happy?
alright, you later covered this, but would it have gotten clanwars.cc off your back? even if it was for entirely wrong reasons?
Quote: | oh dear, you completely changed the subject.
|
nope, i didn't at all change the subject
i understand that in your eyes the only people that didn't want the pointmod used in clanwars were the only people that posted in that topic, which you named
i believe that may be untrue
Quote: | translation: you blindly swallowed what a small number of cheaters and compulsive liars told you, despite the fact that at the time i was carefully pointing out the simple truth of the matter
|
i don't think i thought either way on it, i simply understood why what you said could have been true and why their concerns and thoughts could have been true
i still don't know what whiskey thought either way, even if he told you he wanted it used
maybe he didn't and wanted to please you
i don't think it matters much either way whether he did or not, just saying
Quote: | who gives a shit whether anybody "enjoys" debates? if you want a rule changed, explain why. if you can't, don't expect it to be changed. who cares whether you enjoy trying to explain why?
|
that's a nice way of putting it
a lot of people don't like posting things if they know they're going to get criticized for it, so perhaps they saw simpee and the others trying to tell you why they wanted the original points used and the way you tried to tell them their opinions were wrong and decided against posting at all
though since you only care about debate in determining how clanwars.cc is run it wouldn't have mattered either way to you
Quote: | the "if i ran a league" is the critical bit. if you gave enough of a shit about clan gaming to host a league, here's how you'd run it! well, i suppose we have to take you at your word, such as it is, because you didn't give enough of a shit about clan gaming to host a league, though you've got plenty of criticism to aim at the only person who DID host one because it wasn't exactly as you wanted it to be.
|
i just have a hard time understanding why you do what you do, that's all
am i not allowed to ask you why you do what you do in regards to running a clan league or tell you why i think it makes no sense because i don't or haven't run one myself? i don't agree with that thinking, and i covered it earlier
Quote: | your parents must have had a hell of time
|
i was raised by wolves
hurp durp
Quote: | as would anyone who could be bothered hosting a pointbugged ladder when, according to you, everyone except me and whiskey wanted one.
|
i think if people were asked who the best person to host a pointbugged ladder in ren would be it would be you
maybe that's why they wanted you to do it so badly
Quote: | what a pity that not a single person on the planet could, so instead you direct your anger at the only person who hosts a league and the only person who helps him run it.
|
what makes you think i'm mad? lol
i don't think that anyone else could have successfully run an original points ladder, especially while you were running your own ladder
i'm sure i'm not the only one that thinks that either
Quote: | if you can't see how phenomenally stupid you are being here, i just don't know how many more times i need to repeat it.
|
forgive me, i can be slow
Quote: | because they're a bunch of idiots? that's the short answer.
|
Quote: | you're almost on to something here. you don't run a clanwars league for these people so you don't know? indeed. so you know what it's like to not host a league for a bunch of idiots... so you ought to understand what might drive someone else to decide not to as well.
|
fair enough, there are quite a few reasons i can come up with for why more people haven't tried
Quote: | why didn't you read my detailed and repeated explanations of why i wouldn't play him at the time?
|
didn't you cite that the vehicle alignment issue was the main reason? and that the map wasn't complete without it? if there was more to it please fill me in
it just looked to me like you were avoiding it, and i didn't think the vehicle alignment issue would have changed the outcome of the game
Quote: | again, i'll just leave this quote to stand on its own, it says a lot more than you meant it to
|
i posed the question above in regards to the Soul situation
not that it matters either way!
i was just questioning whether your way of conducting business at cw.cc was always best done by discussion, though you did a good job covering it
Quote: | you seem reluctant to finish your sentence. the last words that belong on the end are "but they were wrong"
|
i didn't think i had to say that, the fact that they couldn't argue it says just that
even though the pointmod makes the game much more fair people still didn't want it used
Quote: | it might be the same thing you thought you would lose by hosting a pointbugged clan ladder for them?
|
which is what?
Quote: | the fact you don't give enough of a shit about the clan world to host a league at all is enough to demonstrate you wouldn't be a good admin, we don't need much more evidence than that. we don't even need to notice your contempt for the only person who actually did and the renadmin at the time, though that helps form the picture too.
|
you have an idea of what you're doing and it worked in the past
i have a hard time understanding it, that's all
Quote: | nobody said they were, though you lied and tried to make it sound like i did.
|
you made a point to say that polls were rigged in clanwars multiple times after you mentioned the poll about wanting the pointmod in clanwars
what i inferred was you were suggesting this one had been rigged as well
what i said several times was that just because others in the past had been rigged that this one wasn't necessarily rigged
if you never said that it had been rigged then what's the big deal? i don't recall you saying it, but i did respond thinking that's what you had meant
Quote: | or you were just overly focused on the small group of cheaters and pointpushers
|
perhaps!
Quote: | i can't tell if that's a serious question or not
|
just because whiskey was the only person who always stood by your side and listened to you does not mean no one else cared or "gave a shit" about clanwars
Quote: | is there anything praiseworthy here?
|
who said anything about delivering praise? i'm just explaining why i think more people "gave a shit" about clanwars than you think
maybe you should tell me exactly what you mean when you say "gave a shit"
Quote: | never mind them, we're talking about the enormous number of people who never tried at all, for whom you're very quick to make excuses.
|
they would fall into your "come back with excuses" category
Quote: | would that explain the general enthusiasm when i was suspended because a cheater lied his way into my clan?
|
who said they have to like you? you probably made them feel stupid at one point or another
you've said several times that they're idiots, so is it farfetched to say they may not have liked you much
despite them disliking you they stuck around, which you've attributed to them being too lazy to make their own league
Quote: | still, carry on making excuses for these people if you like. the fact remains that none of them came up with the goods, and you attacked the only person who did.
|
what if no one else was capable? if you're the only one that can honestly do it then what? i can't see anyone else running a clan league for renegade
Quote: | having a debate thread at all is more generous than they have a reason to expect; i could just say "here's spoony's decision the madder, live with it" and lock the thread, as i was advised by quite a few people to do instead of actually talking to these idiots.
|
why do that though? that would be no fun for you
Quote: | i've been asked the same question before, but in a more threatening tone.
|
alright, but that doesn't answer the question
would you be content with your decision even if it emptied out your community?
it doesn't seem to bother you that right now renegade at clanwars.cc sits nearly empty so "no" seems a plausible answer to me
Quote: | no? that was the first time you seemed to acknowledge the fact that the anti-pointsfix crowd at clanwars had been caught rigging polls like that before, despite the innumerable times i kept pointing it out to you and you obviously didn't care.
|
no - i believed you on that, without actually having seen it myself, but you mentioned it numerous times after mentioning that specific poll
it looked to me like you were saying that that poll had been rigged, and that's why several times i've stated that i don't believe that because other polls were rigged in the past that that poll had been rigged
you never actually said it, but again it appeared you were clearly hinting at it
Quote: | i suspect this is wilful dishonesty on your part rather than simple stupidity. i didn't say you have to crafted a beautifully worded essay, i just said you had to actually be right.
|
hmm
no, stick with simple stupidity
in the case of the pointmod what was the point? if you made a topic where people were supposed to prove why it's more fair when you already know it's unfair you're just lying a trap out with the intention of slapping people around
was your topic made to ask whether people wanted to use the pointmod or whether people thought it was more fair?
Quote: | this one seems more like simple stupidity than wilful dishonesty. i can only advise you to actually read and understand what i say before replying to it.
|
easier said than done
you're severely british, and my brain is odd
as a result things get misunderstood
Quote: | i know you don't, because it logically makes you much more of a douche than i could ever be, and given the sheer number of times you've called me a douche for this reason it would make you the most colossal douche in the world.
|
pfft
if the reason no one else has tried to make a clan ladder, over the pointmod issue or any other issue, was solely due to people "not giving a shit" then i would have no problem agreeing with you
i'm not so sure that's the case
Quote: | from you and from the people you were so enthusiastically defending, it was absolutely true.
|
that's probably true, and i don't know enough to prove it otherwise
for the record i honestly think it's great that you hosted a league for renegade throughout the years, even if you've never gotten that from me
Quote: | no. but your standards for meeting the label "douche" are much lower than mine; they apply to someone who's going to great lengths to do you a favour if that favour isn't exactly the way you'd like it.
|
correct
Quote: | i see you've already forgotten about the whole "CLAN WARS would have shut the league down" bit, maybe because - as i said several times before - it's not something you are at all bothered by.
at one point shortbus (global admin) said that blkst0rm and i were the only good things about the renegade community (he was specifically talking about the clanwars section, before anybody here objects), precisely because we were actually going by rules and fairness and honesty instead of caving in to a bunch of idiots.
that's one thing we could have lost - the entire league.
aside from that, what a great precedent to set. "here's a situation where you can get away with pointpushing and photoshopping screenshots for fake wins, guys". tell me, do you think that would lead to more cheating or less? but maybe you don't care about rules being applied fairly, maybe you think punishments should not be decided by what your offence was but how many people like you instead. well, i don't give a shit about pleasing people, i'd rather be honest. so under your system, me - maybe the fairest and most honest player you could find - would come off much worse than someone with such a colourful history of cheating and pointpushing and lying to everyone about it (the admins, his opponents, his own clan).
i suppose if you could give enough of a shit to actually run a clan league, this is what it might look like.
what could i lose? dignity, for one thing. ever heard of it? where there is a question of cheating or fairplay or honesty, you will always find me on the right side. there are quite a lot of people in the renegade community for whom this can't be said.
|
well said
Quote: | "dismissing all of them because you disagree with it" is a dishonest way to phrase it. it's not as bad as "didn't listen to them", which was an outright lie you should be ashamed of yourself for saying as often as you did, but it's still dishonest. "dismissing them because you disagreed with them", no. i read everything they said and replied to them all. shame they were all WRONG. perhaps you don't like to think that anybody's opinion could actually be WRONG, liquid.
|
that's an interesting question
i like to think that if people have opinions on things that they should at least be able to back them up, and i back up what i say
if i'm proven wrong i'll admit it, i'm not a dishonest person (at least not intentionally)
what i was trying to get at is that since you felt their opinions were not valid (or as you say WRONG) that they do not matter
once again it's my way of thinking not understanding yours, which would make me a bad clanwars admin
Quote: | yes, it was. not everyone is as bad as robo or simpee.
|
i still think of zell as a good person!
Quote: | i don't remember saying i EXPECTED anyone from clanwars to behave maturely?
|
you didn't say it, i just assumed it's what you meant and addressed it as such
if it's not then don't worry about it
but did you expect it? more or less?
Quote: | it was obvious they didn't think i'd have such an easy time proving they were lying.
|
yet they still put it out there
perhaps it was what they honestly thought and you set the record straight for them - if so then that's good, right?
|
|
|
|
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438717 is a reply to message #438707] |
Mon, 01 November 2010 05:51 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
liquidv2 wrote on Sun, 31 October 2010 18:23 | you assume i didn't want to because i can't be bothered or wouldn't lower myself to paying or running anything for renegade
not saying i did, but what if i really liked the idea, but didn't do it because i felt it would be pointless trying to make a ladder for renegade that spoony did not endorse? i think it's possible other people felt the same way
|
i think you're focusing too much on the excuses and not enough on the complete absence of effort or results.
Quote: | now you finally understand!
i guess my thinking is skewed
i figure that since you're the only person that can really run a renegade ladder (whether you'll openly admit this or not) you would do
|
why? i don't have magic powers, i don't have access to some source of wisdom that's denied everyone else. if your statement boils down to "you're the only one with the sufficient dedication" then it doesn't belong in an argument against me, does it?
[quote title=Quote:]Quote: |
Quote: | you've lost me there.
|
how would allowing soul to play have nearly jeopardized the ren league at cw.cc? the uproar was caused by him being banned
you acted correctly but that nearly resulted in clanwars.cc cutting Renegade off of their site
|
uh no, letting him play was what probably would've caused that. like i said, the global admins thought that me and blkst0rm were the only decent people in a community that was - aside from we two - a complete cesspool and not at all worth CLAN WARS's resources to host. the exception were the two admins who ran things as fairly as we did no matter how retarded the general community was being at the time.
Quote: | i'm not so sure it's that they couldn't be bothered
i think people realize that you do a better job than they actually could (minus a select few people like trooprm02 - i've read clanwars.cc a handful of times and each time he was trying to tell you why you suck at what you're doing and how he could do better) and figured there was no point in trying
like i've said Spoony is clanwars.cc; people do not believe clanwars can succeed without you at this point
|
well, if the entire anti-pointsfix crowd (everyone except me and whiskey, supposedly) clubbed together and still couldn't with their combined might do better than spoony, you might think this would make people think that spoony's doing something right and perhaps, just perhaps, his decisions are worth some respect.
instead we seem to've had a situation where the community needed spoony to survive just as long as spoony didn't make any decisions. perhaps i can just wave a flag from the touchline or something.
Quote: | and because i didn't run a clan ladder for renegade means i have no credibility on the subject? i'm not saying i do have credibility on the subject, but that thinking is flawed
you should not criticize politicians or what they do because you've never been one yourself - you have no credibility on the subject
|
no, that analogy does not work at all. a politician is your employee. your vote decides who gets the job, your taxes pay their salary, they're (supposed to be, at least) there to serve you. people always compare the clanwars league to a government, and the analogy fails on every level. it's more like a cinema or a bowling alley that the owner lets you use for free. i let you play there, or you could play in someone else's bowling alley, or make your own, or not go bowling at all. if you play in my bowling alley you play by my rules, if i decide that there's no smoking or whatever. you can smoke in someone else's bowling alley for all i care. you can smoke out in the street for all i care. you can make your own bowling alley where smoking is allowed for all i care.
in my bowling alley, thou shalt not smoke.
Quote: | it looks to me that you're insinuating things about people but when i mention it or point it out you call me a liar
it's a trap
here's what i got from what you were saying: "these people want me to change my ladder but aren't willing to go make their own community to have the proposed changes to my ladder - that makes them douchebags"
i also got this: "these people want me to change what i'm doing to cater to their wants instead of thanking me for hosting it - that makes them douchebags"
am i incorrect in saying this?
|
i would have thought that you have your hands full enough with things i have said without needing to deal with things i didn't say.
Quote: | in the past other people have made claims and you dismissed them, but when you made claims you treated them as fact
|
"treated them as fact" is your euphemism for "explained why they were right", and "dismissed them" is your reverse-euphemism for "explained why they were wrong".
Quote: | one time i remember is when you accused MSGTPain of hating you due to you catching his friends cheating in a community war, and when i asked if you had proof of that you never responded
|
i'd certainly have responded to a question about MSGTPain, unless you're talking about the thread that got locked (with one of my posts bizarrely deleted right before)
Quote: |
Quote: | i suppose i'm glad to hear you would agree with me if only you were perceptive enough to see what's right in front of you.
|
it seems to me you've decided that clanwars.cc is entirely represented by simpee and orca
one "couldn't be bothered" to host a league whereas the other "wouldn't lower himself to that"
i don't believe that all of clanwars.cc can be described by either of these two players
|
and yet you can't point to a clanwars player who actually did DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, can you? like i said, you're focusing too much on their excuses and ignoring the fact that nobody can be found who put in the slightest effort.
Quote: | how do you know simpee was telling the truth? it's possible he would have liked to but felt it would not work and didn't want to get flak for it
|
i just had the gut feeling that simpee was telling the truth for a change, and his explanation certainly fit the known facts.
Quote: |
Quote: | eh? one of the main reasons i hosted the clanwars ladder is because no fucker else on renegade could be bothered.
|
well that was very kind of you
didn't people host it before yourself?
|
yes, for quite a significant period of time actually. CLAN WARS set up the league a few months after the game's release (in large part due to the absolute shittiness of Westwood's official clan ladder). that would have been around summer 2002. i didn't become an admin until summer 2005.
Quote: | perhaps someone else would have had you not stepped in
you must have done a good job because after you came along no one else really wanted to try
|
it's hard to square these comments with getting called the "worst admin in history" whenever i make a decision that someone disapproves of
Quote: | perhaps they thought they could not do a better job than you do or did and that their efforts would be pointless
you said yourself that clanwars.cc died because you stopped playing - perhaps there's some validity to my words
|
you're confusing "spoony playing in the league" with "spoony being the admin"
Quote: |
Quote: | there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. no rebuttal necessary, the quote speaks for itself.
|
it's a simple question - you claimed that banning soul almost killed renegade at cw.cc
|
i would never say something as ridiculous as that.
Quote: | i don't disagree with you banning him for breaking a rule but i simply raised a question - do you think the uproar may have been averted had you just let it go and made everyone else happy?
|
what do you mean by "uproar"? the community going apeshit at me and blkstorm? well, we weren't to know what a terrible low the community was about to sink to.
Quote: | alright, you later covered this, but would it have gotten clanwars.cc off your back? even if it was for entirely wrong reasons?
|
uh no, you've got this totally wrong. the higher-ups thought me and blkst0rm were the only things good enough in the renegade league to justify keeping it alive, precisely because we were playing it by the rules and fairness and honesty instead of just doing whatever these idiots wanted.
Quote: |
Quote: | oh dear, you completely changed the subject.
|
nope, i didn't at all change the subject
i understand that in your eyes the only people that didn't want the pointmod used in clanwars were the only people that posted in that topic, which you named
i believe that may be untrue
|
if it is, we can refer to my earlier statement on the subject. either they couldn't marshal their thoughts to justify their views in the debate thread that the admin specifically put there for their benefit, or they didn't dare join the debate for fear of being proved wrong. in neither case am i going to do what they want.
Quote: | i still don't know what whiskey thought either way, even if he told you he wanted it used
maybe he didn't and wanted to please you
i don't think it matters much either way whether he did or not, just saying
|
that's feeble of you. you made so many posts and PMs saying whiskey was obviously only speaking in favour of the pointsfix because he was spoony's renadmin at the time. this was flat out untrue, and you just swallowed the bullshit the anti-pointsfix crowd were putting out at the time; that anybody who likes the pointsfix MUST have some hidden agenda. it's an odd thing to think from someone whose only admissible evidence is "here's how many people like it or don't like it". once again, the game is rigged.
Quote: | a lot of people don't like posting things if they know they're going to get criticized for it
|
yeah, they like just saying things and expecting it to be accepted without giving anyone the platform to challenge it.
Quote: | so perhaps they saw simpee and the others trying to tell you why they wanted the original points used and the way you tried to tell them their opinions were wrong and decided against posting at all
though since you only care about debate in determining how clanwars.cc is run it wouldn't have mattered either way to you
|
that's right. it's a very similar situation to the "nobody else hosted a clan ladder" scenario. i'm focusing on the complete lack of effort or success, you're focusing on the excuses for that lack - even going so far as to make them on other peoples' behalf.
Quote: | i just have a hard time understanding why you do what you do, that's all
am i not allowed to ask you why you do what you do in regards to running a clan league or tell you why i think it makes no sense because i don't or haven't run one myself? i don't agree with that thinking, and i covered it earlier
|
of course you're allowed to ask, and i'm allowed to reply explaining why it's a stupid question
Quote: |
Quote: | as would anyone who could be bothered hosting a pointbugged ladder when, according to you, everyone except me and whiskey wanted one.
|
i think if people were asked who the best person to host a pointbugged ladder in ren would be it would be you
maybe that's why they wanted you to do it so badly
|
if only i had gotten some credit for hosting a pointbugged ladder for so long, despite being the biggest opponent of the point bug.
Quote: |
Quote: | because they're a bunch of idiots? that's the short answer.
|
|
don't look so surprised. "why are they acting like idiots?" "because they're idiots" quite simple really
Quote: |
Quote: | you're almost on to something here. you don't run a clanwars league for these people so you don't know? indeed. so you know what it's like to not host a league for a bunch of idiots... so you ought to understand what might drive someone else to decide not to as well.
|
fair enough, there are quite a few reasons i can come up with for why more people haven't tried
|
my reason was "i've put up with you ungrateful twats long enough, you treat me like shit despite all the favours i've done for you and you don't deserve any more of my effort" - this reason seemed to be unacceptable to a lot of people
Quote: |
Quote: | why didn't you read my detailed and repeated explanations of why i wouldn't play him at the time?
|
didn't you cite that the vehicle alignment issue was the main reason? and that the map wasn't complete without it? if there was more to it please fill me in
it just looked to me like you were avoiding it, and i didn't think the vehicle alignment issue would have changed the outcome of the game
|
wow, why don't you pay attention to what the person you're arguing with is saying?
i pointed out the colossal flaw in simpee's argument again and again and again. neither of you acknowledged it. simpee was trying to prove two things at the same time - firstly that i sucked at the game, secondly that mesa was unfair. and his way to prove this was to play me on mesa. stop and think for a second. how can you prove one player is great and the other player sucks by arranging a match on a horribly unfair map? conversely, how can you prove mesa is unfair by pitting a great player against a terrible player?
there were other reasons i posted at the time, you both ignored them too - such as the fact simpee had already been proven wrong in these pointsfix debates many times already and had shown a pathetic reluctance to avoid admitting it - therefore it wouldn't change a damn thing if he was proven wrong about this too (yet again, the game is rigged).
also, i vaguely remember having internet problems at the time, but never mind that.
Quote: |
Quote: | you seem reluctant to finish your sentence. the last words that belong on the end are "but they were wrong"
|
i didn't think i had to say that, the fact that they couldn't argue it says just that
even though the pointmod makes the game much more fair people still didn't want it used
|
yes, especially those people who had a track record of profiting from unfairness.
Quote: |
Quote: | it might be the same thing you thought you would lose by hosting a pointbugged clan ladder for them?
|
which is what?
|
you tell me. i don't want to assume why you didn't do that, do i?
Quote: |
Quote: | nobody said they were, though you lied and tried to make it sound like i did.
|
[color=skyblue]you made a point to say that polls were rigged in clanwars multiple times after you mentioned the poll about wanting the pointmod in clanwars
what i inferred was you were suggesting this one had been rigged as well
|
no, i was inferring what i actually said, which was "we do not decide policy by polls, we never did, nobody said this poll was important, and anyway the anti-pointsfix crowd has already tried rigging these things in the past"
Quote: | what i said several times was that just because others in the past had been rigged that this one wasn't necessarily rigged
if you never said that it had been rigged then what's the big deal?
|
you're not backing far enough away from your original point, which was "this poll is the only evidence we need to consider"
Quote: |
Quote: | i can't tell if that's a serious question or not
|
just because whiskey was the only person who always stood by your side and listened to you does not mean no one else cared or "gave a shit" about clanwars
|
firstly, i've argued more divisively with whiskey over stuff than with almost anyone else at clanwars, so that point falls.
secondly, you're totally rephrasing my point again. i didn't say whiskey was the only person who gave a shit about the community because he agreed with me, i said he was one of a very small number of people who actually put any effort into the community, and got nothing but contempt in return
Quote: |
Quote: | would that explain the general enthusiasm when i was suspended because a cheater lied his way into my clan?
|
who said they have to like you?
|
oh dear.
firstly, a lot of your statements have been along the lines of "you should do what the majority wants". as i've said before, this would mean that one of the worst cheaters in history gets away with it, whereas the fairest and most honest player around is fucked. have fun in a league like that.
secondly, i'm not talking about the fact they didn't like me, i'm talking about the fact they supported me being banned purely because of personal dislike, with not even so much as a thought as to what justification there might be for it.
Quote: | despite them disliking you they stuck around, which you've attributed to them being too lazy to make their own league
|
don't say "stuck around" as if there's anything praiseworthy there... they carried on accepting my charity?
Quote: |
Quote: | still, carry on making excuses for these people if you like. the fact remains that none of them came up with the goods, and you attacked the only person who did.
|
what if no one else was capable? if you're the only one that can honestly do it then what? i can't see anyone else running a clan league for renegade
|
excuse me, but if you're capable of saying "here's what i think the rule on this matter should be" you're capable of being an admin and making that rule. and if the anti-pointsfix crowd was as enormous as you've decided that it is (though on what evidence i'm not quite sure) then you'd think that they could easily club together to outdo someone who knows as little about coding as i do.
Quote: |
Quote: | having a debate thread at all is more generous than they have a reason to expect; i could just say "here's spoony's decision the madder, live with it" and lock the thread, as i was advised by quite a few people to do instead of actually talking to these idiots.
|
why do that though? that would be no fun for you
|
are you kidding? it'd be more fun if i DIDN'T put myself through those debates. it's depressing how stupid most of the other participants were, depressing having to repeat myself again and again because they just weren't reading what the person they're arguing with was saying, depressing watching so many people lie through their teeth to try to get what they wanted, etc etc etc
Quote: |
Quote: | i've been asked the same question before, but in a more threatening tone.
|
alright, but that doesn't answer the question
would you be content with your decision even if it emptied out your community?
|
if something that improved the level of fairness in the league made people who'd already proven their preference for unfairness leave, this would probably have made me realise even sooner what a waste of effort the community was. that's a result, i suppose.
Quote: |
Quote: | no? that was the first time you seemed to acknowledge the fact that the anti-pointsfix crowd at clanwars had been caught rigging polls like that before, despite the innumerable times i kept pointing it out to you and you obviously didn't care.
|
no - i believed you on that, without actually having seen it myself, but you mentioned it numerous times after mentioning that specific poll
it looked to me like you were saying that that poll had been rigged, and that's why several times i've stated that i don't believe that because other polls were rigged in the past that that poll had been rigged
you never actually said it, but again it appeared you were clearly hinting at it
|
i think i still haven't made myself clear that i couldn't have cared less whether the poll was rigged or not, because i never said it was important. the only thing a rigged poll demonstrates is the dishonesty of the other side of the argument, although that had been obvious for a very long time.
Quote: | in the case of the pointmod what was the point? if you made a topic where people were supposed to prove why it's more fair when you already know it's unfair you're just lying a trap out with the intention of slapping people around
|
see, this is the curse of renegade debates... people are always trying to make things that aren't bad sound bad. the fact i went to great lengths to encourage debate and listened to what everyone said and replied to every post... that's good. the fact i was willing to put the question to the test is a good thing, and it doesn't become a bad thing because the other side of the debate fared so badly.
Quote: | was your topic made to ask whether people wanted to use the pointmod or whether people thought it was more fair?
|
more fair, better for the league, etc. "do you prefer this" seems like a waste of a question to me, though i might ask "why do you prefer it"
Quote: |
Quote: | i know you don't, because it logically makes you much more of a douche than i could ever be, and given the sheer number of times you've called me a douche for this reason it would make you the most colossal douche in the world.
|
pfft
if the reason no one else has tried to make a clan ladder, over the pointmod issue or any other issue, was solely due to people "not giving a shit" then i would have no problem agreeing with you
i'm not so sure that's the case
|
i'm still not sure why
Quote: |
Quote: | from you and from the people you were so enthusiastically defending, it was absolutely true.
|
that's probably true, and i don't know enough to prove it otherwise
for the record i honestly think it's great that you hosted a league for renegade throughout the years, even if you've never gotten that from me
|
that's right, it is odd that this didn't appear as a counterpoint to "you're a douche because it's not being done in this particular way"
Quote: | what i was trying to get at is that since you felt their opinions were not valid (or as you say WRONG) that they do not matter
|
when it comes to changing the rules of a league, they don't matter enough. the opinion of someone who's right is worth more than the opinion of someone who's wrong.
let me illustrate it with a hypothetical.
question: should base to base be allowed on islands with a MRLS?
someone says: yes, because nod can buy a MRLS and do the same thing
spoony: uh no, nod can't do that.
someone: stfu you should respect my opinion
spoony: you're factually wrong here
someone: STFU MY OPINION IS WORTH AS MUCH AS YOURS
no, the someone else's vote should not count as much as mine, because i'm right and he's wrong, and this is exactly what happened in the pointsfix debates.
Quote: |
Quote: | i don't remember saying i EXPECTED anyone from clanwars to behave maturely?
|
you didn't say it, i just assumed it's what you meant and addressed it as such
if it's not then don't worry about it
but did you expect it? more or less?
|
no?
Quote: |
Quote: | it was obvious they didn't think i'd have such an easy time proving they were lying.
|
yet they still put it out there
perhaps it was what they honestly thought and you set the record straight for them - if so then that's good, right?
|
if that was the case they'd have been grateful for pointing out how crashingly wrong they were, and they'd have been relieved to learn that the guy who they thought was such a corrupt admin was in fact very honest.
this was not their reaction at all, in case you missed it.
that's just talking about their accusations against me (which were, of course, all untrue). now let's look at my counter-accusations against them (which were all true, though they denied them). what is your theory for why they denied them? do you think they might have been equally honest in that case?
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
[Updated on: Mon, 01 November 2010 06:27] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438723 is a reply to message #438525] |
Mon, 01 November 2010 08:27 |
|
GoTWhisKéY
Messages: 320 Registered: July 2004 Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
G'day lads.
Yes I was initially against the pointsfix. I tried it out, and something seemed off about tank battles. I realized that we weren't receiving enough points for tank battles because of the 'eject from tank last second to avoid opponent getting points' exploit. It wasn't a problem before when everyone was receiving too many points for hitting green tanks anyway, but now that the pointsfix corrected that, we weren't receiving enough. I told Spoony about this and he got somebody to develop a fix for that as well.
Since then, Kill & I played a lot of clanwars with the pointsfix and 'tankfix' or whatever you call it, and we both ended up liking it afterall. It changed the gameplay to favor aggression, but at the same time you couldn't be as sloppy since it was a little harder to receive credits. The points you were awarded actually made sense.
As for Spoony & I, Yea we've gotten along fine and agree with most things for a long time, but that wasn't always the case. One time I didn't agree with Spoony banning Soul (I think this was the 2nd or 3rd time of Soul getting banned) so I ended up buying the league entirely and unbanning him. Spoony wasn't too happy about that lol. But in time, we put aside our grievences and I ended up being admin @ clanwars for a long time. I think I've filed about 1000 AR's lol.
I see Spoony as someone who actually cared about Renegade and has always put in the effort to run the clanwars league as best as he could, and I respect him for that. Do we agree on everything? No. I didn't agree with the way the Clear/Simpee situation was dealt with, for example.
Old School Renny
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438742 is a reply to message #438723] |
Mon, 01 November 2010 14:56 |
|
liquidv2
Messages: 3407 Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
GoTWhisKéY wrote on Mon, 01 November 2010 10:27 | G'day lads.
Yes I was initially against the pointsfix. I tried it out, and something seemed off about tank battles. I realized that we weren't receiving enough points for tank battles because of the 'eject from tank last second to avoid opponent getting points' exploit. It wasn't a problem before when everyone was receiving too many points for hitting green tanks anyway, but now that the pointsfix corrected that, we weren't receiving enough. I told Spoony about this and he got somebody to develop a fix for that as well.
Since then, Kill & I played a lot of clanwars with the pointsfix and 'tankfix' or whatever you call it, and we both ended up liking it afterall. It changed the gameplay to favor aggression, but at the same time you couldn't be as sloppy since it was a little harder to receive credits. The points you were awarded actually made sense.
As for Spoony & I, Yea we've gotten along fine and agree with most things for a long time, but that wasn't always the case. One time I didn't agree with Spoony banning Soul (I think this was the 2nd or 3rd time of Soul getting banned) so I ended up buying the league entirely and unbanning him. Spoony wasn't too happy about that lol. But in time, we put aside our grievences and I ended up being admin @ clanwars for a long time. I think I've filed about 1000 AR's lol.
I see Spoony as someone who actually cared about Renegade and has always put in the effort to run the clanwars league as best as he could, and I respect him for that. Do we agree on everything? No. I didn't agree with the way the Clear/Simpee situation was dealt with, for example.
|
did the amount you get for vehicle alignment make that much of a difference? it seems like absolute crap after playing with the original points for so long
i'd have absolutely no beef with the pointmod if players had an easier time adapting to it but realistically they're not patient enough to earn what they need
that's why lots of players play in st0rm servers with 1000 starting credits and extra + faster harv income...and their overall gameplay is fairly bad in comparison
and one problem for that vehicle alignment fix is it causes lag in games anywhere near a large size (in clanwars it's fine but in servers even 10vs10 or higher it becomes a huge lag issue)
|
|
|
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438743 is a reply to message #438525] |
Mon, 01 November 2010 15:52 |
|
liquidv2
Messages: 3407 Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
Quote: | i think you're focusing too much on the excuses and not enough on the complete absence of effort or results.
|
i'm explaining why i feel there may have been an absence
just saying "no one gave a shit" could be entirely true, but i like to think that it's not the case
and my suggestions make sense
Quote: | why? i don't have magic powers, i don't have access to some source of wisdom that's denied everyone else. if your statement boils down to "you're the only one with the sufficient dedication" then it doesn't belong in an argument against me, does it?
|
not really an argument that makes logical sense, no
Quote: | uh no, letting him play was what probably would've caused that. like i said, the global admins thought that me and blkst0rm were the only decent people in a community that was - aside from we two - a complete cesspool and not at all worth CLAN WARS's resources to host. the exception were the two admins who ran things as fairly as we did no matter how retarded the general community was being at the time.
|
alright, so it could have
it was possible, but not certain
i wouldn't call it a cesspool but it seems odd that no one else felt he should be banned or didn't speak up about it
Quote: | well, if the entire anti-pointsfix crowd (everyone except me and whiskey, supposedly) clubbed together and still couldn't with their combined might do better than spoony, you might think this would make people think that spoony's doing something right and perhaps, just perhaps, his decisions are worth some respect.
|
in time
Quote: | instead we seem to've had a situation where the community needed spoony to survive just as long as spoony didn't make any decisions. perhaps i can just wave a flag from the touchline or something.
|
Quote: | no, that analogy does not work at all. a politician is your employee. your vote decides who gets the job, your taxes pay their salary, they're (supposed to be, at least) there to serve you. people always compare the clanwars league to a government, and the analogy fails on every level. it's more like a cinema or a bowling alley that the owner lets you use for free. i let you play there, or you could play in someone else's bowling alley, or make your own, or not go bowling at all. if you play in my bowling alley you play by my rules, if i decide that there's no smoking or whatever. you can smoke in someone else's bowling alley for all i care. you can smoke out in the street for all i care. you can make your own bowling alley where smoking is allowed for all i care.
in my bowling alley, thou shalt not smoke.
|
what if a poll was held and smoking beat not smoking?
Quote: | i would have thought that you have your hands full enough with things i have said without needing to deal with things i didn't say.
|
i pick up on other things whether you intended them or not
some things you probably didn't even think of or mean at all, which is why i asked to be sure
Quote: | "treated them as fact" is your euphemism for "explained why they were right", and "dismissed them" is your reverse-euphemism for "explained why they were wrong".
|
i disagree, but i don't have an example so i'll drop it
Quote: | i'd certainly have responded to a question about MSGTPain, unless you're talking about the thread that got locked (with one of my posts bizarrely deleted right before)
|
nah, i'm pretty sure it was in a PM
Quote: | and yet you can't point to a clanwars player who actually did DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, can you? like i said, you're focusing too much on their excuses and ignoring the fact that nobody can be found who put in the slightest effort.
|
this is true - none of them tried to make their own league
there may be more reasons for that than simply "they didn't care" but it doesn't matter since your point is "it never happened"
Quote: | i just had the gut feeling that simpee was telling the truth for a change, and his explanation certainly fit the known facts.
|
pfft, your gut or your mind thinking simpee's finally telling the truth about something because it betters your argument
your gut is full of Lies, and straw
Quote: | yes, for quite a significant period of time actually. CLAN WARS set up the league a few months after the game's release (in large part due to the absolute shittiness of Westwood's official clan ladder). that would have been around summer 2002. i didn't become an admin until summer 2005.
|
cool renehistory
so how did they run things before you came along?
Quote: | it's hard to square these comments with getting called the "worst admin in history" whenever i make a decision that someone disapproves of
|
you couldn't have been that bad because no one got up and made their own Spoony-free clanwars league
Quote: | you're confusing "spoony playing in the league" with "spoony being the admin"
|
i thought you said stopped playing, and that people asked you all the time but that you declined
fine, that makes sense
all you're doing is strengthening my statement that "Spoony is clanwars"
Quote: | i would never say something as ridiculous as that.
|
then what was it that you were saying? that not banning Soul may have been the end of Renegade at cw.cc? it didn't click in my head until you explained it earlier, i was thinking they wanted to cut Renegade out because of the bickering and bitching on the forums and that had you just let it go it all would have subsided
my mistake; carry on
Quote: | what do you mean by "uproar"? the community going apeshit at me and blkstorm? well, we weren't to know what a terrible low the community was about to sink to.
|
yes!
Quote: | uh no, you've got this totally wrong. the higher-ups thought me and blkst0rm were the only things good enough in the renegade league to justify keeping it alive, precisely because we were playing it by the rules and fairness and honesty instead of just doing whatever these idiots wanted.
|
i understand
it just took a while
Quote: | if it is, we can refer to my earlier statement on the subject. either they couldn't marshal their thoughts to justify their views in the debate thread that the admin specifically put there for their benefit, or they didn't dare join the debate for fear of being proved wrong. in neither case am i going to do what they want.
|
i dare say that you are Mean
Quote: | that's feeble of you. you made so many posts and PMs saying whiskey was obviously only speaking in favour of the pointsfix because he was spoony's renadmin at the time. this was flat out untrue, and you just swallowed the bullshit the anti-pointsfix crowd were putting out at the time; that anybody who likes the pointsfix MUST have some hidden agenda. it's an odd thing to think from someone whose only admissible evidence is "here's how many people like it or don't like it". once again, the game is rigged.
|
if that's true then it was wrong of me and i was mistaken
Quote: | yeah, they like just saying things and expecting it to be accepted without giving anyone the platform to challenge it.
|
a lot of the time
Quote: | that's right. it's a very similar situation to the "nobody else hosted a clan ladder" scenario. i'm focusing on the complete lack of effort or success, you're focusing on the excuses for that lack - even going so far as to make them on other peoples' behalf.
|
i can't change the fact that it didn't happen, but i'm open to the idea that your reasons as to why may be incorrect
Quote: | of course you're allowed to ask, and i'm allowed to reply explaining why it's a stupid question
|
booooooooo
Quote: | if only i had gotten some credit for hosting a pointbugged ladder for so long, despite being the biggest opponent of the point bug.
|
that's true generosity, giving something expecting nothing in return
Quote: | don't look so surprised. "why are they acting like idiots?" "because they're idiots" quite simple really
|
more like =O
that's not a nice thing to say
Quote: | my reason was "i've put up with you ungrateful twats long enough, you treat me like shit despite all the favours i've done for you and you don't deserve any more of my effort" - this reason seemed to be unacceptable to a lot of people
|
cuz they loved you and didn't want to see you go, duh
even though they were mean to you
clanwars is a violent relationship, that's all
Quote: | wow, why don't you pay attention to what the person you're arguing with is saying?
|
i just told you that i read them and cannot remember what they were, though i believe one was the lack of a vehicle alignment fix at the time
i'm telling you what i thought at the time after having read your post
i suppose the other reasons are irrelevant because you never played him
Quote: | i pointed out the colossal flaw in simpee's argument again and again and again. neither of you acknowledged it. simpee was trying to prove two things at the same time - firstly that i sucked at the game, secondly that mesa was unfair. and his way to prove this was to play me on mesa. stop and think for a second. how can you prove one player is great and the other player sucks by arranging a match on a horribly unfair map? conversely, how can you prove mesa is unfair by pitting a great player against a terrible player?
|
oh yeah, he wanted to do it on Mesa, not Mesa2
see, you're helping
Quote: | there were other reasons i posted at the time, you both ignored them too - such as the fact simpee had already been proven wrong in these pointsfix debates many times already and had shown a pathetic reluctance to admitting it - therefore it wouldn't change a damn thing if he was proven wrong about this too (yet again, the game is rigged).
|
fair enough
Quote: | also, i vaguely remember having internet problems at the time, but never mind that.
|
thought you were one of those "get the job done" people
HMMMMM?!
Quote: | yes, especially those people who had a track record of profiting from unfairness.
|
that's not really relevant though, it seems like a way for you to justify their differing opinions not meaning anything
what if only the respectable, clean track record clanwars players had supported using the original points and the rapist genocide club had wanted the original points?
Quote: | you tell me. i don't want to assume why you didn't do that, do i?
|
i figure you already have, and since i don't know i asked you
i'll say lemonade because it's a tasty beverage
Quote: | no, i was inferring what i actually said, which was "we do not decide policy by polls, we never did, nobody said this poll was important, and anyway the anti-pointsfix crowd has already tried rigging these things in the past"
|
alright
more reasons why you don't use polls instead of a reason why this one came out a certain way, which is what i thought you were on about
Quote: | you're not backing far enough away from your original point, which was "this poll is the only evidence we need to consider"
|
you make me sound really stupid or something
;\
see the violent relationship quote above
Quote: | firstly, a lot of your statements have been along the lines of "you should do what the majority wants". as i've said before, this would mean that one of the worst cheaters in history gets away with it, whereas the fairest and most honest player around is fucked. have fun in a league like that.
secondly, i'm not talking about the fact they didn't like me, i'm talking about the fact they supported me being banned purely because of personal dislike, with not even so much as a thought as to what justification there might be for it.
|
this means they would not have made good clanwars admins, based on your previous teachings
Quote: | don't say "stuck around" as if there's anything praiseworthy there... they carried on accepting my charity?
|
is that not what you intended for people to do when you hosted a league for them? you act as if they're in the wrong for playing there
Quote: | excuse me, but if you're capable of saying "here's what i think the rule on this matter should be" you're capable of being an admin and making that rule. and if the anti-pointsfix crowd was as enormous as you've decided that it is (though on what evidence i'm not quite sure) then you'd think that they could easily club together to outdo someone who knows as little about coding as i do.
|
i felt that the way renegade was scored should be what the players wanted, but i didn't think that all rules or decisions should be decided by the players
so if what you say is true i'm capable of being an admin and making that rule, but then what? it falls apart because it stops there
either way what i say previously remains true - there is no clanwars without Spoony
you're welcome to disprove that if you can
Quote: | are you kidding? it'd be more fun if i DIDN'T put myself through those debates. it's depressing how stupid most of the other participants were, depressing having to repeat myself again and again because they just weren't reading what the person they're arguing with was saying, depressing watching so many people lie through their teeth to try to get what they wanted, etc etc etc
|
the whole intellectual sparring thing was lost you say? bah, i say
Quote: | if something that improved the level of fairness in the league made people who'd already proven their preference for unfairness leave, this would probably have made me realise even sooner what a waste of effort the community was. that's a result, i suppose.
|
i don't think it was a waste of effort, and i'm sure the people who played there wouldn't say that
if they did they would be lying
Quote: | see, this is the curse of renegade debates... people are always trying to make things that aren't bad sound bad. the fact i went to great lengths to encourage debate and listened to what everyone said and replied to every post... that's good. the fact i was willing to put the question to the test is a good thing, and it doesn't become a bad thing because the other side of the debate fared so badly.
|
was it just a way to assure that you were correct on the issue then? so they couldn't come back later and say that?
Quote: | more fair, better for the league, etc. "do you prefer this" seems like a waste of a question to me, though i might ask "why do you prefer it"
|
i understand
it just seems harsh
that all comes with the business of clanwars i suppose
Quote: | that's right, it is odd that this didn't appear as a counterpoint to "you're a douche because it's not being done in this particular way"
|
it still seems douchey to me, on principle
but does it make the game more fair, and could it potentially better the league? sure
perhaps to do the right thing in this case you had to be a douche
maybe in the end when it all worked out you wouldn't have seemed like a douche
Quote: | when it comes to changing the rules of a league, they don't matter enough. the opinion of someone who's right is worth more than the opinion of someone who's wrong.
let me illustrate it with a hypothetical.
question: should base to base be allowed on islands with a MRLS?
someone says: yes, because nod can buy a MRLS and do the same thing
spoony: uh no, nod can't do that.
someone: stfu you should respect my opinion
spoony: you're factually wrong here
someone: STFU MY OPINION IS WORTH AS MUCH AS YOURS
no, the someone else's vote should not count as much as mine, because i'm right and he's wrong, and this is exactly what happened in the pointsfix debates.
|
that was awesome
you seemed surprised to me that people in clanwars were the way they were; that's why i asked
Quote: | if that was the case they'd have been grateful for pointing out how crashingly wrong they were, and they'd have been relieved to learn that the guy who they thought was such a corrupt admin was in fact very honest.
this was not their reaction at all, in case you missed it.
that's just talking about their accusations against me (which were, of course, all untrue). now let's look at my counter-accusations against them (which were all true, though they denied them). what is your theory for why they denied them? do you think they might have been equally honest in that case?
|
they could have been but they were not
maybe their dislike for you made it impossible
shame on you for making good guys like simpee and clearsh0t hate you!
|
|
|
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438745 is a reply to message #438743] |
Mon, 01 November 2010 16:36 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
Quote: | did the amount you get for vehicle alignment make that much of a difference? it seems like absolute crap after playing with the original points for so long
|
in many cases the amount lost by the jump-out-of-your-tank-at-the-last-second exploit was actually more than the amount subtracted by the pointsfix.
Quote: | i'd have absolutely no beef with the pointmod if players had an easier time adapting to it but realistically they're not patient enough to earn what they need
that's why lots of players play in st0rm servers with 1000 starting credits and extra + faster harv income...and their overall gameplay is fairly bad in comparison Dont Get It
|
the extra credits is a more sensible way of solving the problem some players have. if you want to be able to afford whatever you want no matter how badly you're being thrashed, you should just say so. up the credits instead of using this fucking dumb mod where you have to shoot a light tank with an auto rifle when you could be doing something important instead.
Quote: | and one problem for that vehicle alignment fix is it causes lag in games anywhere near a large size (in clanwars it's fine but in servers even 10vs10 or higher it becomes a huge lag issue)
|
? that surprises me
Quote: |
Quote: | why? i don't have magic powers, i don't have access to some source of wisdom that's denied everyone else. if your statement boils down to "you're the only one with the sufficient dedication" then it doesn't belong in an argument against me, does it?
|
not really an argument that makes logical sense, no
|
oh, it makes sense, it just ought to be pointed towards everyone except me instead of me
Quote: |
Quote: | uh no, letting him play was what probably would've caused that. like i said, the global admins thought that me and blkst0rm were the only decent people in a community that was - aside from we two - a complete cesspool and not at all worth CLAN WARS's resources to host. the exception were the two admins who ran things as fairly as we did no matter how retarded the general community was being at the time.
|
alright, so it could have
it was possible, but not certain
i wouldn't call it a cesspool but it seems odd that no one else felt he should be banned or didn't speak up about it
|
other than the higher-up admins at clanwars, i can only think of two people besides myself and blkst0rm who agreed with the ban, both of whom said so on MSN rather than the forum.
Quote: | what if a poll was held and smoking beat not smoking?
|
held by who? the bowling alley owner who specifically chose to let the community have a vote? or just some guy from the community who got the weird idea that he's entitled to one?
if it's the latter then this is what makes it such a joke that people call it "democracy". they're actually trying to take someone's privately owned property and turn its control over to "the people". call it what it is, it's communism.
Quote: |
Quote: | i would have thought that you have your hands full enough with things i have said without needing to deal with things i didn't say.
|
i pick up on other things whether you intended them or not
some things you probably didn't even think of or mean at all, which is why i asked to be sure
|
you seem to be wrong about these things you "pick up on" quite a lot, though
Quote: |
Quote: | and yet you can't point to a clanwars player who actually did DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, can you? like i said, you're focusing too much on their excuses and ignoring the fact that nobody can be found who put in the slightest effort.
|
this is true - none of them tried to make their own league
there may be more reasons for that than simply "they didn't care" but it doesn't matter since your point is "it never happened"
|
yes, that is the most important part of the equation... by far.
Quote: |
Quote: | i just had the gut feeling that simpee was telling the truth for a change, and his explanation certainly fit the known facts.
|
pfft, your gut or your mind thinking simpee's finally telling the truth about something because it betters your argument
your gut is full of Lies, and straw
|
you ever heard of Occam's Razor?
Quote: |
Quote: | yes, for quite a significant period of time actually. CLAN WARS set up the league a few months after the game's release (in large part due to the absolute shittiness of Westwood's official clan ladder). that would have been around summer 2002. i didn't become an admin until summer 2005.
|
cool renehistory
so how did they run things before you came along?
|
if you mean did they decide policy by poll threads, no they didn't
Quote: |
Quote: | it's hard to square these comments with getting called the "worst admin in history" whenever i make a decision that someone disapproves of
|
you couldn't have been that bad because no one got up and made their own Spoony-free clanwars league
|
i can see we're never going to agree on why that was, are we?
Quote: |
Quote: | if it is, we can refer to my earlier statement on the subject. either they couldn't marshal their thoughts to justify their views in the debate thread that the admin specifically put there for their benefit, or they didn't dare join the debate for fear of being proved wrong. in neither case am i going to do what they want.
|
i dare say that you are Mean
|
it's better than just making your admin decision and then locking the thread and ignoring what anyone says about it, and that's better than not hosting a league at all
Quote: |
Quote: | i pointed out the colossal flaw in simpee's argument again and again and again. neither of you acknowledged it. simpee was trying to prove two things at the same time - firstly that i sucked at the game, secondly that mesa was unfair. and his way to prove this was to play me on mesa. stop and think for a second. how can you prove one player is great and the other player sucks by arranging a match on a horribly unfair map? conversely, how can you prove mesa is unfair by pitting a great player against a terrible player?
|
oh yeah, he wanted to do it on Mesa, not Mesa2
see, you're helping
Quote: | there were other reasons i posted at the time, you both ignored them too - such as the fact simpee had already been proven wrong in these pointsfix debates many times already and had shown a pathetic reluctance to admitting it - therefore it wouldn't change a damn thing if he was proven wrong about this too (yet again, the game is rigged).
|
fair enough
|
why didn't any of this get through to you at the time? i've certainly said all of this before.
Quote: |
Quote: | yes, especially those people who had a track record of profiting from unfairness.
|
that's not really relevant though, it seems like a way for you to justify their differing opinions not meaning anything
|
not relevant?
here comes a change that makes the game fairer, and everyone who liked to profit from unfairness is angry at the change.
Quote: | what if only the respectable, clean track record clanwars players had supported using the original points and the rapist genocide club had wanted the original points?
|
i assume you mean what if the clean track record players wanted the bug and the cheaters wanted the pointsfix?
Quote: |
Quote: | no, i was inferring what i actually said, which was "we do not decide policy by polls, we never did, nobody said this poll was important, and anyway the anti-pointsfix crowd has already tried rigging these things in the past"
|
alright
more reasons why you don't use polls instead of a reason why this one came out a certain way, which is what i thought you were on about
|
see how far you get by reading what i say instead of trying to figure out what i might be thinking but not saying? i've pissed an enormous number of people off by never shying away from saying what i mean...
Quote: |
Quote: | firstly, a lot of your statements have been along the lines of "you should do what the majority wants". as i've said before, this would mean that one of the worst cheaters in history gets away with it, whereas the fairest and most honest player around is fucked. have fun in a league like that.
secondly, i'm not talking about the fact they didn't like me, i'm talking about the fact they supported me being banned purely because of personal dislike, with not even so much as a thought as to what justification there might be for it.
|
this means they would not have made good clanwars admins, based on your previous teachings
|
well observed
Quote: |
Quote: | don't say "stuck around" as if there's anything praiseworthy there... they carried on accepting my charity?
|
is that not what you intended for people to do when you hosted a league for them? you act as if they're in the wrong for playing there
|
no, i didn't say that, i said there isn't anything praiseworthy in it.
Quote: |
Quote: | excuse me, but if you're capable of saying "here's what i think the rule on this matter should be" you're capable of being an admin and making that rule. and if the anti-pointsfix crowd was as enormous as you've decided that it is (though on what evidence i'm not quite sure) then you'd think that they could easily club together to outdo someone who knows as little about coding as i do.
|
i felt that the way renegade was scored should be what the players wanted, but i didn't think that all rules or decisions should be decided by the players
|
how do you work that out?
Quote: |
Quote: | are you kidding? it'd be more fun if i DIDN'T put myself through those debates. it's depressing how stupid most of the other participants were, depressing having to repeat myself again and again because they just weren't reading what the person they're arguing with was saying, depressing watching so many people lie through their teeth to try to get what they wanted, etc etc etc
|
the whole intellectual sparring thing was lost you say? bah, i say
|
sometimes it's fun against a worthy opponent. it's usually depressing when it's against someone who makes a bucket of pigshit look clever
Quote: |
Quote: | if something that improved the level of fairness in the league made people who'd already proven their preference for unfairness leave, this would probably have made me realise even sooner what a waste of effort the community was. that's a result, i suppose.
|
i don't think it was a waste of effort, and i'm sure the people who played there wouldn't say that
if they did they would be lying
|
well, if they think it's worth their effort, it reinforces my point that one of them ought to have put some in.
Quote: | was it just a way to assure that you were correct on the issue then? so they couldn't come back later and say that?
|
i can see you're not going to easily digest the idea that open debate on a particular question is a good thing for its own sake.
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
|
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438749 is a reply to message #438525] |
Mon, 01 November 2010 17:44 |
|
liquidv2
Messages: 3407 Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
Quote: | oh, it makes sense, it just ought to be pointed towards everyone except me instead of me
|
that's a different argument
Quote: | other than the higher-up admins at clanwars, i can only think of two people besides myself and blkst0rm who agreed with the ban, both of whom said so on MSN rather than the forum.
|
see, it still had hope
Quote: | held by who? the bowling alley owner who specifically chose to let the community have a vote? or just some guy from the community who got the weird idea that he's entitled to one?
|
a random supporter of smoking, of course
that was a joke by the way
Quote: | if it's the latter then this is what makes it such a joke that people call it "democracy". they're actually trying to take someone's privately owned property and turn its control over to "the people". call it what it is, it's communism.
|
just put a slick hammer and sickle emblem on the top banner and you're good to go
Quote: | you seem to be wrong about these things you "pick up on" quite a lot, though
|
and it's good that you can clear it up when i am, i appreciate it
Quote: | yes, that is the most important part of the equation... by far.
|
i suppose, since all else is reduced to speculation
Quote: | you ever heard of Occam's Razor?
|
sounds like a quest item in Zelda: Ocarnia of Time
i don't disagree, i'm sure simpee meant it when he said he didn't want to host a clan league
it's not something that people generally do, and actually uncommon
Quote: | if you mean did they decide policy by poll threads, no they didn't
|
i guess it's understandable
Quote: | i can see we're never going to agree on why that was, are we?
|
who knows, but it most likely does not matter why no one else has tried in recent years to make a non-Spoony clanwars league
i'm under the assumption that many people think you're pretty good at it and doubt they could do better so they don't bother trying
Quote: | it's better than just making your admin decision and then locking the thread and ignoring what anyone says about it, and that's better than not hosting a league at all
|
that's not your style, though
and sure, people would disagree with that, but in the end no one is making them play there
it just clicked - i was thinking something completely different
we're good
Quote: | i assume you mean what if the clean track record players wanted the bug and the cheaters wanted the pointsfix?
|
yah, i got too used to saying one thing
what then?
Quote: | see how far you get by reading what i say instead of trying to figure out what i might be thinking but not saying? i've pissed an enormous number of people off by never shying away from saying what i mean...
|
it's in secret subliminal spoony code or something
Quote: | no, i didn't say that, i said there isn't anything praiseworthy in it.
|
i suppose not
Quote: | how do you work that out?
|
i don't know, i think i thought it made sense at the time
Quote: | sometimes it's fun against a worthy opponent. it's usually depressing when it's against someone who makes a bucket of pigshit look clever
|
that's not a very nice thing to say
Quote: | well, if they think it's worth their effort, it reinforces my point that one of them ought to have put some in.
|
how could a regular player put in effort? in what way do you mean, by assuming Whiskey's role as renadmin?
Quote: | i can see you're not going to easily digest the idea that open debate on a particular question is a good thing for its own sake.
|
i just assume you have some evil intention because you're British
and you seem to enjoy debates in general
some people have fun in winning things, even if their opponents are terrible
are you one of those people?
|
|
|
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438754 is a reply to message #438749] |
Mon, 01 November 2010 19:46 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
Quote: |
Quote: | other than the higher-up admins at clanwars, i can only think of two people besides myself and blkst0rm who agreed with the ban, both of whom said so on MSN rather than the forum.
|
see, it still had hope
|
yes, despite the "majority".
Quote: |
Quote: | yes, that is the most important part of the equation... by far.
|
i suppose, since all else is reduced to speculation
|
except in the quite large number of cases where we know why people won't host a clan league. you'd be surprised how much contempt most clanwars players have for anyone willing to put any time or money into hosting a server or whatever.
and yet even if everyone had perfectly noble reasons for not hosting a clan ladder, the fact that they weren't hosting them would still be the important part of the equation instead of the why of it.
Quote: |
Quote: | i assume you mean what if the clean track record players wanted the bug and the cheaters wanted the pointsfix?
|
yah, i got too used to saying one thing
what then?
|
then it's possible that might make me reconsider.
Quote: |
Quote: | well, if they think it's worth their effort, it reinforces my point that one of them ought to have put some in.
|
how could a regular player put in effort? in what way do you mean, by assuming Whiskey's role as renadmin?
|
yes, applying for the renadmin job and doing a diligent job of it would certainly be one way of putting effort it. and yet despite how many times i tried recruiting one, not many people applied and even fewer turned out to be any good.
Quote: |
Quote: | i can see you're not going to easily digest the idea that open debate on a particular question is a good thing for its own sake.
|
i just assume you have some evil intention because you're British
and you seem to enjoy debates in general
some people have fun in winning things, even if their opponents are terrible
are you one of those people?
|
i do think free, open debate is a good thing. i also like being proven right, though there is value in being proven wrong (cos you come out of it knowing more than you did before). of course, there are a depressing number of people who can't stand being proven wrong (look at hate, he's still angry and it's been some months)
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 03 23:28:50 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01555 seconds
|