Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » God v Bush
God v Bush [message #115908] Tue, 21 September 2004 14:41 Go to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Kudos goes out to HTMLGOD for posting this in #n00bstories. It's something that I'm sure even the Bush fanatics here will find amusing.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v63/enoch1024/GODvsBUSH.gif
God v Bush [message #115928] Wed, 22 September 2004 00:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
There are a LOT of counties that voted Bush... in fact there are more Bush counties missed by the hurricanes than Gore ones. It can be spun any which way, really.

I'm the bawss.
God v Bush [message #116012] Wed, 22 September 2004 12:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Fabian is currently offline  Fabian
Messages: 821
Registered: April 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Karma: 0
Colonel
Nice find Laughing
God v Bush [message #116013] Wed, 22 September 2004 12:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nodbugger is currently offline  Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
The hurricane paths are wrong.

http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1129285834
God v Bush [message #116020] Wed, 22 September 2004 13:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doitle is currently offline  Doitle
Messages: 1723
Registered: February 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Moderator/Captain

Next time it rains where Kerry is, I'll take that as a sign from god to kill him.

http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1285726594
God v Bush [message #116024] Wed, 22 September 2004 13:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Fabian is currently offline  Fabian
Messages: 821
Registered: April 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Karma: 0
Colonel
Rain? Not exactly the same thing...
God v Bush [message #116027] Wed, 22 September 2004 13:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Vitaminous is currently offline  Vitaminous
Messages: 1958
Registered: February 2003
Location: Québec
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

Rain can be associated with fertility, oh Kerry, you're a sneaky one! I mean, only "God" knows your secret! Razz

I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
God v Bush [message #116176] Thu, 23 September 2004 04:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NHJ BV is currently offline  NHJ BV
Messages: 712
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
SEAL

Rain? Not exactly the same thing...


What about acid rain?
God v Bush [message #116208] Thu, 23 September 2004 09:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kurt421 is currently offline  kurt421
Messages: 47
Registered: August 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
lmao!, i like that.
God v Bush [message #116430] Fri, 24 September 2004 19:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aircraftkiller is currently offline  Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
What's even funnier is that it's total bullshit. Smile

http://theclam.com/will/politics/images/exposedlie.jpg
God v Bush [message #118408] Mon, 04 October 2004 16:47 Go to previous message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Read the original picture. You're illegally propagating that picture, Mr. Don't-Post-My-Picture-or-Interpol-Will-Kill-You.

[By the way, I only came back to this topic because a friend of mine brought it up on IM.]


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
Previous Topic: So where exactly is this law thing...?
Next Topic: A week of too much politics and Doom III...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 05 11:14:02 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00766 seconds