Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » ::sorry:: the USA army
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232080 is a reply to message #232070] Sun, 26 November 2006 19:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
fl00d3d wrote on Sun, 26 November 2006 19:33

I would also give more respect by default to any honorably discharged military veteran than a civilian. That is not to say the person is more honorable or to be respected more - but it is a good quick assessment.


You really think so? O_o
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232083 is a reply to message #231866] Sun, 26 November 2006 20:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
fl00d3d wrote on Fri, 24 November 2006 23:31

Unless you type as much as I do in a day and you made a mistake.

Anyone who has any doubts on the validity of my service can ask Crimson to verify. She knows a lot of personal things about me as well as a few other "technical proofs" that I'd rather not get into right now. And if that wasn't enough I'd even send her a copy of my DD214. I was honorably discharged with eligibility for the VFW. I have put my life on the line in a combat zone, and I am offended that a fellow American would think that I made that up.

PS, I also forgot the apostrophe in "McDonald's" - so I apologize for my lack of a perfect post.

Quote:


Sarcasm




Thank you for your time in our military. I honestly appreciate it.


http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232084 is a reply to message #231679] Sun, 26 November 2006 20:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Doesn't your tax money say that?
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232090 is a reply to message #231679] Sun, 26 November 2006 21:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PlastoJoe is currently offline  PlastoJoe
Messages: 647
Registered: October 2005
Karma: 0
Colonel
I think we're losing track of who is actually the ass tard in this thread. That would be the person who started it.

http://qntm.org/files/board/current.png


You may be a fundamentalist atheist if...


Toggle Spoiler
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232092 is a reply to message #231679] Sun, 26 November 2006 22:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Yeah. He has no right to bash the Army for an asinine move taken by our leaders -- that's like blaming models for being too skinny.

[Updated on: Sun, 26 November 2006 22:23]

Report message to a moderator

Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232094 is a reply to message #231679] Sun, 26 November 2006 22:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
I think that was the best topic rebound I've ever seen.
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232096 is a reply to message #232092] Sun, 26 November 2006 22:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xptek is currently offline  xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
z310 wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 00:22

Yeah. He has no right to bash the Army for an asinine move taken by our leaders -- that's like blaming models for being too skinny.


Uh, the Army and the model both have control over their actions. Bashing them in both cases is perfectly acceptable.

icedog90 wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 00:28

I think that was the best topic rebound I've ever seen.


Roofgnomes? Satisfied


cause = time

[Updated on: Sun, 26 November 2006 22:37]

Report message to a moderator

Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232100 is a reply to message #232096] Sun, 26 November 2006 23:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
xptek wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 00:37

z310 wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 00:22

Yeah. He has no right to bash the Army for an asinine move taken by our leaders -- that's like blaming models for being too skinny.


Uh, the Army and the model both have control over their actions. Bashing them in both cases is perfectly acceptable.


So you're saying it is acceptable to bash soldiers of the Army for not rebelling on their orders to fight in the War on Terrorism? Oh c'mon, few think the consequences are worth it. If you were in the Army, would you rebel? The only real way for them to go is a consensus. But that won't happen -- we both know it.

As for the models, money v. making a political standpoint that will do virtually nothing because the heads will just bring in some new models from a third-world country, who you can't ethically blame, to silence the opposition. Hrmm.

[Updated on: Sun, 26 November 2006 23:40]

Report message to a moderator

Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232107 is a reply to message #232100] Mon, 27 November 2006 00:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xptek is currently offline  xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
z310 wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 01:20

So you're saying it is acceptable to bash soldiers of the Army for not rebelling on their orders to fight in the War on Terrorism? Oh c'mon, few think the consequences are worth it. If you were in the Army, would you rebel? The only real way for them to go is a consensus. But that won't happen -- we both know it.

As for the models, money v. making a political standpoint that will do virtually nothing because the heads will just bring in some new models from a third-world country, who you can't ethically blame, to silence the opposition. Hrmm.


No, I'm saying you have a really shitty analogy and in both cases it's up to the individual.


cause = time
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232136 is a reply to message #231679] Mon, 27 November 2006 06:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
*shrugs*
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232168 is a reply to message #232074] Mon, 27 November 2006 13:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
fl00d3d is currently offline  fl00d3d
Messages: 1107
Registered: August 2003
Location: Iowa, USA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
xptek wrote on Sun, 26 November 2006 19:48

fl00d3d, in a fit of severe retardation, wrote

veteren


This and this.

Please evaluate my ignorance and post your scientific conclusion below.


Rather than me throwing my "obvious bias" into a response, why don't you ask anyone else who cares to read those two posts read through the discussion in its entirety.

You are suggesting that:

(1) A mispelling is a 'fit of severe retardation'
(2) I am a 'fucking moron' because I was involved in two threads that were against people of low character.

You are the 'fucking moron' for calling someone who makes a simple misspelling error a 'severe retard'. No other way to look at it. And I think anyone in the entire community with half a brain would agree.

Also, both of those threads were regarding cheaters and thieves of which I do not tolerate. I refused to just "give up and accept it" like a few people suggested because I know what is right and I refuse to give in. Maybe some day you'll learn more about courage.

You're starting to sound like another character around these forums.......oh, what was his name? AIRCRAFTKILLER????!
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232175 is a reply to message #231679] Mon, 27 November 2006 13:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xptek is currently offline  xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:

Also, both of those threads were regarding cheaters and thieves of which I do not tolerate. I refused to just "give up and accept it" like a few people suggested because I know what is right and I refuse to give in. Maybe some day you'll learn more about courage.


HURR ARGUE WITH 16-YEAR-OLD KIDS. DON'T BACK DOWN. I SALUTE YOU VETEREN. Thumbs Up

Quote:

You're starting to sound like another character around these forums.......oh, what was his name? AIRCRAFTKILLER????!


Hahahahahaaaaaaaahaha.


cause = time
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232176 is a reply to message #232175] Mon, 27 November 2006 14:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

xptek wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 15:59

Quote:

Also, both of those threads were regarding cheaters and thieves of which I do not tolerate. I refused to just "give up and accept it" like a few people suggested because I know what is right and I refuse to give in. Maybe some day you'll learn more about courage.


HURR ARGUE WITH 16-YEAR-OLD KIDS. DON'T BACK DOWN. I SALUTE YOU VETEREN. Thumbs Up

Oh, give me a fucking break, Ty. You bitch about people attacking others for no other reason than disliking them, yet you do the same thing. Quit being a hypocrite. Don't respond with your "hurr internet serious biznez" shit. That just makes you even more of a hypocrite.

Yes, veteran = auto-respect. The person may not be respectable, but their commitment and sacrifice sure is. For that alone I give them respect, whether or not I agree with them or think they're an idiot.


whoa.
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232177 is a reply to message #231679] Mon, 27 November 2006 14:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
Respect the position, not the man maybe?

I'm the bawss.
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232179 is a reply to message #231679] Mon, 27 November 2006 14:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
fl00d3d is currently offline  fl00d3d
Messages: 1107
Registered: August 2003
Location: Iowa, USA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
To be completely honest I've served with a lot of idiots, morons, and people with "less than adequate character" (in my opinion) but they still managed to get out "honorably" somehow. Go ahead and try to use that against me and see if I care.

I got off my ass at the age of 18 (17 when I signed) and did something for my nation. I felt it was the right thing to do. I don't want to turn this thread into a debate on whether joining the military is the right thing to do for everyone - but anyone that has joined any military service can tell you that it takes a little bit of testicular fortitute to sign your life away.

This thread was about an ignoramus saying foolish things - and when I stood my ground here comes xptek to save the day with his backwards truths. He's just as ignorant as the topic starter in many regards.

XPTEK: Are you a military veteren yourself? You've said "to a fellow veteran" so I'd like to know. Because to be honest I have NEVER run across a fellow veteran who was as disrespectful to his brother in arms as you ... so I'm starting to think you're full of shit.

Further, I would still like to know how I'm a 'fucking moron' for standing up to some punk 15 (not even 16yrs old yet) kid who tried to steal from my business and from my community. How does that make me a 'fucking moron'? He was adult enough to put up his own site and run his own servers ... so if he wants to play like the big boys, let him be one of the big boys. Not to mention Justin Schultz (sm0ke) is well over 18 with a wife and kids. You must be one of those PUSSIES in life who just watches when bad things happen then blame other people. Well let me remind you of something child, "Karma is a bitch" and I hope that God spanks the fuck out of you someday for being a twat.
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232195 is a reply to message #232179] Mon, 27 November 2006 16:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

fl00d3d

XPTEK: Are you a military veteren yourself? You've said "to a fellow veteran" so I'd like to know. Because to be honest I have NEVER run across a fellow veteran who was as disrespectful to his brother in arms as you ... so I'm starting to think you're full of shit.

The arguing with a 16 year-old comment is talking about you arguing with HIM. HE is 16. Obviously, he hasn't served in the military.


whoa.
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232197 is a reply to message #231679] Mon, 27 November 2006 16:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
fl00d3d is currently offline  fl00d3d
Messages: 1107
Registered: August 2003
Location: Iowa, USA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
I didn't know that. It makes more sense now. Wink
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232220 is a reply to message #231679] Mon, 27 November 2006 21:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
U927 is currently offline  U927
Messages: 709
Registered: February 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Karma: 0
Colonel
Any suggestions/warnings about Basic Training for an Air Force puke? (I ship to Basic on March 6th)

We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act but a habit. - Aristotle

8-Bit Theatre. The power of evil compels you!
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232221 is a reply to message #232179] Mon, 27 November 2006 21:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xptek is currently offline  xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Crimson wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:19

Respect the position, not the man maybe?


Holy shit. One person on this forum understands this concept.

fl00d3d wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:50

This thread was about an ignoramus saying foolish things - and when I stood my ground here comes xptek to save the day with his backwards truths. He's just as ignorant as the topic starter in many regards.


Please elaborate. I'm not seeing how I'm "ignorant." I refuse to automatically put veterans on a pedestal simply because they did their job. Big fucking deal.

fl00d3d wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:50

XPTEK: Are you a military veteren yourself? You've said "to a fellow veteran" so I'd like to know. Because to be honest I have NEVER run across a fellow veteran who was as disrespectful to his brother in arms as you ... so I'm starting to think you're full of shit.


lol

fl00d3d wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:50

Further, I would still like to know how I'm a 'fucking moron' for standing up to some punk 15 (not even 16yrs old yet) kid who tried to steal from my business and from my community. How does that make me a 'fucking moron'? He was adult enough to put up his own site and run his own servers ... so if he wants to play like the big boys, let him be one of the big boys. Not to mention Justin Schultz (sm0ke) is well over 18 with a wife and kids. You must be one of those PUSSIES in life who just watches when bad things happen then blame other people.


Step one: You are old.
Step two: You interact with children over a text-based medium.
Step three: You make important deal with children over a dead game.
Step four: You fight with children over a text-based medium.
Step five: You become fucking moron.
Step six: Aforementioned gaming children laugh at you for being a fucking moron.
Step seven: You fight with children over a text-based medium.
Step eight: Cycle repeats. fl00d3d rage ensues.

fl00d3d wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:50

Well let me remind you of something child, "Karma is a bitch" and I hope that God spanks the fuck out of you someday for being a twat.


What about all the starving Ethiopian children?


Venetian Snares - Duffy


cause = time

[Updated on: Mon, 27 November 2006 21:36]

Report message to a moderator

Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232267 is a reply to message #232084] Tue, 28 November 2006 07:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
z310 wrote on Sun, 26 November 2006 21:46

Doesn't your tax money say that?


no


http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232292 is a reply to message #232220] Tue, 28 November 2006 11:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GoArmy44 is currently offline  GoArmy44
Messages: 265
Registered: October 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Karma: 0
Recruit

U927 wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 22:11

Any suggestions/warnings about Basic Training for an Air Force puke? (I ship to Basic on March 6th)


Well I have yet to go to basic(I am in my first year with Army ROTC at my school) but from watching the Air Force ROTC cadets do their PT session(which is in the afternoon...which infuriates me since the Army's is at 6:30 AM) that it is not as strenous as ours. So I would expect the same about basic, hard but not as hard as the army or marines. I am guessing the hard part is after basic where you have to learn all the technical details of your job.


http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/8056/userbar307447ph.gif
Reconcilia Rem Publicam!
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232297 is a reply to message #231679] Tue, 28 November 2006 12:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nodbugger is currently offline  Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
That is why 30% of the Air Force PT test is a waste measurement score. For males, if you have less than, I think, a 32 inch waste you get the full 30 points.

The reason is that the Air Force is mainly technical jobs now and they don't want to get rid of smart people just because they can't run a 6 minute mile. Of course PJ, CCT, SF, etc require much higher physical fitness levels to join up.

AFROTC right here.

edit* We have 4 PT sessions a week. Wed and Fri at 7am, 5:30 on test days, and Tues and Thursday at 3:30pm. I can only go to the ones on Wed and Fri because I have a class during the other ones. And for some people it is the opposite and they hold their own PT session at 6am Wed or Fri.

We need to make at least 2 per week at if we have less than 80% attendance over the semester we fail and can never go back into ROTC.


http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1129285834

[Updated on: Tue, 28 November 2006 12:38]

Report message to a moderator

Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232318 is a reply to message #231679] Tue, 28 November 2006 14:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aprime
Messages: 900
Registered: July 2005
Location: Gatineau, Canada
Karma: 0
Colonel

Waste?

They measure your shit?


FUCK
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232328 is a reply to message #232318] Tue, 28 November 2006 16:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nodbugger is currently offline  Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
I'm tired, unlike you, I'm actually doing something with my life.

http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1129285834
Re: ::sorry:: the USA army [message #232347 is a reply to message #232221] Tue, 28 November 2006 18:24 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
fl00d3d is currently offline  fl00d3d
Messages: 1107
Registered: August 2003
Location: Iowa, USA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance!
xptek wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 23:34

Crimson wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:19

Respect the position, not the man maybe?


Holy shit. One person on this forum understands this concept.

fl00d3d wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:50

This thread was about an ignoramus saying foolish things - and when I stood my ground here comes xptek to save the day with his backwards truths. He's just as ignorant as the topic starter in many regards.


Please elaborate. I'm not seeing how I'm "ignorant." I refuse to automatically put veterans on a pedestal simply because they did their job. Big fucking deal.

fl00d3d wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:50

XPTEK: Are you a military veteren yourself? You've said "to a fellow veteran" so I'd like to know. Because to be honest I have NEVER run across a fellow veteran who was as disrespectful to his brother in arms as you ... so I'm starting to think you're full of shit.


lol

fl00d3d wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:50

Further, I would still like to know how I'm a 'fucking moron' for standing up to some punk 15 (not even 16yrs old yet) kid who tried to steal from my business and from my community. How does that make me a 'fucking moron'? He was adult enough to put up his own site and run his own servers ... so if he wants to play like the big boys, let him be one of the big boys. Not to mention Justin Schultz (sm0ke) is well over 18 with a wife and kids. You must be one of those PUSSIES in life who just watches when bad things happen then blame other people.


Step one: You are old.
Step two: You interact with children over a text-based medium.
Step three: You make important deal with children over a dead game.
Step four: You fight with children over a text-based medium.
Step five: You become fucking moron.
Step six: Aforementioned gaming children laugh at you for being a fucking moron.
Step seven: You fight with children over a text-based medium.
Step eight: Cycle repeats. fl00d3d rage ensues.

fl00d3d wrote on Mon, 27 November 2006 16:50

Well let me remind you of something child, "Karma is a bitch" and I hope that God spanks the fuck out of you someday for being a twat.


What about all the starving Ethiopian children?


Venetian Snares - Duffy


xptek the reason you can say "big fucking deal" is because of veterans. Spend a week in an authoritarian government and see how you hold up. You'll be begging for veterAns like ME to come liberate you. Downplaying self sacrifice to protect your renegadeforums.com post is proof of your ignorance.

In review of your 8 step program I found the following 8 errors:
(1) I am not old. Perhaps in relation to your 1-sprouted curly self?
(2) I interact with many people over a text-based medium. As do you. So......where were you going with this one? Oh wait, nowhere.
(3) If this game was so dead and unimportant why do YOU waste your breath arguing with "useless people like me"?
(4) <See error in #2>
(5) This has not be proven and I have the respect of MANY more people than you do here. I guess that confirms that you are, in fact, the 'fucking moron'?
(6) There are no children laughing at me. Maybe you? But I do not count you for anything because I've never heard an intelligent word out of your mouth.
(7) <See error #2 and #4>
(Cool I kept my cool and continue to make you look like a fool. Better luck next time.

GAME OVER
Previous Topic: Future Warrior
Next Topic: idea!!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 11 13:24:43 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01379 seconds