| Re: Should the community have a "say"? [message #313945 is a reply to message #313861] |
Sat, 26 January 2008 22:39   |
 |
[NE]Fobby[GEN]
Messages: 1377
Registered: July 2004
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Rocko wrote on Sat, 26 January 2008 17:26 |
No because just like with the United States, the majority is full of total idiots and retards and can not be trusted, and shouldn't be trusted with the ability to make any important decisions.
Crimson, Blazer, and the other admins are doing a decent job at moderating. The very same public wanting moderation are the ones who are spamming pleco pictures and doing retarded things like that.
|
I think this is the first intelligent thing you've ever said.
Unreal Tournament 3 Total Conversion to C&C: Renegade
Check out Renegade X Today!
Mod Wars Veteran
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Should the community have a "say"? [message #314132 is a reply to message #313748] |
Sun, 27 January 2008 17:57 |
 |
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Your proposals are silly (Except for the ban poll. That'd be kinda neat), and your complaints about moderation are sillier. No amount of moderation will catch 100% of the spam immediately. That said, the current moderation is doing fine. We just need to get some of these ban polls going and get rid of the less-desireable element (Scrin, TEO, HORQWER, RenAlpha, etc...).
That said, this isn't a Crimocracy, it's a Crimtatorship. If you're unhappy with these forums, you're free to start your own.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
