Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...' [message #173256 is a reply to message #168750] |
Thu, 29 September 2005 14:18 |
|
NukeIt15
Messages: 987 Registered: February 2003 Location: Out to lunch
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
Quote: | GUYS holy crap, EA is a great company!
|
No, it isn't. They have a penchant for pushing games out the door before QA testing is complete (read that: lots of buggy releases), they hardly ever do anything new (though the same could be said about many large companies, and I understand the reason behind that- but it sucks nonetheless), and frequently have developers hold back content that is later released in undersized, overpriced expansions.
That, and they bloody well did kill Westwood, and there are a great many people who do not like EA because of that- Westwood was essentially the genesis of the RTS genre, and produced a long line of very, very good games (RTS and otherwise) long before EA touched them.
Quote: | They've moved onto bigger and better stuff! I work for blockbuster up here and I've gained quite the knowledge about them and what they've done. Anyone heard of Medal of Honor? These games are amazing!
|
Games aren't made by EA. Developers make games, EA publishes them (and very frequently before they are ready to hit the shelves). The developers deserve credit for the greatness of X, Y, or Z game, the publishers often do not. Developers make games, Publishers advertise and publish them and set deadlines. Got it? Good.
Quote: | How about you all get over the fact that Renegade isn't so popular anymore; if you like it, play it. If not, shut the fuck up.
|
Ren is not the only gripe people have with EA, and if you haven't picked up on that yet you are either blind or ignorant...or both.
Quote: | Also who CARES if they are naming the new CNC game after CNC, they own the name anyway, it IS linked to that genre of series or TYPE of game.
|
Juicy. Here goes:
LOTS of people care that EA slapped the C&C title on Generals. Generals ISN'T C&C. It has exactly zilch of the various qualities that made Westwood's strategy titles such as Dune and C&C as good as they were. The ENTIRE old and familiar (and easy to use) C&C interface was thrown out the window, as was the tech tree, the unit dependencies, resource harvesting, base construction, universe and backstory, and so on. In short, Generals should not be lumped in as a C&C game because it has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with every other C&C game.
You might as well take Starcraft or Warcraft and call it C&C. Hell, why not take Real War, Total Annihilation, and Homeworld, and throw them all in there too! Hey, they're all RTS games, so by your logic they should all be called C&C too!
Quote: | You're basing your opinions mainly because they stopped working on a THREE YEAR OLD GAME.
|
I find it disturbing that you feel games are suddenly not worthy of being supported when they get a little old. People like you are the reason why companies like EA DON'T support their products. It is exactly your "newer is better" train of thought that pushes games out the door before they're ready, that produces steaming piles of crap like Generals, that kills good, solid companies like Westwood. And for some reason, you're content to suck it down and smile about it? You fail at life.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: TEKNIK on Wed, 31 August 2005 17:21
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Jecht on Wed, 31 August 2005 20:22
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Belski on Thu, 01 September 2005 06:39
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Lijitsu on Thu, 01 September 2005 20:04
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: nopic01| on Thu, 01 September 2005 11:40
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Jecht on Fri, 02 September 2005 03:03
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: XeonTeam on Fri, 02 September 2005 04:57
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Belski on Fri, 02 September 2005 10:06
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: danpaul88 on Sun, 11 September 2005 04:59
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Jecht on Fri, 02 September 2005 10:41
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Belski on Sat, 03 September 2005 23:33
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Weirdo on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:19
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: K9Trooper on Wed, 14 September 2005 19:40
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: warranto on Sun, 04 September 2005 11:41
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: nopic01| on Sun, 04 September 2005 12:44
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: nopic01| on Mon, 05 September 2005 18:53
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: TEKNIK on Tue, 06 September 2005 14:43
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Jecht on Tue, 06 September 2005 18:11
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: NukeIt15 on Sun, 11 September 2005 10:19
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: msgtpain on Sun, 11 September 2005 11:56
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Javaxcx on Mon, 12 September 2005 04:31
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Jecht on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:15
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: PatchTr11 on Mon, 26 September 2005 13:02
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: NukeIt15 on Sun, 11 September 2005 17:28
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: NukeIt15 on Mon, 12 September 2005 10:10
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Jecht on Mon, 12 September 2005 11:49
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: NukeIt15 on Mon, 12 September 2005 12:47
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: NukeIt15 on Mon, 12 September 2005 20:02
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Jecht on Tue, 13 September 2005 02:19
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Javaxcx on Tue, 13 September 2005 10:00
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Javaxcx on Tue, 13 September 2005 11:24
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Javaxcx on Tue, 13 September 2005 13:45
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Dreadlord on Mon, 26 September 2005 05:51
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: NukeIt15 on Thu, 29 September 2005 14:18
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Dreadlord on Fri, 30 September 2005 04:34
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: NukeIt15 on Fri, 30 September 2005 08:22
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: NukeIt15 on Wed, 05 October 2005 21:25
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: icedog90 on Sat, 05 November 2005 22:38
|
|
|
Re: illogical sig 'fuck ea...'
By: Coolair on Sun, 06 November 2005 04:10
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 03 00:05:35 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01670 seconds
|