Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Ban kinghigh1?
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161392 is a reply to message #161357] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 10:33   |
flyingfox
Messages: 1612
Registered: February 2003
Location: scotland, uk
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I guess my question is this, how do we define "making a contribution" on these forums. Making a contribution is just making a post adding something to a topic. If making a contribution here is posting something that is considered helpful or worthwhile, then it's a matter of opinion - Personally I think he's just a kid who's after some attention. I Particularly found it funny when about 10 people decided to insult him, "shit on the topic" theirselves then call for him to be banned. Do you people learn nothing. Stoop to his level and you should be banned too. If you were adults, which you aren't, you would stick him on ignore then send a message to crimson requesting the ban. That would make you correct and him wrong. He got the attention he wanted and you forgot about ripintou's message....GJ.
bottom line is if you don't like what someone is saying, don't be a little girl about it. I should really be making a poll requesting every idiot in that topic to be banned too. I know none of you would be banned, though. 5-star hypocrisy, case closed.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161395 is a reply to message #161392] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 10:41 |
 |
cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
| flyingfox |
If you were adults, which you aren't, you would stick him on ignore then send a message to crimson requesting the ban.
|
You said it yourself. For the most part, we aren't adults, so then why expect us to act like adults?
My idea of contributing is to add to the conversation, not degrade it. There are certainly times that each one of us degrade the conversations, but it's not something we set out to do. If it is, then they should be banned as well. I, for the most part, try and add to threads. I'm not perfect, so I'm not trying to say that you have to be perfect in order to stay on these forums, but kinghigh has made it clear that he's just out to get a rise out of everybody.
whoa.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161398 is a reply to message #161384] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 10:58 |
 |
kinghigh1
Messages: 223
Registered: May 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Crimson wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 12:13 |
My main problem is him bustin on Ripin as well. The poll is for 3 days.
|
kinghigh1 wrote on Sun, 19 June 2005 08:00
The part that hits home "Every day there are patriot details for those that wish to attend for our fallen comrades"
Dosen't that hit home,heart,mind, it lets you know its hard over there.
The army would just have to come find me,I'm the a.w.a.l type of person.thats to much you risking your life for,and getting nothing in return.
I mean I'd risk my life if I knew my family would be taking care of,my family can't live or eat with just memories of me.So yes I would go AWOL if that meant staying home helping my family.
I never dissed RIPIN,the only thing I can be accused of is not wishing him me best, which later in that post I did.But since my computer smarts are not good enuff to define what I meant,it may have sounded bad.
but to vote and have all the people who called me names (which started the wars)vote against me cause I insulted them is kinda one sided.my post may be stupid,but I don't got a gun to people head telling them to reply.why can't I just post a opinion or some and not have poeple calling me names for doing that.
I'm a person were if you called me some,you old enuff to take the hard insults I deal.I don't go posting stuff to invoke flame wars.or starting a flame.
But crimson its your furom,so you do what you want Ban me or be real.my mother taught me "if some one hit you ,hit'em back .which I do but this time its with words.If some one call you a name you ban them right? but what to do when you can't ban them? you talk back right?
List of Shit that Rock: Marijuana,Former Pres. Clinton,Budweiser,Family Dollar,Kinghigh1,P.I.M.P.SQUAD
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161399 is a reply to message #161357] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 11:19 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Someone did, in fact, request that he be banned in private message. I am letting you all make the decision instead of my doing it dictator-style. Personally, I think he's just the latest trend sent here to annoy us and he'll either go away or turn into a more normal poster within a couple weeks.
I knew already that someone would draw the parallel between ACK and kinghigh1. What you may forget, however, is that the server owners did successfully vote nopic out of the server owners' forum. ACK, however, HAS contributed to the community as a whole and will continue to be given special consideration for that. If you all think that I just let him get away with whatever he wants, then you're sadly, sadly mistaken. You haven't seen much "reborn sucks" in here lately, now have you? I have also removed his moderator access in the Mod Forum at your insistence. Let's not lose perspective here. You, as a community member, need to decide and cast your vote as to whether or not you feel kinghigh1 is welcome here.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161400 is a reply to message #161357] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 11:20 |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| flyingfox wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 13:33 |
I guess my question is this, how do we define "making a contribution" on these forums. Making a contribution is just making a post adding something to a topic. If making a contribution here is posting something that is considered helpful or worthwhile, then it's a matter of opinion - Personally I think he's just a kid who's after some attention. I Particularly found it funny when about 10 people decided to insult him, "shit on the topic" theirselves then call for him to be banned. Do you people learn nothing. Stoop to his level and you should be banned too. If you were adults, which you aren't, you would stick him on ignore then send a message to crimson requesting the ban. That would make you correct and him wrong. He got the attention he wanted and you forgot about ripintou's message....GJ.
bottom line is if you don't like what someone is saying, don't be a little girl about it. I should really be making a poll requesting every idiot in that topic to be banned too. I know none of you would be banned, though. 5-star hypocrisy, case closed.
|
Quite simply, lines have to be drawn. And I'd say supporting those who support terrorism is one of them. But hey, if you feel that supporting terrorism is something that should be allowed to go unimpeded, I guess that's your perogative.
Ban for making stupid comments? Nope. Ban for insulting everyone, every chance you get? Depends, but not in this case. Ban for supporting Saddam and supporting Hitler's eventual domination of Europe... Most definatly ban worthy.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161404 is a reply to message #161400] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 11:38 |
|
kinghigh1
Messages: 223
Registered: May 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| warranto wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 13:20 |
| flyingfox wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 13:33 |
I guess my question is this, how do we define "making a contribution" on these forums. Making a contribution is just making a post adding something to a topic. If making a contribution here is posting something that is considered helpful or worthwhile, then it's a matter of opinion - Personally I think he's just a kid who's after some attention. I Particularly found it funny when about 10 people decided to insult him, "shit on the topic" theirselves then call for him to be banned. Do you people learn nothing. Stoop to his level and you should be banned too. If you were adults, which you aren't, you would stick him on ignore then send a message to crimson requesting the ban. That would make you correct and him wrong. He got the attention he wanted and you forgot about ripintou's message....GJ.
bottom line is if you don't like what someone is saying, don't be a little girl about it. I should really be making a poll requesting every idiot in that topic to be banned too. I know none of you would be banned, though. 5-star hypocrisy, case closed.
|
Quite simply, lines have to be drawn. And I'd say supporting those who support terrorism is one of them. But hey, if you feel that supporting terrorism is something that should be allowed to go unimpeded, I guess that's your perogative.
Ban for making stupid comments? Nope. Ban for insulting everyone, every chance you get? Depends, but not in this case. Ban for supporting Saddam and supporting Hitler's eventual domination of Europe... Most definatly ban worthy.
|
Why hate some one because the rest hate him.I hate some people that mess with my family,Should you hate them also because I hate them?
I don't support terrorism,I believe people have there reason's for what they do and I let GODjudge them for that,I don't judge ,its not my place.
the real reason here is people don't like the King, so lets ban him
this poll is because someone mis-interputed what i said in that post or it seems all did.
List of Shit that Rock: Marijuana,Former Pres. Clinton,Budweiser,Family Dollar,Kinghigh1,P.I.M.P.SQUAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161409 is a reply to message #161404] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 13:07 |
|
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| kinghigh1 wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 14:38 |
Why hate some one because the rest hate him.I hate some people that mess with my family,Should you hate them also because I hate them?
I don't support terrorism,I believe people have there reason's for what they do and I let GODjudge them for that,I don't judge ,its not my place.
the real reason here is people don't like the King, so lets ban him
this poll is because someone mis-interputed what i said in that post or it seems all did.
|
Don't support terrorism, huh?
| kinghigh1 wrote on Tue, 21 June 2005 20:17 |
| Parad0x wrote on Tue, 21 June 2005 19:10 |
| kinghigh1 wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 00:05 |
He OK, He reminds me of my grandfather 
|
wow.... do you even know who Saddam is? 
|
Yes I do,He just don't seem that bad,I have no problems with saddam,
|
Translation: I know he kills his own citizens and funds terrorist operations, but he's not that bad!
This has absolutely nothing to do with "hating someone because others hate him". It has everything to do with the acts he has committed against humanity. Letting God judge them is fine, but that is no excuse for thinking there is nothing wrong with letting someone hurt others, simply because you are not affected.
Though I find it highly amusing that you turn to God while at the same time being increadably selfish and evil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161414 is a reply to message #161392] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 14:32 |
 |
SickOptometrist
Messages: 314
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| flyingfox wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 13:33 |
bottom line is if you don't like what someone is saying, don't be a little girl about it. I should really be making a poll requesting every idiot in that topic to be banned too. I know none of you would be banned, though. 5-star hypocrisy, case closed.
|
What the hell are you talking about 'fox - nobody is being a "little girl" about it - in fact many have come right out, as in this topic, & have expressed their disgust with his comments - albeit, some are less tactful than others. Nothing I said in that topic post regarding Ripin' was "idiocy" - I merely pointed out that his comment represents the typical, careless babble of many apathetic Americans...His words were spewed out like vomit before he thought about it. Any individual who steps foot in that hell hole, as their chosen duty to their country & fellow citizens, should be given the utmost respect. Saying Ripin' went over there "for nothing" is Kinghigh's freedom afforded opinion, but disrespectful nonetheless...
I dunno ::shrugs shoulders:: maybe we should have 'em stick around & perhaps there is hope that his intellect is just pre-pubescent...
http://spaces.msn.com/members/patswebbucket/
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161416 is a reply to message #161357] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 14:48 |
 |
Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
I guess we're all lucky that kinghigh charges what his free advice is worth.
www.myspace.com/midas
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161427 is a reply to message #161377] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 16:46 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Lijitsu wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 12:57 |
I thought the general populace blew them up. I say just nuke the fuckers, really.
|
The only other person I've ever heard say that is an autistic kid in my grade. What are you, like 10 or something?
By the way, I say let kinghigh stay with a maximum 1 post per day. If he breaches it once for any reason, banned. That way he can't spam too much.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161431 is a reply to message #161357] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 16:54 |
 |
csskiller
Messages: 522
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
lol ^^
At first I thought kinghigh wasn't that bad but after seeing about 3 topics of his retarded posts, I thought this is enough.
Die.
When history witnesses a great change, Razgriz reveals itself,
First as a dark demon,
As a demon it uses its power to reign death upon the land;
and then it dies.
However, after a period of slumber, Razgriz returns.
This time as a great hero...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161435 is a reply to message #161357] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 18:00 |
 |
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
wtf is wrong with you people? Autistic kids aren't fucked up most of the time.
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161453 is a reply to message #161357] |
Wed, 22 June 2005 20:48 |
|
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
wtf? I'm what you consider a Liberal, and I don't make fun of people with disabilities. I guess I'm the oddman out...
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161484 is a reply to message #161357] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 03:57 |
 |
Walrus
Messages: 382
Registered: February 2003
Location: Good old England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
I'm not in too good a mood today. Still,I say ban him. His posts don't even make me smile.
It is kind of odd that he would be so ignorant about the politics of the war in Iraq (that and not willing support someone who is in one hell of a hard position,) it makes me wonder how old he is.
In my opinion, about ten.
One Last Time
"England expects that every man will do his duty"
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ban kinghigh1? [message #161523 is a reply to message #161434] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 09:28 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Crimson wrote on Wed, 22 June 2005 20:50 |
This new forum does let me ban people from specific forums, but limiting posts per day? I don't think I can. 
|
Well, someone might have to keep an eye on him. I'm sure there are plenty of people here who would like to be a patronizing, patriarchal figure.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Nov 02 20:19:01 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01521 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
