|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Same-Sex marriages in Canada [message #162131 is a reply to message #162097] |
Wed, 29 June 2005 14:07 |
|
Renx
Messages: 2321 Registered: April 2003 Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) Category Moderator |
|
|
Aircraftkiller wrote on Wed, 29 June 2005 11:41 | Why should you people marrying homosexuals have anything to do with us?
|
it doesn't matter what the context was, he said "It's Canada, I don't care." It implies he doesn't care about anything that goes on outside of the US. Makes me wonder how people with those views can be such avid supporters of the war in Iraq.
Not importand but just a note, j_ball out drinking age varies by Province, it's 18 where I live.
~Canucck
[Updated on: Wed, 29 June 2005 14:09] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Same-Sex marriages in Canada [message #162143 is a reply to message #162131] |
Wed, 29 June 2005 18:14 |
|
Renx wrote on Wed, 29 June 2005 17:07 | ...drinking age varies by Province....
|
If we Americans actually followed the Constitution instead of just pretending we did, drinking age laws wouldn't be any different. But they are, aren't they?
As for gay marriage, I oppose it. I also oppose an Amendment to ban it. Sounds strange, but it's true.
God is the "0wnage". Plain and Simple.
Visit http://www.theoriginalmrbob.com
"If there's one freak to be, it's a Jesus freak"
All your base are belong to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Same-Sex marriages in Canada [message #162176 is a reply to message #162158] |
Thu, 30 June 2005 08:19 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Hydra wrote on Thu, 30 June 2005 03:06 | Gay marriage destroys the moral fabric of our society.
|
If I might be so bold, what have gay people ever done to you?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|