|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #302449 is a reply to message #302331] |
Tue, 11 December 2007 05:19   |
 |
Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
| razorblade001 wrote on Mon, 10 December 2007 13:58 |
That isn't racism... It is proven that large portions of races conduct themselves in a specific way or have specific characteristics. Also, if it is on a school application or a job application, it is probably something that is used to tell the board where you would be more comfortable. If you would be more comfortable with people you are more accustomed being around and what not.
It is more of a "get to know your personality better" thing that a racist thing.
|
where on earth did you get these ideas from?
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #302477 is a reply to message #302331] |
Tue, 11 December 2007 10:06 |
 |
PlastoJoe
Messages: 647
Registered: October 2005
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| razorblade001 wrote on Mon, 10 December 2007 13:58 |
| Jecht wrote on Mon, 10 December 2007 11:05 |
Racism exists because race is far too acknowledged in our society. I laugh at organizations that consider themselves "equal opportunity" yet still have that group box in their applications asking you to check what race you associate with the most. Especially Universities. If they were truly equal opportunity, the damn checkboxes wouldn't be there in the first place.
|
That isn't racism... It is proven that large portions of races conduct themselves in a specific way or have specific characteristics. Also, if it is on a school application or a job application, it is probably something that is used to tell the board where you would be more comfortable. If you would be more comfortable with people you are more accustomed being around and what not.
It is more of a "get to know your personality better" thing that a racist thing.
|
Also for survey purposes.
You may be a fundamentalist atheist if...
Toggle Spoiler
| Blazer wrote on Fri, 04 August 2006 18:53 |
If you wanna be a badass ex-marine law enforcment game programmer college graduate, then you can be! I'm just glad we don't see the other part of you where you join AOL chat rooms as "hotchik69" and cyber with guys while you spank off into a sock and then cry yourself to sleep on your cock-shaped pillow.
|
| tzarmind wrote on Sat, 06 January 2007 20:52 |
Not only did you immaturely edit what J_Ball said in your quote. But you fucking got in the irony truck and drove it straight off a cliff.
|
| Canadacdn wrote on Tue, 23 October 2007 12:04 |
California burns down every year. I think it's part of nature's cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #303215 is a reply to message #302002] |
Fri, 14 December 2007 22:50 |
newcheese
Messages: 24
Registered: June 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Rocko wrote on Sun, 09 December 2007 00:33 |
obama should become the president of the great united states of america
once a black man becomes prez we can finally prove that racism is over and then my people can start to take over
|
why would you want a democrat in power? all they do is take away your freedoms and higher taxes. who the hell wants that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #306348 is a reply to message #302002] |
Fri, 28 December 2007 20:54 |
prasp
Messages: 59
Registered: July 2007
Location: 666 I'm not telling you
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
why would you want a democrat in power? all they do is take away your freedoms and higher taxes. who the hell wants that?
|
So would the Republicans, only a lot faster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #306363 is a reply to message #302002] |
Fri, 28 December 2007 22:02 |
prasp
Messages: 59
Registered: July 2007
Location: 666 I'm not telling you
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
Right, so when George Bush decided to lower your taxes, you complained, but when clinton decided to raise them, you didn't say a word. You my friend, are a screwed up individual.
|
No, actually, he raised them significantly just so he can get more money to rape Iraqi woman, and raised the ceiling for getting the country into a record amount of debt.
And even though I don't care, Clinton actually eliminated your budget deficit that was greatly increased by Reagan and Bush 1.
And you still fail to answer the part about Republicans taking away your precious civil liberties that you apparently don't care about.
[Updated on: Fri, 28 December 2007 22:07] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #306425 is a reply to message #303215] |
Sat, 29 December 2007 06:19 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
| newcheese wrote on Fri, 14 December 2007 23:50 |
why would you want a democrat in power? all they do is take away your freedoms and higher taxes. who the hell wants that?
|
democrats take away your freedoms, but republicans don't?
ummmm... Patriot Act? death of habeas corpus? wiretapping? dismantling of the Constitution? rendition?
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
[Updated on: Sat, 29 December 2007 06:20] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #306499 is a reply to message #306363] |
Sat, 29 December 2007 13:35 |
 |
GoArmy44
Messages: 265
Registered: October 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| prasp wrote on Fri, 28 December 2007 23:02 |
| Quote: |
Right, so when George Bush decided to lower your taxes, you complained, but when clinton decided to raise them, you didn't say a word. You my friend, are a screwed up individual.
|
No, actually, he raised them significantly just so he can get more money to rape Iraqi woman, and raised the ceiling for getting the country into a record amount of debt.
And even though I don't care, Clinton actually eliminated your budget deficit that was greatly increased by Reagan and Bush 1.
And you still fail to answer the part about Republicans taking away your precious civil liberties that you apparently don't care about.
|
Man, if you stuck to using facts in your arguments, your opinion would have a lot more merit. You state very good points but "just so he can get more money to rape Iraqi women" makes you look like a moron.
| Quote: |
newcheese wrote on Fri, 14 December 2007 23:50
why would you want a democrat in power? all they do is take away your freedoms and higher taxes. who the hell wants that?
democrats take away your freedoms, but republicans don't?
ummmm... Patriot Act? death of habeas corpus? wiretapping? dismantling of the Constitution? rendition?
|
Habeas corpus started dying in the 90's...Clinton signed a law that placed limitations on Habeas corpus in the name of...you guessed it...anti-terrorism. I don't know why people argue for and against parties...as an Independent they all look the same to me.
Reconcilia Rem Publicam!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #307437 is a reply to message #302002] |
Wed, 02 January 2008 15:38 |
w0dka
Messages: 181
Registered: March 2006
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Everything's more useful then Bush as a president... if you dig a little bit... he has some strange connections to people i don't want to rule the USA ... and he is a supporter of the "schock strategie"
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #307703 is a reply to message #302002] |
Thu, 03 January 2008 18:42 |
prasp
Messages: 59
Registered: July 2007
Location: 666 I'm not telling you
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
Man, if you stuck to using facts in your arguments, your opinion would have a lot more merit. You state very good points but "just so he can get more money to rape Iraqi women" makes you look like a moron.
|
Ok you want facts?
Incidents like this basically go unreported by the press due to censorship by the Pentagon, and any soldier reporting any of this to their superior officers are likely to get silenced by their own comrades.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #307709 is a reply to message #307708] |
Thu, 03 January 2008 18:52 |
 |
Starbuzz
Messages: 2500
Registered: May 2007
Karma: 2
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
I agree partially with Prasp.
The thing is, what we see and hear is not what all there is to see and hear. There are lot of things going on the background that ordinary down-to-the-earth folks like us don't know about.
EDIT:
Another important thing to remember is that a conspiracy is not a conspiracy after a bit of truth is found to support it logically.
[Updated on: Thu, 03 January 2008 18:55] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: OBAMA for president [message #307711 is a reply to message #307709] |
Thu, 03 January 2008 19:15 |
 |
R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836
Registered: March 2005
Location: New York
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
No, a conspiracy is still a conspiracy no matter what proof you have weather to it existing or not. I think you mean to say a theory is only a theory until proved otherwise.
Conspiracy: Evil or unlawful plan created in secret by 2 or more people.
Theory: A proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
(An idea that isn't proved but uses real logic to back it up)
[Updated on: Thu, 03 January 2008 19:20] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
