Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » The Dominionists
The Dominionists [message #149305] Tue, 12 April 2005 14:11 Go to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
"Our job is to reclaim America for Christ, whatever the cost," Kennedy
says. "As the vice regents of God, we are to exercise godly dominion
and influence over our neighborhoods, our schools, our government, our
literature and arts, our sports arenas, our entertainment media, our
news media, our scientific endeavors -- in short, over every aspect and
institution of human society."


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
The Dominionists [message #149307] Tue, 12 April 2005 14:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

Had best get the white-out out for your Constitution, then. Oh yeah, and don't forget to legalize slavary, because you can't pick and choose with fundamentalism.


http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
The Dominionists [message #149360] Tue, 12 April 2005 19:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
they are a bit extremist to say the least. These are the opposite spectrum of Jesse Jackson and his flunkies

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
The Dominionists [message #149369] Tue, 12 April 2005 20:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hydra is currently offline  Hydra
Messages: 827
Registered: September 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Karma: 0
Colonel
"Tool" just isn't the right word to describe you anymore, especially after posting this bullshit.

Congratulations, SuperFlyingEngi! You've just been promoted from "tool" to "fucktard!"

All your hard work as a tool of the Democratic Party has finally paid off, SuperFlyingLiberalFucktard! Only a select few can ever achieve such a high level of complete and utter stupidity as you just have; it takes a special kind of person to be as completely devoid of any common sense whatsoever as you are, SuperFlyingLiberalFucktard.

I'm sure you'll be getting your invitation from Hitlery Clinton to her next anti-Republican-and-pro-communist rally in the mail; you make her and Ted so proud!


Walter Keith Koester: September 22, 1962 - March 15, 2005
God be with you, Uncle Wally.
http://www.warriorforums.net/forums/images/warriorsforchrist/statusicon/forum_new.gif(<---New(ish) Prayer Group Forums)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v632/venompawz/cross.gif(<---Archived Prayer Group Forums)
The Dominionists [message #149376] Tue, 12 April 2005 21:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
your signature bugs me Engi

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
The Dominionists [message #149381] Tue, 12 April 2005 21:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DarkDemin is currently offline  DarkDemin
Messages: 1483
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Rolling Stone has got to be the shittiest magazine ever. SuperFlamingLiberal here would be a good writer for them.

Also, read another one of his moronic articles. He thinks that the Democratic Party is drifting right. Is he fucking insane.

http://indyweek.com/durham/2000-08-23/cover.html

Quote:

I'm hunting down liberals in the North Carolina delegation. I want to find out what those on the left think about their party's rightward drift--and how they feel about nominating for president the champion of NAFTA, welfare reform and "reinventing government."



http://www.tiberiumforums.net/sig/tiberiumforumssig.jpg
The Dominionists [message #149397] Wed, 13 April 2005 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Hydra

blah blah blah I hate you.


Hydra, tell me why I'm an idiot for posting this news article. If you might recall, I haven't actually given an opinion on it yet.

DarkDemin

Rolling Stone has got to be the shittiest magazine ever. SuperFlamingLiberal here would be a good writer for them.

Also, read another one of his moronic articles. He thinks that the Democratic Party is drifting right. Is he fucking insane.



Quick!
Tell me why the Democratic party isn't drifting right.

While Rolling Stone is not exactly my favorite magazine, they come out with about 2 dozen good political articles a year.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
The Dominionists [message #149400] Wed, 13 April 2005 05:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doitle is currently offline  Doitle
Messages: 1723
Registered: February 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Moderator/Captain

There's kinda sorta... well.. ABORTION. I don't see the left suddenly saying life starts at conception... I really don't. If that is happening though I may need to go retake SickO's eye test, because my eyes must be going.

http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1285726594
The Dominionists [message #149453] Wed, 13 April 2005 14:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
SuperFlyingEngi

Tell me why the Democratic party isn't drifting right.


Better question: tell me why it is, without refering to the article (unless you already read it. then quote away.)


http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
The Dominionists [message #149493] Wed, 13 April 2005 17:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Hydra

"Tool" just isn't the right word to describe you anymore, especially after posting this bullshit.

Congratulations, SuperFlyingEngi! You've just been promoted from "tool" to "fucktard!"

All your hard work as a tool of the Democratic Party has finally paid off, SuperFlyingLiberalFucktard! Only a select few can ever achieve such a high level of complete and utter stupidity as you just have; it takes a special kind of person to be as completely devoid of any common sense whatsoever as you are, SuperFlyingLiberalFucktard.

I'm sure you'll be getting your invitation from Hitlery Clinton to her next anti-Republican-and-pro-communist rally in the mail; you make her and Ted so proud!

Shut the fuck up and stop trying to sound smart.
http://www.w3bdevil.com/forums/STFU-CommunistNaziJew.gif


http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

The Dominionists [message #149507] Wed, 13 April 2005 18:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
gbull

Better question: tell me why it is, without refering to the article (unless you already read it. then quote away.)


I never said the party was drifting right, darkdemin is just spewing smoke.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
The Dominionists [message #149510] Wed, 13 April 2005 18:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hydra is currently offline  Hydra
Messages: 827
Registered: September 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Karma: 0
Colonel
SuperFlyingEngi

Hydra, tell me why I'm an idiot for posting this news article. If you might recall, I haven't actually given an opinion on it yet.

Because you agree with every word written in that article; it'd go against your nature to disagree with any article that bashes Republicans since you're nothing but a spoon-fed, pathetic tool of the Democratic Party.




IRON FART, the only person here who ever tries (and consistently fails) to sound smarter than he really is is SuperFlyingLiberalFucktard. I have never tried to "sound smart" simply to give my arguments more substance like he does all the time. If you have ever read just about anything he has ever written in this forum, and if you can't see that, you're almost as blind to reality and devoid of as much common sense as he is.


Walter Keith Koester: September 22, 1962 - March 15, 2005
God be with you, Uncle Wally.
http://www.warriorforums.net/forums/images/warriorsforchrist/statusicon/forum_new.gif(<---New(ish) Prayer Group Forums)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v632/venompawz/cross.gif(<---Archived Prayer Group Forums)
The Dominionists [message #149513] Wed, 13 April 2005 18:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:


IRON FART, the only person here who ever tries (and consistently fails) to sound smarter than he really is is SuperFlyingLiberalFucktard. I have never tried to "sound smart" simply to give my arguments more substance like he does all the time. If you have ever read just about anything he has ever written in this forum, and if you can't see that, you're almost as blind to reality and devoid of as much common sense as he is.


I'm a liberal myself, and from my point of view, SFE seems like an overly analytical and paranoid sort of liberal. That is all. No more, no less.

Calling him a liberal fucktard or a "Tool" (preffered word of many) does not help the situation. People here have called him names like this and made jokes about his father like this so many times that it has totally lost its effect by now. From what I see, SFE has matured and learnt to ignore people namecalling and heckling him. Maybe some others here should mature and stop namecalling.

Namecalling does not make you sound smarter or make your argument valid.


http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

The Dominionists [message #149520] Wed, 13 April 2005 19:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
IRON FART

I'm a liberal myself, and from my point of view, SFE seems like an overly analytical and paranoid sort of liberal. That is all. No more, no less.


Thats why I respect you more than most liberals. You can tell the difference.


http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
The Dominionists [message #149671] Thu, 14 April 2005 21:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DarkDemin is currently offline  DarkDemin
Messages: 1483
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
*DarkDemin rigs his flag up to his cross

Guess what superflyingretard, I let my fascist flag fly.

fascism

n : a political theory advocating an authoritarian hierarchical government (as opposed to democracy or liberalism)


http://www.tiberiumforums.net/sig/tiberiumforumssig.jpg
The Dominionists [message #149687] Fri, 15 April 2005 04:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
You really missed the meaning of that quote? Well, I suppose you are a Renforums conservative.

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
The Dominionists [message #149689] Fri, 15 April 2005 05:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Pretty sure he's a conservative outside these forums too Razz

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
The Dominionists [message #149690] Fri, 15 April 2005 05:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
glyde51 is currently offline  glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
IRON FART

Quote:


IRON FART, the only person here who ever tries (and consistently fails) to sound smarter than he really is is SuperFlyingLiberalFucktard. I have never tried to "sound smart" simply to give my arguments more substance like he does all the time. If you have ever read just about anything he has ever written in this forum, and if you can't see that, you're almost as blind to reality and devoid of as much common sense as he is.


I'm a liberal myself, and from my point of view, SFE seems like an overly analytical and paranoid sort of liberal. That is all. No more, no less.

Calling him a liberal fucktard or a "Tool" (preffered word of many) does not help the situation. People here have called him names like this and made jokes about his father like this so many times that it has totally lost its effect by now. From what I see, SFE has matured and learnt to ignore people namecalling and heckling him. Maybe some others here should mature and stop namecalling.

Namecalling does not make you sound smarter or make your argument valid.


I'm a liberal, at least apparently, for my views on the war on Iraq... I was one until Paul Martin(z?) screwed everything up... >_<


No. Seriously. No.
The Dominionists [message #149706] Fri, 15 April 2005 13:24 Go to previous message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
gbull

Pretty sure he's a conservative outside these forums too Razz


Yeah, I know.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
Previous Topic: Sean Hannity - Nominee for the Nobel Prize
Next Topic: What the fuck? LOL
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 16 16:41:53 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01523 seconds