|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: so Obama won [message #357400 is a reply to message #357394] |
Wed, 05 November 2008 15:40   |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Quote: |
Oh and he is only getting rid of Ak47's and assault rifles not pistols, so no he won't get rid of the 2nd Amendment.
|
There's so much wrong with that last sentence that I don't even know where to start. Clearly you haven't looked at Obama's voting record, his political ties, the Second Amendment, or the *political* definition of the term "Assault Weapon." I'm not gonna bring the whole pro/anti-gun argument in here, but at the very minimum would you please inform yourself a little bit better? Ignorance is doing enough damage to this country already.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
[Updated on: Wed, 05 November 2008 15:40] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: so Obama won [message #357401 is a reply to message #357397] |
Wed, 05 November 2008 15:45 |
 |
u6795
Messages: 1261
Registered: March 2006
Location: Maryland
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| madrackz wrote on Wed, 05 November 2008 17:36 |
haha Bush that fucking Bonghole totally failed, hope they will burn hiss ass, house and family down 
|
You are a dumbass.
No, there was no nicer or more polite way to put that.
Why in hell would they burn down the white house, first of all..?
yeah
[Updated on: Wed, 05 November 2008 15:46] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: so Obama won [message #357403 is a reply to message #357384] |
Wed, 05 November 2008 15:58 |
 |
GoArmy44
Messages: 265
Registered: October 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| R315r4z0r wrote on Wed, 05 November 2008 14:27 |
Yea, but it's the President's final consent as commander in chief.
|
Not if there is a super majority which in most cases there has been. After the declaration is passed it is his DUTY to carry out that declaration since he is the executor of the law. Constitutionally besides the threat of a veto the President has little power over declarations of war.
Reconcilia Rem Publicam!
[Updated on: Wed, 05 November 2008 20:52] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: so Obama won [message #357441 is a reply to message #357285] |
Wed, 05 November 2008 20:50 |
Genesis2001
Messages: 1397
Registered: August 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Though the president can send troops out other countries without declaring war. 
But they have like 6-month deployment span or something. I can't remember >_<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: so Obama won [message #357468 is a reply to message #357285] |
Wed, 05 November 2008 22:36 |
Rocko
Messages: 833
Registered: January 2007
Location: Long Beach, California
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
ok racism has been conquered i love u all white people
black and proud
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: so Obama won [message #357554 is a reply to message #357285] |
Thu, 06 November 2008 11:00 |
 |
Ryan3k
Messages: 363
Registered: September 2004
Location: USA
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
It's the War Powers Act passed during Nixon's Administration. Nixon vetoed it and Congress managed to override the veto.
In a nutshell, it states that the President must alert Congress within 48 hours of sending troops overseas, and troops cannot stay abroad in combat more than 6 months without approval by Congress. Congress has been loathe to enforce the WPA in the past.
A Path Beyond
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
. Oh and he is only getting rid of Ak47's and assault rifles not pistols, so no he won't get rid of the 2nd Amendment. 
