|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Star Wars debate [message #129979] |
Fri, 31 December 2004 17:56   |
icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Aircraftkiller |
So because they used something from the 1970s that looked like plastic and had little detail, they should stick to making things with little detail?
|
Kind of like how you make all of your models exact to Red Alert's cinematics, even if they suck.
| Sir Phoenixx |
Looks alright, except that the skin lacks detail in general. For example, instead of making the black parts of the suit solid black, it should have seams, stitching, etc... Right now it just looks like a render of the white plastic parts floating in the air.
|
How about thinking about the fact that it does have detail but the render doesn't show it in the black parts? He's not half-assed where he would make them solid.
|
|
|
|
| Star Wars debate [message #129983] |
Fri, 31 December 2004 18:13 |
 |
Pendullum
Messages: 255
Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
It was plastic in the films and thus it should be plastic in the games, so stop bitching
| Aircraftkiller |
(flaming is what homosexuals do)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Star Wars debate [message #129992] |
Fri, 31 December 2004 18:52 |
 |
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
NO! Keep it the way it is! Ignore this evil devil! Use the force Luke!
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Star Wars debate [message #130095] |
Sat, 01 January 2005 11:44 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I entirely agree with gbull. The old Star Wars movies were inspiring beacons of filming for their time, but the acting in these two new ones sucks.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Star Wars debate [message #131460] |
Sun, 09 January 2005 00:38 |
|
liberator
Messages: 246
Registered: May 2003
Location: Classified, Level Phi cle...
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Keep this up and the roving Warsies will drop in and start flame war. Episode 1 is fine, when taken for what it is, the script is passable and the acting is okay(it had Liam Neeson in it for pete's sake, he saved the damn thing)
Episode 2 is actually quite nice in the non-Anakin sequences. It's just when Darth Whiner shows up that it tanks and tanks hard. I cannot see that pathetic cretin(cret-in) become "You're Badass Master of Ceremonies to the fall of the 10,000+ year old Republic and the death of every last stinking Jedi in the place except for Yoda(cause we finally get to see why everyone in the Jedi call him master) and Obi Wan(for some unknown reason, perhaps a bit of weakness on Vader's part).
There was a time when people were impressed that I have the firepower to decimate a planet in under 10 minutes.
|
|
|
|
| Star Wars debate [message #131935] |
Wed, 12 January 2005 16:37 |
 |
Toolstyle
Messages: 215
Registered: May 2004
Location: Manchester
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Vader wasn't in Episode 2...
| Aircraftkiller |
That's irrelevant to this thread.
Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric:
Ad hominem - attacking the arguer and not the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Star Wars debate [message #132033] |
Thu, 13 January 2005 11:28 |
|
Toolstyle
Messages: 215
Registered: May 2004
Location: Manchester
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
I've got a theory about Yoda. He's claiming disability benefits when he doesn't need to, that's what he has the flying chair and the walking stick, but when he needs to he can do all sorts of crazy shit.
| Aircraftkiller |
That's irrelevant to this thread.
Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric:
Ad hominem - attacking the arguer and not the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
.
. jk man, all in good fun.
