Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Foobar2000
Foobar2000 [message #253201] Sun, 08 April 2007 19:58 Go to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Foobar2000 is my favorite music client. Who uses it? And what are your setups?

I'd show you mine, but I just reformatted and haven't gotten around to installing an application that handles images yet, which I have to do because I removed Paint from the Windows installation disc. I'll show you when I find my copy of Photoshop.

Before you suggest it, no I don't want to install an application that saves screen-shots directly.
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253207 is a reply to message #253201] Sun, 08 April 2007 21:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Use IrfanView. It's free and extremely light.

Why did you remove paint? Sounds like a dumb idea to me.
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253209 is a reply to message #253201] Sun, 08 April 2007 22:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
I never, ever use it.

I'll just post images of my setup when I get Photoshop.
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253211 is a reply to message #253201] Sun, 08 April 2007 22:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
So you totally ignored my advice about IrfanView. Please, would you at least check it out? It won't replace Photoshop, it just makes pasting images from the clipboard and compressing images way the heck easier and faster than waiting for Photoshop to start up.

http://www.irfanview.com/
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253213 is a reply to message #253201] Sun, 08 April 2007 22:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
lol But I always have Photoshop running. >:P
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253220 is a reply to message #253201] Mon, 09 April 2007 00:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jonty is currently offline  Jonty
Messages: 538
Registered: June 2006
Location: Chesterfield, England
Karma: 0
Colonel
Viva la Resistance!
I never saw what all the fuss was about IrfanView. It kinda annoyed me actually, I think the UI looks a little old. Huh
Anyway, on-topic, I usually use either XMMS or VLC, depending on what I'm listening to*. Big Grin

* XMMS doesn't play streaming media very well here. Sad
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253225 is a reply to message #253201] Mon, 09 April 2007 00:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
I fuxed my config and I didn't back it up. :<
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253226 is a reply to message #253220] Mon, 09 April 2007 01:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Jonty wrote on Mon, 09 April 2007 00:14

I never saw what all the fuss was about IrfanView. It kinda annoyed me actually, I think the UI looks a little old. Huh
Anyway, on-topic, I usually use either XMMS or VLC, depending on what I'm listening to*. Big Grin

* XMMS doesn't play streaming media very well here. Sad


Who cares what it looks like? Sheesh, does anybody care about usability anymore these days? When you use it, it's usually open for less than a minute. The point of it is that it starts up instantly, you can load or paste images instantly, and then convert them to jpg, png, gif, whatever, instantly. Also, you can resize them incredibly fast too. I would so rather do that than to wait for The GIMP or Photoshop to open, which would still take longer than it does to do all of this in IrfanView. Use heavy programs like GIMP or Photoshop for real editing.

Also, I suggest using Banshee instead of XMMS... it's like iTunes but without the suck.

[Updated on: Mon, 09 April 2007 01:30]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Foobar2000 [message #253228 is a reply to message #253226] Mon, 09 April 2007 02:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jonty is currently offline  Jonty
Messages: 538
Registered: June 2006
Location: Chesterfield, England
Karma: 0
Colonel
Viva la Resistance!
icedog90 wrote on Mon, 09 April 2007 09:27


Who cares what it looks like?
Well, it would seem I do. Sarcasm

icedog90 wrote on Mon, 09 April 2007 09:27

Also, I suggest using Banshee instead of XMMS... it's like iTunes but without the suck.

Ah, but I don't want iTunes, I want something small and simple, just like XMMS is. Very Happy
http://stuff.jontysewell.co.uk/desktops/desktop220307-2.png <-- There's how I use it.
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253231 is a reply to message #253201] Mon, 09 April 2007 04:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Zion is currently offline  Zion
Messages: 2722
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 1
General (2 Stars)
I am left to use iTunes since i have an iPod and all my music is on there (yet to extract and rename 500+ songs) but if i was left to the playlist i'd use Winamp or stream it.

Btw that's iTunes 6.0 not 7.x because 7.x doesn't like it when other programs run aside it, start playing the tracks faster than usual.

[Updated on: Mon, 09 April 2007 04:19]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Foobar2000 [message #253324 is a reply to message #253201] Mon, 09 April 2007 13:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
http://yuo.be/ipod.php

[Updated on: Mon, 09 April 2007 13:22]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Foobar2000 [message #253332 is a reply to message #253324] Mon, 09 April 2007 14:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
0x90
Messages: 142
Registered: September 2006
Location: Germany
Karma: 0
Recruit
i got

http://www.rockbox.org/

on my ipod, rox Wink

regards
0x90
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253357 is a reply to message #253201] Mon, 09 April 2007 16:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/1989/fb2ktq7.th.jpg

I like things minimal.
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253367 is a reply to message #253201] Mon, 09 April 2007 18:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrpirate is currently offline  mrpirate
Messages: 1262
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ontario
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
haha rush
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253384 is a reply to message #253201] Mon, 09 April 2007 19:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Rush is the shit. Rocked Over
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253401 is a reply to message #253201] Tue, 10 April 2007 02:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9738
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Irfanview for images, mplayer for video, winamp for music.

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253405 is a reply to message #253201] Tue, 10 April 2007 03:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
light is currently offline  light
Messages: 988
Registered: January 2005
Karma: 0
Colonel
I tried Foobar, I went back to WinAmp, it's just more comfortable to me.

Plus anything it doesn't have I have a plugin for, like transparency and toaster etc.

But at work I used amarok, I also have iTunes on this PC.


http://www.azupload.com/displayImage.php/setid2745.png
Re: Foobar2000 [message #253518 is a reply to message #253405] Tue, 10 April 2007 18:38 Go to previous message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
light wrote on Tue, 10 April 2007 03:39

I tried Foobar, I went back to WinAmp, it's just more comfortable to me.


Same, but it was a couple years back.
Previous Topic: what is this language?
Next Topic: Jokes?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Nov 27 08:08:09 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01007 seconds