| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #132102] |
Fri, 14 January 2005 02:59  |
 |
mac
Messages: 1018
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Administrator/General |
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs?[ 53 votes ] |
| 1. |
Yes, jonwil should fix bugs |
 42 / 79% |
| 2. |
No, jonwil should not fix bugs and let users have the consequences |
4 / 8% |
| 3. |
Yes, jonwil should fix bugs but only if fixing them doesnt take away from developent of 2.1 |
7 / 13% |
It has come to my attention, that the current release scripts.dll 2.0 is broken in some ways. Setting the mine limit for windows crashes the fds.
We are about to release a new SSCP1 version which included a scripts 2.0 based SSAOW version which also includes this mine limit setting feature. A new version of brenbot (1.41) makes use of this, and sets the minelimit automatically - obviously, on windows it crashes. works fine on linux.
This is rather annoying for windows server admins, because they cannot use a feature that was promised for scripts.dll 2.0 - instead, their server crashes each time they try it.
Confronting jonwil this this issue, he confirmed that it is actually not working. However, he says he wants to fix it for an upcoming scripts.dll 2.1, which is still far away. His reasons for delaying it that it "would probably take too much time". SSCP1 1.3 is coming out this weekend.
Crimson and me think that this is rather unsetteling. This feature has been promised and brenbot makes full use of it. Bugs, no matter where should be fixed.
Also, the ip address fix for Linux servers is broken in scripts.dll 2.0 - which makes 2 fixable bugs for a scripts.dll 2.0.1
Vote yes, if you think that jonwil should fix bugs, instead of ignoring them and let users suffer the consequences
Win32 Server Admins, post how you feel about that.
|
|
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #132105] |
Fri, 14 January 2005 03:13  |
 |
Titan1x77
Messages: 1086
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
If he has the time to just fix those 2 things and make a scripts 2.01 then that would be fine....then continue on with scripts 2.1
But like he said "would probably take too much time"...so im not sure if it's feasible.
"But if the gameplay sucks, the looks don't matter at all." - Sir Phoenixx
|
|
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #132106] |
Fri, 14 January 2005 03:18 |
|
mac
Messages: 1018
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Administrator/General |
|
|
From what I understand, it wouldn't take a day long effort. Just asking that everyone should get what they orginally were promised from scripts.dll 2.0.
| Quote: |
danpaul88: buggy bugs brenbot because buggy befriends brainlessness
|
|
|
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #132107] |
Fri, 14 January 2005 03:20 |
|
|
a proper fix for the mine limit issue (that was gauranteed not to break anything else) would take a fair bit of time to code.
Jonathan Wilson aka Jonwil
Creator and Lead Coder of the Custom scripts.dll
Renegade Engine Guru
Creator and Lead Coder of TT.DLL
Official member of Tiberian Technologies
|
|
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #132111] |
Fri, 14 January 2005 04:13 |
|
|
oh and btw, dont think this means I am not going to fix it.
A fix is definatly planned for scripts.dll 2.1
Jonathan Wilson aka Jonwil
Creator and Lead Coder of the Custom scripts.dll
Renegade Engine Guru
Creator and Lead Coder of TT.DLL
Official member of Tiberian Technologies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #135163] |
Sun, 30 January 2005 06:54 |
ohnou812
Messages: 58
Registered: March 2003
Location: Western NY
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Thanks v00d00 I would rather have the current stuff with less bugs than to get new stuff with even more bugs. Thanks for the fix ! All you guys at BHS thanks for all the great updates as of late.
Founder of Ohnouserv AOW Renegade Server
US Navy Veteran
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #141353] |
Tue, 01 March 2005 14:41 |
|
|
That's wrong in so many ways.
I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #141380] |
Tue, 01 March 2005 16:12 |
|
|
| xptek |
| Aaron |
| xptek |
| Aaron |
hey ohn! its Aaronjp82  You are right these guys at BHS are awesome!
|
The stupid Aaron from IPS? The same IPS that promised Invision Board would always be free?
|
nope that is not me lol you mean AaronlIPS. I run IPB Helpers not IPS. And for the record they never said it would always be free. 
|
"Yes, we're pushing our paid services harder, but we're still offering a free product that is fully functional. This has always been our vision and it's not going to change. "They" said 1.1 wouldn't be free, it was. "They" said 1.2 wouldn't be free, it was. "They" said 1.3 wouldn't be free, it was. "They" say 2.0 won't be free - and it will be." -Matt Mecham
|
Yes 2.0 was free then 2.0.1 and above went paid. I do not want to sit and debate about if IPB was going to be free or not. This is a Renegade forum any updates on this stuff mac posted about?
IPB Helpers - Free Invision Power Board Support, Free Invison Power Board Mods & Skins Support. Now offering free support for Invison Blog, Chat, File Manager, Gallery & Top Site List.
|
|
|
|
| Should jonwil fix bugs? [message #141568] |
Wed, 02 March 2005 20:53 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Theres no sense in countinuing with 2.1 if 2.0 has bugs. Better to have a solid foundation IMO...
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
Just have to wait for jonwil to incorporate the changes into a new copy
