Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #235929 is a reply to message #235791] |
Tue, 26 December 2006 16:24 |
|
SeargentSarg
Messages: 478 Registered: November 2006
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
I didn't start shit. I am not the only one that agrees that [NR] is a waste of time. I had a sucessful community and server until you brought you ass into it, as well as Nightma's, and I had to shut it down. How about the idea of Nightma taking my playered joined / left irc idea "Host: <name> has just joined #<chan>" So actually, Nightma took one of my ideas to [NR]. Besides, you shouldn't be talking, since you didn't program [NR] This is between me and Nightma, NOT YOU FL00D3D.
Nightma isn't even old enough to be a senior member.. I swear to God it pisses me off every time I see your name fl00d3d. Always talking shit. This had NOTHING to do with you! Why did you come and start this again..
RenCorner.NET - Multi-Gaming Community
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #235938 is a reply to message #235791] |
Tue, 26 December 2006 16:52 |
|
jnz
Messages: 3396 Registered: July 2006 Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
so you coded the Night Regulater? and so Nightma12 took ONE of your ideas. im taking ideas form brenbot, NR etc. so what? if DanPaul88 or Nightma12 wanted me to take something out of the Sbot because i took it from their bot. i would. and that is an infomative idea, it would get into the bot somehow anyway.
and dont go judging people by age.
[Updated on: Tue, 26 December 2006 16:53] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #235965 is a reply to message #235791] |
Tue, 26 December 2006 21:17 |
|
Dave Anderson
Messages: 1953 Registered: December 2004 Location: United States
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Quote: | Nightma isn't even old enough to be a senior member.. I swear to God it pisses me off every time I see your name fl00d3d. Always talking shit. This had NOTHING to do with you! Why did you come and start this again..
|
A lot of the developers, web guys, programmers, modders, etc. in this community are young, and some of them are not to be underestimated.
David Anderson
Founder, Software Consultant
DCOM Productions
Microsoft Partner (MSP)
[Updated on: Tue, 26 December 2006 21:17] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #235970 is a reply to message #235791] |
Tue, 26 December 2006 22:47 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7430 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
It's not harmful. I just don't choose to do it. I don't like sloppiness, and ads in the nature of that particular product seem sloppy to me. I prefer my server-side scripts and bots to appear native, not hacked on later. That's also why I don't use the SSAOW bind/lock functionality. It's the epitome of sloppiness, both with having to issue a command in chat, and the stupid icon that appears on the vehicle when it's bound or locked.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #236091 is a reply to message #235970] |
Wed, 27 December 2006 19:48 |
|
Ryu
Messages: 2833 Registered: September 2006 Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Crimson wrote on Tue, 26 December 2006 23:47 | It's not harmful. I just don't choose to do it. I don't like sloppiness, and ads in the nature of that particular product seem sloppy to me. I prefer my server-side scripts and bots to appear native, not hacked on later. That's also why I don't use the SSAOW bind/lock functionality. It's the epitome of sloppiness, both with having to issue a command in chat, and the stupid icon that appears on the vehicle when it's bound or locked.
|
No offense, when I play you're server and some fucktard steals my tank, It makes me want to not play you're server, The !bl command is something useful, But I'm not here to tell you how to run you're server.
Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.
[Updated on: Wed, 27 December 2006 19:48] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #236123 is a reply to message #235791] |
Thu, 28 December 2006 01:45 |
puddle_splasher
Messages: 595 Registered: May 2006 Location: Scotland, UK
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
SeargentSarg wrote on Tue, 26 December 2006 17:24 | Besides, you shouldn't be talking, since you didn't program [NR] This is between me and Nightma, NOT YOU FL00D3D.
This had NOTHING to do with you! Why did you come and start this again..
|
I would not exactly call this topic "A Flaming Hot Discussion".
It is certainly a "Flaming Subject" apparently against one person.
Why is that? Are you deliberately trying to tell us all, YOUR opinion of one person? Where do you hope that this topic will lead? What exactly are YOU so worried about? How do you perceive that this issue can be resolved?
Can YOU better the attempts of one person, who is attempting to better something?
Its better to have failed trying, than to have failed without trying.
Keep up the good attempts. All good things come to fruition in the end.
Aim for the moon and you may fall short, but, you will still be among the "Stars".
[Updated on: Thu, 28 December 2006 01:48] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #236144 is a reply to message #235965] |
Thu, 28 December 2006 07:24 |
|
Dave Anderson wrote on Tue, 26 December 2006 23:17 |
Quote: | Nightma isn't even old enough to be a senior member.. I swear to God it pisses me off every time I see your name fl00d3d. Always talking shit. This had NOTHING to do with you! Why did you come and start this again..
|
A lot of the developers, web guys, programmers, modders, etc. in this community are young, and some of them are not to be underestimated.
|
well said.
I'm only 16, and clearly not a fucktard
<3 nightma.
</3 ads.
</3 teh-pwnerer.
the end.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #236181 is a reply to message #236103] |
Thu, 28 December 2006 11:53 |
fl00d3d
Messages: 1108 Registered: August 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
SeargentSarg wrote on Tue, 26 December 2006 18:24 | I didn't start shit. I am not the only one that agrees that [NR] is a waste of time. I had a sucessful community and server until you brought you ass into it, as well as Nightma's, and I had to shut it down. How about the idea of Nightma taking my playered joined / left irc idea "Host: <name> has just joined #<chan>" So actually, Nightma took one of my ideas to [NR]. Besides, you shouldn't be talking, since you didn't program [NR] This is between me and Nightma, NOT YOU FL00D3D.
Nightma isn't even old enough to be a senior member.. I swear to God it pisses me off every time I see your name fl00d3d. Always talking shit. This had NOTHING to do with you! Why did you come and start this again..
|
(1) [NR] is just as much of a waste of time as any other bot or community development. Stop being ignorant.
(2) You never had a successful community. You had a popular server and the only reason for it was because it was on a000004.
(3) Nightma12 wrote the fucking bot. You should be lucky enough to even use it, let alone claim that he has no right to develop an idea that you supposedly came up with (which I *highly* doubt as you have no technical knowledge whatsoever).
(4) Nightma12 has created a popular bot and run servers for years --he has contributed more to this community as his age than you ever will.
(5) Why do I get involved when you flame Nightma12 or NR? Because he is my partner and I believe in his creativity and talents. I'm guessing you'd prefer that I just let him defend himself?
Crimson wrote on Wed, 27 December 2006 22:44 | I'm working on an automatic binding system which is the way it should have always been.
|
What happens when you want to relinquish the vehicle to another? Or if you want to bail out of the tank before it blows up so the enemy doesn't get the points for an "enemy controlled vehicle"? The only way to do that would be to type in a command thus removing the whole argument of "sloppiness". I guess automatic binding would be nice if there was a way to un-do it ... but undo-ing it would still be considered sloppy by you, so I really don't see how a two-letter command (!bl) is sloppy or difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #236193 is a reply to message #236181] |
Thu, 28 December 2006 13:03 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7430 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
fl00d3d wrote on Thu, 28 December 2006 11:53 | What happens when you want to relinquish the vehicle to another? Or if you want to bail out of the tank before it blows up so the enemy doesn't get the points for an "enemy controlled vehicle"? The only way to do that would be to type in a command thus removing the whole argument of "sloppiness". I guess automatic binding would be nice if there was a way to un-do it ... but undo-ing it would still be considered sloppy by you, so I really don't see how a two-letter command (!bl) is sloppy or difficult.
|
There would have to be a command to give ownership to another player, and there would be no points awarded to a player if they blow up an empty vehicle. I don't see any way around needing a command if you wish to give your vehicle to someone else and I think the way I have planned is as graceful as it can get. But you shouldn't have to type a command just to say you own a vehicle that you purchased.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #236209 is a reply to message #236193] |
Thu, 28 December 2006 15:54 |
DodgeThis
Messages: 29 Registered: December 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Crimson wrote on Thu, 28 December 2006 21:03 | There would have to be a command to give ownership to another player, and there would be no points awarded to a player if they blow up an empty vehicle. I don't see any way around needing a command if you wish to give your vehicle to someone else and I think the way I have planned is as graceful as it can get. But you shouldn't have to type a command just to say you own a vehicle that you purchased.
|
I never use !bl though, if I use a command like that, I prefer to just !bind my vehicle. If you are out of your vehicle for example to repair it or to defend the base from people who entered a building to destroy it, a teammate could rescue the vehicle by keeping it out of the hands of the enemy, but if an annoying "This vehicle is locked and belongs to <player>" pops up, both the brave teammate and the vehicle are lost
[Updated on: Thu, 28 December 2006 15:55] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Flame War split from Win32 Forum - started by Teh-Pwnerer [message #236217 is a reply to message #235791] |
Thu, 28 December 2006 16:27 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7430 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
I agree. My system just pages the vehicle owner saying "XXX got in your vehicle. Type !something to eject him or !something_else to give him ownership of the vehicle." The guy who gets in gets paged with "This vehicle belongs to YYY. Please do not take off with it unless he gives it to you." Of course I will word it better.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|