|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oooops [message #108072] |
Sun, 15 August 2004 02:20 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/down.png) |
![](http://renegadeforums.com/images/custom_avatars/8.png) |
Crimson
Messages: 7429 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
He was grammatically correct. There is nothing wrong or incorrect in saying that they are thinking of ways to harm the country. What you infer is that he means to act on these ways and actually harm the country... when it's obvious that he actually means that he will act to defend against these ways.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oooops [message #108112] |
Sun, 15 August 2004 08:31 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/down.png) |
![](http://renegadeforums.com/images/custom_avatars/54.jpg) |
warranto
Messages: 2584 Registered: February 2003 Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Endin your favor? lol, nice logic there.
"I called him a name so I won!"
Lets see what you actually won one, shall we?
arguement 1: "What Bush said was correct, he did not screw up!"
- only partially correct, as I've stated he didn't use the best way to convey the message, so because of the way a large number of people interpreted the speech, he did indeed screw up.
arguement 2: "He did not misspeak."
- Even the White House spokesman stated that Bush has misspoken.
arguement 3 "He did not messa up grammatically!"
- on this one your correct.
wow, 1 1/2 of the arguements out of 3. That is 50%, true. However it hardly constitiues ending in your favor. Especially because you've done enough damage to yourself in the process.
|
|
|