| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #37438] |
Thu, 07 August 2003 19:55   |
 |
yahoo
Messages: 109
Registered: July 2003
Location: usa
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Homey |
Med, mammys are too slow.
|
so..........wich tank did ya pick?
You want some!!
WOL sign in-yahoow duh!
be back for a month:)
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #37770] |
Fri, 08 August 2003 22:51 |
Homey
Messages: 1084
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Mediun by far. Meds are easy to headshot infantry while mammys are alot harder.
Homey
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #37875] |
Sat, 09 August 2003 08:20 |
|
yahoo
Messages: 109
Registered: July 2003
Location: usa
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
yea the mammy is harder cuz the dot reticle in front chages cuz theres 2 barrels its like this
(. ) then after that one it chages to the other barrel ( .) and that fire fast so it even hard cuz theres recoil
You want some!!
WOL sign in-yahoow duh!
be back for a month:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #38226] |
Sun, 10 August 2003 12:10 |
Delta Xvii
Messages: 20
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
I like anti-armor infantry myself but if it came down to using one of the two, I would pick the Medium Tank. Its not like I don't like the mammoth tank or anything, its just that I'm too impatient with that slow son of a bitch .I think you should only use the Mammoth tank in certain situations too. Like supportng meds in field control or the like.
A major morale downer is Nod stealing a mammy. for some reason, GDI either acts franticly to take it back/destroy it, or they're just screwed altogether.
"I didn't come to play, I came to win!"
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #38526] |
Mon, 11 August 2003 10:40 |
Homey
Messages: 1084
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Meds are alot easier to headshot with. Not many people headshot infantry with them anyways.
Homey
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #38644] |
Mon, 11 August 2003 18:42 |
|
yahoo
Messages: 109
Registered: July 2003
Location: usa
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
med tank is good for feild control and mammy is good for a rush its really important for the mammy to have hotties or engeneer support
You want some!!
WOL sign in-yahoow duh!
be back for a month:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #39621] |
Fri, 15 August 2003 11:16 |
Delta Xvii
Messages: 20
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Actually, both are good for rushes. The mammy draws alot of fire from the meds so they can start the rush. Once the mammies get through they can lend a hand with their explosive firepower.
"I didn't come to play, I came to win!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #40379] |
Mon, 18 August 2003 11:20 |
Delta Xvii
Messages: 20
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
I've noticed that its eaiser to win on mesa with GDI than Nod. When it comes to the numbers game, GDI will own anybody. Although Nod can strike pretty hard on mesa as well. Its anybodies game!
"I didn't come to play, I came to win!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #43033] |
Tue, 26 August 2003 22:17 |
Renegade1
Messages: 83
Registered: April 2003
Location: --
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
|
mammys are stronger. they are for n00bs who want 2 lose there team ladder games thought, were only good ir ur playing a small clanner and u want 2 comp on like under or field.
|
|
|
|
| A med tank and a mammy tank!? [message #48882] |
Wed, 24 September 2003 00:56 |
 |
t1000n1
Messages: 41
Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
???Mammy shitty?? well i can take on 2 stanks or 2 light tanks or a combination of both pretty easy in my mammys. Ya just have to be smart about stuff.
Just when u thought u seen the last of me.....ILL BE BACK!!!
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
i have a bad laser mouse
