Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Overclocking
Overclocking [message #379158] Tue, 07 April 2009 12:37 Go to next message
The Party is currently offline  The Party
Messages: 546
Registered: February 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Karma: 0
Colonel
How safetly do you think I could overclock a Celeron E1400 Dual Core at 2.00 Ghz?

War is Peace.
Ignorance is Strength.
Freedom is Slavery.
Re: Overclocking [message #379160 is a reply to message #379158] Tue, 07 April 2009 12:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gen_Blacky is currently offline  Gen_Blacky
Messages: 3250
Registered: September 2006
Karma: 1
General (3 Stars)
depends on how much cooling you have , i would think it would be safe and you could get 2.6 ghz at low temps.

http://s18.postimage.org/jc6qbn4k9/bricks3.png
Re: Overclocking [message #379162 is a reply to message #379160] Tue, 07 April 2009 12:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
The Party is currently offline  The Party
Messages: 546
Registered: February 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Karma: 0
Colonel
I am just using the out-of-the-box fan that came with the cpu, however I was thinking of upgrading it to a better fan. But what do you think the max Ghz I could get out of it without having a negative effect.

War is Peace.
Ignorance is Strength.
Freedom is Slavery.
Re: Overclocking [message #379172 is a reply to message #379158] Tue, 07 April 2009 16:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cmatt42 is currently offline  cmatt42
Messages: 2057
Registered: July 2004
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Overclocking is always going to have a negative effect. Even with an excellent cooler, you're going to shorten your chip's lifespan.

But anyway, everyone's situation is different when it comes to overclocking. You have to have a decent aftermarket cooler, yes, but you must also be aware of your case's ambient temperature, the temperature of the room that the machine is in, your PSU's power, etc. Basically, increase your clocks little by little and see how stable your machine is. If it starts crashing or bluescreening, clock it back down.


Re: Overclocking [message #379187 is a reply to message #379172] Tue, 07 April 2009 19:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
The Party is currently offline  The Party
Messages: 546
Registered: February 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Karma: 0
Colonel
I tried that I got it up to 4.0 Ghz just fine but I am wanting to know if I overclocked it to 3.0 ghz or even 3.5 ghz how long would it last?

War is Peace.
Ignorance is Strength.
Freedom is Slavery.
Re: Overclocking [message #379195 is a reply to message #379158] Tue, 07 April 2009 20:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
_SSnipe_ is currently offline  _SSnipe_
Messages: 4121
Registered: May 2007
Location: Riverside Southern Califo...
Karma: 0
General (4 Stars)
Lol For mine I have the side case off and a 20 inch fan blowing right into the pc at all times it is on

how much could mine clock?

I have an amd athlon x2 64 3800+
Re: Overclocking [message #379213 is a reply to message #379158] Wed, 08 April 2009 02:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9738
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Aren't celeron chips shitty in any case? Or has that changed?

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: Overclocking [message #379230 is a reply to message #379213] Wed, 08 April 2009 05:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
luv2pb is currently offline  luv2pb
Messages: 1488
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Not everything is as it appears
Untouchable
cmatt42 wrote on Tue, 07 April 2009 19:41

Overclocking is always going to have a negative effect. Even with an excellent cooler, you're going to shorten your chip's lifespan.

That is relative to what you are doing and how stupid you are. The average processor gets replaced before it dies anyways. To say you are shortening the life span to 10 years when it is going to be replace in 2 doesn't really mean shit.

Goztow wrote on Wed, 08 April 2009 05:25

Aren't celeron chips shitty in any case? Or has that changed?

shitty yes ... but you can over clock the shit out of them


N00bstories Director Of Operations
Re: Overclocking [message #379237 is a reply to message #379158] Wed, 08 April 2009 06:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9738
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Ain't shit² still shit?

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: Overclocking [message #379248 is a reply to message #379213] Wed, 08 April 2009 08:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
The Party is currently offline  The Party
Messages: 546
Registered: February 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Karma: 0
Colonel
Goztow wrote on Wed, 08 April 2009 04:25

Aren't celeron chips shitty in any case? Or has that changed?


Well a normal celeron sucks ass, but a dual core celeron does a really good job, that is what I am using now. Well my dual core celeron seems to be doing better than my core 2 duo processor. But yes you can get a very high speed out of a celeron dual core with very little temp increase, I have been doing my reading.


War is Peace.
Ignorance is Strength.
Freedom is Slavery.
Re: Overclocking [message #379371 is a reply to message #379158] Thu, 09 April 2009 10:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chuck Norris is currently offline  Chuck Norris
Messages: 312
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
The Celeron should have never been made a dual core. The Pentium Dual-core was the Celeron version of a dual core (A Pentium Dual-core is just a Core 2 with less L2 cache). Now, you have two Celerons, the actual Celeron and the Pentium Dual-core. The latter comes with L2 cache in sizes of 2MB or 3MB total, or 1MB or 1.5MB per core, and the actual Celeron comes with 1MB L2 cache total, or 512k per core.

Since there were small differences between 2MB and 4MB L2 cache, and even larger differences between 2MB and 4MB, you can imagine the hurt such a low cache puts on the architecture. That being said, they aren't bad chips, but considering the very small cost difference between a dual core Celeron and a Pentium Dual-core, there's no reason to go with the former. The cost difference between the single core Celeron and the Pentium Dual-core was generally small anyway. Intel simply made it dual core to complete their whole lineup to multi-core.


When the Boogeyman goes to sleep every night, he checks his closet for Chuck Norris.

Chuck Norris is the reason why Waldo is hiding.

When Chuck Norris does a pushup, he isn’t lifting himself up, he’s pushing the Earth down.

Chuck Norris can slam a revolving door.
Re: Overclocking [message #380450 is a reply to message #379371] Wed, 15 April 2009 08:22 Go to previous message
The Party is currently offline  The Party
Messages: 546
Registered: February 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Karma: 0
Colonel
Wow, all for more money and fame...

War is Peace.
Ignorance is Strength.
Freedom is Slavery.
Previous Topic: wtf
Next Topic: Fast & Furious
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Dec 02 05:36:24 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00812 seconds