| Your penis removed durning surgery? [message #383234] |
Tue, 28 April 2009 12:29  |
 |
The Party
Messages: 546
Registered: February 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
lol What would you do if this had happened to you
| Quote: |
Kentucky man who claims his penis was removed without his consent during what was supposed to be a circumcision has sued the doctor who performed the surgery.
Phillip Seaton, 61, and his wife are seeking unspecified compensation from Dr. John M. Patterson and the medical practice that performed the circumcision for "loss of service, love and affection." The Seatons also are seeking unspecified punitive damages from Patterson and the medical practice, Commonwealth Urology.
A woman who answered the phone at Commonwealth Urology would not take a message for the doctor Thursday. But the Seaton's attorney said the doctor's post-surgical notes show the doctor thought he detected cancer and removed the penis. Attorney Kevin George said a later test did detect cancer.
"It was not an emergency," George told The Associated Press on Thursday. "It didn't have to happen that way."
Seaton was having the procedure on Oct. 19, 2007, to better treat inflammation.
The lawsuit filed earlier this month in state court claims Patterson removed Seaton's penis without consulting either Phillip or Deborah Seaton, or giving them an opportunity to seek a second opinion.
The couple also sued the anesthesiologist, Dr. Oliver James of Shelbyville, claiming he used a general anesthesia even though Seaton asked that it not be administered.
A message left at Commonwealth Urology's corporate office in Lexington was not immediately returned Thursday. A message left for James also was not immediately returned.
The Seatons' suit is similar to one in which an Indianapolis man was awarded more than $2.3 million in damages after he claimed his penis and left testicle were removed without his consent during surgery for an infection in 1997.
SOURCE
|
War is Peace.
Ignorance is Strength.
Freedom is Slavery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Your penis removed durning surgery? [message #383399 is a reply to message #383392] |
Wed, 29 April 2009 06:30  |
 |
Goztow
Messages: 9738
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
|
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe |
|
|
| ErroR wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 14:06 |
| SSnipe wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 01:03 |
That doctor needs to lose his license, and goto jail, cancer or not not his choice
|
he could die cuz of it.. the cancer could spread, doctor did right in my opinnion, altho wouldn't want this to happen to anyone
|
It's not as if it would have mattered if he had waited another day or two.
You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Your penis removed durning surgery? [message #383413 is a reply to message #383234] |
Wed, 29 April 2009 07:46 |
 |
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Regardless, I'd say the loss of an organ (Especially one with the...ahem...special consideration of the penis) makes the risk in getting permission first worthwhile. You stand nothing to lose by waiting.
For the record, it turned out that in this case, there was no cancer all along.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Your penis removed durning surgery? [message #383506 is a reply to message #383443] |
Wed, 29 April 2009 16:43 |
Muad Dib15
Messages: 839
Registered: July 2007
Location: behind a computer screen,...
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| ErroR wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 12:24 |
| Dover wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 17:46 |
Regardless, I'd say the loss of an organ (Especially one with the...ahem...special consideration of the penis) makes the risk in getting permission first worthwhile. You stand nothing to lose by waiting.
For the record, it turned out that in this case, there was no cancer all along.
|
lol, poor man.
|
+1
The manliest post on the internet
|
|
|
|
| Re: Your penis removed durning surgery? [message #383547 is a reply to message #383441] |
Wed, 29 April 2009 20:31 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Doitle wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 10:20 |
| Dover wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 09:46 |
Regardless, I'd say the loss of an organ (Especially one with the...ahem...special consideration of the penis) makes the risk in getting permission first worthwhile. You stand nothing to lose by waiting.
|
Yeah, except your life potentially. I already stated why they would not want to put someone under twice when they could put them under once. The risks are too high.
|
Perhaps, but the choice was not the doctor's to make.
Again, let me note that in this case there was no cancer. In the persuit of prolonging this man's life, his doctor has essentially destroyed this man's quality of life. Which of the two is more important?
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Your penis removed durning surgery? [message #383660 is a reply to message #383547] |
Thu, 30 April 2009 06:52 |
|
The Party
Messages: 546
Registered: February 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 22:31 |
| Doitle wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 10:20 |
| Dover wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 09:46 |
Regardless, I'd say the loss of an organ (Especially one with the...ahem...special consideration of the penis) makes the risk in getting permission first worthwhile. You stand nothing to lose by waiting.
|
Yeah, except your life potentially. I already stated why they would not want to put someone under twice when they could put them under once. The risks are too high.
|
Perhaps, but the choice was not the doctor's to make.
Again, let me note that in this case there was no cancer. In the persuit of prolonging this man's life, his doctor has essentially destroyed this man's quality of life. Which of the two is more important?
|
Go jump off a cliff zertual for your random posts. Also Dover how did they destroy his ability to live life really buy taking his penis away at age 70 or whatever his age is. I mean your not going to use it for well one of its main pruposes after such an old age.
Just meaning he has to sit now when he goes to the bathroom I guess.
War is Peace.
Ignorance is Strength.
Freedom is Slavery.
[Updated on: Thu, 30 April 2009 06:53] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Your penis removed durning surgery? [message #383726 is a reply to message #383660] |
Thu, 30 April 2009 15:23 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| MasterEvolution wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 06:52 |
| Dover wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 22:31 |
| Doitle wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 10:20 |
| Dover wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 09:46 |
Regardless, I'd say the loss of an organ (Especially one with the...ahem...special consideration of the penis) makes the risk in getting permission first worthwhile. You stand nothing to lose by waiting.
|
Yeah, except your life potentially. I already stated why they would not want to put someone under twice when they could put them under once. The risks are too high.
|
Perhaps, but the choice was not the doctor's to make.
Again, let me note that in this case there was no cancer. In the persuit of prolonging this man's life, his doctor has essentially destroyed this man's quality of life. Which of the two is more important?
|
Go jump off a cliff zertual for your random posts. Also Dover how did they destroy his ability to live life really buy taking his penis away at age 70 or whatever his age is. I mean your not going to use it for well one of its main pruposes after such an old age.
Just meaning he has to sit now when he goes to the bathroom I guess.
|
Old people have sex too, believe it or not. And even if they don't it's something with a lot of sentimental value. People who have stuff like this happen to them (Even when they actually do have cancer) often feel like less of a man.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Your penis removed durning surgery? [message #383736 is a reply to message #383726] |
Thu, 30 April 2009 16:48 |
 |
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 23:23 |
| MasterEvolution wrote on Thu, 30 April 2009 06:52 |
| Dover wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 22:31 |
| Doitle wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 10:20 |
| Dover wrote on Wed, 29 April 2009 09:46 |
Regardless, I'd say the loss of an organ (Especially one with the...ahem...special consideration of the penis) makes the risk in getting permission first worthwhile. You stand nothing to lose by waiting.
|
Yeah, except your life potentially. I already stated why they would not want to put someone under twice when they could put them under once. The risks are too high.
|
Perhaps, but the choice was not the doctor's to make.
Again, let me note that in this case there was no cancer. In the persuit of prolonging this man's life, his doctor has essentially destroyed this man's quality of life. Which of the two is more important?
|
Go jump off a cliff zertual for your random posts. Also Dover how did they destroy his ability to live life really buy taking his penis away at age 70 or whatever his age is. I mean your not going to use it for well one of its main pruposes after such an old age.
Just meaning he has to sit now when he goes to the bathroom I guess.
|
Old people have sex too, believe it or not. And even if they don't it's something with a lot of sentimental value. People who have stuff like this happen to them (Even when they actually do have cancer) often feel like less of a man.
|
Legendary discription of an old man's cock.
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
