Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Should ACK be banned?
Should ACK be banned? [message #151273] Sun, 24 April 2005 18:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Creed3020 is currently offline  Creed3020
Messages: 1438
Registered: February 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
I would have said yes a long time ago but now I just shrugg it off. If he aides in getting a topic, off-topic then I just realize nothing has changed and never will. This place called the Renegade Forums has been home to many of for many years. There are not many of us here left that were members on the official WW Renegade Forums but there it was no different either. I was actually banned once from those forums because of fighting with ACK so much. My nick was Creed3020 and I re-registered as Creed3022. I might have "learned my lesson" but I learned that certain individuals will always hold more weight with who is upstairs then you will and there is little to nothing you can do about. So I continue posting where I can helping others out where others have not been able to. You may dismise the ignore feature but it will help you start to build up a tolerance to what goes on here in one of 6.22 posts.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151275] Sun, 24 April 2005 19:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
IRON FART

Crimson

And you think ACK doesn't encourage conversation? If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here?

Because he is only one out of the many people that come here. I'm not going to stop because of one annoying person.

Also, don't presume that he makes anything so horrible that I'd stop coming here. He probably thinks he's really getting to me, but the truth is that he is just a really really annoying pest. I still want to visit these forums, but I don't like hanging around somewhere where there is some 20 something year old loser who hangs around trying to piss me and others off.

If I add ACK to my ignore list, then I will have to add everyone who replies to his asshole remarks to my ignore list also.
Quote:


Am I getting through to you, Crimson, or is your mind already made up?


Answer??? Am I wasting my time talking to you or is there any hope of doing anything about ACK?

Quote:


Ever think as to why he does? Maybe you should think outside the box and look for the motive behind his actions rather than just his actions.


Hold on - There is a reason for annoying people?
LOL


Perhaps it's us who are not getting through. The ignore button is there for a reason, use it. If Aircraftkiller goes off on one of his tirades, ignore it. If people start responding, and the conversation goes way off course, ignore it. Let them have their own little discussion.

Remember, you contribute to the derailment as much as he does when you reply to the topic.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151278] Sun, 24 April 2005 19:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
but what happens if he derails a topic you start and you arent the one replying to him and its the others that are doing it? Make another topic for him to de-rail? Personally, I don't like making topics that ultimately turn into flame wars or a discussion on vocabulary or grammar. It gets old people. Ignoring him won't make him go away unless EVERYONE does it. But we all know everyone won't.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Should ACK be banned? [message #151279] Sun, 24 April 2005 19:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

So because others can restrain themselves then the only solution is that Aircraftkiller is banned? PERFECT logic.

Here's a scenario with that logic used:

I'm failing a class in college. This means that I should kill the teacher. I mean, obviously it's NOT my fault for not doing the work necessary to pass it. She's the one who is causing me to fail because she's the one who is giving me the homework, so obviously killing her is the perfect way to get out of failing.


whoa.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151280] Sun, 24 April 2005 19:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
gbull

but what happens if he derails a topic you start and you arent the one replying to him and its the others that are doing it? Make another topic for him to de-rail? Personally, I don't like making topics that ultimately turn into flame wars or a discussion on vocabulary or grammar. It gets old people. Ignoring him won't make him go away unless EVERYONE does it. But we all know everyone won't.


Example of the solution. (Slight exageration,, don't take offense)

gbull: "Hey everyone! NOD stole the stealth technology!"

j_ball430: "Wow, where did you learn this?"

Aircraftkiller: "It's Nod, not NOD"

Nightma12: "Shut up ACK"

Aircraftkiller "It's Aircraftkiller, not ACK"

gbull: "I found it on the website for Tiberium Twilight"

IRON FART: "Shut up ACK, stop derailing the topic"

j_ball430: "wow, interesting"

Aircraftkiller "It's Aircraftkiller, not ACK"

gbull: "It is interesting"


-END-

In this example, the topic was derailed. However all those interested in the topic ignored it, and the original discussion remains intact.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151281] Sun, 24 April 2005 19:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
msgtpain is currently offline  msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
Colonel
Sorry, but it seems overly apparent that there are extraneous circumstances which preclude those in power from having any sort of "control" or placing any type of restraints on the actual person at fault. This reeks of a new-age child psychology exercise when you use the words "enabler" and demand that others simply ignore the offender. When a kid steps out of line you smack them on the butt and demand that they stop their behavior, you don't pass the blame on to those around them because then YOU are becoming the enabler. If you have no desire to enact consequences for actions because the offender is a friend, simply say that instead of pretending that it's everyone else's fault. At least then everyone will know where you stand and can shut up and move along.

Quote:

If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here?


Look at my post count.

Warranto: Instead of telling everyone it's their fault for not being able to ignore it, why not at least publicly tell Ack to shut the fuck up and knock it off? Remember that thread we had a while back regarding favoritism? This to me is a shining example. Instead of passing the blame on to everyone else that can't ignore him, why not admonish the person responsible for their actions, and let them know that it really isn't appreciated? Like I said, your passive acceptance to the behavior is more enabling than any response to his posts could ever be.

So the question is, is everyone who hates the game allowed to just stick around here and be a prick on purpose? or only friends.

[Updated on: Mon, 25 April 2005 06:14]

Report message to a moderator

Should ACK be banned? [message #151284] Sun, 24 April 2005 19:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

This topic is dedicated to banning Aircraftkiller, we're just giving the opposing side. Is Aircraftkiller being annoying? Obviously, or else this wouldn't be an issue. The thing is, it IS about restraint. If people didn't pay attention to Aircraftkiller so much, he wouldn't have the desire to keep up his actions for long because he's no longer getting the desired effect and attention he's aiming for. Should Aircraftkiller and others like him be repremanded for their actions? Sure, but it shouldn't result in banning them because a bunch of people can't ignore him and his posts.

whoa.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151288] Sun, 24 April 2005 20:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
® is currently offline  ®
Messages: 26
Registered: April 2005
Karma: 0
Recruit
Ack made glacier. That alone should get him banned.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151289] Sun, 24 April 2005 20:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

That I agree with. Ban Aircrafkiller for Glacier! Surprised

whoa.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151300] Sun, 24 April 2005 20:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NuBCaKeS is currently offline  NuBCaKeS
Messages: 37
Registered: April 2005
Karma: 0
Recruit
Crimson

And you think ACK doesn't encourage conversation? If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here?
Get off his nuts damn... hes annoying EVERYONE thinks so. What part of EVERYONE dont you understand?


http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1045138352
y u jelos my member #?
Should ACK be banned? [message #151301] Sun, 24 April 2005 21:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cheesesoda is currently offline  cheesesoda
Messages: 6507
Registered: March 2003
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)

The part that people like me, icedog, warranto, and such are included in "EVERYONE", and guess what? WE DON'T WANT HIM BANNED.

whoa.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151302] Sun, 24 April 2005 21:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
spreegem is currently offline  spreegem
Messages: 1755
Registered: March 2003
Location: Ellington, CT
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

Lets all play the who can not respond to AircraftKiller's topic derailing remarks the longest game. Who ever doesn't respond to him the longest (Excluding members who do not regularly post here) Will recieve a mystery box with a mystery prize in it. I'm actually trying to think of a prize I could give someone, so far I am thinking some Money in my MMOG and maybe your own planet named after you. . . not really helpful to you though.

Should ACK be banned? [message #151304] Sun, 24 April 2005 21:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Random: How come you put spaces between your dots? Just curious.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151305] Sun, 24 April 2005 21:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:


So the question is, is everyone who hates the game allowed to just stick around here and be a prick on purpose? or only friends.


We should put that to the test. I don't play Renegade that much anymore, and I can be a complete asshole when I want... Laughing


http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

[Updated on: Sun, 24 April 2005 22:10]

Report message to a moderator

Should ACK be banned? [message #151306] Sun, 24 April 2005 21:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Majiin Vegeta is currently offline  Majiin Vegeta
Messages: 2186
Registered: February 2003
Location: London
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Majiin Vegeta

like i said before this Link works very well
Should ACK be banned? [message #151311] Sun, 24 April 2005 21:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
I wouldnt want him banned either if he wasnt such an Asshole and Topic De-railer. But guess what....

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Should ACK be banned? [message #151312] Sun, 24 April 2005 21:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aircraftkiller is currently offline  Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
You know, I only had to respond once here for it to become a three page thread.

Please keep it up, I have five hours to go before I pick up Sarah from the bus station and I'd love to have some constant amusement until then. Smile
Should ACK be banned? [message #151315] Sun, 24 April 2005 22:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Mistake sorry. Meant to edit something.

http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

Should ACK be banned? [message #151318] Sun, 24 April 2005 22:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icedog90 is currently offline  icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
There's a delete button so you can delete your post.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151320] Sun, 24 April 2005 22:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oblivion165 is currently offline  Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Crimson

If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here?


The ocean is a several million year old fish tank that hasnt been cleaned and taste like sweat. Sure those things suck but that doesnt make the ass whipping the waves give you any less fun.


WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
Should ACK be banned? [message #151322] Sun, 24 April 2005 23:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Spice
Messages: 1448
Registered: November 2003
Location: Ohio
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
I saw a dead deer in the road off I-75. It was odd. Shocked

http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/8027/userbar358428pu3.gif
Should ACK be banned? [message #151324] Mon, 25 April 2005 02:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Titan1x77 is currently offline  Titan1x77
Messages: 1086
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
The only time this was a problem was when he was a moderator on the mod forums....simply cause he was deleting post's and replys.

I just don't see the fun in getting him banned.....Trust me you'll miss arguing with him if he's gone....It's sort of like that idiot you pick on at work or school, once he's gone you dont have that person to pick on anymore.


"But if the gameplay sucks, the looks don't matter at all." - Sir Phoenixx

Should ACK be banned? [message #151328] Mon, 25 April 2005 03:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sterps is currently offline  sterps
Messages: 223
Registered: October 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Karma: 0
Recruit
I dont really care of what he does, the only thing that i want to know is why does he come to this forum, when he hates the game.
Should ACK be banned? [message #151329] Mon, 25 April 2005 03:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sniper12345 is currently offline  sniper12345
Messages: 817
Registered: November 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Karma: 0
Colonel

Although I already have ACK on my ignore list and cannot read his posts as of last week, I still think it is a good idea to ban him.

WOL: megapunk0

http://images.listen-to.com/png.php/4g/sniper12345
Should ACK be banned? [message #151332] Mon, 25 April 2005 04:35 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Homey is currently offline  Homey
Messages: 1084
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Titan1x77

The only time this was a problem was when he was a moderator on the mod forums....simply cause he was deleting post's and replys.

I just don't see the fun in getting him banned.....Trust me you'll miss arguing with him if he's gone....It's sort of like that idiot you pick on at work or school, once he's gone you dont have that person to pick on anymore.

You mean like the village idiot? Or the joker of a castle? <<


Homey
Previous Topic: Remember kids defrag often or feel stupid.
Next Topic: Map's
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Oct 16 19:51:11 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01555 seconds