| heres somthing [message #180939] |
Wed, 30 November 2005 21:49  |
 |
superj69
Messages: 309
Registered: September 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
ok why is the U.S. in iraq neway .at first it was because they had weapons of mass destruction, but did they find ne NO so why they still there
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: heres somthing [message #181008 is a reply to message #180939] |
Thu, 01 December 2005 15:12  |
 |
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
As I understand, WMDs were the original idea.
But, since there are no WMDs there, we may as well continue to help stabilize the government. Well, YOU should, Canada thankfully never got into it.
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
| Re: heres somthing [message #181009 is a reply to message #180939] |
Thu, 01 December 2005 15:14 |
 |
Hydra
Messages: 827
Registered: September 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Bush has said we'll stay until the job is done.
The job could be done as early as next year, or it could be a bit longer. By most modern measurements of victory, though, Iraq has been and continues to be a resounding success, and signs for a bright and optimistic future are very apparent. This is in spite of how the anti-Bush media like to play up every little story about "insurgent" attacks while burying the good news in the back pages of the newspapers, not to mention accepting every allegation of "torture" and "abuse" as absolute truth and plastering more pictures of Abu Ghraib at every possible moment.
Also:
| Hydra |
We have been over this many times before; the war was waged for three main reasons: 1) Saddam's failure to fully disclose all weapons of mass destruction in accordance with the cease0fire ending the first Gulf War as well as numerous UN resolutions; 2) Saddam's harboring and giving aid and comfort to known international Islamic terrorist groups; and 3) to liberate the oppressed Iraqi people from a brutal dictator that has a long history of torturing his very own people.
|
Walter Keith Koester: September 22, 1962 - March 15, 2005
God be with you, Uncle Wally.
 (<---New(ish) Prayer Group Forums)
 (<---Archived Prayer Group Forums)
[Updated on: Thu, 01 December 2005 15:18] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: heres somthing [message #181012 is a reply to message #180939] |
Thu, 01 December 2005 15:16 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
How many Iraqi soldiers do we have fully trained and mobilized?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: heres somthing [message #181541 is a reply to message #180939] |
Tue, 06 December 2005 16:13 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Too bad George Bush can't tell the truth.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: heres somthing [message #181594 is a reply to message #180939] |
Wed, 07 December 2005 05:36 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Um...
George Bush didn't know Iraq was going poorly? BTW, I wasn't talking about WMDs, or rather the lack thereof, here.
But while we're on the topic, how do you think George Bush managed to lead the country to war based entirely on lies? Was it really not his fault at all?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Re: heres somthing [message #181604 is a reply to message #180939] |
Wed, 07 December 2005 07:45 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7431
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
One of my friends just became a Marine and he's leaving in February for a 14-month deployment in Fallujah. He's actually lucky because he'll be working with the computer network there and be in 72-degrees F all day.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Re: heres somthing [message #181606 is a reply to message #181594] |
Wed, 07 December 2005 08:35 |
 |
Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Wed, 07 December 2005 06:36 |
Um...
George Bush didn't know Iraq was going poorly? BTW, I wasn't talking about WMDs, or rather the lack thereof, here.
But while we're on the topic, how do you think George Bush managed to lead the country to war based entirely on lies? Was it really not his fault at all?
|
I thought you were referring to the WMDs.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
