|
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #432981 is a reply to message #432829] |
Sat, 17 July 2010 14:08   |
 |
GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Thu, 15 July 2010 23:32 |
Senators elected by their marksmanship? Guns in our kindergardens? Granted, only a shithole like Arizona would be this retarded, but this isn't the kind of thing you want to be glorifiying.
|
...yes, let's find a few very specific examples of something I'm not even talking about
I do agree, that shit's retarded, but that hardly means we suddenly should give up the right to own firearms...
Toggle Spoiler| Scrin wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:22 |
| cAmpa wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 12:45 |
Scrin, stop pming people to get the building bars.
|
FUCK YOU AND THIS SHIT GAME WITH YOUR SCRIPTS!!! I HAVE ASKING YOU AND ANOTHER NOOBS HERE ABOUT HELP WITH THAT BUILDING ICONS FEATURES FOR YEARS, BUT YOU KEEP IGNORING ME AND KEEP WRITE SHIT, SO BURN YOU AND YOUR ASSLICKERS FRIENDS, THIS TIME I'M NOT COME BACK!!!!!!!!!   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #433030 is a reply to message #433005] |
Sun, 18 July 2010 02:48 |
 |
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Sat, 17 July 2010 14:08 |
| Dover wrote on Thu, 15 July 2010 23:32 |
Senators elected by their marksmanship? Guns in our kindergardens? Granted, only a shithole like Arizona would be this retarded, but this isn't the kind of thing you want to be glorifiying.
|
...yes, let's find a few very specific examples of something I'm not even talking about
I do agree, that shit's retarded, but that hardly means we suddenly should give up the right to own firearms...
|
Heaven forbid you can't carry around machine guns, and how dare they make you fill out some paperwork for the rest of your guns.
| Z3RATUL99 wrote on Sat, 17 July 2010 21:55 |
Guns = gun control
gun control = over gun control
over gun control = protests over not enough gun control and ban of guns
ban of guns = protests
protests = guns
and the cycle continues
|
You're a fucking idiot.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #433064 is a reply to message #433058] |
Sun, 18 July 2010 14:09 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Z3RATUL99 wrote on Sun, 18 July 2010 12:55 |
| Z3RATUL99 wrote on Sat, 17 July 2010 22:55 |
Guns = gun control
gun control = over gun control
over gun control = protests over not enough gun control and ban of guns
ban of guns = CRIME
CRIME = Event.ini not found
then the government will step in and do something stupid... or in a lucky event something that will save everyone
|
I have realized my mistake and fixed accordingly
|
Still retarded. Why does gun control = over-control? Why would people be protesting about not enough gun control if there's supposedly too much? Why would a ban of guns lead to CRIME in capital letters, when criminals would be set at the exact same weapons footing as honest citizens? Because you're a fucking idiot.
And every time someone says "the government" as if they're some kind of far off foreign entity that you have no ties to or influence over, a baby sheds a tear somewhere. Stop making babies cry.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
[Updated on: Sun, 18 July 2010 14:12] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #433072 is a reply to message #433064] |
Sun, 18 July 2010 15:29 |
 |
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Sun, 18 July 2010 16:09 |
And every time someone says "the government" as if they're some kind of far off foreign entity that you have no ties to or influence over, a baby sheds a tear somewhere. Stop making babies cry.
|
The irony also being that this 'anti-government' sentiment is virulently conjured up by organizations like the NRA who endorse candidates that are generally Republican. Under Bush's watch, America's government and bureaucracy increased dramatically in size. If the NRA was truly for a distancing between government, and people's daily lives, they'd be touting Libertarians, or be politically agnostic.
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #433076 is a reply to message #433072] |
Sun, 18 July 2010 16:36 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| nikki6ixx wrote on Sun, 18 July 2010 15:29 |
| Dover wrote on Sun, 18 July 2010 16:09 |
And every time someone says "the government" as if they're some kind of far off foreign entity that you have no ties to or influence over, a baby sheds a tear somewhere. Stop making babies cry.
|
The irony also being that this 'anti-government' sentiment is virulently conjured up by organizations like the NRA who endorse candidates that are generally Republican. Under Bush's watch, America's government and bureaucracy increased dramatically in size. If the NRA was truly for a distancing between government, and people's daily lives, they'd be touting Libertarians, or be politically agnostic.
|
That would make too much sense though, wouldn't it.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #433086 is a reply to message #433084] |
Sun, 18 July 2010 20:51 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Z3RATUL99 wrote on Sun, 18 July 2010 20:28 |
this is all my opinion mainly
|
So basically you admit it's all bullshit. I'm glad we agree.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #433236 is a reply to message #433072] |
Wed, 21 July 2010 13:59 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| nikki6ixx wrote on Sun, 18 July 2010 17:29 |
| Dover wrote on Sun, 18 July 2010 16:09 |
And every time someone says "the government" as if they're some kind of far off foreign entity that you have no ties to or influence over, a baby sheds a tear somewhere. Stop making babies cry.
|
The irony also being that this 'anti-government' sentiment is virulently conjured up by organizations like the NRA who endorse candidates that are generally Republican. Under Bush's watch, America's government and bureaucracy increased dramatically in size. If the NRA was truly for a distancing between government, and people's daily lives, they'd be touting Libertarians, or be politically agnostic.
|
The NRA is a single-issue organization. If the candidate doesn't support the 2nd Amendment, they do not get endorsed- regardless of what else is on their record. They've been known to refuse support to otherwise exceptional candidates for the sole and exclusive reason that they advocated more restrictive gun laws. You don't see as many Democrats as Republicans getting NRA support is simply because fewer Democrats are pro-gun (most of the ones who are come from districts where they wouldn't get elected if they weren't pro-gun). If the Democratic Party changed its stance on gun control, I think that the NRA would swing back to center pretty quickly.
The reason why the NRA doesn't support Libertarian candidates is because they usually don't have a chance in hell of actually winning- which is ironic because a Libertarian backed by the NRA in the right place at the right time would stand a very good chance of winning. Believe me, I would love to see them support more Libertarians... but it's not going to happen unless the party grows strong enough to be a major contender. The NRA is interested only in putting candidates in office who share the organization's agenda, and there's a stronger chance of that with mainstream candidates.
Incidentally, this is also why the ACLU is usually seen as a left-wing organization- and also why they have never taken a firm, definitive stance one way or the other on guns (it changes based on who's writing the press releases). The practical realities of political maneuvering don't leave much room for incorruptible pure idealism no matter what issue or agenda you're promoting. In theory, however, both organizations would likely take a libertarian position if they could afford to do so without eroding their vast influence.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #434876 is a reply to message #431713] |
Mon, 16 August 2010 09:55 |
 |
The Party
Messages: 546
Registered: February 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Stop throwing around the word faggot, it offends me.
War is Peace.
Ignorance is Strength.
Freedom is Slavery.
|
|
|
|
| Re: inc flaming [message #434878 is a reply to message #431654] |
Mon, 16 August 2010 10:07 |
|
|
Epic bumps over a month offend me.
Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
| BBC news, quoting... |
Supporters of Proposition 8 will argue California does not discriminate against gays, as the current law allows them to get married - as long as they wed a partner of the opposite sex.
|
| halokid wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 08:46 |
| R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 15:35 |
|
the hell is that?
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
