|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: jester718 banned or tolerated? [message #182167 is a reply to message #182146] |
Tue, 13 December 2005 12:47   |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Give 'em the axe. It's not as if he's new and inexperienced, he registered more than a year and a half ago...ought to know better by now.
Make the spammer go bye-bye.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: jester718 banned or tolerated? [message #182189 is a reply to message #182146] |
Tue, 13 December 2005 14:30 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
How about we remove the general discussion forum? The only thing that really ever gets discussed is who should be banned from it.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: jester718 banned or tolerated? [message #182198 is a reply to message #182146] |
Tue, 13 December 2005 15:27 |
Weirdo
Messages: 369
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
Could someone please explain me, why only warning him? He is intentionally spamming the forums, trying to screw up the general discussion.
He isn't just some dumb guy who makes one stupid post, thinking it's a bit smarter. Or a guy who try's to show e-penis by flaming/ discussing topics. He has posted multiple threads, with only one purpose and that is screwing up the forums. He has no real purpose and can join the other people like the old fatazz.
Size doesn't matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: jester718 banned or tolerated? [message #182210 is a reply to message #182146] |
Tue, 13 December 2005 17:41 |
|
|
Tell me, why should someone be banned for posting four shit threads
in the General Discussion forum while some here have already done far worse and are still here today? I mean Renardin's still here, no?
(EDIT: Technically he's making fun of those newbies who are making posts about Renegade just because (and I'm assuming it's the reason) the forums are inactive.)
FUCK
[Updated on: Tue, 13 December 2005 17:42] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: jester718 banned or tolerated? [message #182254 is a reply to message #182189] |
Wed, 14 December 2005 09:28 |
Chronojam
Messages: 688
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Tue, 13 December 2005 16:30 |
How about we remove the general discussion forum? The only thing that really ever gets discussed is who should be banned from it.
|
Really. How many are there on the first page, today? Other than this one.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
