Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: General Discussion

Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » What should C&C3 have been?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: What should C&C3 have been? [message #420610 is a reply to message #420598]

Mon, 22 February 2010 19:55

Lone0001
Messages: 2112
Registered: August 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada

Karma:

General (2 Stars)

R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 22 February 2010 20:39

C&C3 was a good game. There were some unit ideas and faction mechanics that I would have made different and some game mechanics that I would have either changed or omitted, but it was a decent game.

Things like cranes I would have taken out completely because they totally ruined the game, imo, because they made echo-booming much easier.

I also would have made Nod less of a steamroller faction then they ended up becoming.

For GDI, I would have payed more tribute to what happened in TS, technology and design wise.

As for the single player, they did an ok job, but if it were me, they could have lengthened it. Obviously it told its story, but I would have made more early missions. Kane's re-appearance should have been more dramatic because of how he was personally killed by McNeil in TS. And overall, I would have made at least a few references to Tiberian Sun. Just mentioning things that happened in that game would be a basis to drive ideas, so I'm kind of perplexed at why they sort of tended to stay away from that.

From what I've seen from the C&C4 FMV trailers, C&C3's story should have been more like that. If C&C4's gameplay didn't suck so bad, it could potentially be an excellent C&C game. However, it's bad gameplay isn't really what has me distressed, it's the fact that its the conclusion of the Kane story.

I thought the story of C&C4 looked like just as much as an epic failure as the gameplay, overall the game is really bad.

Lone0001.ca
C&C Files

[Updated on: Mon, 22 February 2010 19:56]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		What should C&C3 have been? By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Mon, 22 February 2010 16:14
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Mon, 22 February 2010 16:35
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: zeratul on Mon, 22 February 2010 16:46
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Mon, 22 February 2010 16:48
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: terminator 101 on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:00
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: Spoony on Wed, 24 February 2010 06:24
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Mon, 22 February 2010 17:01
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: Lone0001 on Mon, 22 February 2010 17:32
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: nope.avi on Mon, 22 February 2010 18:35
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: R315r4z0r on Mon, 22 February 2010 18:39
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: Lone0001 on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:55
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: DRNG on Mon, 22 February 2010 19:04
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: R315r4z0r on Mon, 22 February 2010 20:49
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: Gen_Blacky on Mon, 22 February 2010 21:07
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: nopol10 on Tue, 23 February 2010 03:18
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: DRNG on Tue, 23 February 2010 05:53
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: Zion on Tue, 23 February 2010 03:12
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 23 February 2010 08:59
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: nopol10 on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:32
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: R315r4z0r on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:04
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: HaTe on Tue, 23 February 2010 17:35
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Tue, 23 February 2010 16:57
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Wed, 24 February 2010 06:57
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Wed, 24 February 2010 21:44
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: cmatt42 on Wed, 24 February 2010 22:31
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: Tiesto on Wed, 24 February 2010 07:02
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: R315r4z0r on Wed, 24 February 2010 11:52
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: Spoony on Wed, 24 February 2010 12:12
		Re: What should C&C3 have been? By: R315r4z0r on Wed, 24 February 2010 13:03

Previous Topic:	Renegade-X: Nod Invasion on Hourglass :)
Next Topic:	wrong phone calls

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Sep 16 13:47:10 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00973 seconds