unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #376915] |
Fri, 20 March 2009 21:28 |
Rocko
Messages: 833 Registered: January 2007 Location: Long Beach, California
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
unlock gnome topic yes/no[ 32 votes ] |
1. |
yes, i laike gnomes |
25 / 78% |
2. |
no dont unlock (i might be racist) |
3 / 9% |
3. |
all these moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain, time to die |
4 / 13% |
I think the gnome topic was unjustly and unnecessarily closed by carrier. it is a great topic with lots of history behind it, and a staple of the renegade forums general discussion. talk about taking the rules too seriously when locking that topic. what do ya'll think?
black and proud
|
|
|
|
|
Re: unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #376924 is a reply to message #376915] |
Fri, 20 March 2009 22:04 |
|
luv2pb
Messages: 1489 Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Not everything is as it appears Untouchable |
|
|
after spamming crimson, blazer and twitter I finally found doitle in #n00bstories to fix this injustice.
Quote: | [00:02:38] [+BlazBot] [Twitter]: @luv2pb (*****): An outrage has occured at renforums that requires immediate attention!
|
N00bstories Director Of Operations
[Updated on: Fri, 20 March 2009 22:04] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #376942 is a reply to message #376934] |
Sat, 21 March 2009 04:02 |
|
Dreganius
Messages: 780 Registered: April 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Crimson wrote on Sat, 21 March 2009 21:16 | I have never and will never post in the topic, but I don't see why it should ever be locked.
|
LIES!
Crimson wrote on Mon, 25 September 2006 01:23 |
j_ball430 wrote on Sun, 24 September 2006 08:02 |
Dave Anderson wrote on Sun, 24 September 2006 10:35 |
trooprm02 wrote on Sun, 24 September 2006 08:07 | Wow, wtf is this?
How did an unregistered person post?
|
This thread goes way back. And at that time, you were most likely able to post as a guest.
|
Wrong. It's because those posts were from the old Westwood forums (if I'm not mistaken), and all the names of the original posters were still intact, but they all had the member number of -1, and then when Crimson switched to FUD just recently, it must not have accomodated that and given everybody (from the old forums) "Anonymous".
|
Yep, unfortunately that is the case. If I can ever come up with a better way to do it, I'll find a way to re-import them. phpBB supported anonymous posting with a filled-in username which worked, but FUD doesn't.
(For the record, this is my first and only post in this thread, and hopefully it will be my last.)
|
TEH PR00FZ:
http://www.renegadeforums.com/index.php?t=msg&goto=221823&rid=22555
and I'm screenshotting it!!! MUAHAHAHA
Heresy grows from idleness!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #377077 is a reply to message #376944] |
Sat, 21 March 2009 19:46 |
|
luv2pb
Messages: 1489 Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Not everything is as it appears Untouchable |
|
|
Crimson wrote on Sat, 21 March 2009 06:15 | Oh fuck... at least it was "on topic" (as it were)...
|
I beg to differ - your post had nothing to do with roofgnomes.
N00bstories Director Of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #377199 is a reply to message #376915] |
Sun, 22 March 2009 14:20 |
|
R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836 Registered: March 2005 Location: New York
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
That's not what I mean.
Rules are meant to protect the people of this forum. Not punish them.
Why restrict their use of something when it doesn't cause any problems or conflict? Even though it says in the rules to not allow it, it is saying it under the contents of protecting people on the forum from having to suffer from some form of conflict that derives out of it.
If no one is suffering from some form of conflict derived out of 'breaking the rule' then there really is no purpose or meaning behind enforcing it in that particular scenario.
[Updated on: Sun, 22 March 2009 14:20] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #377217 is a reply to message #376915] |
Sun, 22 March 2009 17:11 |
|
futura83
Messages: 1285 Registered: July 2006 Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
Carrier has a point.
Why necro such a thread to spam in it when there is a whole section devoted to spam and a new thread can simply be made?
But at the same time it doesn't harm anyone either, but then, the rules are rules and should be enforced really.
Interestingly enough, since it's been unlocked 2 people have posted in it...why did you campaign for it to be opened if no-ones gonna post in it?
I say hall of fame it TBH.
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
|
Re: unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #377239 is a reply to message #376915] |
Mon, 23 March 2009 00:26 |
|
Goztow
Messages: 9743 Registered: March 2005 Location: Belgium
Karma: 14
|
General (5 Stars) Goztoe |
|
|
I'm personally sick of seeing people spam the hell out of that topic, for no other reason but the fact that it has a lot of pages. I requested it to be moved to HOF and locked it for the time being.
If there's another valid reason needed: so I don't need to read the spam in it every time.
You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
|
|
|
Re: unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #377243 is a reply to message #377226] |
Mon, 23 March 2009 02:38 |
|
futura83
Messages: 1285 Registered: July 2006 Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
cheesesoda wrote on Mon, 23 March 2009 03:27 | Putting the thread in the HoF would ruin it. It's an epic thread, but the tradition is that it remains unlocked. It would lose some of its significance if it was to be put in the HoF.
insert_brain_here, the thread ISN'T supposed to get continuous posts. The thread only should be posted in for a couple of days where it sinks back to oblivion only to be revived several months down the line.
|
Is 'insulting' me supposed to make your post more valid or your e-peen hard?
I'm not even gonna start discussing the value of it being 'epic' cos i truly don't care if it's 'epic' or not.
Oh, and i'm sure when the topic was created the real intention for it was to be necroed every so often.
I know what we should do, let this thread die and post in it a few months down the line, then let it die again, then post in it again another few months down the line. See where i'm going with that? Or, you could even necro a thread from the last page with spam in it and keep doing it every so often.
If this thread isn't put in the HoF, at the very least it should go in the spam section.
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: unlock the gnome topic - vote [message #377257 is a reply to message #377251] |
Mon, 23 March 2009 06:46 |
|
Goztow
Messages: 9743 Registered: March 2005 Location: Belgium
Karma: 14
|
General (5 Stars) Goztoe |
|
|
Frontier Psychiatrist wrote on Mon, 23 March 2009 13:54 |
Goztow wrote on Mon, 23 March 2009 01:26 | I'm personally sick of seeing people spam the hell out of that topic, for no other reason but the fact that it has a lot of pages. I requested it to be moved to HOF and locked it for the time being.
If there's another valid reason needed: so I don't need to read the spam in it every time.
|
IF YOU DONT WANT TO READ THE SPAM IN IT, WHY DONT YOU NOT CLICK ON THE TOPIC.
|
AS A GLOBAL MODERATOR IT IS KIND OF MY JOB TO READ AS MANY OF THE TOPICS THAT CAN CONTAIN SPAM, NO? IF I'D IGNORE TOPICS THAT MAY CONTAIN SPAM, THEN I'D DO A PRETTY BAD JOB AT BEING A MODERATOR, NO?
ALSO CAPS LOCK IS COOL.
You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
|
|
|
|