Re: Phones and Receptionist [message #438521 is a reply to message #438517] |
Thu, 28 October 2010 17:18 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec738/ec7381b9d5db06cc4a67437580585b424791dce2" alt="" |
Altzan
Messages: 1586 Registered: September 2008 Location: Tennessee
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I think the receptionist should get the phone first, but only if the person on the line needs something that takes just a minute or two at most. If it takes longer, the receptionist should tell them to hold or call back, then get back to you.
Think of if you were calling - you would at least want an answer so you know there's someone there to respond, right? Although the caller definitely doesn't get a higher priority.
I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker. ~Voltaire
|
|
|