Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » A path beyond site move
Re: RA:APB Site Move [message #183946 is a reply to message #183925] |
Wed, 28 December 2005 12:16 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
ACK,
First off, this thread is by no means the "only" source I'm getting my information from. Please.
Now, Chronojam does not actually point out all the problems that Reborn has caused, and your sentence has vague pronoun references.
The simple fact of the matter is you hosted Reborn-created material without their permission in a malicious manner which got you removed from PCNC.
Now, let's talk about ModDB.
Renardin mailed InTenSe! (However you capitalize that) asking that if he could produce evidence as to your leaking of Reborn content, then would Intense remove your mod from ModDB. As far as this whole "proof" thing goes,
http://steppo.andfreeporn.net/misc/rebornrenalertspat.html
There's you talking to Steppo about how ethical it is to leak the Reborn mod. The answer is of course that is entirely unethical, but fortunately you're too naive/stupid to care.
http://www.renegadeforums.com/index.php?t=msg&th=18141&a mp;a mp;start=0&rid=1841
There's you actually leaking the mod.
http://www.renegadeforums.com/index.php?t=msg&th=18144&a mp;a mp;start=0&rid=1841
Please note "credit to Aircraftkiller"
I guess Intense! thought that counted for something. Personally, it doesn't look like a "false complaint" to me. Oh, and I was searching ModDB and I couldn't find your mod listed there. So it seems like you got taken off of ModDB.
TehSteppo | "I mean, if you hear that there's a Reborn leak on the internet, and then you post in RenForums "hey, here's a Reborn leak!" then you're pretty much just as guilty of copyright violations as the guy who uploaded it in the first place, assuming it wasn't you"
|
Phoenixx, what rules did Renardin break?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
[Updated on: Wed, 28 December 2005 12:17] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
A path beyond site move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Aidoneus on Wed, 28 December 2005 12:31
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Renx on Wed, 28 December 2005 22:51
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: U927 on Wed, 28 December 2005 12:38
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Grass on Wed, 28 December 2005 15:53
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Aprime on Thu, 29 December 2005 00:24
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
By: Goztow on Thu, 29 December 2005 03:06
|
|
|
Re: RA:APB Site Move
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
By: Crimson on Sat, 31 December 2005 03:24
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
By: Crimson on Sat, 31 December 2005 19:42
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
By: Aprime on Sat, 31 December 2005 15:36
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
|
|
|
Re: A path beyond site move
By: warranto on Sun, 01 January 2006 20:25
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Nov 16 17:58:56 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00890 seconds
|