Re: weed [message #273327 is a reply to message #272284] |
Sun, 15 July 2007 05:22   |
 |
OWA
Messages: 647 Registered: May 2006 Location: W3D Hub
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |

|
|
It's banned now, keep it that way. Apart from cannabis (or is it cocaine) that is supposed to be good for your joints. It could be prescribed that way.
[Updated on: Sun, 15 July 2007 05:23] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: weed [message #274023 is a reply to message #273947] |
Wed, 18 July 2007 07:40   |
 |
cheesesoda
Messages: 6507 Registered: March 2003 Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |

|
|
renohol wrote on Wed, 18 July 2007 00:50 | Cant u all see its all about the roots of communication.
While we were still walking on 4 legs we perfected the art of communicating "BAD" or "DANGER" to each other to prevent one another from being eaten.
Weed is just a plant yet through various brain washing techniques wealthy business men have giving Cannibus bad names like "Dope", or "Weed", or "Marijuana", while laughing all the way to the bank as the price increased and the competition went to jail for years and years.
A great example is Baseball and steriods...
For decades nobody cared that huge muscled bound giants hit a ball with a stick very very far. Then the president used the "DANGER" communication technique and all the media followed suit. Now public opinion has turned as we see the once hero as the now "BAD/DANGER" scapegoat. Who owns who?
|
I believe (most) people are more advanced than 4-legged creatures, and should be able to make decisions for themselves.
Businessmen gave cannabis those "bad" names? Are you smoking right now? I'm pretty sure most, if not all, of those nicknames are terms of endearment, and weren't created by wealthy businessmen, but by those doing the smoking.
As for the whole steroid issue, the dangers weren't known about steroids, and when they have been known, then there was a public outcry, not a warning by the President.
The reason why marijuana is illegal is because the government couldn't regulate it. They couldn't tax it, so it wasn't worth keeping legal.
whoa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: weed [message #276205 is a reply to message #273850] |
Mon, 30 July 2007 11:31   |
|
Romaner wrote on Tue, 17 July 2007 13:52 | smoking weed and doing cocaine are completely seperate things. smoking weed doesnt kill you, might make you a little dumber but hey there is a price for everything. but when you do harder drugs you are literraly fucking yourself over. on this i agree with you gbull. but putting the two in one sentence isnt right since one is like having beer for example. and the other is drinking rubbing alcohol. what im trying to say is weed and coke/crack/ectasy and all that other chemical shit is not even close to eachother. and me saying weed isnt that bad by no means is me supporting the other shit.
|
cocaine erodes the lining of your brain.
its quite marvelous really.
phew, and lets not forget how much dxm ive done in the past month.
damn.
|
|
|