Ram. [message #233345] |
Fri, 08 December 2006 10:28 |
badmanh
Messages: 4 Registered: October 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
here goes im building my own comp and i stuck do i get normal ram(1gb) or Ddr(512 my dad says this is the same as the 1gb normal). what is the difference between the two?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ram. [message #233388 is a reply to message #233345] |
Fri, 08 December 2006 17:02 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483 Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
I think what he means by "normal" is SDRAM. SDRAM is a different size, so if you already have SDRAM in your motherboard, you're not going to be able to fit DDR unless you buy a new motherboard.
By the way, DDR2 completely fails.
[Updated on: Fri, 08 December 2006 17:02] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ram. [message #233961 is a reply to message #233345] |
Wed, 13 December 2006 07:50 |
|
SeargentSarg
Messages: 478 Registered: November 2006
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
SDRAM blows. As far as I know, it was one of the first ram modules made.
DDR is right in the middle of SDRAM and DDR2.
DDR2 is the best type of ram out there right now.
RAM is more important then the CPU in the long run, so if you want to invest in a fast computer, invest $300+ in 2GB of DDR2.
RenCorner.NET - Multi-Gaming Community
|
|
|
|
Re: Ram. [message #234590 is a reply to message #233345] |
Sun, 17 December 2006 02:55 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483 Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
DDR2 isn't better at all. It may have faster clock speeds, but the timings are REALLY BAD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ram. [message #237394 is a reply to message #233345] |
Fri, 05 January 2007 06:32 |
fl00d3d
Messages: 1107 Registered: August 2003 Location: Iowa, USA
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
The technologies provide different bus speeds. And often things such as cpu clock and motherboard FSB are overlooked.
For example, my shitty rig has a 1.5Ghz athlon processor running on a 266mhz bus. My memory is 333mhz (pc2700). My motherboard is a 400mhz bus. With all three of these things working together, my system is running at 266 and physically cannot go faster than that because of the weakest link. My CPU is a bottleneck - and a crappy one at that. Soon I plan on upgrading to a 2.2Ghz 333fsb cpu, which will in turn make more use out of my motherboard and RAM.
Going back to the examples given, DDR is definitely better than any SDRAM you'll find megabyte -to- megabyte. I think the last SDRAM I used was pc133, and DDR is pc2100/2700 (right around there). Huge difference in speed. But unfortunately you will be restricted based on the capacity (slots) of your motherboard. So max out with what you have and try to keep your memory in equal pairs if possible.
|
|
|
Re: Ram. [message #237463 is a reply to message #237025] |
Fri, 05 January 2007 17:26 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483 Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
iSm0k3r0x wrote on Wed, 03 January 2007 11:30 | I still don't know what the difference is between the two; say we compair 1 GB SDRAM and a 1 GB DDR, what's the difference?
|
DDR is way the heck faster than SDRAM. It's easy to understand.
|
|
|