|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Election '08 [message #308148 is a reply to message #308124] |
Sat, 05 January 2008 23:51   |
 |
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Because I'm Canadian, I support McCain. I've even donated money to his campaign, and I can't even vote for the guy.
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Election '08 [message #308369 is a reply to message #308287] |
Sun, 06 January 2008 21:09 |
Sn1per74*
Messages: 939
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
McCain or Ron Paul. I'm a huge conservative republican and Giuliani is too much of a democrat for me. I hope to God that Hillary doesn't win. I would much rather have Obama over Hillary.
Creator: AoBFrost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Election '08 [message #308545 is a reply to message #308124] |
Mon, 07 January 2008 14:33 |
 |
cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
Without any questions in my mind, my vote is for Ron Paul. He's been my candidate since April, and I've been given no reason whatsoever to stop my support of him. If he doesn't win the Republican's nomination, my vote will either be given to the Libertarian Party candidate, as long as Hillary or Giuliani or Romney are not their respective party's candidates. If it's Hillary against Rudy or Mitt, I'm moving to Canada or starting a revolution (and I don't think I'd have any problems finding supporters of that). I will gladly choose Barack over Rudy or Mitt any day of the week, and I'm a conservative libertarian.
whoa.
[Updated on: Mon, 07 January 2008 14:35] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Election '08 [message #308606 is a reply to message #308373] |
Mon, 07 January 2008 17:51 |
Muad Dib15
Messages: 839
Registered: July 2007
Location: behind a computer screen,...
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| MWright967 wrote on Sun, 06 January 2008 22:22 |
| Sn1per74* wrote on Sun, 06 January 2008 22:15 |
| MWright967 wrote on Sun, 06 January 2008 22:11 |
| Sn1per74* wrote on Sun, 06 January 2008 23:09 |
McCain or Ron Paul. I'm a huge conservative republican and Giuliani is too much of a democrat for me. I hope to God that Hillary doesn't win. I would much rather have Obama over Hillary.
|
If Hilary or Obama wins, I'm moving to Canada. I am not fucking kidding. That would mean everything this country stands for would be a complete shit-in-the-basket.
|
|
And I'm BLACK. When a Black man doesn't want a Black guy as president, you should realize that something is wrong immedietly.
|
QTF
What sucks is that I'm going to be 17 this year, so I have to wait another 4 years to vote. Damn it.
Ron Paul is too much of a fanatic for me, I would have to say Fred Thompson, or Mitt Romney.
The problem is that both of them have personal baggage. Mitt is a Mormon (though that shouldn't matter, it seems to in this country) and Fred hasn't really done anything. McCain is a republican only with the war. Other than that, he is a democrat. Hillary ran the country in the 90s, I don't want to see her run it again.
The manliest post on the internet
[Updated on: Tue, 08 January 2008 14:33] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Election '08 [message #308623 is a reply to message #308606] |
Mon, 07 January 2008 19:31 |
|
cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
| Muad Dib15 wrote on Mon, 07 January 2008 19:51 |
Ron Paul is too much of a fanatic for me, I would have to say Fred Thompson, or Mitt Romey.
|
Constitutionalism is NOT fanaticism. They seem like radical ideals, but they're simple ideas of small government that everybody is afraid of for no real good reason. People are so used to big government, it scares them to imagine a world without such interference. It's like taking a blanket away from a small child. The child doesn't need the blanket, but it doesn't know anything else. The fact is, the child ends up being better off without it because now it doesn't have a disease-infested strip of fabric attached to its hand, it no longer slows the child down when playing, and the child learns to rely on himself to be confident rather than the blanket. The same goes for government, it's nothing but a disease-infested organization that doesn't really have a place playing a major part in one's every day life. Getting rid of it would certainly help the economy, and it would force Americans to rely on themselves (as they did for 150 years before the 1930s) instead of government.
whoa.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
