Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » What should C&C3 have been?
Re: What should C&C3 have been? [message #420859 is a reply to message #420771] |
Wed, 24 February 2010 21:44 |
|
[NE]Fobby[GEN]
Messages: 1377 Registered: July 2004 Location: Canada
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 24 February 2010 08:57 | I appreciate the discussion guys, but could you please bring the topic of C&C4 elsewhere? This thread's about C&C3 and what it should've been, not C&C4 and how it sucks/doesn't suck/whatever.
|
I guess this means the thread isn't about UFOs (or UOs) either
Anyway the thread is about two and a half years late, but I feel like I've covered quite a bit in my post. I'd like to add though, that I don't really feel strongly about C&C3. Complaining about plot holes and inconsistencies between TS and TW is one thing, but the gameplay itself wasn't that bad in my opinion. It's still one of the better RTS games of the past decade, and probably EALA's best game in general (definitely better than Generals, RA3, and C&C4) but that being said there still is room for complaints.
Unreal Tournament 3 Total Conversion to C&C: Renegade
Check out Renegade X Today!
Mod Wars Veteran
|
|
|
|
|
What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: zeratul on Mon, 22 February 2010 16:46
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Spoony on Wed, 24 February 2010 06:24
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Lone0001 on Mon, 22 February 2010 17:32
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nope.avi on Mon, 22 February 2010 18:35
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Lone0001 on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:55
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: DRNG on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:04
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nopol10 on Tue, 23 February 2010 03:18
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: DRNG on Tue, 23 February 2010 05:53
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Zion on Tue, 23 February 2010 03:12
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: nopol10 on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:32
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: HaTe on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:35
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: cmatt42 on Wed, 24 February 2010 22:31
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Tiesto on Wed, 24 February 2010 07:02
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
By: Spoony on Wed, 24 February 2010 12:12
|
|
|
Re: What should C&C3 have been?
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Sep 16 05:12:57 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00937 seconds
|