| Star Wars (new v old) [message #397750] |
Wed, 12 August 2009 15:15  |
cnc95fan
Messages: 1260
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Which Star Wars editions are better?[ 28 votes ] |
| 1. |
Old ones (Episode IV-VI) |
 19 / 68% |
| 2. |
New Ones (Episodes I-III) |
9 / 32% |
Which ones do you think are better?
| Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 27 April 2008 15:50 |
I say a personal fanning of the genitals would be awesome.
|
RA3 AUTOMATICLY SUCKS
www.battlefordune.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397759 is a reply to message #397750] |
Wed, 12 August 2009 16:54  |
 |
slosha
Messages: 1540
Registered: September 2008
Location: North Dakota FTW
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
The original ones of course. I found it to rather distracting when they started using CGI for the aliens. They should have stuck to costumes.
The road I cruise is a bitch now, baby.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397760 is a reply to message #397750] |
Wed, 12 August 2009 17:32 |
 |
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
The new ones were a mindfuck because all the shit from episodes 1-3 looked better than episodes 4-6. The other two strikes were that the new ones had Jar Jar, and that he wasn't brutally murdered for our enjoyment.
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397778 is a reply to message #397750] |
Wed, 12 August 2009 20:58 |
|
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
You're saying a trilogy of films made in the late 70's and early 80's have 'fail graphics?' What'd you expect them to look like? :/
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397784 is a reply to message #397772] |
Wed, 12 August 2009 21:38 |
|
slosha
Messages: 1540
Registered: September 2008
Location: North Dakota FTW
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| GoodOneDriver wrote on Wed, 12 August 2009 22:28 |
lol how can you like it?
its fail graphics , characters , story , effects
(i havnt seen the new ones)
|
The force is weak within you, and that is why you shall beg for your life before I kill you with my bare hands.
The road I cruise is a bitch now, baby.
[Updated on: Wed, 12 August 2009 21:44] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397785 is a reply to message #397772] |
Wed, 12 August 2009 21:39 |
 |
u6795
Messages: 1261
Registered: March 2006
Location: Maryland
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| GoodOneDriver wrote on Wed, 12 August 2009 23:28 |
lol how can you like it?
its fail graphics , characters , story , effects
(i havnt seen the new ones)
|
Get out of the fucking internet. You are no longer welcome here.
yeah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397794 is a reply to message #397750] |
Wed, 12 August 2009 22:30 |
 |
[NE]Fobby[GEN]
Messages: 1377
Registered: July 2004
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
They both had their ups and downs. The old ones were more fun to watch, but I felt some parts were long and overdone (especially in episode 4 and 6).
As for the new ones, I don't think episode 1 or 2 were that good. I loved episode 3 though, that may actually be my favourite Star Wars movie.
Unreal Tournament 3 Total Conversion to C&C: Renegade
Check out Renegade X Today!
Mod Wars Veteran
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397875 is a reply to message #397750] |
Thu, 13 August 2009 17:24 |
 |
R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
I liked them all pretty equally... except III. That one was by far the best of the series.
But each movie has their moments where you just can't get enough of that scene.
I - Pod race
II - Clone Reinforcements on Geonosis
III - "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"
IV - Assault on the Death Star
V - Battle of Hoth
VI - Finale
[Updated on: Thu, 13 August 2009 17:24] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397940 is a reply to message #397750] |
Fri, 14 August 2009 20:17 |
 |
Altzan
Messages: 1586
Registered: September 2008
Location: Tennessee
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
It seemed to me that, for each new movie, the Jedi were raised higher and higher up on a pedestal. In Episodes 2 and 3, Jedi were really powerful, whereas in Episodes 4,5,6 Luke was able to become a half-decent Jedi in a short time.
Just pointing something out.
I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker. ~Voltaire
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #397995 is a reply to message #397750] |
Sat, 15 August 2009 16:26 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
The original films, by far.
You know, because the cast could act. They were cliche, they were campy, but the characters had good chemistry and good lines. Special effects don't make good films, people do.
Ewan MacGregor, IMHO, was the only saving grace of the prequels. The handful of reprised roles were a nice touch, and Samuel L. Jackson was fun to watch, but the rest of the acting was wooden and the chemistry was nonexistent. Many of the effects came across as shoehorned in, existing lore was completely disregarded (hot tip, Lucas- you may be the creator, but you can't just let people publish fiction for more than two decades then throw it all out the window), and the camp- of which there was much- was decidely not of the good variety. Anakin blows up giant starship by mistake? WTF? "Roger Roger?" Fuck you, Lucas.
Nevermind that the entire "plot" of the second prequel can be summed up thusly: WWWWAAAAAAANNNNNGGGGSSSSSTTTT!!!!!111!1!1!!!1oneoneoneeleventyshiftone!!!
And don't even get me started on the retconning inflicted upon the original movies after the prequels came out. That there was no DVD release before those three abortions of cinematic spooge is a horrible tragedy.
Pfeh.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
[Updated on: Sat, 15 August 2009 16:27] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Star Wars (new v old) [message #398076 is a reply to message #398001] |
Sun, 16 August 2009 10:20 |
|
Altzan
Messages: 1586
Registered: September 2008
Location: Tennessee
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| R315r4z0r wrote on Sat, 15 August 2009 19:14 |
As for the point about Luke becoming a Jedi really quickly: You have to remember, he is a descendant of the force himself. Anakin never had a father. His mother simply had him with no male intervention. (A virgence in the force). Although Luke had a mother, his father was born from the force, therefore Luke is a direct decedent of the force itself.
As such, he is able to harness and use it much more naturally than others. What might take another apprentice years of training, Luke could probably have a natural talent for. Also the hard trials he had to endure (like facing his father and the emperor himself)
However, that's not to say that Luke is considered a Jedi master. He becomes the last remaining living force wielding knight after Yoda dies of old age. Luke's own natural morals help him along his ascendancy as well. (Being a Jedi isn't simply about wielding the force, it's about knowing how life works and how justice should be served to preserve peace in the galaxy.)
Also, don't forget the time laps between episode V and episode VI. The entire time he was training.
Another way to think of it:
The Jedi way didn't just spawn out of nothingness. Someone or group had to have come up with the organization. Thought up the rules and standards and taught it to others. Luke just has to do that same thing and come up with the order on his own.
|
 Good summary.
I also thought this was pretty interesting:
| http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Lightsaber |
In the early incarnations of the Star Wars story, lightsabers were not exclusive to the Jedi and Sith. In fact, they were very mundane, being used by Rebel and Imperial troopers alike. George Lucas then limited the weapon to only the Jedi & Sith so as to give the weapon a unique feel.
In the early rough draft of Star Wars in 1974, lightsabers were called "laserswords."
|
I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker. ~Voltaire
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
