|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169307 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 02:48   |
Weirdo
Messages: 369
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
It's kind of sad. They have some developers of Generals on there web site telling what they remember of 10 years C&C and I think none of them, have actually been working on C&C for 10 years.
Size doesn't matter.
[Updated on: Sun, 04 September 2005 02:48] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169341 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 08:54 |
Belski
Messages: 93
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
i been playin since ts to buddy...i play yr the most, TS in my opinion was NOT the best....
oh and i think thats an "emperor overlord" a 2 bit copy of the apoc
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169358 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 11:23 |
Kanezor
Messages: 855
Registered: February 2005
Location: Sugar Land, TX, USA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
There's only a few things that I liked RA2 over TS.
RA2 definitely has a better interface. The build menu is always in order (that is, if you build a war factory, a repair pad, and tech center... then the repair pad is destroyed then rebuilt, the units that the repair pad allowed are not placed at the end of the list. Also, there are four build lists. Infantry and vehicles are separated, as well as base defenses and construction/tech buildings. It results in a much cleaner (meaning easier and faster to use) build interface.
Tiberian Sun's vehicles' speeds are very sporadic. You go up a hill and the speed drops to half. They get to the top and they speed up for two cells, then turn and go to a shit speed again. They finish turning and speed up for three cells... then end up rolling over a different type of terrain and their speed goes to the shithole again. RA2's vehicles' speeds are much more consistent. While it's a good idea that vehicles get slowed down due to terrain and elevation changes, TS seems to have the slowdowns overexaggerated in my opinion.
Other than that, Tiberian Sun's graphics look much better (as in, much less cartoony). Tiberian Sun also has a much better plotline in my opinion.
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169442 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 18:14 |
 |
Lijitsu
Messages: 1575
Registered: April 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Its supposed to be the China's Overlord tank, that can be upgraded to either have a Gattling Cannon, a Battle Bunker, or a Subliminal Message Speaker. The Bunker is for garrisoning troops(Best used with Tank Hunters), the Gattling Cannon is AA, and the Speaker increases healing rate, and attack speed.
Yes, i played Generals.
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 22:30 |
I've been Nodbuggered. =( =( =(
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169447 is a reply to message #169442] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 18:50 |
Belski
Messages: 93
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
|
i play generals to, but if you do look at it...it does look like an apoc, i never noticed it though, i usually make rhinos instead of apocs..
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169461 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 21:13 |
Belski
Messages: 93
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
|
holy hell...thats BS not giving chat for ra2 and giving it to a game that 0 peeps play now, lol kindov funny actually
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169464 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 21:28 |
tooncy
Messages: 407
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
Turn XWIS off before you make judgements. I played TS two months ago and there were about 30 people online.
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169465 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 21:36 |
Belski
Messages: 93
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
what do you mean by that..? i only use wol for renegade now...
i only use xwis for yr,ra2,or ts
plus strike-team hosts community matches in TS...so i was basing on average...there is no way 30 peeps on a game that old every day...
[Updated on: Sun, 04 September 2005 21:36] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169468 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 22:41 |
 |
exnyte
Messages: 746
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
The real question is for those who are bickering is ... Who cares?
All of you have your OWN OPINIONS... That's all that they are... OPINIONS. No one is going to be right or wrong, and in the end you'll all end up looking stupid... So stop.
American Cancer Society | Donate
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169471 is a reply to message #169197] |
Sun, 04 September 2005 22:52 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
^^^ Listen to him.
Well, the first Command & Conquer game I played was the original Command & Conquer. Then Red Alert, then Tiberian Sun, then Red Alert 2, then Renegade, and then Generals.
Hell, I've played them all and I have them all, except I have never played Sole Survivor and I definitely do not have it.
|
|
|
|
| Re: westwood.com [message #169474 is a reply to message #169197] |
Mon, 05 September 2005 00:00 |
Kanezor
Messages: 855
Registered: February 2005
Location: Sugar Land, TX, USA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Sole Survivor was fun.
I wish I had Sole Survivor. I've only played it at my uncle's about 5 years ago for three to four hours.
---
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
