Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Computer trouble
Re: Computer trouble [message #184969 is a reply to message #184757] Sat, 07 January 2006 05:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PackHunter is currently offline  PackHunter
Messages: 487
Registered: November 2004
Location: Holland
Karma: 0
Commander
I'm curious, what brand motherboard do you have? I heard and in fact found out myself Asus is making really shitty motherboards these days. I have got 2 fried Asus motherboards that do the exact same thing yours does, *nothing*.
Re: Computer trouble [message #184971 is a reply to message #184757] Sat, 07 January 2006 07:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aprime
Messages: 900
Registered: July 2005
Location: Gatineau, Canada
Karma: 0
Colonel

I was able to get my fan working, but my RAM's still underclocked no matter what I do.

FUCK
Re: Computer trouble [message #184975 is a reply to message #184757] Sat, 07 January 2006 10:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Renx is currently offline  Renx
Messages: 2321
Registered: April 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Category Moderator
Clear the CMOS. Turn off the power supply and unplug it, then there should be a little two-pinned jumper sitting on a set of three pins(somewhere on the mobo). Move the jumper so it is sitting on one of the pins it wasn't before, but still on two pins. Leave it for 15s, move it back, plug in and turn on the power supply. It should post fine then.

~Canucck

http://www.sloganizer.net/en/style7,Espion.png

Blazer

...RG made me ugly

[Updated on: Sat, 07 January 2006 10:14]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #184983 is a reply to message #184757] Sat, 07 January 2006 11:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SCOTT9 is currently offline  SCOTT9
Messages: 111
Registered: November 2005
Karma: 0
Recruit
i would suggest have a look at every critical component and see if ones got fried

Humvees own you!
Re: Computer trouble [message #184986 is a reply to message #184757] Sat, 07 January 2006 12:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PaRaDoX is currently offline  PaRaDoX
Messages: 288
Registered: October 2005
Karma: 0
Recruit
jest return it if it jest stopped working then its a peace of shit

http://renegadehelp.kinstry.co.uk/paradox/xfire.gif
Moee wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 00:10

U 2 bumb as a pot

[Updated on: Sat, 07 January 2006 12:49]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #184992 is a reply to message #184757] Sat, 07 January 2006 14:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mision08 is currently offline  mision08
Messages: 525
Registered: May 2005
Location: Cattle Drive, Dallas to F...
Karma: 0
Colonel
Bummer, I would let you borrow my spare MOBO, CPU, and RAM if I made the daily commute to Houston. Hell, last year I went from N.Dallas to S.Houston, I-45@ Almeda RD. 4 to 6 times a week. I know every inch of I-45, and a few inches of Hwy75.


Howdy Comrade,
Why did you flash the BIOS? What MOBO, chipset, RAM, video card are you working with? What did you do to fix the fan? Is the RAM set to a 1:1 ratio in the BIOS DRAM configuration?


[Updated on: Sat, 07 January 2006 14:58]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #185015 is a reply to message #184952] Sat, 07 January 2006 19:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Scythar wrote on Fri, 06 January 2006 18:32

icedog90 wrote on Fri, 06 January 2006 15:56

Scythar wrote on Fri, 06 January 2006 12:25

icedog90 wrote on Fri, 06 January 2006 14:53

Dual channel isn't a certain type of memory, it's two sticks of DDR that are both exactly the same and are being effectively doubled in bandwidth from the RAM to the CPU.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_channel



Actually, the bandwidth is only doubled between the RAM and memory controller. There's still only one frontside bus (between CPU and chipset), which is exactly why dual channel doesn't bring such a huge performance increase in AMD chips than Intel, since AMD doesn't have as fast FSB and it creates a bottleneck. Intel's fast 800 Mhz(= 2x DDR400 speed) is great for dual channel arcitechture.


I knew someone would jump in and attempt to correct me because I said "bandwidth". I was talking about the bits, not the actual bandwidth. Utilizing two 64-bit channels, it results in a total bandwidth of 128 bits for moving from the RAM to the CPU.


There isn't a straight databus between RAM and CPU, it all goes through the chipset.

The problem is that the FSB(CPU<->chipset) is only 64-bit, so the uber1337 2x64-bit dual channel memory(Chipset<->RAM) bus can't fit through the FSB, causing a bottleneck, and nowhere near 2x transfer rates.

This is becoming obsolete info when 128-bit FSB is becoming more common or there's some other new tech stuff involved, but anyone with Athlon XP-family CPU, for example, will not benefit all that much from dual channel.



Now you're going into another topic...
Re: Computer trouble [message #185020 is a reply to message #184992] Sat, 07 January 2006 21:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aprime
Messages: 900
Registered: July 2005
Location: Gatineau, Canada
Karma: 0
Colonel

mision08 wrote on Sat, 07 January 2006 16:46

Bummer, I would let you borrow my spare MOBO, CPU, and RAM if I made the daily commute to Houston. Hell, last year I went from N.Dallas to S.Houston, I-45@ Almeda RD. 4 to 6 times a week. I know every inch of I-45, and a few inches of Hwy75.


Howdy Comrade,
Why did you flash the BIOS? What MOBO, chipset, RAM, video card are you working with? What did you do to fix the fan? Is the RAM set to a 1:1 ratio in the BIOS DRAM configuration?



It's an ATi X800XT (AGP). I nscrewed the entire heatsink, cleaned it a bit, gave it a run in one of our other six computers and it was working again, if it ever occurs again I'll just buy another heatsink for it.

It's Kingston value RAM (one of them has Samsung memory while the other one has Kingston memory, I bought both sticks at the same place last year), it does the job and I can overclock my CPU without any problems. As for the motherboard it's an Asus K8N-E Deluxe, a socket 754 motherboard to be exact, my RAM has always been clocked to 400MHz before, but now it's downclocked to 333MHz, but when I remove a stick and leave one in (no matter which one it is) it's clocked to 400MHz again. I checked all the DIMMs. I flashed the BIOS because there was a new version out.
The RAM is indeed set to a 1:1 ratio.


FUCK

[Updated on: Sat, 07 January 2006 22:00]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #185043 is a reply to message #185015] Sun, 08 January 2006 04:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Scythar is currently offline  Scythar
Messages: 580
Registered: February 2003
Location: Finland
Karma: 0
Colonel
icedog90 wrote on Sat, 07 January 2006 21:52

Scythar wrote on Fri, 06 January 2006 18:32

icedog90 wrote on Fri, 06 January 2006 15:56

Scythar wrote on Fri, 06 January 2006 12:25

icedog90 wrote on Fri, 06 January 2006 14:53

Dual channel isn't a certain type of memory, it's two sticks of DDR that are both exactly the same and are being effectively doubled in bandwidth from the RAM to the CPU.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_channel



Actually, the bandwidth is only doubled between the RAM and memory controller. There's still only one frontside bus (between CPU and chipset), which is exactly why dual channel doesn't bring such a huge performance increase in AMD chips than Intel, since AMD doesn't have as fast FSB and it creates a bottleneck. Intel's fast 800 Mhz(= 2x DDR400 speed) is great for dual channel arcitechture.


I knew someone would jump in and attempt to correct me because I said "bandwidth". I was talking about the bits, not the actual bandwidth. Utilizing two 64-bit channels, it results in a total bandwidth of 128 bits for moving from the RAM to the CPU.


There isn't a straight databus between RAM and CPU, it all goes through the chipset.

The problem is that the FSB(CPU<->chipset) is only 64-bit, so the uber1337 2x64-bit dual channel memory(Chipset<->RAM) bus can't fit through the FSB, causing a bottleneck, and nowhere near 2x transfer rates.

This is becoming obsolete info when 128-bit FSB is becoming more common or there's some other new tech stuff involved, but anyone with Athlon XP-family CPU, for example, will not benefit all that much from dual channel.



Now you're going into another topic...


No I'm not Rocked Over I just made it clear that dual channel architecture doesn't automatically double the bits to 128 between RAM and CPU, just RAM and memory contrtoller, as I've said about three times now Razz

Whether there's actually a FSB fast enough to take advantage of that, shouldn't be taken for granted. (Ahtlon XP)

But hey, we're hijacking this...


There's a hole in the sky through which things can fly.

[Updated on: Sun, 08 January 2006 04:30]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #185061 is a reply to message #184817] Sun, 08 January 2006 12:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
trooprm02 is currently offline  trooprm02
Messages: 3266
Registered: August 2005
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
icedog90 wrote on Thu, 05 January 2006 16:52

trooprm02 wrote on Thu, 05 January 2006 12:57

Try running it in safe mode, if then the desktops shown, then you either have a faulty registry or video driver Big Grin


He can't boot, period. That means that when he turns on his computer, nothing happens and there is no display.


Ok then during the boot, boot your computer with the "last know good/working config" that is a selection in the setup section, try that Big Grin


Re: Computer trouble [message #185066 is a reply to message #184757] Sun, 08 January 2006 13:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nineball is currently offline  Nineball
Messages: 78
Registered: November 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
Can you not read?
He cannot boot, PERIOD. Nothing at all comes up. Is that hard to understand?

Anyway...
Have you tried a different PSU? That seems to be the most likely culprit; that, or something shorted out, and completely fucked up.


http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/915/ninesig1ek.jpg

[Updated on: Sun, 08 January 2006 13:55]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #185069 is a reply to message #184757] Sun, 08 January 2006 15:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mision08 is currently offline  mision08
Messages: 525
Registered: May 2005
Location: Cattle Drive, Dallas to F...
Karma: 0
Colonel
He has an extended warranty and is content to let the manufacturer deal with it. Although, I think he should get another extension to his warranty courteous of the manufacturer.
Comrade, you broke rule number one of BIOS flashing. BIOS updates are usually for known issues like voltage setting that kill RAM modules, or maybe an issue with underclocking RAM. There is an element of risk involved, AWDFLASH.EXE is a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Yes, I know the first thing to do when installing a new MOBO is update the BIOS. That is a desire of the manufacturer to have the MOBO on the shelf ASAP. Hell, BIOS flahing is most likely the product of a marketing circle jerk, not research and development at all. Anyway, im not saying you did the wrong thing, just that you should have a better reason for doing it. If you find a BIOS that works well with the memory sticks, you should probably stay with it.


The heatsink screws to the PCB on the ATI X800XT? Did you clean the mating surface with acetone, and apply a tiny bit of thermal paste before reseating it?
Is that Kingston value with Samsung TCCD memory? A BIOS usually favors RAM due to the chip it uses.


[Updated on: Sun, 08 January 2006 16:36]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #185092 is a reply to message #184757] Sun, 08 January 2006 20:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Renx is currently offline  Renx
Messages: 2321
Registered: April 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Category Moderator
Clear. The. CMOS.

~Canucck

http://www.sloganizer.net/en/style7,Espion.png

Blazer

...RG made me ugly
Re: Computer trouble [message #185093 is a reply to message #184757] Sun, 08 January 2006 21:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aprime
Messages: 900
Registered: July 2005
Location: Gatineau, Canada
Karma: 0
Colonel

It's TCCC memory.
RenX: Will tomorrow when I get back from school.


FUCK

[Updated on: Sun, 08 January 2006 21:55]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #185094 is a reply to message #184757] Mon, 09 January 2006 03:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nineball is currently offline  Nineball
Messages: 78
Registered: November 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
BIOS updates will (sometimes) add new settings, and add compatibility for new CPUs, as well.

http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/915/ninesig1ek.jpg
Re: Computer trouble [message #185097 is a reply to message #185094] Mon, 09 January 2006 08:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mision08 is currently offline  mision08
Messages: 525
Registered: May 2005
Location: Cattle Drive, Dallas to F...
Karma: 0
Colonel
Yes, and I would know exactly what new settings are added, and what hardware is being updated. If you don't have a dual processor, no need in getting a BIOS that fixes issues for that hardware.

[Updated on: Tue, 10 January 2006 05:27]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Computer trouble [message #185311 is a reply to message #184757] Tue, 10 January 2006 23:42 Go to previous message
Nineball is currently offline  Nineball
Messages: 78
Registered: November 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
Unless AMD or Intel releases a new core.

http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/915/ninesig1ek.jpg
Previous Topic: Post your Playlist for 2006
Next Topic: 1337 PHP Proxy Script I Just Found
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 30 14:21:32 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01068 seconds