Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star [message #213671 is a reply to message #213662] |
Thu, 17 August 2006 00:35 |
|
Blazer
Messages: 3322 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma:
|
General (3 Stars) Administrator/General |
|
|
Of course we all know that in a real battle, the Empire would be crushed like eggshells. This argument has gone on for decades, but it pretty much comes down to "torp at warp". Federation ships are capable of controling their travel and weapons while at warp speed. The empire ships can only make Hyperspace jumps, that they must precisely calculate beforehand and have no control over until they complete the jump.
Several ways which the federation would own the Empire:
1. Firing weapons at warp speed. Star destroyers etc couldn't hope to hit them with their pitiful turbo lasers.
2. Antimater spread. Federation ships have the ability to fire bursts of antimatter which pretty much annihilate anything.
3. Transporter technology. Federation ships could beam some torpedoes inside enemy vessels, or beam darth vader out into space...lol
4. Superior armor. Even without their shields, there are many Federation ships like the U.S.S. Defiant, that have armor that can withstand sustained phaser fire. Heck while we are at it:
5. The U.S.S. Defiant. The defiant has superior armor, shields, and weapons. The defiant is also equipped with a cloaking device, so they could uncloak, unleash a volley of fire, and then dissappear. I would imagine that the Defiant could single-handedly wipe out the entire fleet of the Empire.
6. The Borg. The federation could just notify the Borg of where to find the Empire, and they would go to own them, especially when they found out they have a damn ROUND ship, which would surely offend the Borg with their square cubes Just kidding of course, as the borg scout vessels are spherical.
P.S. This post is in jest. I have no desire to ignite a star trek vs star wars flamefest.
|
|
|
|
|
The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: Blazer on Thu, 17 August 2006 00:35
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: light on Thu, 17 August 2006 00:42
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: warranto on Thu, 17 August 2006 06:15
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: Jaspah on Thu, 17 August 2006 10:07
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: bisen11 on Thu, 17 August 2006 10:20
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: Dover on Thu, 17 August 2006 11:53
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: reborn on Fri, 18 August 2006 14:48
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: cmatt42 on Fri, 18 August 2006 14:51
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: reborn on Fri, 18 August 2006 15:23
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: bisen11 on Fri, 18 August 2006 17:29
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: cmatt42 on Fri, 18 August 2006 18:42
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
By: JohnDoe on Thu, 24 August 2006 08:44
|
|
|
Re: The USS Enterprise-D versus the Death Star
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 14 05:45:09 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00836 seconds
|