Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » erikboxem
Re: erikboxem [message #272753 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 06:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OWA is currently offline  OWA
Messages: 647
Registered: May 2006
Location: W3D Hub
Karma: 0
Colonel

Well, if it's his server, let him do what he fucking wants with it.

Re: erikboxem [message #272754 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 06:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
He made some rules on his server, and these rules include "cheating forbidden"..
Re: erikboxem [message #272759 is a reply to message #272753] Thu, 12 July 2007 07:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

One Winged Angel wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 09:41

Well, if it's his server, let him do what he fucking wants with it.

He can do whatever he pleases with his server. We're not saying he can't. We're saying that he's still a cheater for doing it, and then he lied about the whole situation on top of it all.


whoa.
Re: erikboxem [message #272763 is a reply to message #272759] Thu, 12 July 2007 07:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Caveman is currently offline  Caveman
Messages: 2476
Registered: July 2005
Location: Wales, UK
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

One Winged Angel wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 14:41

Well, if it's his server, let him do what he fucking wants with it.


Understand this: It may have been his server and yes I agree he can do whatever he wants with it. If he wants to cheat in public on his own server then thats fine. It'll only make players not return there anymore. But as soon as you cheat in a FUNWAR (Don't you understand that...A FUNWAR) you cross the line.

He should be punished like the no good cheater that he is.


CarrierII wrote

BLUEHTHEN YOU AR NOT JUST A BIG CHEATAS AND YOU THE BIG HEAD JUST YOU USE FLY H4X FUCK YOU BIG CHEATAS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD YOU WANT I WRAUGHT THIS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD HEY IS 1 YEAR YOUR PROMESS A FLY HAX IN MULTIPLAYER AND IS DONT JUST TROOPRM02 I TELL IT ALL WHO REPLYER IN THIS FORUM YOU CHEATZ

Please don't make me type something like that again, not using puntuation is annoying.


http://r9.fodey.com/2158/bc450f3ca15045e9bdd7651fa49f3a0a.0.gif
Re: erikboxem [message #272785 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 09:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
QoQFrost is currently offline  QoQFrost
Messages: 10
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Guys stay to the topic please.

I still don't know how you dg people thinks thats its ok to cheat. Even if its just 5 seconds and you leave ITS STILL CHEATING. Why? Because you have a cheat on during the game. It doesn't matter how it's used, it's still cheating.

So please, don't even bother to post replies that says "BUT HE DIDN'T USE IT TO WIN THE GAME". No, don't post those kind of replies, it'll just make you stupid and make us laugh.

Re: erikboxem [message #272789 is a reply to message #272733] Thu, 12 July 2007 09:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
One Winged Angel wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 13:46

Dammit, the stupidity of some people here is unbearable.

Why should he be banned if he has not done anything to you personally and he wasn't doing any intentional harm to other players? I agree that cheats are bad, but without a spectator mode or something (like MP-Gaming's server) what was there to use to root out the cheat? IRC logs are good but con-crete proof is more substantial in an argument to back up the log.

I believe erik acted in a perfectly acceptable way since he has the authority to do so. Any of you saying "well does that mean we can cheat to find cheaters" are wrong, since you don't have the right to do so on their server. Since erik is an official on the server, I would see that it is his right to use what methods he can to root out cheaters. Although, he should think a bit more next time before acting so rashly.

Give him a slap on the wrist and send him on his way. Banning is too extreme for this case.

It is his server is it not? Or am I mistaken here. I find it perfectly acceptable if it is on his server. Otherwise I take back my previous comment.

Logs are too long, so I didn't read. I'm just vouching an opinion based on what I know.

Needs Saberhawk's anticheat..... It blocks 90% of renegade nastys. Pity it is clientside though :\

Well, if it's his server, let him do what he fucking wants with it.

OK, read this slowly and carefully.

1. It didn't happen in his public server. It was an organised community match. If the leader of the opposite team wasn't informed beforehand about the fact the leader of each team is supposedly "allowed" to use cheats - and he clearly wasn't - he DOESN'T have the authority to use it.
2. This is the important part:
HE LIED TO YOU AND HIS COMMUNITY ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED

HE SAID HE LEFT THE GAME TO TURN ON THE CHEAT FOR ITS SPECTATOR QUALITIES - HE WAS LYING TO YOU, LOGS HAVE PROVEN THIS. HE WAS PROBABLY LYING ABOUT THE "CHEATER" ON THE OTHER TEAM TOO, SINCE NOT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE HAS BEEN POSTED TO SUPPORT IT OTHER THAN THE WORD OF SOMEONE WHO HAS PROVEN HE WILL LIE TO HIS OWN COMMUNITY TO MANIPULATE THEM INTO SUPPORTING HIM AFTER HE WAS CAUGHT CHEATING


Don't post again until you've read and understood the reality of that post ^^

Just to repeat something:
Spoony wrote

If he did leave the game briefly, then he may be telling the truth.

If he didn't, then he's not only a cheater but he's also lied to his own community so they'll risk their own reputations to stick up for him, which is very nearly (but not quite) as pathetic as actually cheating.


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
Re: erikboxem [message #272790 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 09:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
QoQFrost is currently offline  QoQFrost
Messages: 10
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Couldn't say it better myself
Re: erikboxem [message #272793 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 09:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

I'll paraphrase what Spoony said in his big, red letters, so there's no misunderstanding (though, I can't see how there would be).

1. He lied to his community and us.
2. All we have is his word.
3. If he lied, which logs proved he did, his word means nothing because he has the potential to continue to lie.


whoa.
Re: erikboxem [message #272804 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Commandosky is currently offline  Commandosky
Messages: 19
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
everyone understands now what all of our guy's are saying

every evening(in my timedistrict) is the server of DG full, so it doesn't say anything that a server owner has cheat during a fw
the normal players aren't interrested in the story about a server owner who is cheating

it's bad what he has done, but just leave it,
do what you feelings is saying



http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg214/Commandosky/FullCommando.jpg
Re: erikboxem [message #272806 is a reply to message #272804] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
Commandosky wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 12:14

everyone understands now what all of our guy's are saying

every evening(in my timedistrict) is the server of DG full, so it doesn't say anything that a server owner has cheat during a fw
the normal players aren't interrested in the story about a server owner who is cheating

it's bad what he has done, but just leave it,
do what you feelings is saying



You don't care that he cheated?
You don't care that he lied to everyone in your community so you would look stupid by defending someone who was obviously guilty?

Is it not more reasonable to suggest that you guys have tried to cover it up at DG forums? As soon as the truth comes out that Erik was lying to you right from the start, it's all "it's over people make mistakes move on!", right?


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
Re: erikboxem [message #272811 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Commandosky is currently offline  Commandosky
Messages: 19
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
yes, i do care that he has cheated and he regret that

that's enough for me, but not for you i see

we don't have spoken alot about the problem on the forums

just move on


http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg214/Commandosky/FullCommando.jpg

[Updated on: Thu, 12 July 2007 10:24]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272812 is a reply to message #272811] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Romaner is currently offline  Romaner
Messages: 355
Registered: January 2007
Location: edmonton, canada
Karma: 0
Commander
Commandosky wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 11:23

yes, i do care that he has cheated and he regret that

that's enough for me, but not for you i see

just move on



but any cheater can say he is sorry and that he regrets cheating...

all he really regrets is being caught cheating
Re: erikboxem [message #272814 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Commandosky is currently offline  Commandosky
Messages: 19
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
everyone has told his/her point in this problem

it's now the decision of the rest of you what to do with it
your choice


http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg214/Commandosky/FullCommando.jpg
Re: erikboxem [message #272815 is a reply to message #272811] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
Commandosky wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 12:23

yes, i do care that he has cheated and he regret that

Rofl no he doesn't...
he lied to you again and again so he'd get away with it, not caring that people like you would look stupid by defending him BECAUSE HE LIED TO YOU

Commandosky wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 12:23

that's enough for me, but not for you i see

we don't have spoken alot about the problem on the forums

just move on

you're right it's not enough, you can't just say "let's move on" LESS THAN A DAY AFTER YOU GOT CAUGHT CHEATING AND LYING TO YOUR ENTIRE COMMUNITY TO COVER IT UP.

I'm reminded of the fact most of you guys were going absolutely berserk in the community match against Clanwars.cc, when you wrongly thought one of us was cheating. It's different when it's your leader, of course.


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful

[Updated on: Thu, 12 July 2007 10:29]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272816 is a reply to message #272811] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
Commandosky wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 18:23

yes, i do care that he has cheated and he regret that

that's enough for me, but not for you i see

we don't have spoken alot about the problem on the forums

just move on



Blind faith FTW. Sarcasm


This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
Re: erikboxem [message #272817 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Commandosky is currently offline  Commandosky
Messages: 19
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
nobody from the DG community is following this, only i, but it seems to be pointless to stay here any longer

http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg214/Commandosky/FullCommando.jpg
Re: erikboxem [message #272818 is a reply to message #272814] Thu, 12 July 2007 10:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

Commandosky wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 13:28

everyone has told his/her point in this problem

it's now the decision of the rest of you what to do with it
your choice

That's a bullshit cop-out.

You just don't want to lose your stance in a community. All of the reasonable people here have seen your point, but have argued against it because it makes no sense to support a LIAR. He LIED to all of us.

You say you believe that he's regretting his decision, okay. How about now that he lied about quitting to activate the cheat? If he lied about that, couldn't he have lied about regretting his decision? You can't tell if people are sincere over the internet. It just means that you're a sap.


whoa.
Re: erikboxem [message #272823 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 11:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Romaner is currently offline  Romaner
Messages: 355
Registered: January 2007
Location: edmonton, canada
Karma: 0
Commander
well it seems clear that those who decided to stay loyal to him are not going to even listen to this. i mean its already been proven.. that he cheated, had the cheat on from the getgo. lied about it and now wants to sweep it under the rug, by urging the members of his community not to visit renforums... what more can be done? nothing!
so this topic might aswell be locked since it has served its purpose. and the only people that are posting in it are either the renforum members that are mad that this cheater is not being treated as any other low life cheating scum... or the people following this cheating server owner that do not question him or doubt in him.
Re: erikboxem [message #272826 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 12:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
QoQFrost is currently offline  QoQFrost
Messages: 10
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
Well, I think we should bring the war to their home, seeing as how they didn't realize what they done yet. Of course, I'm not that evil.

If anyone cares...
http://duke-gaming.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1836&sid=c0f58f04b0e09814a650fd 1707de91c9
Re: erikboxem [message #272827 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 12:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OWA is currently offline  OWA
Messages: 647
Registered: May 2006
Location: W3D Hub
Karma: 0
Colonel

The phrase "Too long, didn't read" comes to mind.

Spoony, he did not lie to me personally, what makes you think he did? Big red text is unnecessary kthx.

Anyways, I'm done. This thread is lost. I have nothing more to add or argue about.


[Updated on: Thu, 12 July 2007 12:28]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272840 is a reply to message #272827] Thu, 12 July 2007 14:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spoony is currently offline  Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator
One Winged Angel wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 14:21

Spoony, he did not lie to me personally, what makes you think he did?

the fact you swallowed his bullshit story like a mouthful of semen and you misguidedly defend him, that's what.

One Winged Angel wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 14:21

Big red text is unnecessary kthx.

It's rare I use it, it's reserved for occasions when someone displays colossal stupidity by refusing to see something blindingly obvious to any adult, most children and, in fact, some domestic animals.


Unleash the Renerageâ„¢

Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful

[Updated on: Thu, 12 July 2007 14:25]

Report message to a moderator

Re: erikboxem [message #272851 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 15:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ghostshaw is currently offline  Ghostshaw
Messages: 709
Registered: September 2006
Karma: 0
Colonel
Somebody lock this, this is obvously not gonna help anyone.

-Ghost-


BlackIntel Administrator
Re: erikboxem [message #272852 is a reply to message #272082] Thu, 12 July 2007 15:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hex is currently offline  Hex
Messages: 858
Registered: March 2004
Karma: 0
Colonel
He lied to me on IRC even after he was found out

goztow wrote on Tue, 11 May 2010 08:00

If we had to ban all who ever cheated or ever created a cheat (obj3cts and such) then I don't think there would be many members left here (sad fact).


reborn wrote on Fri, 29 January 2010 23:37

std is for pro's. Razz
Re: erikboxem [message #272853 is a reply to message #272852] Thu, 12 July 2007 16:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
i want to see someone play on DG and get banned for the same cheat erik was using, that'll make me laugh Listen

liquidv2
Re: erikboxem [message #272857 is a reply to message #272751] Thu, 12 July 2007 16:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Blast is currently offline  Blast
Messages: 27
Registered: September 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
One Winged Angel wrote on Thu, 12 July 2007 14:36

It is his server is it not? Or am I mistaken here. I find it perfectly acceptable if it is on his server. Otherwise I take back my previous comment.

Logs are too long, so I didn't read. I'm just vouching an opinion based on what I know.

Needs Saberhawk's anticheat..... It blocks 90% of renegade nastys. Pity it is clientside though :\


Sure it was his server. I bet I speak for most ppl in here in saying that we don't actually give a damn about what happens to his server. He owns it. We can't ban him there. But he bypassed RenGuard, therefore earning a ban from the RG network...

Got it? Ok, shut the hell up about that.

The questioning now seems to lean towards the dumbasses on his "side". Personally, I don't care if you side with him and stay in that server, I don't want ppl of your reasoning infecting the few remaining decent servers.

Basically, it seems like most ppl here will think you are a fucktard if you stay, reasonable if you leave, and Crimson even seems to be helping by offering mods to some...
Previous Topic: lol, "renejew"
Next Topic: Apple MacBook Vs. Dell Latitude D630
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Nov 22 20:11:54 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01834 seconds