Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Whatever.
Whatever. [message #333927] Sat, 07 June 2008 20:19 Go to next message
HeavyX101- Left is currently offline  HeavyX101- Left
Messages: 633
Registered: April 2008
Location: WindowsJail=ZipFolder
Karma: 0
Colonel
No Message Body

This account is no longer being active.

[Updated on: Tue, 08 July 2008 09:09]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Ban ACK [message #333928 is a reply to message #333927] Sat, 07 June 2008 20:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
u6795 is currently offline  u6795
Messages: 1261
Registered: March 2006
Location: Maryland
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Just because he hurt your feelings doesn't mean we have to ban him.

Go away.


yeah
Re: Ban ACK [message #333929 is a reply to message #333928] Sat, 07 June 2008 20:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HeavyX101- Left is currently offline  HeavyX101- Left
Messages: 633
Registered: April 2008
Location: WindowsJail=ZipFolder
Karma: 0
Colonel
He never hurt my feelings. I wanna see how he feels about this thread, and then he would know how people feel about it when he posts them. There is a moral! Smile

This account is no longer being active.
Re: Ban ACK [message #333930 is a reply to message #333929] Sat, 07 June 2008 20:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BlueThen is currently offline  BlueThen
Messages: 2402
Registered: February 2006
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Ok, this is too far. I say a mod just closes this or moves the thread to spam. I think we've had enough of these useless "ban" threads.
Re: Ban ACK [message #333931 is a reply to message #333927] Sat, 07 June 2008 20:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aircraftkiller is currently offline  Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
I've been banned before, it's only a minor setback.
Re: Ban ACK [message #333932 is a reply to message #333931] Sat, 07 June 2008 20:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ryu is currently offline  Ryu
Messages: 2833
Registered: September 2006
Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

Aircraftkiller wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 04:32

I've been banned before, it's only a minor setback.


For Internet domination, that is.


Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.
Re: Ban ACK [message #333941 is a reply to message #333930] Sat, 07 June 2008 20:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HeavyX101- Left is currently offline  HeavyX101- Left
Messages: 633
Registered: April 2008
Location: WindowsJail=ZipFolder
Karma: 0
Colonel
BlueThen wrote on Sat, 07 June 2008 23:25

Ok, this is too far. I say a mod just closes this or moves the thread to spam. I think we've had enough of these useless "ban" threads.

function OnReply(pID, Type, Message)
  if message == "move this thread to spam" then
    DeleteMember("BlueThen")
      InputRenforums("msg HAHA!")
  end
end

Some of my coding skilz Smile


This account is no longer being active.
Re: Ban ACK [message #333967 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 01:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ghostshaw is currently offline  Ghostshaw
Messages: 709
Registered: September 2006
Karma: 0
Colonel
I suggest we ban the next person that starts a "ban <insert nick here>" thread.

BlackIntel Administrator
Re: Ban ACK [message #333969 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 01:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Reaver11 is currently offline  Reaver11
Messages: 888
Registered: April 2007
Karma: 1
Colonel
Just ban Heavy for beeing very stupid. Dude common I see no reason that ack would be banned now I did rather see you beeing banned for making sugestif polls

[Updated on: Sun, 08 June 2008 01:43]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Ban ACK [message #333986 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 03:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jnz is currently offline  jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
This obviously backfired on the OP.
Re: Ban ACK [message #334005 is a reply to message #333941] Sun, 08 June 2008 05:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cnc95fan is currently offline  cnc95fan
Messages: 1260
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
HeavyX101 wrote on Sat, 07 June 2008 22:50

BlueThen wrote on Sat, 07 June 2008 23:25

Ok, this is too far. I say a mod just closes this or moves the thread to spam. I think we've had enough of these useless "ban" threads.

function OnReply(pID, Type, Message)
  if message == "move this thread to spam" then
    DeleteMember("BlueThen")
      InputRenforums("msg HAHA!")
  end
end

Some of my coding skilz Smile

I don't know what language that's supposed to be. But obviosuly this backfired on you. Fail.
endl;


Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 27 April 2008 15:50

I say a personal fanning of the genitals would be awesome.


RA3 AUTOMATICLY SUCKS
www.battlefordune.co.uk
Re: Ban ACK [message #334007 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 05:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
renalpha is currently offline  renalpha
Messages: 1000
Registered: January 2007
Location: Holland - Zuid-Holland - ...
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
lulz voted Ban me instead for being a fuckhead

i srsly meant myself though xD


Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 18 February 2011 23:50

I figured some people will still go LOLOLOL STARVING CATS LOOOOLZ UR A FAG or some dumb shit like that. Thanks for not disappointing! Smile

Re: Ban ACK [message #334031 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 09:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Canadacdn is currently offline  Canadacdn
Messages: 1830
Registered: September 2005
Location: Temple of Nod
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
PLECOS MASTER
5
Re: Ban ACK [message #334033 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 09:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CarrierII is currently offline  CarrierII
Messages: 3804
Registered: February 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Yeah. It's almost Pascal, but lacks ;'s.

It uses the C "==" comparison operator, but uses the Pascal type "end" rather than the C "}"

So, it's really crap psuedocode.


Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
Re: Ban ACK [message #334046 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 09:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ghostshaw is currently offline  Ghostshaw
Messages: 709
Registered: September 2006
Karma: 0
Colonel
Its a BASIC like language.

BlackIntel Administrator
Re: Ban ACK [message #334048 is a reply to message #334005] Sun, 08 June 2008 09:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HeavyX101- Left is currently offline  HeavyX101- Left
Messages: 633
Registered: April 2008
Location: WindowsJail=ZipFolder
Karma: 0
Colonel
cnc95fan wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 08:09

HeavyX101 wrote on Sat, 07 June 2008 22:50

BlueThen wrote on Sat, 07 June 2008 23:25

Ok, this is too far. I say a mod just closes this or moves the thread to spam. I think we've had enough of these useless "ban" threads.

function OnReply(pID, Type, Message)
  if message == "move this thread to spam" then
    DeleteMember("BlueThen")
      InputRenforums("msg HAHA!")
  end
end

Some of my coding skilz Smile

I don't know what language that's supposed to be. But obviosuly this backfired on you. Fail.
endl;

MAybe lua language. And i dont really care if you banned me from bfd.com because it sucks. My bro quit that mod because it sucked.


This account is no longer being active.
Re: Ban ACK [message #334050 is a reply to message #334046] Sun, 08 June 2008 09:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nightma12 is currently offline  Nightma12
Messages: 2593
Registered: August 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Category Moderator
Ghostshaw wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 11:43

Its a BASIC like language.


Thats not BASIC either =/

'==' is not BASIC

and putting 'End' in the middle of the code halts the program and terminates it... lol so it not that either =]
Re: Ban ACK [message #334061 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 10:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrãçķz is currently offline  mrãçķz
Messages: 3069
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Permabanned for trying and failing DDoS
lol Nightma, you never worked with lua
Re: Ban ACK [message #334063 is a reply to message #334050] Sun, 08 June 2008 10:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
CarrierII is currently offline  CarrierII
Messages: 3804
Registered: February 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Nightma12 wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 17:57

Ghostshaw wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 11:43

Its a BASIC like language.


Thats not BASIC either =/

'==' is not BASIC

and putting 'End' in the middle of the code halts the program and terminates it... lol so it not that either =]


Yeah, it'd read "end if" and "end sub" off the top of my head.


Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
Re: Ban ACK [message #334087 is a reply to message #334048] Sun, 08 June 2008 13:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cnc95fan is currently offline  cnc95fan
Messages: 1260
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
HeavyX101 wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 11:46

And i dont really care if you banned me from bfd.com because it sucks. My bro quit that mod because it sucked.

Did I even once mention BFD in this thread? No? Then why bring it up?


Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 27 April 2008 15:50

I say a personal fanning of the genitals would be awesome.


RA3 AUTOMATICLY SUCKS
www.battlefordune.co.uk
Re: Ban ACK [message #334088 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 14:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
u6795 is currently offline  u6795
Messages: 1261
Registered: March 2006
Location: Maryland
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
This thread makes me absolutely ashamed to be a member of this forum.

yeah
Re: Ban ACK [message #334089 is a reply to message #334088] Sun, 08 June 2008 14:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HeavyX101- Left is currently offline  HeavyX101- Left
Messages: 633
Registered: April 2008
Location: WindowsJail=ZipFolder
Karma: 0
Colonel
u6795 wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 17:13

This thread makes me absolutely ashamed to be a member of this forum.

Silence! I KHILL U


This account is no longer being active.
Re: Ban ACK [message #334090 is a reply to message #334088] Sun, 08 June 2008 14:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cnc95fan is currently offline  cnc95fan
Messages: 1260
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
u6795 wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 16:13

This thread makes me absolutely ashamed to be a member of this forum.

It's not the thread, it's the people, but in this instance.. the person.
@ "Heavy"
What is a KHILL? No one finds your sad humor any bit funny.


Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 27 April 2008 15:50

I say a personal fanning of the genitals would be awesome.


RA3 AUTOMATICLY SUCKS
www.battlefordune.co.uk
Re: Ban ACK [message #334091 is a reply to message #333927] Sun, 08 June 2008 15:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nope.avi is currently offline  nope.avi
Messages: 601
Registered: December 2007
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
Colonel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uwOL4rB-go
KHILL


http://i.imgur.com/APEYl.gif
Re: Ban ACK [message #334092 is a reply to message #334048] Sun, 08 June 2008 15:09 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
danpaul88 is currently offline  danpaul88
Messages: 5795
Registered: June 2004
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
HeavyX101 wrote on Sun, 08 June 2008 17:46

MAybe lua language.



You don't know what language your own code is written in? Not so 'skilz'ful then are we?


http://steamsignature.com/card/1/76561197975867233.png

[Updated on: Sun, 08 June 2008 15:10]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: EA admits that they lack
Next Topic: New World Order
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Nov 03 00:56:27 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01351 seconds