|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139089] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 10:39   |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
And let's not forget the millions of Iraqis who came out and voted. The insurgents are not Iraqis.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139149] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 14:23 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
We really need to stop picking fights with Middle Eastern countries. Because as far as I can tell, that's about as far from peace as one can physically get.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139167] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 15:59 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Do realize that not all Middle Easterners are card-carrying al Qaeda members...
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139211] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 18:05 |
 |
Doitle
Messages: 1723
Registered: February 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Moderator/Captain |
|
|
| SFE |
We really need to stop picking fights with Middle Eastern countries.
|
We aren't randomly choosing one.
*Scene in the whitehouse Party Hall*
Cheyney: Ok, here's what we do, you drink 5 shots of vodka, spin around in a circle for a minute then run at that wall and stick a arrow on that map over there.
Bush: Let's rock and roll!
*Go go go go go!*
Bush: Yeahhaw!
*Bush runs loopily at wall*
*He runs into wall and knocks himself out while hitting the Arrow on Syria*
Cheyney: Ah ah ha! He is so messed up! Quick lets get out of here before he wakes up!
*Cheyney and random cabinet members run out to their offices*
Later that day...
Bush receives a call from France
Jaques: Man, wut iz u thinkng? Declare war on C-Reia!? Loser is yuo!
Bush: What are you talking about? Damn my head hurts... Where's that Excedrin...
Bush walks out of his office to be told he's having a press conference in 5 minutes.
Bush: What for? Did I miss a memo again? What is going on around here!?
He heads to the room where it's happening and a head advisor is out there already.
Advisor: The president will be answering questions regarding his declaration of war in Syria. Please keep the questions succinct as possible as we are keeping intelligence on a need to know basis until more of the plan is determined.
Producer: 5, 4, 3, (counting with fingers only) 2, 1...
Bush: Well uh... I'm here... And I will just open the floor to questions right now.
Reporter 1: What has caused your sudden decision to disregard UN regulations and declare war on Syria?
Bush: What are you talking about?
Advisor 1: That's all the time he has to answer questions right now, we will be sending you Time to Bomb Syria T-Shirts for you and your crews. Condolezza is over there at that table, give her your shirt size on your way out.
Bush: But... huh?
*Secret Service move Bush back to his office*
A few minutes later Laura comes in...
Laura: Hey hunnie, how's your day been.
Bush: Plumb awful... All I remember of the earlier half was talking to cheyney in the Party Hall, then I woke up a while later alone on the floor. My head hurts and I don't know why and now everyone's been acting so darn strange. I can't make heads or tails of it...
Laura: Ahh well you should prolly just quit early today and get some extra rest...
Bush: Yeah I guess your right, maybe tomororw things will be back to normal...
The sun sets, and though some doubted it, rises again the next morning.
*End educationtastically fun narrative*
This is obviously not how things go down, but some people think so. People give the president too much credit. If he were to pick a country off a map and went to congress and said "let's go kill these sons of bitches!" Congress would go, "What? I can't hear ya? Somber Histeria? What'd he say?" "I think he said we're gonna jam with Spiced Tea Ya" "Turn up your hearing aids! Read my lips "HE WANTS... TO... BOOOOOOOOMMBB... SEEEER... EE... UH...." "Oh, really? Does he have a case?"
Does he have a case?
That's RIGHT. Bush would need to actually prove we should invade them just like was done for Iraq. Congress needs to approve stuff like this and you all think he can just waltz in and declare war on the world. Well he can't, your wrong. Game over man. So let's cut all this BUSH wants to attack Syria and Iran. BUSH hates the middle east. BUSH is picking on Arabian nations. If he has a case, and Congress agrees than we blow them up. It's that simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139243] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 18:42 |
|
|
| =[DT |
=gbull=[L]=]All they had to do was NOT Crash planes into our Monuments. And we would have left them alone.
|
They were jealous of your giant twin penises.
I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139265] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 19:36 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I don't know. Maybe its cheaper, efficient, cleaner, faster and all round better?
Also those millions of barrels of oil can be sold at higher prices than normal currently to other countries. In fact the leaders of Iran were supporting George Bush for president as opposed to Kerry because prices per barrel would go or stay high. Basically, its more profitble to use nuclear power instead of using oil.
There are as many reasons why Nuclear power is better than fossil fuels as there are barrels of oil in Iran.
EDIT: Oh and Iran is participating in the Kyoto agreement.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
[Updated on: Fri, 18 February 2005 19:37] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139267] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 19:41 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Thats not what I'm saying.
Nuclear power is not perfect, but it still is much better than burning fossil fuels.
One of the main problems is that there is no good way to dispose of depleted Uranium. And so we all end up shoving it into some mountain in the middle of nowhere for 10,000 years. Far from perfect, but is a feasible replacement for fossil fuels until we can be dependent on other energy sources.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139271] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 20:03 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I'm not complaining about shoving it in mountains...
I'm just pointing out how it is not perfect, because all that Uranium becomes totally unusable.
The only other use that the US Gov't. has found for it is to armor tanks or put them in shells for added weight.
We can't use it for much else, and therefore, Nuclear Power is not perfect. But I'm saying its way better that fossil fuels.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139281] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 22:22 |
|
|
| Doitle |
We helped Iran out when Iraq was scudding them. I assumed everyone was familiar with atleast like a 10 year history of the countries we're dealing with here aprime.
|
Really? Thought that was Kuwait? :/
I really really thought you encouraged the war between Iraq and Iran until they use their chemical weapons against Iran, so I suppose the SCUD part was after, eh?
I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139291] |
Fri, 18 February 2005 23:04 |
|
|
/me hands Doitle his official Generals multiplayer test CD.
I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oh yes. [message #139912] |
Mon, 21 February 2005 23:31 |
|
|
| Doitle |
Why do you need nuclear energy when your entire country floats on millions upon millions upon millions of barrels of liquid energy.
|
Just for fun or maybe just because it gives more money to them by selling it than using it...
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
