Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared  () 1 Vote
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438624 is a reply to message #438525] Sat, 30 October 2010 12:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ELiT3FLyR is currently offline  ELiT3FLyR
Messages: 119
Registered: April 2008
Karma: 0
Recruit
hes fighting for justice and all things fair
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438628 is a reply to message #438525] Sat, 30 October 2010 13:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
i'm trying to understand the creature known as Spoony
it's difficult for me because he's severely british



Toggle Spoiler


liquidv2
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438651 is a reply to message #438525] Sun, 31 October 2010 00:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9737
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Someone report all messages that need to be split off. I'm not going to read through it all. And yes: I am a mod here, and will see to it that carrierII also gets these rights Smile.

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438658 is a reply to message #438525] Sun, 31 October 2010 02:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gen_Blacky is currently offline  Gen_Blacky
Messages: 3250
Registered: September 2006
Karma: 1
General (3 Stars)
Clanwars .cc Presents Command & Conquer Renegade Essay Wars. Essay wars brings a new gameplay experience like never before. The point system for each essay has been greatly enhanced.

http://s18.postimage.org/jc6qbn4k9/bricks3.png

[Updated on: Sun, 31 October 2010 03:08]

Report message to a moderator

Re: BHS Ladder [message #438660 is a reply to message #438658] Sun, 31 October 2010 03:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
EvilWhiteDragon is currently offline  EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Gen_Blacky wrote on Sun, 31 October 2010 10:59

Clanwars .cc Presents Command & Conquer Renegade Essay Wars. Essay wars brings a new gameplay experience like never before. The point system for each essay has been greatly enhanced.

Talking about essays, perhaps it is fun to invite everyone to write an essay on how they think the ladder should be. Afterwards the results a published and people can vote on them.


http://www.blackintel.org/usr/evilwhitedragon/pointfix.gif
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/

V, V for Vendetta

People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438674 is a reply to message #438628] Sun, 31 October 2010 09:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
EWD, have you summoned up enough decency and honesty to apologise to me yet, or are you still cuddling up to your friend 0x90 despite the fact he's still making and releasing stuff that harms renegade, exactly as I tried to convince your dumb ass that he would?

liquid:
Toggle Spoiler


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438675 is a reply to message #438525] Sun, 31 October 2010 09:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
trooprm02 is currently offline  trooprm02
Messages: 3266
Registered: August 2005
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
@liquid, its pretty clear you have no idea what your talking about, have never been any good at this game, nor know how to even run a server....I'd say save your breath.

@spoony, yes thats exactly my point...if this ladder is instated democratically, then retards like liquid will just come up/argue for retarded ideas as to how it should work. I know ignorance might be bliss, but im saying those who know what they are talking about should be the ones designing this whole thing for the betterment of all (regardless if they see it as that way or not).


Re: BHS Ladder [message #438707 is a reply to message #438525] Sun, 31 October 2010 17:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
troop shouldn't bother you, he doesn't bother me
he's just mistaken, that's all


Spoony

Toggle Spoiler


liquidv2
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438713 is a reply to message #438525] Mon, 01 November 2010 00:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9737
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Please feel free to continue the debate here.

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: BHS Ladder [message #438717 is a reply to message #438707] Mon, 01 November 2010 05:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
liquidv2 wrote on Sun, 31 October 2010 18:23

you assume i didn't want to because i can't be bothered or wouldn't lower myself to paying or running anything for renegade
not saying i did, but what if i really liked the idea, but didn't do it because i felt it would be pointless trying to make a ladder for renegade that spoony did not endorse? i think it's possible other people felt the same way


i think you're focusing too much on the excuses and not enough on the complete absence of effort or results.

Quote:

now you finally understand!
i guess my thinking is skewed
i figure that since you're the only person that can really run a renegade ladder (whether you'll openly admit this or not) you would do


why? i don't have magic powers, i don't have access to some source of wisdom that's denied everyone else. if your statement boils down to "you're the only one with the sufficient dedication" then it doesn't belong in an argument against me, does it?

[quote title=Quote:]
Quote:

Quote:

you've lost me there.

how would allowing soul to play have nearly jeopardized the ren league at cw.cc? the uproar was caused by him being banned
you acted correctly but that nearly resulted in clanwars.cc cutting Renegade off of their site


uh no, letting him play was what probably would've caused that. like i said, the global admins thought that me and blkst0rm were the only decent people in a community that was - aside from we two - a complete cesspool and not at all worth CLAN WARS's resources to host. the exception were the two admins who ran things as fairly as we did no matter how retarded the general community was being at the time.

Quote:

i'm not so sure it's that they couldn't be bothered
i think people realize that you do a better job than they actually could (minus a select few people like trooprm02 - i've read clanwars.cc a handful of times and each time he was trying to tell you why you suck at what you're doing and how he could do better) and figured there was no point in trying
like i've said Spoony is clanwars.cc; people do not believe clanwars can succeed without you at this point


well, if the entire anti-pointsfix crowd (everyone except me and whiskey, supposedly) clubbed together and still couldn't with their combined might do better than spoony, you might think this would make people think that spoony's doing something right and perhaps, just perhaps, his decisions are worth some respect.

instead we seem to've had a situation where the community needed spoony to survive just as long as spoony didn't make any decisions. perhaps i can just wave a flag from the touchline or something.

Quote:

and because i didn't run a clan ladder for renegade means i have no credibility on the subject? i'm not saying i do have credibility on the subject, but that thinking is flawed
you should not criticize politicians or what they do because you've never been one yourself - you have no credibility on the subject

no, that analogy does not work at all. a politician is your employee. your vote decides who gets the job, your taxes pay their salary, they're (supposed to be, at least) there to serve you. people always compare the clanwars league to a government, and the analogy fails on every level. it's more like a cinema or a bowling alley that the owner lets you use for free. i let you play there, or you could play in someone else's bowling alley, or make your own, or not go bowling at all. if you play in my bowling alley you play by my rules, if i decide that there's no smoking or whatever. you can smoke in someone else's bowling alley for all i care. you can smoke out in the street for all i care. you can make your own bowling alley where smoking is allowed for all i care.
in my bowling alley, thou shalt not smoke.

Quote:

it looks to me that you're insinuating things about people but when i mention it or point it out you call me a liar
it's a trap
here's what i got from what you were saying: "these people want me to change my ladder but aren't willing to go make their own community to have the proposed changes to my ladder - that makes them douchebags"
i also got this: "these people want me to change what i'm doing to cater to their wants instead of thanking me for hosting it - that makes them douchebags"
am i incorrect in saying this?

i would have thought that you have your hands full enough with things i have said without needing to deal with things i didn't say.

Quote:

in the past other people have made claims and you dismissed them, but when you made claims you treated them as fact

"treated them as fact" is your euphemism for "explained why they were right", and "dismissed them" is your reverse-euphemism for "explained why they were wrong".

Quote:

one time i remember is when you accused MSGTPain of hating you due to you catching his friends cheating in a community war, and when i asked if you had proof of that you never responded

i'd certainly have responded to a question about MSGTPain, unless you're talking about the thread that got locked (with one of my posts bizarrely deleted right before)

Quote:

Quote:

i suppose i'm glad to hear you would agree with me if only you were perceptive enough to see what's right in front of you.

it seems to me you've decided that clanwars.cc is entirely represented by simpee and orca
one "couldn't be bothered" to host a league whereas the other "wouldn't lower himself to that"
i don't believe that all of clanwars.cc can be described by either of these two players


and yet you can't point to a clanwars player who actually did DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, can you? like i said, you're focusing too much on their excuses and ignoring the fact that nobody can be found who put in the slightest effort.

Quote:

how do you know simpee was telling the truth? it's possible he would have liked to but felt it would not work and didn't want to get flak for it

i just had the gut feeling that simpee was telling the truth for a change, and his explanation certainly fit the known facts.

Quote:

Quote:

eh? one of the main reasons i hosted the clanwars ladder is because no fucker else on renegade could be bothered.

well that was very kind of you
didn't people host it before yourself?


yes, for quite a significant period of time actually. CLAN WARS set up the league a few months after the game's release (in large part due to the absolute shittiness of Westwood's official clan ladder). that would have been around summer 2002. i didn't become an admin until summer 2005.

Quote:

perhaps someone else would have had you not stepped in

you must have done a good job because after you came along no one else really wanted to try

it's hard to square these comments with getting called the "worst admin in history" whenever i make a decision that someone disapproves of

Quote:

perhaps they thought they could not do a better job than you do or did and that their efforts would be pointless
you said yourself that clanwars.cc died because you stopped playing - perhaps there's some validity to my words

you're confusing "spoony playing in the league" with "spoony being the admin"

Quote:

Quote:

there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. no rebuttal necessary, the quote speaks for itself.

it's a simple question - you claimed that banning soul almost killed renegade at cw.cc

i would never say something as ridiculous as that.

Quote:

i don't disagree with you banning him for breaking a rule but i simply raised a question - do you think the uproar may have been averted had you just let it go and made everyone else happy?

what do you mean by "uproar"? the community going apeshit at me and blkstorm? well, we weren't to know what a terrible low the community was about to sink to.

Quote:

alright, you later covered this, but would it have gotten clanwars.cc off your back? even if it was for entirely wrong reasons?

uh no, you've got this totally wrong. the higher-ups thought me and blkst0rm were the only things good enough in the renegade league to justify keeping it alive, precisely because we were playing it by the rules and fairness and honesty instead of just doing whatever these idiots wanted.

Quote:

Quote:

oh dear, you completely changed the subject.

nope, i didn't at all change the subject
i understand that in your eyes the only people that didn't want the pointmod used in clanwars were the only people that posted in that topic, which you named
i believe that may be untrue


if it is, we can refer to my earlier statement on the subject. either they couldn't marshal their thoughts to justify their views in the debate thread that the admin specifically put there for their benefit, or they didn't dare join the debate for fear of being proved wrong. in neither case am i going to do what they want.

Quote:

i still don't know what whiskey thought either way, even if he told you he wanted it used
maybe he didn't and wanted to please you
i don't think it matters much either way whether he did or not, just saying

that's feeble of you. you made so many posts and PMs saying whiskey was obviously only speaking in favour of the pointsfix because he was spoony's renadmin at the time. this was flat out untrue, and you just swallowed the bullshit the anti-pointsfix crowd were putting out at the time; that anybody who likes the pointsfix MUST have some hidden agenda. it's an odd thing to think from someone whose only admissible evidence is "here's how many people like it or don't like it". once again, the game is rigged.

Quote:

a lot of people don't like posting things if they know they're going to get criticized for it

yeah, they like just saying things and expecting it to be accepted without giving anyone the platform to challenge it.

Quote:

so perhaps they saw simpee and the others trying to tell you why they wanted the original points used and the way you tried to tell them their opinions were wrong and decided against posting at all
though since you only care about debate in determining how clanwars.cc is run it wouldn't have mattered either way to you

that's right. it's a very similar situation to the "nobody else hosted a clan ladder" scenario. i'm focusing on the complete lack of effort or success, you're focusing on the excuses for that lack - even going so far as to make them on other peoples' behalf.

Quote:

i just have a hard time understanding why you do what you do, that's all
am i not allowed to ask you why you do what you do in regards to running a clan league or tell you why i think it makes no sense because i don't or haven't run one myself? i don't agree with that thinking, and i covered it earlier


of course you're allowed to ask, and i'm allowed to reply explaining why it's a stupid question

Quote:

Quote:

as would anyone who could be bothered hosting a pointbugged ladder when, according to you, everyone except me and whiskey wanted one.

i think if people were asked who the best person to host a pointbugged ladder in ren would be it would be you
maybe that's why they wanted you to do it so badly


if only i had gotten some credit for hosting a pointbugged ladder for so long, despite being the biggest opponent of the point bug.

Quote:

Quote:

because they're a bunch of idiots? that's the short answer.

Surprised

don't look so surprised. "why are they acting like idiots?" "because they're idiots" quite simple really

Quote:

Quote:

you're almost on to something here. you don't run a clanwars league for these people so you don't know? indeed. so you know what it's like to not host a league for a bunch of idiots... so you ought to understand what might drive someone else to decide not to as well.

fair enough, there are quite a few reasons i can come up with for why more people haven't tried

my reason was "i've put up with you ungrateful twats long enough, you treat me like shit despite all the favours i've done for you and you don't deserve any more of my effort" - this reason seemed to be unacceptable to a lot of people

Quote:

Quote:

why didn't you read my detailed and repeated explanations of why i wouldn't play him at the time?

didn't you cite that the vehicle alignment issue was the main reason? and that the map wasn't complete without it? if there was more to it please fill me in
it just looked to me like you were avoiding it, and i didn't think the vehicle alignment issue would have changed the outcome of the game


wow, why don't you pay attention to what the person you're arguing with is saying?

i pointed out the colossal flaw in simpee's argument again and again and again. neither of you acknowledged it. simpee was trying to prove two things at the same time - firstly that i sucked at the game, secondly that mesa was unfair. and his way to prove this was to play me on mesa. stop and think for a second. how can you prove one player is great and the other player sucks by arranging a match on a horribly unfair map? conversely, how can you prove mesa is unfair by pitting a great player against a terrible player?

there were other reasons i posted at the time, you both ignored them too - such as the fact simpee had already been proven wrong in these pointsfix debates many times already and had shown a pathetic reluctance to avoid admitting it - therefore it wouldn't change a damn thing if he was proven wrong about this too (yet again, the game is rigged).
also, i vaguely remember having internet problems at the time, but never mind that.

Quote:

Quote:

you seem reluctant to finish your sentence. the last words that belong on the end are "but they were wrong"

i didn't think i had to say that, the fact that they couldn't argue it says just that
even though the pointmod makes the game much more fair people still didn't want it used


yes, especially those people who had a track record of profiting from unfairness.

Quote:

Quote:

it might be the same thing you thought you would lose by hosting a pointbugged clan ladder for them?

which is what?

you tell me. i don't want to assume why you didn't do that, do i?

Quote:

Quote:

nobody said they were, though you lied and tried to make it sound like i did.

[color=skyblue]you made a point to say that polls were rigged in clanwars multiple times after you mentioned the poll about wanting the pointmod in clanwars
what i inferred was you were suggesting this one had been rigged as well

no, i was inferring what i actually said, which was "we do not decide policy by polls, we never did, nobody said this poll was important, and anyway the anti-pointsfix crowd has already tried rigging these things in the past"

Quote:

what i said several times was that just because others in the past had been rigged that this one wasn't necessarily rigged
if you never said that it had been rigged then what's the big deal?

you're not backing far enough away from your original point, which was "this poll is the only evidence we need to consider"

Quote:

Quote:

i can't tell if that's a serious question or not

just because whiskey was the only person who always stood by your side and listened to you does not mean no one else cared or "gave a shit" about clanwars

firstly, i've argued more divisively with whiskey over stuff than with almost anyone else at clanwars, so that point falls.
secondly, you're totally rephrasing my point again. i didn't say whiskey was the only person who gave a shit about the community because he agreed with me, i said he was one of a very small number of people who actually put any effort into the community, and got nothing but contempt in return

Quote:

Quote:

would that explain the general enthusiasm when i was suspended because a cheater lied his way into my clan?

who said they have to like you?

oh dear.

firstly, a lot of your statements have been along the lines of "you should do what the majority wants". as i've said before, this would mean that one of the worst cheaters in history gets away with it, whereas the fairest and most honest player around is fucked. have fun in a league like that.
secondly, i'm not talking about the fact they didn't like me, i'm talking about the fact they supported me being banned purely because of personal dislike, with not even so much as a thought as to what justification there might be for it.

Quote:

despite them disliking you they stuck around, which you've attributed to them being too lazy to make their own league

don't say "stuck around" as if there's anything praiseworthy there... they carried on accepting my charity?

Quote:

Quote:

still, carry on making excuses for these people if you like. the fact remains that none of them came up with the goods, and you attacked the only person who did.

what if no one else was capable? if you're the only one that can honestly do it then what? i can't see anyone else running a clan league for renegade

excuse me, but if you're capable of saying "here's what i think the rule on this matter should be" you're capable of being an admin and making that rule. and if the anti-pointsfix crowd was as enormous as you've decided that it is (though on what evidence i'm not quite sure) then you'd think that they could easily club together to outdo someone who knows as little about coding as i do.

Quote:

Quote:

having a debate thread at all is more generous than they have a reason to expect; i could just say "here's spoony's decision the madder, live with it" and lock the thread, as i was advised by quite a few people to do instead of actually talking to these idiots.

why do that though? that would be no fun for you

are you kidding? it'd be more fun if i DIDN'T put myself through those debates. it's depressing how stupid most of the other participants were, depressing having to repeat myself again and again because they just weren't reading what the person they're arguing with was saying, depressing watching so many people lie through their teeth to try to get what they wanted, etc etc etc

Quote:

Quote:

i've been asked the same question before, but in a more threatening tone.

alright, but that doesn't answer the question
would you be content with your decision even if it emptied out your community?


if something that improved the level of fairness in the league made people who'd already proven their preference for unfairness leave, this would probably have made me realise even sooner what a waste of effort the community was. that's a result, i suppose.

Quote:

Quote:

no? that was the first time you seemed to acknowledge the fact that the anti-pointsfix crowd at clanwars had been caught rigging polls like that before, despite the innumerable times i kept pointing it out to you and you obviously didn't care.

no - i believed you on that, without actually having seen it myself, but you mentioned it numerous times after mentioning that specific poll
it looked to me like you were saying that that poll had been rigged, and that's why several times i've stated that i don't believe that because other polls were rigged in the past that that poll had been rigged
you never actually said it, but again it appeared you were clearly hinting at it


i think i still haven't made myself clear that i couldn't have cared less whether the poll was rigged or not, because i never said it was important. the only thing a rigged poll demonstrates is the dishonesty of the other side of the argument, although that had been obvious for a very long time.

Quote:

in the case of the pointmod what was the point? if you made a topic where people were supposed to prove why it's more fair when you already know it's unfair you're just lying a trap out with the intention of slapping people around

see, this is the curse of renegade debates... people are always trying to make things that aren't bad sound bad. the fact i went to great lengths to encourage debate and listened to what everyone said and replied to every post... that's good. the fact i was willing to put the question to the test is a good thing, and it doesn't become a bad thing because the other side of the debate fared so badly.

Quote:

was your topic made to ask whether people wanted to use the pointmod or whether people thought it was more fair?

more fair, better for the league, etc. "do you prefer this" seems like a waste of a question to me, though i might ask "why do you prefer it"

Quote:

Quote:

i know you don't, because it logically makes you much more of a douche than i could ever be, and given the sheer number of times you've called me a douche for this reason it would make you the most colossal douche in the world.

pfft
if the reason no one else has tried to make a clan ladder, over the pointmod issue or any other issue, was solely due to people "not giving a shit" then i would have no problem agreeing with you
i'm not so sure that's the case


i'm still not sure why

Quote:

Quote:

from you and from the people you were so enthusiastically defending, it was absolutely true.

that's probably true, and i don't know enough to prove it otherwise
for the record i honestly think it's great that you hosted a league for renegade throughout the years, even if you've never gotten that from me


that's right, it is odd that this didn't appear as a counterpoint to "you're a douche because it's not being done in this particular way"

Quote:

what i was trying to get at is that since you felt their opinions were not valid (or as you say WRONG) that they do not matter

when it comes to changing the rules of a league, they don't matter enough. the opinion of someone who's right is worth more than the opinion of someone who's wrong.

let me illustrate it with a hypothetical.

question: should base to base be allowed on islands with a MRLS?
someone says: yes, because nod can buy a MRLS and do the same thing
spoony: uh no, nod can't do that.
someone: stfu you should respect my opinion
spoony: you're factually wrong here
someone: STFU MY OPINION IS WORTH AS MUCH AS YOURS

no, the someone else's vote should not count as much as mine, because i'm right and he's wrong, and this is exactly what happened in the pointsfix debates.

Quote:

Quote:

i don't remember saying i EXPECTED anyone from clanwars to behave maturely?

you didn't say it, i just assumed it's what you meant and addressed it as such
if it's not then don't worry about it
but did you expect it? more or less?


no?

Quote:

Quote:

it was obvious they didn't think i'd have such an easy time proving they were lying.

yet they still put it out there
perhaps it was what they honestly thought and you set the record straight for them - if so then that's good, right?


if that was the case they'd have been grateful for pointing out how crashingly wrong they were, and they'd have been relieved to learn that the guy who they thought was such a corrupt admin was in fact very honest.

this was not their reaction at all, in case you missed it.

that's just talking about their accusations against me (which were, of course, all untrue). now let's look at my counter-accusations against them (which were all true, though they denied them). what is your theory for why they denied them? do you think they might have been equally honest in that case?


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful

[Updated on: Mon, 01 November 2010 06:27]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438718 is a reply to message #438525] Mon, 01 November 2010 06:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
this thread is less entertaining than promised.
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438723 is a reply to message #438525] Mon, 01 November 2010 08:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GoTWhisKéY is currently offline  GoTWhisKéY
Messages: 320
Registered: July 2004
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
Recruit
G'day lads.
Yes I was initially against the pointsfix. I tried it out, and something seemed off about tank battles. I realized that we weren't receiving enough points for tank battles because of the 'eject from tank last second to avoid opponent getting points' exploit. It wasn't a problem before when everyone was receiving too many points for hitting green tanks anyway, but now that the pointsfix corrected that, we weren't receiving enough. I told Spoony about this and he got somebody to develop a fix for that as well.

Since then, Kill & I played a lot of clanwars with the pointsfix and 'tankfix' or whatever you call it, and we both ended up liking it afterall. It changed the gameplay to favor aggression, but at the same time you couldn't be as sloppy since it was a little harder to receive credits. The points you were awarded actually made sense.

As for Spoony & I, Yea we've gotten along fine and agree with most things for a long time, but that wasn't always the case. One time I didn't agree with Spoony banning Soul (I think this was the 2nd or 3rd time of Soul getting banned) so I ended up buying the league entirely and unbanning him. Spoony wasn't too happy about that lol. But in time, we put aside our grievences and I ended up being admin @ clanwars for a long time. I think I've filed about 1000 AR's lol.
I see Spoony as someone who actually cared about Renegade and has always put in the effort to run the clanwars league as best as he could, and I respect him for that. Do we agree on everything? No. I didn't agree with the way the Clear/Simpee situation was dealt with, for example.


Old School Renny

Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438736 is a reply to message #438525] Mon, 01 November 2010 13:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
trooprm02 is currently offline  trooprm02
Messages: 3266
Registered: August 2005
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
My posts don't belong here, I don't care about liquids menopause, I was talking about the ladder (for which I initially started the topic about), and not their little hissy fit.

Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438741 is a reply to message #438525] Mon, 01 November 2010 14:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GEORGE ZIMMER is currently offline  GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
"Liquid trying to understand British logic"

LOL. Best thread title ever.

Also, I now realize my mistake for bringing up pointsfix.


Toggle Spoiler
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438742 is a reply to message #438723] Mon, 01 November 2010 14:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
GoTWhisKéY wrote on Mon, 01 November 2010 10:27

G'day lads.
Yes I was initially against the pointsfix. I tried it out, and something seemed off about tank battles. I realized that we weren't receiving enough points for tank battles because of the 'eject from tank last second to avoid opponent getting points' exploit. It wasn't a problem before when everyone was receiving too many points for hitting green tanks anyway, but now that the pointsfix corrected that, we weren't receiving enough. I told Spoony about this and he got somebody to develop a fix for that as well.

Since then, Kill & I played a lot of clanwars with the pointsfix and 'tankfix' or whatever you call it, and we both ended up liking it afterall. It changed the gameplay to favor aggression, but at the same time you couldn't be as sloppy since it was a little harder to receive credits. The points you were awarded actually made sense.

As for Spoony & I, Yea we've gotten along fine and agree with most things for a long time, but that wasn't always the case. One time I didn't agree with Spoony banning Soul (I think this was the 2nd or 3rd time of Soul getting banned) so I ended up buying the league entirely and unbanning him. Spoony wasn't too happy about that lol. But in time, we put aside our grievences and I ended up being admin @ clanwars for a long time. I think I've filed about 1000 AR's lol.
I see Spoony as someone who actually cared about Renegade and has always put in the effort to run the clanwars league as best as he could, and I respect him for that. Do we agree on everything? No. I didn't agree with the way the Clear/Simpee situation was dealt with, for example.

did the amount you get for vehicle alignment make that much of a difference? it seems like absolute crap after playing with the original points for so long

i'd have absolutely no beef with the pointmod if players had an easier time adapting to it but realistically they're not patient enough to earn what they need
that's why lots of players play in st0rm servers with 1000 starting credits and extra + faster harv income...and their overall gameplay is fairly bad in comparison Dont Get It

and one problem for that vehicle alignment fix is it causes lag in games anywhere near a large size (in clanwars it's fine but in servers even 10vs10 or higher it becomes a huge lag issue)


liquidv2
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438743 is a reply to message #438525] Mon, 01 November 2010 15:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Quote:

i think you're focusing too much on the excuses and not enough on the complete absence of effort or results.

i'm explaining why i feel there may have been an absence
just saying "no one gave a shit" could be entirely true, but i like to think that it's not the case
and my suggestions make sense


Quote:

why? i don't have magic powers, i don't have access to some source of wisdom that's denied everyone else. if your statement boils down to "you're the only one with the sufficient dedication" then it doesn't belong in an argument against me, does it?

not really an argument that makes logical sense, no

Quote:

uh no, letting him play was what probably would've caused that. like i said, the global admins thought that me and blkst0rm were the only decent people in a community that was - aside from we two - a complete cesspool and not at all worth CLAN WARS's resources to host. the exception were the two admins who ran things as fairly as we did no matter how retarded the general community was being at the time.

alright, so it could have
it was possible, but not certain
i wouldn't call it a cesspool but it seems odd that no one else felt he should be banned or didn't speak up about it


Quote:

well, if the entire anti-pointsfix crowd (everyone except me and whiskey, supposedly) clubbed together and still couldn't with their combined might do better than spoony, you might think this would make people think that spoony's doing something right and perhaps, just perhaps, his decisions are worth some respect.

in time

Quote:

instead we seem to've had a situation where the community needed spoony to survive just as long as spoony didn't make any decisions. perhaps i can just wave a flag from the touchline or something.

Big Ups

Quote:

no, that analogy does not work at all. a politician is your employee. your vote decides who gets the job, your taxes pay their salary, they're (supposed to be, at least) there to serve you. people always compare the clanwars league to a government, and the analogy fails on every level. it's more like a cinema or a bowling alley that the owner lets you use for free. i let you play there, or you could play in someone else's bowling alley, or make your own, or not go bowling at all. if you play in my bowling alley you play by my rules, if i decide that there's no smoking or whatever. you can smoke in someone else's bowling alley for all i care. you can smoke out in the street for all i care. you can make your own bowling alley where smoking is allowed for all i care.
in my bowling alley, thou shalt not smoke.

what if a poll was held and smoking beat not smoking? Surprised

Quote:

i would have thought that you have your hands full enough with things i have said without needing to deal with things i didn't say.

i pick up on other things whether you intended them or not
some things you probably didn't even think of or mean at all, which is why i asked to be sure


Quote:

"treated them as fact" is your euphemism for "explained why they were right", and "dismissed them" is your reverse-euphemism for "explained why they were wrong".

i disagree, but i don't have an example so i'll drop it

Quote:

i'd certainly have responded to a question about MSGTPain, unless you're talking about the thread that got locked (with one of my posts bizarrely deleted right before)

nah, i'm pretty sure it was in a PM

Quote:

and yet you can't point to a clanwars player who actually did DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, can you? like i said, you're focusing too much on their excuses and ignoring the fact that nobody can be found who put in the slightest effort.

this is true - none of them tried to make their own league
there may be more reasons for that than simply "they didn't care" but it doesn't matter since your point is "it never happened"


Quote:

i just had the gut feeling that simpee was telling the truth for a change, and his explanation certainly fit the known facts.

pfft, your gut or your mind thinking simpee's finally telling the truth about something because it betters your argument
your gut is full of Lies, and straw


Quote:

yes, for quite a significant period of time actually. CLAN WARS set up the league a few months after the game's release (in large part due to the absolute shittiness of Westwood's official clan ladder). that would have been around summer 2002. i didn't become an admin until summer 2005.

cool renehistory
so how did they run things before you came along?


Quote:

it's hard to square these comments with getting called the "worst admin in history" whenever i make a decision that someone disapproves of

you couldn't have been that bad because no one got up and made their own Spoony-free clanwars league

Quote:

you're confusing "spoony playing in the league" with "spoony being the admin"

i thought you said stopped playing, and that people asked you all the time but that you declined
fine, that makes sense
all you're doing is strengthening my statement that "Spoony is clanwars"


Quote:

i would never say something as ridiculous as that.

then what was it that you were saying? that not banning Soul may have been the end of Renegade at cw.cc? it didn't click in my head until you explained it earlier, i was thinking they wanted to cut Renegade out because of the bickering and bitching on the forums and that had you just let it go it all would have subsided
my mistake; carry on


Quote:

what do you mean by "uproar"? the community going apeshit at me and blkstorm? well, we weren't to know what a terrible low the community was about to sink to.

yes!

Quote:

uh no, you've got this totally wrong. the higher-ups thought me and blkst0rm were the only things good enough in the renegade league to justify keeping it alive, precisely because we were playing it by the rules and fairness and honesty instead of just doing whatever these idiots wanted.

i understand
it just took a while


Quote:

if it is, we can refer to my earlier statement on the subject. either they couldn't marshal their thoughts to justify their views in the debate thread that the admin specifically put there for their benefit, or they didn't dare join the debate for fear of being proved wrong. in neither case am i going to do what they want.

i dare say that you are Mean

Quote:

that's feeble of you. you made so many posts and PMs saying whiskey was obviously only speaking in favour of the pointsfix because he was spoony's renadmin at the time. this was flat out untrue, and you just swallowed the bullshit the anti-pointsfix crowd were putting out at the time; that anybody who likes the pointsfix MUST have some hidden agenda. it's an odd thing to think from someone whose only admissible evidence is "here's how many people like it or don't like it". once again, the game is rigged.

if that's true then it was wrong of me and i was mistaken

Quote:

yeah, they like just saying things and expecting it to be accepted without giving anyone the platform to challenge it.

a lot of the time

Quote:

that's right. it's a very similar situation to the "nobody else hosted a clan ladder" scenario. i'm focusing on the complete lack of effort or success, you're focusing on the excuses for that lack - even going so far as to make them on other peoples' behalf.

i can't change the fact that it didn't happen, but i'm open to the idea that your reasons as to why may be incorrect

Quote:

of course you're allowed to ask, and i'm allowed to reply explaining why it's a stupid question

booooooooo

Quote:

if only i had gotten some credit for hosting a pointbugged ladder for so long, despite being the biggest opponent of the point bug.

that's true generosity, giving something expecting nothing in return

Quote:

don't look so surprised. "why are they acting like idiots?" "because they're idiots" quite simple really

more like =O
that's not a nice thing to say


Quote:

my reason was "i've put up with you ungrateful twats long enough, you treat me like shit despite all the favours i've done for you and you don't deserve any more of my effort" - this reason seemed to be unacceptable to a lot of people

cuz they loved you and didn't want to see you go, duh
even though they were mean to you
clanwars is a violent relationship, that's all


Quote:

wow, why don't you pay attention to what the person you're arguing with is saying?

i just told you that i read them and cannot remember what they were, though i believe one was the lack of a vehicle alignment fix at the time
i'm telling you what i thought at the time after having read your post
i suppose the other reasons are irrelevant because you never played him


Quote:

i pointed out the colossal flaw in simpee's argument again and again and again. neither of you acknowledged it. simpee was trying to prove two things at the same time - firstly that i sucked at the game, secondly that mesa was unfair. and his way to prove this was to play me on mesa. stop and think for a second. how can you prove one player is great and the other player sucks by arranging a match on a horribly unfair map? conversely, how can you prove mesa is unfair by pitting a great player against a terrible player?

oh yeah, he wanted to do it on Mesa, not Mesa2
see, you're helping


Quote:

there were other reasons i posted at the time, you both ignored them too - such as the fact simpee had already been proven wrong in these pointsfix debates many times already and had shown a pathetic reluctance to admitting it - therefore it wouldn't change a damn thing if he was proven wrong about this too (yet again, the game is rigged).

fair enough

Quote:

also, i vaguely remember having internet problems at the time, but never mind that.

thought you were one of those "get the job done" people
HMMMMM?!


Quote:

yes, especially those people who had a track record of profiting from unfairness.

that's not really relevant though, it seems like a way for you to justify their differing opinions not meaning anything
what if only the respectable, clean track record clanwars players had supported using the original points and the rapist genocide club had wanted the original points?


Quote:

you tell me. i don't want to assume why you didn't do that, do i?

i figure you already have, and since i don't know i asked you
i'll say lemonade because it's a tasty beverage


Quote:

no, i was inferring what i actually said, which was "we do not decide policy by polls, we never did, nobody said this poll was important, and anyway the anti-pointsfix crowd has already tried rigging these things in the past"

alright
more reasons why you don't use polls instead of a reason why this one came out a certain way, which is what i thought you were on about


Quote:

you're not backing far enough away from your original point, which was "this poll is the only evidence we need to consider"

you make me sound really stupid or something
;\


Quote:

oh dear.

see the violent relationship quote above

Quote:

firstly, a lot of your statements have been along the lines of "you should do what the majority wants". as i've said before, this would mean that one of the worst cheaters in history gets away with it, whereas the fairest and most honest player around is fucked. have fun in a league like that.
secondly, i'm not talking about the fact they didn't like me, i'm talking about the fact they supported me being banned purely because of personal dislike, with not even so much as a thought as to what justification there might be for it.

this means they would not have made good clanwars admins, based on your previous teachings

Quote:

don't say "stuck around" as if there's anything praiseworthy there... they carried on accepting my charity?

is that not what you intended for people to do when you hosted a league for them? you act as if they're in the wrong for playing there

Quote:

excuse me, but if you're capable of saying "here's what i think the rule on this matter should be" you're capable of being an admin and making that rule. and if the anti-pointsfix crowd was as enormous as you've decided that it is (though on what evidence i'm not quite sure) then you'd think that they could easily club together to outdo someone who knows as little about coding as i do.

i felt that the way renegade was scored should be what the players wanted, but i didn't think that all rules or decisions should be decided by the players
so if what you say is true i'm capable of being an admin and making that rule, but then what? it falls apart because it stops there
either way what i say previously remains true - there is no clanwars without Spoony
you're welcome to disprove that if you can


Quote:

are you kidding? it'd be more fun if i DIDN'T put myself through those debates. it's depressing how stupid most of the other participants were, depressing having to repeat myself again and again because they just weren't reading what the person they're arguing with was saying, depressing watching so many people lie through their teeth to try to get what they wanted, etc etc etc

the whole intellectual sparring thing was lost you say? bah, i say

Quote:

if something that improved the level of fairness in the league made people who'd already proven their preference for unfairness leave, this would probably have made me realise even sooner what a waste of effort the community was. that's a result, i suppose.

i don't think it was a waste of effort, and i'm sure the people who played there wouldn't say that
if they did they would be lying


Quote:

see, this is the curse of renegade debates... people are always trying to make things that aren't bad sound bad. the fact i went to great lengths to encourage debate and listened to what everyone said and replied to every post... that's good. the fact i was willing to put the question to the test is a good thing, and it doesn't become a bad thing because the other side of the debate fared so badly.

was it just a way to assure that you were correct on the issue then? so they couldn't come back later and say that?

Quote:

more fair, better for the league, etc. "do you prefer this" seems like a waste of a question to me, though i might ask "why do you prefer it"

i understand
it just seems harsh
that all comes with the business of clanwars i suppose


Quote:

that's right, it is odd that this didn't appear as a counterpoint to "you're a douche because it's not being done in this particular way"

it still seems douchey to me, on principle
but does it make the game more fair, and could it potentially better the league? sure
perhaps to do the right thing in this case you had to be a douche
maybe in the end when it all worked out you wouldn't have seemed like a douche


Quote:

when it comes to changing the rules of a league, they don't matter enough. the opinion of someone who's right is worth more than the opinion of someone who's wrong.

let me illustrate it with a hypothetical.

question: should base to base be allowed on islands with a MRLS?
someone says: yes, because nod can buy a MRLS and do the same thing
spoony: uh no, nod can't do that.
someone: stfu you should respect my opinion
spoony: you're factually wrong here
someone: STFU MY OPINION IS WORTH AS MUCH AS YOURS

no, the someone else's vote should not count as much as mine, because i'm right and he's wrong, and this is exactly what happened in the pointsfix debates.

that was awesome

Quote:

no?

you seemed surprised to me that people in clanwars were the way they were; that's why i asked

Quote:

if that was the case they'd have been grateful for pointing out how crashingly wrong they were, and they'd have been relieved to learn that the guy who they thought was such a corrupt admin was in fact very honest.

this was not their reaction at all, in case you missed it.

that's just talking about their accusations against me (which were, of course, all untrue). now let's look at my counter-accusations against them (which were all true, though they denied them). what is your theory for why they denied them? do you think they might have been equally honest in that case?

they could have been but they were not
maybe their dislike for you made it impossible
shame on you for making good guys like simpee and clearsh0t hate you!


liquidv2
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438745 is a reply to message #438743] Mon, 01 November 2010 16:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
Quote:

did the amount you get for vehicle alignment make that much of a difference? it seems like absolute crap after playing with the original points for so long

in many cases the amount lost by the jump-out-of-your-tank-at-the-last-second exploit was actually more than the amount subtracted by the pointsfix.

Quote:

i'd have absolutely no beef with the pointmod if players had an easier time adapting to it but realistically they're not patient enough to earn what they need
that's why lots of players play in st0rm servers with 1000 starting credits and extra + faster harv income...and their overall gameplay is fairly bad in comparison Dont Get It

the extra credits is a more sensible way of solving the problem some players have. if you want to be able to afford whatever you want no matter how badly you're being thrashed, you should just say so. up the credits instead of using this fucking dumb mod where you have to shoot a light tank with an auto rifle when you could be doing something important instead.

Quote:

and one problem for that vehicle alignment fix is it causes lag in games anywhere near a large size (in clanwars it's fine but in servers even 10vs10 or higher it becomes a huge lag issue)

? that surprises me

Quote:

Quote:

why? i don't have magic powers, i don't have access to some source of wisdom that's denied everyone else. if your statement boils down to "you're the only one with the sufficient dedication" then it doesn't belong in an argument against me, does it?

not really an argument that makes logical sense, no

oh, it makes sense, it just ought to be pointed towards everyone except me instead of me

Quote:

Quote:

uh no, letting him play was what probably would've caused that. like i said, the global admins thought that me and blkst0rm were the only decent people in a community that was - aside from we two - a complete cesspool and not at all worth CLAN WARS's resources to host. the exception were the two admins who ran things as fairly as we did no matter how retarded the general community was being at the time.

alright, so it could have
it was possible, but not certain
i wouldn't call it a cesspool but it seems odd that no one else felt he should be banned or didn't speak up about it


other than the higher-up admins at clanwars, i can only think of two people besides myself and blkst0rm who agreed with the ban, both of whom said so on MSN rather than the forum.

Quote:

what if a poll was held and smoking beat not smoking? Surprised

held by who? the bowling alley owner who specifically chose to let the community have a vote? or just some guy from the community who got the weird idea that he's entitled to one?

if it's the latter then this is what makes it such a joke that people call it "democracy". they're actually trying to take someone's privately owned property and turn its control over to "the people". call it what it is, it's communism.

Quote:

Quote:

i would have thought that you have your hands full enough with things i have said without needing to deal with things i didn't say.

i pick up on other things whether you intended them or not
some things you probably didn't even think of or mean at all, which is why i asked to be sure


you seem to be wrong about these things you "pick up on" quite a lot, though

Quote:

Quote:

and yet you can't point to a clanwars player who actually did DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, can you? like i said, you're focusing too much on their excuses and ignoring the fact that nobody can be found who put in the slightest effort.

this is true - none of them tried to make their own league
there may be more reasons for that than simply "they didn't care" but it doesn't matter since your point is "it never happened"


yes, that is the most important part of the equation... by far.

Quote:

Quote:

i just had the gut feeling that simpee was telling the truth for a change, and his explanation certainly fit the known facts.

pfft, your gut or your mind thinking simpee's finally telling the truth about something because it betters your argument
your gut is full of Lies, and straw


you ever heard of Occam's Razor?

Quote:

Quote:

yes, for quite a significant period of time actually. CLAN WARS set up the league a few months after the game's release (in large part due to the absolute shittiness of Westwood's official clan ladder). that would have been around summer 2002. i didn't become an admin until summer 2005.

cool renehistory
so how did they run things before you came along?


if you mean did they decide policy by poll threads, no they didn't

Quote:

Quote:

it's hard to square these comments with getting called the "worst admin in history" whenever i make a decision that someone disapproves of

you couldn't have been that bad because no one got up and made their own Spoony-free clanwars league

i can see we're never going to agree on why that was, are we?

Quote:

Quote:

if it is, we can refer to my earlier statement on the subject. either they couldn't marshal their thoughts to justify their views in the debate thread that the admin specifically put there for their benefit, or they didn't dare join the debate for fear of being proved wrong. in neither case am i going to do what they want.

i dare say that you are Mean

it's better than just making your admin decision and then locking the thread and ignoring what anyone says about it, and that's better than not hosting a league at all

Quote:

Quote:

i pointed out the colossal flaw in simpee's argument again and again and again. neither of you acknowledged it. simpee was trying to prove two things at the same time - firstly that i sucked at the game, secondly that mesa was unfair. and his way to prove this was to play me on mesa. stop and think for a second. how can you prove one player is great and the other player sucks by arranging a match on a horribly unfair map? conversely, how can you prove mesa is unfair by pitting a great player against a terrible player?

oh yeah, he wanted to do it on Mesa, not Mesa2
see, you're helping


Quote:

there were other reasons i posted at the time, you both ignored them too - such as the fact simpee had already been proven wrong in these pointsfix debates many times already and had shown a pathetic reluctance to admitting it - therefore it wouldn't change a damn thing if he was proven wrong about this too (yet again, the game is rigged).

fair enough

why didn't any of this get through to you at the time? i've certainly said all of this before.

Quote:

Quote:

yes, especially those people who had a track record of profiting from unfairness.

that's not really relevant though, it seems like a way for you to justify their differing opinions not meaning anything

not relevant?

here comes a change that makes the game fairer, and everyone who liked to profit from unfairness is angry at the change.

Quote:

what if only the respectable, clean track record clanwars players had supported using the original points and the rapist genocide club had wanted the original points?

i assume you mean what if the clean track record players wanted the bug and the cheaters wanted the pointsfix?

Quote:

Quote:

no, i was inferring what i actually said, which was "we do not decide policy by polls, we never did, nobody said this poll was important, and anyway the anti-pointsfix crowd has already tried rigging these things in the past"

alright
more reasons why you don't use polls instead of a reason why this one came out a certain way, which is what i thought you were on about


see how far you get by reading what i say instead of trying to figure out what i might be thinking but not saying? i've pissed an enormous number of people off by never shying away from saying what i mean...

Quote:

Quote:

firstly, a lot of your statements have been along the lines of "you should do what the majority wants". as i've said before, this would mean that one of the worst cheaters in history gets away with it, whereas the fairest and most honest player around is fucked. have fun in a league like that.
secondly, i'm not talking about the fact they didn't like me, i'm talking about the fact they supported me being banned purely because of personal dislike, with not even so much as a thought as to what justification there might be for it.

this means they would not have made good clanwars admins, based on your previous teachings

well observed

Quote:

Quote:

don't say "stuck around" as if there's anything praiseworthy there... they carried on accepting my charity?

is that not what you intended for people to do when you hosted a league for them? you act as if they're in the wrong for playing there

no, i didn't say that, i said there isn't anything praiseworthy in it.

Quote:

Quote:

excuse me, but if you're capable of saying "here's what i think the rule on this matter should be" you're capable of being an admin and making that rule. and if the anti-pointsfix crowd was as enormous as you've decided that it is (though on what evidence i'm not quite sure) then you'd think that they could easily club together to outdo someone who knows as little about coding as i do.

i felt that the way renegade was scored should be what the players wanted, but i didn't think that all rules or decisions should be decided by the players

how do you work that out?

Quote:

Quote:

are you kidding? it'd be more fun if i DIDN'T put myself through those debates. it's depressing how stupid most of the other participants were, depressing having to repeat myself again and again because they just weren't reading what the person they're arguing with was saying, depressing watching so many people lie through their teeth to try to get what they wanted, etc etc etc

the whole intellectual sparring thing was lost you say? bah, i say

sometimes it's fun against a worthy opponent. it's usually depressing when it's against someone who makes a bucket of pigshit look clever

Quote:

Quote:

if something that improved the level of fairness in the league made people who'd already proven their preference for unfairness leave, this would probably have made me realise even sooner what a waste of effort the community was. that's a result, i suppose.

i don't think it was a waste of effort, and i'm sure the people who played there wouldn't say that
if they did they would be lying


well, if they think it's worth their effort, it reinforces my point that one of them ought to have put some in.

Quote:

was it just a way to assure that you were correct on the issue then? so they couldn't come back later and say that?

i can see you're not going to easily digest the idea that open debate on a particular question is a good thing for its own sake.


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438748 is a reply to message #438745] Mon, 01 November 2010 17:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HaTe is currently offline  HaTe
Messages: 923
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
Colonel
Spoony is a freakin annoying ass troll, Liquid can't let it go, and troop is somehow still managing to get dumber by the fucking second. Meanwhile the mods of this section aren't even willing to read all of the stupid ass spam quotes. Lovely topic!

http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t263/psuHaTe32_2007/HaTe3.jpg
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmund Burke
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438749 is a reply to message #438525] Mon, 01 November 2010 17:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Quote:

oh, it makes sense, it just ought to be pointed towards everyone except me instead of me

that's a different argument

Quote:

other than the higher-up admins at clanwars, i can only think of two people besides myself and blkst0rm who agreed with the ban, both of whom said so on MSN rather than the forum.

see, it still had hope

Quote:

held by who? the bowling alley owner who specifically chose to let the community have a vote? or just some guy from the community who got the weird idea that he's entitled to one?

a random supporter of smoking, of course

that was a joke by the way


Quote:

if it's the latter then this is what makes it such a joke that people call it "democracy". they're actually trying to take someone's privately owned property and turn its control over to "the people". call it what it is, it's communism.

just put a slick hammer and sickle emblem on the top banner and you're good to go

Quote:

you seem to be wrong about these things you "pick up on" quite a lot, though

and it's good that you can clear it up when i am, i appreciate it

Quote:

yes, that is the most important part of the equation... by far.

i suppose, since all else is reduced to speculation

Quote:

you ever heard of Occam's Razor?

sounds like a quest item in Zelda: Ocarnia of Time
i don't disagree, i'm sure simpee meant it when he said he didn't want to host a clan league
it's not something that people generally do, and actually uncommon


Quote:

if you mean did they decide policy by poll threads, no they didn't

i guess it's understandable

Quote:

i can see we're never going to agree on why that was, are we?

who knows, but it most likely does not matter why no one else has tried in recent years to make a non-Spoony clanwars league
i'm under the assumption that many people think you're pretty good at it and doubt they could do better so they don't bother trying


Quote:

it's better than just making your admin decision and then locking the thread and ignoring what anyone says about it, and that's better than not hosting a league at all

that's not your style, though
and sure, people would disagree with that, but in the end no one is making them play there


Quote:

not relevant?

it just clicked - i was thinking something completely different
we're good


Quote:

i assume you mean what if the clean track record players wanted the bug and the cheaters wanted the pointsfix?

yah, i got too used to saying one thing
what then?


Quote:

see how far you get by reading what i say instead of trying to figure out what i might be thinking but not saying? i've pissed an enormous number of people off by never shying away from saying what i mean...

it's in secret subliminal spoony code or something

Quote:

no, i didn't say that, i said there isn't anything praiseworthy in it.

i suppose not

Quote:

how do you work that out?

i don't know, i think i thought it made sense at the time

Quote:

sometimes it's fun against a worthy opponent. it's usually depressing when it's against someone who makes a bucket of pigshit look clever

that's not a very nice thing to say

Quote:

well, if they think it's worth their effort, it reinforces my point that one of them ought to have put some in.

how could a regular player put in effort? in what way do you mean, by assuming Whiskey's role as renadmin?

Quote:

i can see you're not going to easily digest the idea that open debate on a particular question is a good thing for its own sake.

i just assume you have some evil intention because you're British
and you seem to enjoy debates in general
some people have fun in winning things, even if their opponents are terrible
are you one of those people? Surprised


liquidv2
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438754 is a reply to message #438749] Mon, 01 November 2010 19:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
Quote:

Quote:

other than the higher-up admins at clanwars, i can only think of two people besides myself and blkst0rm who agreed with the ban, both of whom said so on MSN rather than the forum.

see, it still had hope

yes, despite the "majority".

Quote:

Quote:

yes, that is the most important part of the equation... by far.

i suppose, since all else is reduced to speculation

except in the quite large number of cases where we know why people won't host a clan league. you'd be surprised how much contempt most clanwars players have for anyone willing to put any time or money into hosting a server or whatever.

and yet even if everyone had perfectly noble reasons for not hosting a clan ladder, the fact that they weren't hosting them would still be the important part of the equation instead of the why of it.

Quote:

Quote:

i assume you mean what if the clean track record players wanted the bug and the cheaters wanted the pointsfix?

yah, i got too used to saying one thing
what then?


then it's possible that might make me reconsider.

Quote:

Quote:

well, if they think it's worth their effort, it reinforces my point that one of them ought to have put some in.

how could a regular player put in effort? in what way do you mean, by assuming Whiskey's role as renadmin?

yes, applying for the renadmin job and doing a diligent job of it would certainly be one way of putting effort it. and yet despite how many times i tried recruiting one, not many people applied and even fewer turned out to be any good.

Quote:

Quote:

i can see you're not going to easily digest the idea that open debate on a particular question is a good thing for its own sake.

i just assume you have some evil intention because you're British
and you seem to enjoy debates in general
some people have fun in winning things, even if their opponents are terrible
are you one of those people? Surprised


i do think free, open debate is a good thing. i also like being proven right, though there is value in being proven wrong (cos you come out of it knowing more than you did before). of course, there are a depressing number of people who can't stand being proven wrong (look at hate, he's still angry and it's been some months)


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438759 is a reply to message #438748] Mon, 01 November 2010 21:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
trooprm02 is currently offline  trooprm02
Messages: 3266
Registered: August 2005
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
HaTe wrote on Mon, 01 November 2010 18:40

Spoony is a freakin annoying ass troll, Liquid can't let it go, and troop is somehow still managing to get dumber by the fucking second. Meanwhile the mods of this section aren't even willing to read all of the stupid ass spam quotes. Lovely topic!


Didn't you challenge me to 1v1 ctf/build match while being serious lol? gg.


[Updated on: Mon, 01 November 2010 21:21]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438761 is a reply to message #438759] Mon, 01 November 2010 21:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Quote:

except in the quite large number of cases where we know why people won't host a clan league. you'd be surprised how much contempt most clanwars players have for anyone willing to put any time or money into hosting a server or whatever.

maybe has something to do with them not fully understanding or grasping the fact that you own the thing and that it's not there without you
like how some people are under the assumption that Renegade has its own servers, like EA hosts them or something like that


Quote:

yes, applying for the renadmin job and doing a diligent job of it would certainly be one way of putting effort it. and yet despite how many times i tried recruiting one, not many people applied and even fewer turned out to be any good.

maybe that's not the best environment for recruiting an admin in the first place
and that being said you can hardly blame them, they're there purely for the competition i'm sure


Quote:

i do think free, open debate is a good thing. i also like being proven right, though there is value in being proven wrong (cos you come out of it knowing more than you did before).

that's why i appreciate you going back and forth with me over issues such as this




liquidv2
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438802 is a reply to message #438759] Tue, 02 November 2010 18:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HaTe is currently offline  HaTe
Messages: 923
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
Colonel
trooprm02 wrote on Mon, 01 November 2010 22:15

HaTe wrote on Mon, 01 November 2010 18:40

Spoony is a freakin annoying ass troll, Liquid can't let it go, and troop is somehow still managing to get dumber by the fucking second. Meanwhile the mods of this section aren't even willing to read all of the stupid ass spam quotes. Lovely topic!


Didn't you challenge me to 1v1 ctf/build match while being serious lol? gg.


I challenged you to 1v1 coop. Stop proving my point. You dodged either way....which is a bit pathetic to be completely honest with you.


http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t263/psuHaTe32_2007/HaTe3.jpg
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmund Burke
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438804 is a reply to message #438525] Tue, 02 November 2010 20:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
R315r4z0r is currently offline  R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
How now brown cow.
Re: Liquid trying to understand British logic - cleared [message #438805 is a reply to message #438802] Tue, 02 November 2010 22:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
trooprm02 is currently offline  trooprm02
Messages: 3266
Registered: August 2005
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
HaTe wrote on Tue, 02 November 2010 19:21

trooprm02 wrote on Mon, 01 November 2010 22:15

HaTe wrote on Mon, 01 November 2010 18:40

Spoony is a freakin annoying ass troll, Liquid can't let it go, and troop is somehow still managing to get dumber by the fucking second. Meanwhile the mods of this section aren't even willing to read all of the stupid ass spam quotes. Lovely topic!


Didn't you challenge me to 1v1 ctf/build match while being serious lol? gg.


I challenged you to 1v1 coop. Stop proving my point. You dodged either way....which is a bit pathetic to be completely honest with you.



Your awful at this game, have dodged me countless times, not even sure why you still post here:

http://img35.imageshack.us/f/hatedodge.png/

^LOL Thumbs Up


Previous Topic: how many renegade players have died in real life?
Next Topic: Who is the best Renegade player(s) nowadays?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Nov 03 23:28:50 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01555 seconds