|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401010 is a reply to message #400984] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 15:12   |
dr3w2
Messages: 485
Registered: September 2006
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
or.. JUST MAYBE there were some extreme islamic people sourced from afganistan and saudi arabia that disagreed with western culture. I know it's a long shot but it is possible! 
n00bstories Server Administrator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401013 is a reply to message #400984] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 15:23 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Shall I get out my tin-foil hat? Any minute now we'll be hearing from the "we never went to the moon" crowd that think the gub'mint used missiles and C4 that were somehow altered to look like commercial airliners and jet fuel explosions instead. Oh, and we mustn't forget how they evacuated all the jews from the towers, or how nobody *really* died at the Pentagon (they're at Area 51 with the alien bodies and the mind control rays).
Or we could wait a few more days, have a moment of silence, and get on with our lives.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401018 is a reply to message #401015] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 16:56 |
 |
GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:35 |
| DarkKnight wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 15:03 |
he was able to pull off 9/11.
|
What does this mean? Have you seen the footage of him being told the nation is under attack? He sat there like a kid who can't find his mom at a playground.
| DarkKnight wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 15:03 |
Of course Clinton who was just in office he in now way had anything to do with it
|
What?
|
I see what he was going for, he just said it wrong.
He was sarcastically implying that there's no way Bush could have pulled off such an "intricate" plan (that middle school dropouts could apparently "uncover"), especially when most of the same people say he's dumb as a load of bricks and what have you.
His second "point" was that any involvement Bush had, Clinton probably had just as much, all things considered.
But that's a hypothetical argument to an already retarded theory, so...
Toggle Spoiler| Scrin wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:22 |
| cAmpa wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 12:45 |
Scrin, stop pming people to get the building bars.
|
FUCK YOU AND THIS SHIT GAME WITH YOUR SCRIPTS!!! I HAVE ASKING YOU AND ANOTHER NOOBS HERE ABOUT HELP WITH THAT BUILDING ICONS FEATURES FOR YEARS, BUT YOU KEEP IGNORING ME AND KEEP WRITE SHIT, SO BURN YOU AND YOUR ASSLICKERS FRIENDS, THIS TIME I'M NOT COME BACK!!!!!!!!!   
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401021 is a reply to message #401018] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 17:14 |
 |
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 16:56 |
I see what he was going for, he just said it wrong.
He was sarcastically implying that there's no way Bush could have pulled off such an "intricate" plan (that middle school dropouts could apparently "uncover"), especially when most of the same people say he's dumb as a load of bricks and what have you.
|
That's really the debate amongst Bush-haters. Is he evil or is he stupid? Those are two distinct camps which you shouldn't confuse. Although, if they're still discussing it, they're hopeless cases and you can confuse them all you want.
| GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 16:56 |
His second "point" was that any involvement Bush had, Clinton probably had just as much, all things considered.
|
Uh, no. Not even close. It's not the about the actual events of 9/11 -- After all, who could've predicted it? (Although there are quite a few intelligence reports that have come out since then that point to a bit of negligence on the federal governments part). It's mostly the misguided actions Bush took because of the events of 9/11 that would be his big mistake. Clinton had no part in that, now did he?
And I have to ask, what the hell is it with blaming everything on the Clintons? Can't Republicans grow a pair and own up to their mistakes?
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401024 is a reply to message #401021] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 17:36 |
|
GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Quote: |
Uh, no. Not even close. It's not the about the actual events of 9/11 -- After all, who could've predicted it? (Although there are quite a few intelligence reports that have come out since then that point to a bit of negligence on the federal governments part). It's mostly the misguided actions Bush took because of the events of 9/11 that would be his big mistake. Clinton had no part in that, now did he?
And I have to ask, what the hell is it with blaming everything on the Clintons? Can't Republicans grow a pair and own up to their mistakes?
|
I'm saying that's what DarkKnight's hypothetical argument to the "LAWL GOVERNMENT DID 9/11 JEWS ETC" bullshit. If Bush was involved, Clinton had just as much involvement. Although I don't see why that's relevant, considering it's all bullshit anyway...
Toggle Spoiler| Scrin wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:22 |
| cAmpa wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 12:45 |
Scrin, stop pming people to get the building bars.
|
FUCK YOU AND THIS SHIT GAME WITH YOUR SCRIPTS!!! I HAVE ASKING YOU AND ANOTHER NOOBS HERE ABOUT HELP WITH THAT BUILDING ICONS FEATURES FOR YEARS, BUT YOU KEEP IGNORING ME AND KEEP WRITE SHIT, SO BURN YOU AND YOUR ASSLICKERS FRIENDS, THIS TIME I'M NOT COME BACK!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401027 is a reply to message #401024] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 17:56 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 17:36 |
I'm saying that's what DarkKnight's hypothetical argument to the "LAWL GOVERNMENT DID 9/11 JEWS ETC" bullshit. If Bush was involved, Clinton had just as much involvement. Although I don't see why that's relevant, considering it's all bullshit anyway...
|
While I get what you're trying to do, I don't get why you're dragging Clinton into this. Why not blame it on Carter while you're at it?
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401032 is a reply to message #401018] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 18:17 |
 |
DarkKnight
Messages: 754
Registered: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:56 |
| Dover wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:35 |
| DarkKnight wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 15:03 |
he was able to pull off 9/11.
|
What does this mean? Have you seen the footage of him being told the nation is under attack? He sat there like a kid who can't find his mom at a playground.
| DarkKnight wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 15:03 |
Of course Clinton who was just in office he in now way had anything to do with it
|
What?
|
I see what he was going for, he just said it wrong.
He was sarcastically implying that there's no way Bush could have pulled off such an "intricate" plan (that middle school dropouts could apparently "uncover"), especially when most of the same people say he's dumb as a load of bricks and what have you.
His second "point" was that any involvement Bush had, Clinton probably had just as much, all things considered.
But that's a hypothetical argument to an already retarded theory, so...
|
btw your hired as my new editor. yes that's what i was trying to say lol
No I don't believe for one second Bush or Clinton had anything to do with it. I'm going with the wild conspiracy theory that andr3w282 posted about. What I was trying to say is if your going to blame Bush who was only in office for a few months then blame the president before him as well. Don't see why he would be excluded.
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401033 is a reply to message #401032] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 18:22 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| DarkKnight wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:17 |
What I was trying to say is if your going to blame Bush who was only in office for a few months then blame the president before him as well. Don't see why he would be excluded.
|
Hey, good thinking! But why stop there? Let's blame the two presidents before that, too! This is all Reagan's fault!!1!
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401035 is a reply to message #401034] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 18:25 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:22 |
If there WERE any kind of conspiracy, almost every single president would have to have been in on it.
|
Because all presidents share the same ideologies and goals, right?
By this same logic, everything Obama has done these first few months in his presidency that you Republicans hate so much can be directly placed at Bush's feet.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
[Updated on: Mon, 31 August 2009 18:26] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 9/11 [message #401040 is a reply to message #401036] |
Mon, 31 August 2009 18:33 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| DarkKnight wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:29 |
ok let me ask it a different way.
bush had just come into office when 9/11 hit. then the conspiracies fly about how it was bush behind the scenes doing it all. why does Clinton get a pass?
|
You make it sound as if it was days after his inauguration. Bush was already in power for almost a year by September 11th, 2001. That's enough time for any Clinton-era staff (Which you Republicans HAET so much) to be removed and replaced by Bush staff.
Clinton gets a "pass" because he had nothing to do with anything. He isn't involved at all and the only reason his name is being brought up is because conservatives like yourself, Mr. ZIMMER, and Rush Limbawwww have a pathological need to paint the Clinton family as the root of all evil. It's fucking pathetic.
| DarkKnight wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:32 |
I didnt hit edit cause i figured Dover was ready to pounce on my latest comment.
|
lol.
| DarkKnight wrote on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:32 |
Like that isnt happening??? Just recently Obama said he was still trying to clean up the mess the previous president left behind. I'd like to know when it becomes Obama's mess.
|
It becomes his mess when he does something retarded to cause a mess, like say taking a budget surplus and pissing it away on a pointless war or tax cuts to the wealthy.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
[Updated on: Mon, 31 August 2009 18:35] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
