Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Should ACK be banned?
Should ACK be banned? [message #151436] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

The only thing he's doing is being annoying. There's nothing in the rules stating that he can't have his own opinion or he can't correct others' spelling and grammar.

whoa.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151437] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Kind of like how people are openly allowed to respond?

Kind of like how everyone else is allowed to do the same thing? (As Crimson and spoony pointed out earlier)

Yes, there is so much favourtism present, I favour everyone!
Should ACK be banned? [message #151440] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
msgtpain

Quote:

In such a case, I'd be more than happy to tell him to shut up. However, thanks to the wonders of modern technology, there is an "ignore button". If you don't want him to interrupt topics, hit that button. It's quite simple.


So let me get this straight.. just so there is no missinterpretation on my part. If we were talking face to face, what ACK constantly does would warrant (no pun intended) a response of "shut up" from you. However, since we have another feature called "ignore", it is our fault if he continues, and there is no reason for you to tell him to "shut up".. Did I get that right? Since we're in to "real world examples" lets have another.. If my daughter sees a mans 10 inch erect cock on the side of the road, it's her fault for looking at it, and we should just ignore the person standing there nude, after all.. she has a neck, she should use it.


I fail to see how criminal acts relate to someone being annoying, but lets go with it. I also fail to see how the "hearing of words vs. seeing of words" compares to the "seeing of pornography", but I can state my opinion.

Tell you what, the next time Aircraftkiller posts pornography, I'll do what I would do with the person on the street. Put a stop to it. Whether that be reporting it to the police, removing the offensive post, or recommending a ban; as the situation demands.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151441] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
msgtpain is currently offline  msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
Colonel
warranto


Kind of like how everyone else is allowed to do the same thing? (As Crimson and spoony pointed out earlier)



You're absolutely right, Crimson did speak her mind in a post, how she feels and the reasons she does what she does.. and I applaud her for that. (and the fact that she didn't tell everyone it was their fault that topics are derailed when ack posts in them)
Should ACK be banned? [message #151442] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spice
Messages: 1448
Registered: November 2003
Location: Ohio
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Blazer

EXdeath7

Does anyone have any good skins for use on my game?! Shocked Shocked [over 100 shock smileys deleted]


Umm...wtf is with the spam?


You know you love it , It's for dinner!


http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/8027/userbar358428pu3.gif
Should ACK be banned? [message #151443] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
msgtpain is currently offline  msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
Colonel
warranto



I fail to see how criminal acts relate to someone being annoying, but lets go with it. I also fail to see how the "hearing of words vs. seeing of words" compares to the "seeing of pornography", but I can state my opinion.

Tell you what, the next time Aircraftkiller posts pornography, I'll do what I would do with the person on the street. Put a stop to it. Whether that be reporting it to the police, removing the offensive post, or recommending a ban; as the situation demands.


I thought you were like a legal assistant in training or something, no? So enlighten me, why is it a criminal act? is it because a society has determined that there are specific guidelines and codes of conduct that they want enforced to keep the peace? Could that be in any way shape or form applied to someone that has no purpose in a community for any reason other than tormenting the other citizens?

[Updated on: Mon, 25 April 2005 16:52]

Report message to a moderator

Should ACK be banned? [message #151444] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
And this is the problem with society today, the unwillingness to place blame where it is due. "It's not MY fault I hit the guy, he started it!"; "I don't like that guy, so I'm going to blame everything I can on him, and accept none of it!"

BOTH are to blame, Aircraftkiller for starting it, and everyone else for continuing it. Therefore, if something is going to happen to one side, the exact same thing has to happen to the other side.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151445] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Jzinsky

IRON FART

OK then.

Tell me: What is ACK's reason for coming here to annoy people?


Did you ever go on irc to seeif you could get banned? Did you ever laugh because people were getting annoyed at you? I did when I first got the internet. Iwas young then, he's still doing the same thing.

He's not going to get banned, get over it. I appreciate that he really pisses a lotof you guys off, but I do also realise that everyone responds. The moment he posts something it turns into a flamewar. If his comments sway off topic, ignore them.

I like the way that he's even managing to laugh at this now by posting using only his last page of previous posts, the link to which was posted on here. Look at this, a 4-page thread on getting him banned, and how early on did you say he will not get banned Crimson?

I stopped going to IRC 2 years ago after I got kicked out for having "FART" in my name.

I realised yesterday that there is no chance of him getting banned.

Hell, I got banned from here a long time ago for being less of an asshole - And I had a reason to be. I wasn't being an asshole just to piss people off like ACK does.
Quote:


The only thing he's doing is being annoying. There's nothing in the rules stating that he can't have his own opinion or he can't correct others' spelling and grammar.


There is also nothing in the rules about SPAMMING threads with things that are completely off topic.

What's your point? Are you going to redefine spam?

I realise that Crimson & Blazer (Possibly Warranto?) have the last word if he gets banned or not. Well, I respect that. I understand that you lot are the only ones that can make that desicion. But you've said yourself that this is pretty much what is left of the official community and that you'd like to preserve it. Well I don't see it being preserved when there is someone like ACK running arround trying to piss people off. It is OBVIOUS that there are many here who don't feel comfortable with him around.

You aren't obliged to take any action, but if you don't, this place is just going to become really, really shitty. It's your choice.


http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

Should ACK be banned? [message #151447] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Quote:

I realise that Crimson & Blazer (Possibly Warranto?) have the last word if he gets banned or not.


Just to answer this, for the sake of clarity. I have no say in the final decision. I may be able to voice my position on the matter, but all I am is a moderator. No powers other than those of closing, editing, and removing posts.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151448] Mon, 25 April 2005 16:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
msgtpain is currently offline  msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
Colonel
warranto

And this is the problem with society today, the unwillingness to place blame where it is due. "It's not MY fault I hit the guy, he started it!"; "I don't like that guy, so I'm going to blame everything I can on him, and accept none of it!"

BOTH are to blame, Aircraftkiller for starting it, and everyone else for continuing it. Therefore, if something is going to happen to one side, the exact same thing has to happen to the other side.


To the first paragraph, that's called self defense, and there definately is no blame to be placed on the person that hits back, as long as they don't pummel the poor bastard.

As for the second, I completely agree.. I see no problem with telling everyone to stop responding to ACK's posts.. But as you said, what happens to one side must happen to the other.. so could you also please make a public post requesting that ACK stops making the childish topic derailing posts? Thanks a bunch.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151449] Mon, 25 April 2005 17:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
"Self defence" has absolutly nothing to do with blame. Unless, of course, you are suggesting that it WASN'T the person who controlled his own fist to strike the individual. a Defence simply states that the action was permissable. It was still that person who threw the punch.


I would tell him to stop, but apparently I favour Aircraftkiller. So there isn't much point in doing so.

Or, it could be the fact that I haven't actually told everyone else to stop responding. All I've stated is how derailment could be prevented if he does post, and in return that it's quite hypocritical to call Aircraftkiller on his derailments, when other people do the same thing.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151450] Mon, 25 April 2005 17:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
msgtpain is currently offline  msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
Colonel
yea, I didn't think so..
Should ACK be banned? [message #151451] Mon, 25 April 2005 17:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
*gasp* Favourtism! :rolleyes:

I didn't tell anyone from either side to stop, so I must be favouring Aircraftkiller. After all, I didn't single him out!
Should ACK be banned? [message #151452] Mon, 25 April 2005 17:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
msgtpain is currently offline  msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
Colonel
warranto


Perhaps it's us who are not getting through. The ignore button is there for a reason, use it. If Aircraftkiller goes off on one of his tirades, ignore it. If people start responding, and the conversation goes way off course, ignore it. Let them have their own little discussion.

Remember, you contribute to the derailment as much as he does when you reply to the topic.


Like I said... The world you live in must be warm and fuzzy, at least I hope so.

I'll leave it at this, I think I've sufficiently shown what I came here to show.

[Updated on: Mon, 25 April 2005 17:18]

Report message to a moderator

Should ACK be banned? [message #151453] Mon, 25 April 2005 17:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Well if he was banned, wouldn't that be putting out the fire from the source?

If he didn't post retarded things, then nobody would reply to him, and a thread would not be derailed. Where is this flawed?

Realistically, most of the people here aren't going to ignore him, and he will still get away with derailing threads.

EDIT: I have a feeling that this thread is going to be locked and that absolutely nothing is going to be done about ACK.


http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

Should ACK be banned? [message #151459] Mon, 25 April 2005 18:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jaspah is currently offline  Jaspah
Messages: 1478
Registered: July 2003
Location: Syracuse, New York
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Hey everyone! Let's talk about how RenAlert sucks!
Should ACK be banned? [message #151460] Mon, 25 April 2005 18:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Creed3020 is currently offline  Creed3020
Messages: 1438
Registered: February 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
j4S[p

]Hey everyone! Let's talk about how RenAlert sucks!


®

Ack made glacier. That alone should get him banned.


Not sure which one is funnier....LMFAO Laughing Laughing
Should ACK be banned? [message #151473] Mon, 25 April 2005 20:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chronojam is currently offline  Chronojam
Messages: 688
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
j4S[p

]Hey everyone! Let's talk about how RenAlert sucks!


Fuck off, please.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151474] Mon, 25 April 2005 20:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
glyde51 is currently offline  glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Chronojam

j4S[p

]Hey everyone! Let's talk about how RenAlert sucks!


Fuck off, please.


NOU!


No. Seriously. No.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151478] Mon, 25 April 2005 20:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hydra is currently offline  Hydra
Messages: 827
Registered: September 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Karma: 0
Colonel
No, Glyde, no.

Stop now before I hurt you.


Walter Keith Koester: September 22, 1962 - March 15, 2005
God be with you, Uncle Wally.
http://www.warriorforums.net/forums/images/warriorsforchrist/statusicon/forum_new.gif(<---New(ish) Prayer Group Forums)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v632/venompawz/cross.gif(<---Archived Prayer Group Forums)
Should ACK be banned? [message #151480] Mon, 25 April 2005 21:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
lock?

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Should ACK be banned? [message #151485] Mon, 25 April 2005 21:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mick is currently offline  Mick
Messages: 78
Registered: September 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Karma: 0
Recruit
Should ACK be banned? No, ya gotta have a good flame war every now and then, livens up the forums a bit. Admit it, a good flame war makes the forum more interesting.

*This is no way a defence towards ACK, but I find arguing against him to be humourous*


http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w40/Mick3D/Signature.gif
Should ACK be banned? [message #151493] Tue, 26 April 2005 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Xtrm2Matt is currently offline  Xtrm2Matt
Messages: 1318
Registered: February 2003
Location: England, UK
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
I don't see why ACK doesn't get flamed for flaming Reborn when we get flamed for flaming RenAlert? They both suck equally (I don't dislike Reborn nor Renalert).

Seriously, if you don't like ACK flaming, then just leave. Once everyone is gone, he can't flame anyone but himself. Yes he's a lamer, yes he's a faggot, but isn't everyone?


http://www.OpticalGaming.com/matt/signature.jpg
http://www.OpticalGaming.com || irc.OpticalGaming.com
Should ACK be banned? [message #151494] Tue, 26 April 2005 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sniper12345 is currently offline  sniper12345
Messages: 817
Registered: November 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Karma: 0
Colonel

Hydra

No, Glyde, no.

Stop now before I hurt you.


Big tough man over the internet is going to hurt Glyde! Oh no! Razz


WOL: megapunk0

http://images.listen-to.com/png.php/4g/sniper12345
Should ACK be banned? [message #151497] Tue, 26 April 2005 01:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
These forums have never been a warm, inviting, friendly place... not before I ever heard of Renegade, not when I started posting during the beta test, not when Westwood ran them... Is that a direct result of ACK's continued presence in them? Perhaps. Lord knows he's made it his personal goal in life to annoy people on these forums. The problem is, if I banned him and told him not to post here anymore, then within a week there would be a topic and long discussion about banning deadfive, then spoony, and so on. You hold the power to change the landscape of this place, each and every one of you. You start with yourself. Set an example and try to make it apparent that you are not going to act a certain way anymore. Me waving the banstick around isn't going to help anything... all it will do is piss people off.

I'm the bawss.
Previous Topic: Remember kids defrag often or feel stupid.
Next Topic: Map's
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Sep 15 06:19:25 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01933 seconds