|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146014] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 13:02   |
 |
xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
That's so stupid. If you don't want to watch the channel, how about NOT changing it to that channel?
cause = time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146028] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 14:46 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
This is now officially the stupidest invention ever. And yes, I would say the same thing if someone invented someone to block Air America from my radio.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146035] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 15:14 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I know, of course one can just not watch FOX News. But that's not the point of the FOX Blocker.
| http://www.foxblocker.com/ |
With every order placed, FOXBlocker.com will send an e-mail in your name to the TOP 10 advertisers at FOX News letting them know that yet another subscriber has opted out of FOX News. With a little luck and a lot of volume, we can shut the FOX up!
|
It's meant as a message to FOX and it's affiliates that you are willing to pay money to actively be removed from them. If enough people participate in this, then advertisers may be swayed.
And this device blocks a specific channel on your TV, not FOX, so you can block whatever you want with it. The channel is set at time of manufacture.
I just though everyone would be interested.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146041] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 16:35 |
msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
seriously now...
I'm pretty sure that the advertisers on Fox news, know that they are an openly, right leaning news organization... Meaning that they are already WELL aware that at least 150 million people in the country despise them, and will never watch.
As soon as more that that number are sold, they just might start rethinking where their advertisement dollars are going. But if that ever happens, it'll just be the inventor who is laughing at everyone, not the Dem's laughing at Fox.
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146047] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 16:47 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I never said it would work.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146082] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 18:54 |
Jzinsky
Messages: 339
Registered: June 2004
Location: Warrington
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Seen this before, and I said then don't put the channel on.
You bloody Americans with all your bloody channels...
I think Sky has about 900,000... before you all think I'm America bashing again, and yes I have Sky..
No flashy signature..
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146097] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 19:49 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
It's a great idea although the invention is totally pointless.
It only exists to show that Fox News is nothing but fluff.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146102] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 20:00 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Hydra |
You're pathetic, SuperFlyingLiberalTool.
|
And your only skill is ad hominem.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146109] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 20:09 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Aircraftkiller a.k.a. ACK |
Much like your arguments, I must say.
|
I've said this a thousand times. Trying to sound smart will not make your E-Penis any bigger.
Do you only post when you have something negative to say?
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146113] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 20:27 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Wait...you don't like Fox...so you're willing to PAY someone to block the channel, when you could have it done for free?
Here's a tip: save the $8.95, press the channel changer, and write your own letter- if you actually think anyone will care. Then go buy lunch with the $8.95. You'll feel better afterwards.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146123] |
Sun, 27 March 2005 22:22 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
| IRON FART |
It's a great idea although the invention is totally pointless.
It only exists to show that Fox News is nothing but fluff.
|
That's funny... I thought it existed as a tax on morons.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The FOX Blocker [message #146151] |
Mon, 28 March 2005 05:50 |
Jzinsky
Messages: 339
Registered: June 2004
Location: Warrington
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
You probably also own one of the crappiest pcs in the world too, no need to make up for anything...
No flashy signature..
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
