| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161537 is a reply to message #161533] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 10:56   |
 |
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Nodbugger wrote on Thu, 23 June 2005 13:47 |
i say no because I have been banned from too many forums because I pissed people off.
I was pwning them every time.
|
Remember that time we played CS:S and you accused me of cheating?
I think you fail at pwning.
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161560 is a reply to message #161357] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 14:34 |
 |
Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Lol I'm in there too. I feel so privileged. Shame the tard who put my username on there can't spell DJM properly.
www.myspace.com/midas
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161576 is a reply to message #161357] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 16:16 |
 |
Walrus
Messages: 382
Registered: February 2003
Location: Good old England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
I looked up walrus... well... thats just wrong.
edit. Hmmm. It seems many familiar names from this forum have ended up in there. I wondered how long it would take.
One Last Time
"England expects that every man will do his duty"
[Updated on: Thu, 23 June 2005 16:26] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161645 is a reply to message #161537] |
Fri, 24 June 2005 07:34 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Nodbugger wrote on Thu, 23 June 2005 13:47 |
i say no because I have been banned from too many forums because I pissed people off.
I was pwning them every time.
|
Think you could show us an example of conservative logic winning?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161659 is a reply to message #161645] |
Fri, 24 June 2005 09:08 |
 |
Hydra
Messages: 827
Registered: September 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Fri, 24 June 2005 10:34 |
Think you could show us an example of conservative logic winning?
|
http://www.n00bstories.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=4330 (the whole thread; your liberal counterpart Traingye (though, to his credit, he's not as big a tool as you are) gets absolutely owned)
http://www.conservility.com/article.php?id=17
http://www.renegadeforums.com/index.php?t=msg&th=13062&a mp;prevloaded=1&rid=1504&start=0 (great example of your pathetic arguments getting smashed)
Oh, and just about anything political Neosaber has written.
Just to name a few.
Can we remain on-topic, please?
Walter Keith Koester: September 22, 1962 - March 15, 2005
God be with you, Uncle Wally.
 (<---New(ish) Prayer Group Forums)
 (<---Archived Prayer Group Forums)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161688 is a reply to message #161357] |
Fri, 24 June 2005 15:03 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Nodbugger |
Well I have never lost.
|
| SuperFlyingEngi |
show us an example
|
By the way, I was specifically referring to your brand of it.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161692 is a reply to message #161680] |
Fri, 24 June 2005 16:19 |
 |
Mindtzar
Messages: 108
Registered: April 2004
Location: U.K.
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| DarkDemin wrote on Fri, 24 June 2005 16:56 |
your comment has no basis.
|
You are a failure, An embarrassment to the internet.
You never know what you are talking about. You try to make your self out to be important. You are arrogant, and you tried to make a PHP mailbomer. Which doesn't even work. And it's stolen code. You try to be an internet badass, I see it all the time on IRC. You threatened some small online community. ect. Summed up you are an asshole.
So I have plenty to base my comment on.
I go back to what I said originally about you should be drowned at birth.
www . MindTzar . com
[Updated on: Fri, 24 June 2005 16:25] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161702 is a reply to message #161357] |
Fri, 24 June 2005 18:58 |
=HT=T-Bird
Messages: 712
Registered: June 2005
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Well, I think we can safely say Bye-Bye to kinghigh1. That, and don't let the door blow up in your face on the way out. LOL 
HTT-Bird (IRC)
HTTBird (WOL)
Proud HazTeam Lieutenant.
BlackIntel Coder & Moderator.
If you have trouble running BIATCH on your FDS, have some questions about a BIATCH message or log entry, or think that BIATCH spit out a false positive, PLEASE contact the BlackIntel coding team and avoid wasting the time of others.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161715 is a reply to message #161695] |
Fri, 24 June 2005 20:48 |
 |
exnyte
Messages: 746
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| cowmisfit wrote on Fri, 24 June 2005 20:05 |
Ah yes , and your 53 post would for sure back up your statement and knowlage of his post, go sip on some windex.
|
When are you going to realize that your post count doesn't measure ones amount of knowledge of a situation, it's merely how many times they've decided to voice what they think about something...
Post counts don't mean shit.
American Cancer Society | Donate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161740 is a reply to message #161357] |
Sat, 25 June 2005 07:00 |
 |
Halo38
Messages: 955
Registered: February 2003
Location: UK
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
All I see him guilty of is having some pretty odd opinions when compaired to the average forum user.
He doesn't just go out of his way to insult or wind up other people with harsh language like some people do he just puts fowards his (odd) view then you all rise to him *sigh* I wonder where we have seen that before.
Maybe he gives these views just to annoy us? well add him to your ignore list then.
also, he's had 219 posts how come we are only acting now?
!vote no
!add ignore list kinghigh1
Online Portfolio - www.chettle1.com
Renegade projects - Halo38's Den hosted by www.laeubi.de
Creator of : C&C_Arid, C&C_Ancients, C&C_Bio, C&C_Duel Arena
Mod Wars Veteran
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
