Re: erikboxem [message #272992 is a reply to message #272990] |
Fri, 13 July 2007 10:42 |
|
futura83
Messages: 1285 Registered: July 2006 Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
cheesesoda wrote on Fri, 13 July 2007 18:39 |
sadukar09 wrote on Fri, 13 July 2007 13:27 |
Romaner wrote on Fri, 13 July 2007 12:00 |
One Winged Angel wrote on Fri, 13 July 2007 |
I don't follow or play renegade often, only really to test things.
|
sounds like something an AR mod leader would say
|
fixed AGAIN
|
Oh, shut the fuck up.
|
Hear hear!
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273010 is a reply to message #272907] |
Fri, 13 July 2007 12:29 |
Blast
Messages: 27 Registered: September 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Spoony wrote on Fri, 13 July 2007 00:33 |
Blast wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 18:22 | Sure it was his server. I bet I speak for most ppl in here in saying that we don't actually give a damn about what happens to his server. He owns it.
|
it WASN'T his server, it was an organised match against another community.
|
Ah, my mistake, I was under the impression that the match was in his server. Therefore we couldn't ban him there...
But okie dokie!
lol
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273024 is a reply to message #272082] |
Fri, 13 July 2007 15:15 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Forum Rules | Moderators: Respect the decisions of the moderators, they hold that position for good reason. If you have any serious complaints, contact Crimson or Blazer privately. Do not start a public bash-fest against a moderator you don't agree with.
Also keep in mind that you are not a moderator. You do not decide when threads are locked, posts are deleted, etc., and therefore should not post as such in threads. The "Report Message" and Private Message features are there for a reason.
|
Either way, I am moving this to the Heated Discussions forum.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273142 is a reply to message #273010] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 07:32 |
Duke
Messages: 5 Registered: July 2007 Location: Manchester, England
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Blast wrote on Fri, 13 July 2007 14:29 |
Spoony wrote on Fri, 13 July 2007 00:33 |
Blast wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 18:22 | Sure it was his server. I bet I speak for most ppl in here in saying that we don't actually give a damn about what happens to his server. He owns it.
|
it WASN'T his server, it was an organised match against another community.
|
Ah, my mistake, I was under the impression that the match was in his server. Therefore we couldn't ban him there...
But okie dokie!
lol
|
It was hosted on our server.
www.duke-gaming.com
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273143 is a reply to message #273142] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 07:42 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
Who hosted the community match has absolutely no relevance WHATSOEVER.
I guess if I'm playing a clanmatch and I'm providing the server, it's OK for me to cheat, right? Also fine for me to lie to my own clan about whether I'm cheating so they'll stick up for me?
Stupid geeks... anything to avoid seeing what everyone else knew from the start.
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273175 is a reply to message #273143] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 11:57 |
|
sadukar09
Messages: 2812 Registered: May 2007 Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Spoony wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 09:42 | Who hosted the community match has absolutely no relevance WHATSOEVER.
I guess if I'm playing a clanmatch and I'm providing the server, it's OK for me to cheat, right? Also fine for me to lie to my own clan about whether I'm cheating so they'll stick up for me?
Stupid geeks... anything to avoid seeing what everyone else knew from the start.
|
Spoony always says it all.
Quote: | [19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
Quote: | [22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273187 is a reply to message #272082] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 13:10 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
don't get me wrong... I have the utmost respect for anyone who's willing to host a server for clanmatches, community games, etc... I've got a bunch of 'em in my league and they have my thanks. But anyone who thinks they're allowed to cheat because of it is a FUCKING RETARD
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273193 is a reply to message #273187] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 13:31 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
Everyone on Erikboxem's side, EVERYONE, has been arguing completely backward...
to clarify that: arguing forwards is when you look at the situation and the facts, and then draw a conclusion based on those facts. That's what everyone is doing when they see the evidence that he cheated and the lies he told to try to get away with it. Conclusion: he's a cheater and a liar
Arguing backwards is when you draw your conclusion first and then look for facts that will support it. And the thing about people who argue backwards is when their 'facts' are proven wrong, they don't abandon the conclusion JUST BECAUSE there's absolutely nothing to support it - they just look for another 'fact' to support it.
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273201 is a reply to message #273143] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 14:14 |
Blast
Messages: 27 Registered: September 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Spoony wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 09:42 | Who hosted the community match has absolutely no relevance WHATSOEVER.
I guess if I'm playing a clanmatch and I'm providing the server, it's OK for me to cheat, right? Also fine for me to lie to my own clan about whether I'm cheating so they'll stick up for me?
Stupid geeks... anything to avoid seeing what everyone else knew from the start.
|
Ah, you seem to have misunderstood. I am in no way defending him, AT ALL.
I agree that everyone defending him has no reason to do so.
My point was simply that we cannot ban him from his own server.
Seeing as he has been banned from the RG network, what else can we do besides not play there and hope the dumbasses defending him don't play with us?
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273204 is a reply to message #273201] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 14:31 |
|
futura83
Messages: 1285 Registered: July 2006 Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
Blast wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 22:14 |
Spoony wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 09:42 | Who hosted the community match has absolutely no relevance WHATSOEVER.
I guess if I'm playing a clanmatch and I'm providing the server, it's OK for me to cheat, right? Also fine for me to lie to my own clan about whether I'm cheating so they'll stick up for me?
Stupid geeks... anything to avoid seeing what everyone else knew from the start.
|
Ah, you seem to have misunderstood. I am in no way defending him, AT ALL.
I agree that everyone defending him has no reason to do so.
My point was simply that we cannot ban him from his own server.
Seeing as he has been banned from the RG network, what else can we do besides not play there and hope the dumbasses defending him don't play with us?
|
We can spread his IP to server owners so they can chose to ban him...they even have a section for this on this message board...
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273217 is a reply to message #273204] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 16:12 |
Caveman
Messages: 2476 Registered: July 2005 Location: Wales, UK
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Ancient_and_forever wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 22:31 |
Blast wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 22:14 |
Spoony wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 09:42 | Who hosted the community match has absolutely no relevance WHATSOEVER.
I guess if I'm playing a clanmatch and I'm providing the server, it's OK for me to cheat, right? Also fine for me to lie to my own clan about whether I'm cheating so they'll stick up for me?
Stupid geeks... anything to avoid seeing what everyone else knew from the start.
|
Ah, you seem to have misunderstood. I am in no way defending him, AT ALL.
I agree that everyone defending him has no reason to do so.
My point was simply that we cannot ban him from his own server.
Seeing as he has been banned from the RG network, what else can we do besides not play there and hope the dumbasses defending him don't play with us?
|
We can spread his IP to server owners so they can chose to ban him...they even have a section for this on this message board...
|
Is that a change of heart I see now? So you agree that banning him from all the servers is a good thing and that he was CHEATING in a FunWar?
CarrierII wrote | BLUEHTHEN YOU AR NOT JUST A BIG CHEATAS AND YOU THE BIG HEAD JUST YOU USE FLY H4X FUCK YOU BIG CHEATAS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD YOU WANT I WRAUGHT THIS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD HEY IS 1 YEAR YOUR PROMESS A FLY HAX IN MULTIPLAYER AND IS DONT JUST TROOPRM02 I TELL IT ALL WHO REPLYER IN THIS FORUM YOU CHEATZ
Please don't make me type something like that again, not using puntuation is annoying.
|
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273223 is a reply to message #273217] |
Sat, 14 July 2007 16:27 |
|
futura83
Messages: 1285 Registered: July 2006 Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
Caveman wrote on Sun, 15 July 2007 00:12 |
Ancient_and_forever wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 22:31 |
Blast wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 22:14 |
Spoony wrote on Sat, 14 July 2007 09:42 | Who hosted the community match has absolutely no relevance WHATSOEVER.
I guess if I'm playing a clanmatch and I'm providing the server, it's OK for me to cheat, right? Also fine for me to lie to my own clan about whether I'm cheating so they'll stick up for me?
Stupid geeks... anything to avoid seeing what everyone else knew from the start.
|
Ah, you seem to have misunderstood. I am in no way defending him, AT ALL.
I agree that everyone defending him has no reason to do so.
My point was simply that we cannot ban him from his own server.
Seeing as he has been banned from the RG network, what else can we do besides not play there and hope the dumbasses defending him don't play with us?
|
We can spread his IP to server owners so they can chose to ban him...they even have a section for this on this message board...
|
Is that a change of heart I see now? So you agree that banning him from all the servers is a good thing and that he was CHEATING in a FunWar?
|
Is that sarcasm i smell?
Cos i hopefully have made it clear i don't like erikboxrem cos he cheated...
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273294 is a reply to message #272082] |
Sun, 15 July 2007 00:45 |
_SSnipe_
Messages: 4121 Registered: May 2007 Location: Riverside Southern Califo...
Karma: 0
|
General (4 Stars) |
|
|
LOL has anyone yet seen his serv irc? i looked today only had 6 ppl and the guy who stood up for him was now an owner hahaha
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273355 is a reply to message #273294] |
Sun, 15 July 2007 08:23 |
|
sadukar09
Messages: 2812 Registered: May 2007 Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
joe937465 wrote on Sun, 15 July 2007 02:45 | LOL has anyone yet seen his serv irc? i looked today only had 6 ppl and the guy who stood up for him was now an owner hahaha
|
I see bribery
Quote: | [19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
Quote: | [22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273356 is a reply to message #273355] |
Sun, 15 July 2007 08:29 |
|
futura83
Messages: 1285 Registered: July 2006 Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
sadukar09 wrote on Sun, 15 July 2007 16:23 |
joe937465 wrote on Sun, 15 July 2007 02:45 | LOL has anyone yet seen his serv irc? i looked today only had 6 ppl and the guy who stood up for him was now an owner hahaha
|
I see bribery
|
O RLY!?
(Post count +1)
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273367 is a reply to message #273294] |
Sun, 15 July 2007 09:36 |
Duke
Messages: 5 Registered: July 2007 Location: Manchester, England
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
joe937465 wrote on Sun, 15 July 2007 02:45 | LOL has anyone yet seen his serv irc? i looked today only had 6 ppl and the guy who stood up for him was now an owner hahaha
|
Listen if you don't you what your talking about don't say anything. Who is this person that just became a server owner because nobody can just do that. Name some names because I don't have a clue who you are talking about.
www.duke-gaming.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: erikboxem [message #273377 is a reply to message #272082] |
Sun, 15 July 2007 10:31 |
|
sadukar09
Messages: 2812 Registered: May 2007 Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Mod on a popular server>Admin on a shitty server
Which means he likes power, which also concludes HE wants power over people.
Quote: | [19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
Quote: | [22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|