Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #268997 is a reply to message #268995] Tue, 26 June 2007 17:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IronWarrior is currently offline  IronWarrior
Messages: 2460
Registered: November 2004
Location: England UK
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 19:52

Sn1per74* wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 01:03

but I definately KNOW God is real. Why? There are many inexplicable events that happened in my life and I KNOW he helped me.


No, you don't "know" anything. You believe that because it fits with whatever bullshit your head has been filled with.



lol.
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269001 is a reply to message #268997] Tue, 26 June 2007 18:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
puddle_splasher is currently offline  puddle_splasher
Messages: 595
Registered: May 2006
Location: Scotland, UK
Karma: 0
Colonel
IronWarrior wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 19:54

mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 19:52

Sn1per74* wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 01:03

but I definately KNOW God is real. Why? There are many inexplicable events that happened in my life and I KNOW he helped me.


No, you don't "know" anything. You believe that because it fits with whatever bullshit your head has been filled with.



lol.


OMFG, let the 16 year olds argue all they want!

DIE AND TELL ME ALL ABOUT DEATH. Otherwise, look for the answers in all the other forums.

Quote what you must, scripture or otherwise. It all comes to the same.

Believe what you want.

Topic closed, sounds good. ( where is the giant yawn emoticon?)

Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269002 is a reply to message #268995] Tue, 26 June 2007 18:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 18:52

Sn1per74* wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 01:03

but I definately KNOW God is real. Why? There are many inexplicable events that happened in my life and I KNOW he helped me.


No, you don't "know" anything. You believe that because it fits with whatever bullshit your head has been filled with.



The same could be said about anything we claim we "know", be it religious or not.
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269003 is a reply to message #255920] Tue, 26 June 2007 18:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zunnie is currently offline  zunnie
Messages: 2959
Registered: September 2003
Location: Netherlands
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

Although it appears christianity itself is not based on factual
truth, it still doesnt prove that a "God" doesnt exist..
It only proves christianity is not what most people believe it to be..
Its not "impossible", like many other things are....

"I love the pope driving around in his pope-mobile surrounded by
3 feet bulletproof plexi-glass. There is faith in action."
(not my quote) Razz


https://multiplayerforums.com/uploads/monthly_2018_03/TCW2_Signature.png.6236a0dbc6e1e53472a18fe8cd15e47b.png
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269006 is a reply to message #269002] Tue, 26 June 2007 18:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrpirate is currently offline  mrpirate
Messages: 1262
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ontario
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
warranto wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 21:06

mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 18:52

Sn1per74* wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 01:03

but I definately KNOW God is real. Why? There are many inexplicable events that happened in my life and I KNOW he helped me.


No, you don't "know" anything. You believe that because it fits with whatever bullshit your head has been filled with.



The same could be said about anything we claim we "know", be it religious or not.


Yes, that's true. However, the word "know" is usually used to mean that you have some factual basis for believing something, versus saying that god is helping you because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside.
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269016 is a reply to message #268995] Tue, 26 June 2007 19:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
AoBfrost is currently offline  AoBfrost
Messages: 1248
Registered: March 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 20:52

Sn1per74* wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 01:03

but I definately KNOW God is real. Why? There are many inexplicable events that happened in my life and I KNOW he helped me.


No, you don't "know" anything. You believe that because it fits with whatever bullshit your head has been filled with.


I guess thats a "good" comeback which proves God isnt real in your case....seriously, if you want to fight something, I suggest addming some details of experience, or facts or something you know....


http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/FMAROCKS/godotsig.gif
Scrin wrote on Fri, 05 October 2007 12:19

''whoa im the photoshop''

KANE LIVES!!!
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269027 is a reply to message #269006] Tue, 26 June 2007 20:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 19:12

warranto wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 21:06

mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 18:52

Sn1per74* wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 01:03

but I definately KNOW God is real. Why? There are many inexplicable events that happened in my life and I KNOW he helped me.


No, you don't "know" anything. You believe that because it fits with whatever bullshit your head has been filled with.



The same could be said about anything we claim we "know", be it religious or not.


Yes, that's true. However, the word "know" is usually used to mean that you have some factual basis for believing something, versus saying that god is helping you because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside.



As do most people who claim to "know" God exists. You can't get more factual than personal experience.

Besides, the only reason you believe your parents are who they say they are is because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside Wink
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269132 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 27 June 2007 08:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrpirate is currently offline  mrpirate
Messages: 1262
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ontario
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
But that's the whole point, though, don't you see?

Believing that your personal experience has any relevance in determining truth is ridiculous, because everybody's personal experiences will point their beliefs in different (and often contradictory) directions.

[Updated on: Wed, 27 June 2007 08:51]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269137 is a reply to message #269027] Wed, 27 June 2007 08:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MexPirate is currently offline  MexPirate
Messages: 883
Registered: March 2006
Location: UK
Karma: 0
Colonel
warranto wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 22:10

You can't get more factual than personal experience.


haha, no.


http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e255/Cloudx16/Newer%20Stuff/03f9b76a.png
It's a mexican pirate .... F*ck a dog by Blink 182
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269139 is a reply to message #268967] Wed, 27 June 2007 08:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
tzarmind wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 17:38

What I don't understand is why religion has to work outside the bounds of science. Perhaps God wanted things to evolve to best suit their enviroments?

No one ever seems to think that maybe God did create creatures that could evolve, and that certain things in the bible aren't literal?


Actually, thats the way I've always thought Wink


http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269140 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 27 June 2007 08:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrpirate is currently offline  mrpirate
Messages: 1262
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ontario
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Isn't picking and choosing which parts of the bible you want to take literally kind of absurd?
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269141 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 27 June 2007 09:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MexPirate is currently offline  MexPirate
Messages: 883
Registered: March 2006
Location: UK
Karma: 0
Colonel
the problem with that theory is that you have to "stick the tail on the donkey" for wherever people feel comfortable removing God from the equation.

Did he put a few chemicals together? perhaps he created a few species and left them to it? did he design man?

I find the theory to be a way of explaining things for people who choose to follow religion but can't see past the sense of science - so they agree a comprimise.


http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e255/Cloudx16/Newer%20Stuff/03f9b76a.png
It's a mexican pirate .... F*ck a dog by Blink 182
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269147 is a reply to message #269132] Wed, 27 June 2007 09:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
mrpirate wrote on Wed, 27 June 2007 09:26

But that's the whole point, though, don't you see?

Believing that your personal experience has any relevance in determining truth is ridiculous, because everybody's personal experiences will point their beliefs in different (and often contradictory) directions.


Personal experience is the only thing that we can rightfully claim as a "fact", unless you want to settle claiming what you don't experience as simply a belief (you are told something or read something and must choose whether or not it is truth). If you experience it personally, it is a fact.

However, even a fact can be misinterpreted or misunderstood. A good example of the is the SCIENTIFIC FACT that heat transfer is done through an invisible liquid called "caloric" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caloric_theory ). This was a SCIENTIFIC FACT that was treated as truth - and even proved as truth in several experiments. Heat transfer can only be experiencd through the "personal experience" mean in order to be proven as a fact, however this did not prevent the interpretation of the fact to be wrong . Something does cause heat transfer (fact proven through personal experience), it is just not an invisible liquid which does this (incorrect interpretation of the personal experience).

Edit to clarify last paragraph

[Updated on: Wed, 27 June 2007 09:17]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269148 is a reply to message #269147] Wed, 27 June 2007 09:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrpirate is currently offline  mrpirate
Messages: 1262
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ontario
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
warranto wrote on Wed, 27 June 2007 12:14


Personal experience is the only thing that we can rightfully claim as a "fact", unless you want to settle claiming what you don't experience as simply a belief (you are told something or read something and must choose whether or not it is truth). If you experience it personally, it is a fact.


Does Carlos Castaneda really turn into a crow?

Misinterpretation, as you mentioned, seems to make your first paragraph irrelevant.

[Updated on: Wed, 27 June 2007 09:25]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269160 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 27 June 2007 10:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Actually, it reinforces it.

The fact of that statement is that you can claim that you saw him actually turn into the crow. The misinterpretation would be that what you saw was true, where it was a "trick" that caused it to look like it did. Just as it was a "fact" that the invisible liquid existed, despite not actually existing.

Confusing? It's supposed to be, so don't worry about that.

It also highlights why we can't always trust our personal experiences, but then again, that is all we have to go with as far as facts and knowledge is concerned.
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269192 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 27 June 2007 12:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrpirate is currently offline  mrpirate
Messages: 1262
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ontario
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
What I'm really talking about is personal experiences with respect to religion; or personal experiences with no physical manifestation with which to be verified. Someone thinking god's talked to them in a dream, for example. Does god exist? To this person, yes, because of a personal experience they've had talking to god. My point is that this personal experience has no bearing on whether or not there is a god.
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269196 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 27 June 2007 12:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
I think you mean no physical manifestation which has been detectable.

Yes, I'm relating to a TV show and combining it with a completely hypothetical situation, but it gives you an idea what I mean.

In the show Star Trek, there is an episode which has a life-form trapped, and unable to escape. It sends out messages to a telepath on the ship, who can only receive them in a dream form.
There was no way of knowing that these beings were trapped, as all scans of the area showed nothing, however they were still there and only able to communicate through the dreams of one person.

Who is to say that something similar is not at work here? The dream was how God chose to communicate to someone, and the reason there is no physical evidence to support it is only due to the fact that nothing exists that can detect it?

Just a completely "out in left field" hypothetical situation, but not like something like this has not been seen in real life before.
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269198 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 27 June 2007 12:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrpirate is currently offline  mrpirate
Messages: 1262
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ontario
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
I'm not saying it's impossible.

If, in that episode, there were many "telepaths", each receiving different and sometimes conflicting messages, an objective observer would be inclined not to believe any of them, don't you think?
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269201 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 27 June 2007 12:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Most definitely.

It doesn't mean the original message wasn't sent by a life-form, though.

Just as with the dream, and this whole "fact" thing, just because the message was misinterpreted doesn't mean there was not still a message.

As well, even if one interpretation of that message was proven to be wrong, it doesn't mean that the origin of the message does not exist (I'll leave you to interpret that one).

sorry for the double negatives.
icon10.gif  WARNING OFF TOPIC! [message #269329 is a reply to message #268293] Thu, 28 June 2007 05:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlayMp1 is currently offline  PlayMp1
Messages: 29
Registered: April 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
SpyGuy246 wrote on Sat, 23 June 2007 00:14

Hitler invaded countries to gain more land for Germany and bring about the dominance of his master race. Something to think about.



Hehe, and if hitler hadn't invaded europe, Red Alert would have happened, and then in turn, TD, if that happened, I'd be sitting in a tiberium patch right now Big Grin . Anyway, I'm athiest and proud of it. I accept reason over faith. If you were in a plane for example, would you trust the makers with simply faith and believe the plane will hold together, or would you rather KNOW that this plane won't shatter apart at the first sign of turbulence? I'd go with know, personally but w/e.

I'm aware that my analogy isn't that good, but please don't flame me about it >_>.


KANE LIVES!!!!!
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269335 is a reply to message #269027] Thu, 28 June 2007 06:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sn1per74* is currently offline  Sn1per74*
Messages: 939
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 0
Colonel
warranto wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 22:10

mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 19:12

warranto wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 21:06

mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 18:52

Sn1per74* wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 01:03

but I definately KNOW God is real. Why? There are many inexplicable events that happened in my life and I KNOW he helped me.


No, you don't "know" anything. You believe that because it fits with whatever bullshit your head has been filled with.



The same could be said about anything we claim we "know", be it religious or not.


Yes, that's true. However, the word "know" is usually used to mean that you have some factual basis for believing something, versus saying that god is helping you because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside.



As do most people who claim to "know" God exists. You can't get more factual than personal experience.

Besides, the only reason you believe your parents are who they say they are is because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside Wink


I claim to "know" that he is there because of things that happened to me in my life that are almost impossible to be called coincidences (I think I spelled that right Listen ). I'd post to explain them but you guys would call me a dumb 16 year old and just call me a SUPER lucky guy.


http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/FMAROCKS/sniper74halosigsnipedontforgettogiv.png
Creator: AoBFrost
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #269338 is a reply to message #269140] Thu, 28 June 2007 06:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
mrpirate wrote on Wed, 27 June 2007 10:59

Isn't picking and choosing which parts of the bible you want to take literally kind of absurd?


Who says I'm picking and choosing? No where in the bible does it say that Micro-Evolution isn't possible, nor does it say that Evolution is impossible. It says God put things on earth, it doesn't say what the capabilities of those things were after they were put there Wink.


http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #270321 is a reply to message #268995] Mon, 02 July 2007 22:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Starbuzz is currently offline  Starbuzz
Messages: 2500
Registered: May 2007
Karma: 3
General (2 Stars)
mrpirate wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 19:52

Sn1per74* wrote on Tue, 26 June 2007 01:03

but I definately KNOW God is real. Why? There are many inexplicable events that happened in my life and I KNOW he helped me.


No, you don't "know" anything. You believe that because it fits with whatever bullshit your head has been filled with.



Very true, mrpirate. I am sure Sniper74* would be a different person with different beliefs if his parents did not tell him about God when he was young.


buzzsigfinal
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #270533 is a reply to message #270321] Tue, 03 July 2007 17:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sn1per74* is currently offline  Sn1per74*
Messages: 939
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 0
Colonel
No. I wouldn't.

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/FMAROCKS/sniper74halosigsnipedontforgettogiv.png
Creator: AoBFrost
Re: Religion discussion from "Meaning of Life" thread [message #270704 is a reply to message #255920] Wed, 04 July 2007 11:10 Go to previous message
mrpirate is currently offline  mrpirate
Messages: 1262
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ontario
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
haha

I guess Sniper's views about the universe were formed without any parental input.
Previous Topic: Terrorists in the UK
Next Topic: New Pentagon footage from hotel
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Feb 05 15:02:36 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01524 seconds