Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » This should start an arguement.
Re: This should start an arguement. [message #281542 is a reply to message #281434] |
Wed, 29 August 2007 18:21 |
|
Jecht
Messages: 3156 Registered: September 2004
Karma:
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
Hey, I thought there was too much nut-stroking happening in this topic so I figured I'd give a little dissent for shits and giggles.
nikki6ixx wrote on Tue, 28 August 2007 20:40 | I reread the speech for the sixth time.
I can tell the author doesn't live anywhere near an ocean. What a pompous asshole. Maybe if the government actually did its job and built the proper infrastructure in order to stop the water from destroying peoples' homes and lives, Katrina would have been a much less severe situation. Calling some of America's poorest 'stupid' just goes to show what an ignorant fucktard the author is.
|
He's calling some of these people 'stupid' because even though they were given warning of an impending siege of water wind and whatever earthly hell a hurricane can conjure, many of them made naught an effort to seek better refuge and blatantly disregarded warning that their life was at risk.
I don't give a damn about the rest of your post, but these next two statements got me.
Quote: |
Quote: | You're incapable of seeing things through the long lens of history, the way our enemies do.
|
History?... maybe instead of looking to the past, YOU SHOULD BE LOOKING TOWARD THE FUTURE FOR CHRISSAKE!
|
This statement is one of the biggest piles of literary bullshit I've ever seen. Anyone who has ever been to High School History class could tell you what the consequences are for disregarding the past, even though the author didn't intend the message to deliver that type of message.
The Author likely meant that this process takes time, and most people are so caught up on deadlines that they believe nothing is getting done, just because they're not getting done now.
Quote: |
I really want to know who the author is. Probably some idiot in a Klan clubhouse, or in some shanty in Utah.
|
This quote made me laugh, simply because probably not five minutes prior to typing this little gem, you made reference to the problems that generalizing displays:
Quote: |
Calling some of America's poorest 'stupid' just goes to show what an ignorant fucktard the author is.
|
You kicked Mr. Irony right in the crown jewels there.
|
|
|
|
|
This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Rocko on Mon, 27 August 2007 23:14
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Renerage on Mon, 27 August 2007 23:15
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Rocko on Tue, 28 August 2007 16:31
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Jecht on Tue, 28 August 2007 01:09
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Starbuzz on Tue, 28 August 2007 01:58
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Starbuzz on Tue, 28 August 2007 12:59
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Memphis on Tue, 28 August 2007 09:33
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: z310 on Tue, 28 August 2007 13:52
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Jecht on Wed, 29 August 2007 18:21
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Jecht on Wed, 29 August 2007 21:03
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Starbuzz on Tue, 28 August 2007 21:22
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: prasp on Wed, 29 August 2007 13:57
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Rocko on Wed, 29 August 2007 22:29
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Jecht on Thu, 30 August 2007 01:43
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: nikki6ixx on Thu, 27 September 2007 21:54
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: ron paul on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:06
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: Jecht on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:39
|
|
|
Re: This should start an arguement.
By: ron paul on Wed, 03 October 2007 14:10
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Dec 02 04:33:20 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01135 seconds
|