Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Patriot Act Renewal rejected by the Senate
Re: Patriot Act Renewal rejected by the Senate [message #184501 is a reply to message #182418] Mon, 02 January 2006 12:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nodbugger is currently offline  Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
Quote:


That doesn't apply to electronic surveillance. Duh.


Yes they can. I showed you the damn law.

Quote:


http://www.cs.indiana.edu/statecraft/warpow.html


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Act

Fuck you.

Quote:

Not really.


Yes really.

Quote:

To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;


No such power exists for the president.

Quote:

Except that Bob has constitutionally-protected rights, and to say you can violate them because you really want to is just stupid.


Bob has no right to be a terrorist and the search is not unreasonable.

Quote:

Law works on facts, not common sense.


What the hell does this mean? Common sense and facts are one in the same you idiot.

Quote:


Which I suppose you would consider good


Of course, just because someone is an American doesn't disqualify them from being a terrorist.




Now go away you fucking idiot, the laws says it can be done, fuck off.


http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1129285834
Re: Patriot Act Renewal rejected by the Senate [message #184507 is a reply to message #182418] Mon, 02 January 2006 14:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NukeIt15 is currently offline  NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
Colonel
*notices that very nearly everybody is gone except for the rabid, raving extremists, laughs, and walks away*

"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine

Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
Re: Patriot Act Renewal rejected by the Senate [message #184514 is a reply to message #184489] Mon, 02 January 2006 15:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
runewood is currently offline  runewood
Messages: 138
Registered: October 2005
Location: SE Michigan
Karma: 0
Recruit
Javaxcx wrote on Mon, 02 January 2006 11:24

Actually, if you want to play the legal game: You cannot commit the legal definition of "treason" without it being established as such by a court. You can be CHARGED with treason, but it must be proven.

Military law, in context, is a bit different however.



Thats the damn point, YOU DONT NEED TO BE CONVICTED! Its like there has been an invasion of enemy troops, when you capture them you dont give them a trial.


"Don't try to be a great man, just be a man. Let history make it's own judgments."

"Maybe its not the destination that matters, but the journey."

"How many people does it take before its wrong? A thousand? Fifty thousand? A million?"

"Im not here to tell you how it is going to end, Im here to tell you how it is going to begin."

"Its not the end or even the beggining of the end, mearly the end of the beggining."

"Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end."
Re: Patriot Act Renewal rejected by the Senate [message #184518 is a reply to message #184488] Mon, 02 January 2006 15:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DreamWraith is currently offline  DreamWraith
Messages: 130
Registered: November 2005
Karma: 0
Recruit
runewood wrote on Mon, 02 January 2006 12:20


...I am a terrorist. I am also am an American citizen...

I will be sure to let ol' Georgie know.


http://www.renevo.com/members/carl/banner.png
Re: Patriot Act Renewal rejected by the Senate [message #188862 is a reply to message #184514] Tue, 07 February 2006 21:42 Go to previous message
PointlessAmbler is currently offline  PointlessAmbler
Messages: 318
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
runewood wrote on Mon, 02 January 2006 17:08

Javaxcx wrote on Mon, 02 January 2006 11:24

Actually, if you want to play the legal game: You cannot commit the legal definition of "treason" without it being established as such by a court. You can be CHARGED with treason, but it must be proven.

Military law, in context, is a bit different however.



Thats the damn point, YOU DONT NEED TO BE CONVICTED! Its like there has been an invasion of enemy troops, when you capture them you dont give them a trial.



Let's not have trials for anything, because everyone accused of a crime must be guilty! Yeah, let's go back to ninth century human rights!

Under our own law, there is a huge difference between being charged with a crime and having been found guilty. Until you are found guilty, your rights are protected by the Constitution. The government cannot (legally) abridge the rights of a citizen that has not been found guilty in a court of law. This includes nasty crimes like treason.

Honestly, it scares me that there are people who think like you. The government is not infalliable. Our founding fathers realized this and tried to create a governmental system that protects itself against corrupt individuals who want to seize power. If you buy into this whole "culture of fear" nonsense-- that it's somehow okay to take away our rights because a bunch of bad men want to kill us, then you are only asking for your fundamental rights to be removed.


Previous Topic: Texas politician proposes 50 percent game tax
Next Topic: My Opinions on Clans(Warning: Anti-Clan Rant Ahead)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 11 12:52:46 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00847 seconds