|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: And yet you people still say the American Army isn't capable of mass rapes [message #311255 is a reply to message #310028] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 19:11   |
prasp
Messages: 59
Registered: July 2007
Location: 666 I'm not telling you
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
The title also implies, as mentioned before, that this rape was ordered by the American Army. However the rape was the action of a single man not acting under orders from the American Army, hence it cannot be considered that the American Army committed rape, but that a single male commited rape, and it just happens to be the case that he is in the American Army. If a Tesco employee (or other supermarket chain) commits rape, that does not mean Tesco commits rape.
|
Was I implying it? No, you only heard what you wanted to hear and, hundreds of individual soldiers after the invasion was over decided to take the aforementioned action stated above, and their higher ups not only did nothing about it but secretly encouraged it, similar to what happened in Poland and the Soviet Union during WW2.
| Quote: |
In future, please ensure the title of your topic is relevant to the actual post you make, and please refrain from being a complete and utter twat. Thank you.
|
Why don't you stop being sheep?
| Quote: |
He also says that these "mass rapings" are rarely mentioned in the media... I wonder how he knows they're actually happening?
|
The internet?
[Updated on: Tue, 15 January 2008 19:47] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: And yet you people still say the American Army isn't capable of mass rapes [message #311260 is a reply to message #311255] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 19:23 |
 |
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| prasp wrote on Tue, 15 January 2008 18:11 |
Was I implying it? No, you only heard what you wanted to hear.
|
You're right. You didn't imply it. You outright said it. It's still in the time "...capable of MASS rapes" The term "mass" means many, multiple, more than one.
| prasp wrote on Tue, 15 January 2008 18:11 |
Did I say that officers and generals personally ordered them to rape Iraq woman? No. However, hundreds of individual soldiers after the invasion was over decided to take the aforementioned action stated above, and their higher ups not only did nothing about it but secretly encouraged it, similar to what happened in Poland and the Soviet Union during WW2.
|
Yes. They secretly encouraged it. Which is why pimply-faced teenagers are writing about it in forums founded on completely unrelated topics. THATS how secret the orders were, right?
| prasp wrote on Tue, 15 January 2008 18:11 |
Why don't you stop being sheep?
|
Prasp, please stop giving the rest of us with grieviences a bad name. Some of us like to think critically and support our arguements, and you're fucking it up for us.
| prasp wrote on Tue, 15 January 2008 18:11 |
The internet?
|
Everything on the internet is true.
EVERYTHING
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: And yet you people still say the American Army isn't capable of mass rapes [message #311279 is a reply to message #310028] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 20:05 |
prasp
Messages: 59
Registered: July 2007
Location: 666 I'm not telling you
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
Yes. They secretly encouraged it. Which is why pimply-faced teenagers are writing about it in forums founded on completely unrelated topics. THATS how secret the orders were, right?
|
No, but considering the anti-Muslim attitude that occurred shortly after 911, it is very likely that is what happened.
| Quote: |
Prasp, please stop giving the rest of us with grieviences a bad name. Some of us like to think critically and support our arguements, and you're fucking it up for us.
|
No actually, I was just acting like the typical conservative who would post mindless posts on how America is the best country in the world.
| Quote: |
Everything on the internet is true.
EVERYTHING
|
No, but this article is more credible than Fox News.
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/HAS505A.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: And yet you people still say the American Army isn't capable of mass rapes [message #311294 is a reply to message #310028] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 20:23 |
prasp
Messages: 59
Registered: July 2007
Location: 666 I'm not telling you
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
May I ask why? The grammar and lack of revision makes it look on par with a middle school student.
|
And your not smart enough to infer that English isn't his native tongue?
| Quote: |
I only glanced at the page when I saw that and decided I didn't want to waste my time.
|
Like you actually read the Iraq constitution under Saddam Hussein, which ironically the US supported until he invaded Kuwait.
| Quote: |
A typical Conservative doesn't make mindless posts.
|
This topic proves otherwise.
Also read Muad Diab's and Sn1per74's posts.
|
|
|
|
| Re: And yet you people still say the American Army isn't capable of mass rapes [message #311319 is a reply to message #311279] |
Tue, 15 January 2008 21:40 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
[quote title=prasp wrote on Tue, 15 January 2008 19:05]| Quote: |
No, but considering the anti-Muslim attitude that occurred shortly after 911, it is very likely that is what happened.
|
So, we've gone from "GOVERNMENT ORDERS MARINES TO RAPE PPL!!1!" to "This one isolated rape incident occured between two members of the marines, and I, prasp, have this giant flimsy theory that perhaps this could be more common that previously thought. Maybe."
[quote title=prasp wrote on Tue, 15 January 2008 19:05]| Quote: |
No actually, I was just acting like the typical conservative who would post mindless posts on how America is the best country in the world.
|
Call it what you will. I con't care. But knock this shit off.
[quote title=prasp wrote on Tue, 15 January 2008 19:05]
I disagree.
Not to say Fox News is credible, but neither is that article.
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: And yet you people still say the American Army isn't capable of mass rapes [message #311367 is a reply to message #311255] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 01:40 |
 |
danpaul88
Messages: 5795
Registered: June 2004
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
| prasp wrote on Wed, 16 January 2008 02:11 |
| Quote: |
The title also implies, as mentioned before, that this rape was ordered by the American Army. However the rape was the action of a single man not acting under orders from the American Army, hence it cannot be considered that the American Army committed rape, but that a single male commited rape, and it just happens to be the case that he is in the American Army. If a Tesco employee (or other supermarket chain) commits rape, that does not mean Tesco commits rape.
|
Was I implying it? No, you only heard what you wanted to hear and, hundreds of individual soldiers after the invasion was over decided to take the aforementioned action stated above, and their higher ups not only did nothing about it but secretly encouraged it, similar to what happened in Poland and the Soviet Union during WW2.
|
Yes, you implied that, because that's what you wrote. Your title clearly says the American Army is capable of mass rapes, by which you are saying the American Army has ordered it's soldiers to go around raping people.
| prasp wrote on Wed, 16 January 2008 02:11 |
| Quote: |
In future, please ensure the title of your topic is relevant to the actual post you make, and please refrain from being a complete and utter twat. Thank you.
|
Why don't you stop being sheep?
|
I am not even sure what your talking about here....
[Updated on: Wed, 16 January 2008 01:41] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: And yet you people still say the American Army isn't capable of mass rapes [message #311383 is a reply to message #311294] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 03:14 |
 |
Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| prasp wrote on Tue, 15 January 2008 21:23 |
| Quote: |
May I ask why? The grammar and lack of revision makes it look on par with a middle school student.
|
And your not smart enough to infer that English isn't his native tongue?
|
So? A truly credible source isn't limited to the research of an individual. Individuals are much more easily corrupt than groups. A truly credible source has an EDITOR to fix these mistakes. Otherwise they may be seen as...oh...let's say...bogus.
So while you say I'm not smart enough to infer that English isn't his first language, you fell prey to his words automatically without even the slightest hesitation because they sounded good to you. You forget that since this is research - There should be some evidence of sources. I see little to none outside the obscure, and this is just at first glance. No links to back up claims, and little by way of further elaboration to the author's vague statements.
And finally:
| Quote: |
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
|
[Updated on: Wed, 16 January 2008 03:15] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: And yet you people still say the American Army isn't capable of mass rapes [message #311384 is a reply to message #311383] |
Wed, 16 January 2008 03:24 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Jecht wrote on Wed, 16 January 2008 02:14 |
And finally:
| Quote: |
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
|
|
Ownt. 
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
