| Litmus test for liberals [message #106165] |
Wed, 04 August 2004 19:35  |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Steps to becoming a GOOD Democrat
Virtually anyone can be a Democrat. Just simply quit thinking (about it) and vote that way. If you want to be a GOOD Democrat, however, there are some prerequisites you must have first. Compare them below and see how you rate...
1. You have to believe the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of Federal funding.
2. You have to believe that the same school system that can't teach 4th graders how to read is somehow the best qualified to teach those same kids all about sex.
3. You have to believe that guns, in the hands of law abiding Americans, are more of a threat than US nuclear weapons technology, in the hands of Chinese communists.
4. You have to believe that there was no art before Federal funding.
5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical, documented changes in the earth's climate, and more affected
by Americans driving SUVs'!
6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial but being homosexual is natural.
7. You have to be against capital punishment but support abortion on demand.
8. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.
9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but loony activists from Seattle do.
10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.
11. You have to believe that the US military starts wars--not evil tyrannical regimes.
12. You have to believe the NRA is bad, because it supports certain parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good, because it supports
certain parts of the constitution.
13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.
14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, General Robert E. Lee or Thomas Edison.
15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.
16. You have to believe Hillary Clinton is all about "progress" and not power. She just wants to help us out of the archaic system of
governing that we've been subjected to since our founding.
17. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried, is because the right people haven't been in charge.
18. You have to believe Republicans telling the truth belong in jail, but a cheat, liar and sex offender belongs in the White House and you
would vote him back in there in a New York minute (if you could).
19. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag and transvestites should be constitutionally protected and manger scenes
at Christmas should be illegal.
20. You have to believe that illegal Democrat Party funding by the Chinese is somehow in the best interest of the United States.
21. You have to believe that the vociferous minorities who protest against prayer and saluting the flag in school, the 10 commandments in court, have far more rights than the majority who believe in God and country and want these values to be instilled in our young children.
If you are locked in solidly to most of these beliefs - you're gonna be a big asset to John Kerry.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106187] |
Thu, 05 August 2004 00:04  |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
| SEAL |
Crimson's copying and pasting skills are superb.
This is all retarded garbage.
|
I know the truth hurts...
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106193] |
Thu, 05 August 2004 00:27 |
NHJ BV
Messages: 712
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
I can do that.
President George W Bush is visiting an elementary school, and he
visits one of the classes. They are in the middle of a discussion related to words and their meanings. The teacher asks the President if he would like to lead the class in the discussion of the word, "tragedy." So the illustrious leader asks the class for an example of a "tragedy."
One little boy stands up and offers, "If my best friend, who lives next
door, is playing in the street and a car comes along and runs him over,
that would be a tragedy."
"No," says Bush, "that would be an ACCIDENT."
A little girl raises her hand: "If a school bus carrying 50 children drove
off a cliff, killing everyone involved, that would be a tragedy."
"I'm afraid not," explains Mr. President. "That's what we would call a
GREAT LOSS."
The room goes silent. No other children volunteer. President Bush searches
the room. "Isn't there someone here who can give me an example of a
tragedy?"
Finally, way in the back of the room, a small boy raises his hand. In a
quiet voice he says, "If Air Force One, carrying Mr. Bush, were struck by a
missile and blown up to smithereens, by a terrorist like Osama bin Laden,
that would be a tragedy."
"Fantastic," exclaims Bush, "that's right. And can you tell me WHY that
would be a TRAGEDY?"
"Well," says the boy, "because it wouldn't be an accident, and it certainly
wouldn't be a great loss."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106253] |
Thu, 05 August 2004 11:21 |
 |
Pak
Messages: 19
Registered: February 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Especially When you have a Cash Cow Whore Wife, i.e. Teresa Heinz Kerry
She was a Republican That Went Bad, Like Heinz Ketchup
Chairman and CEO of Pak Incorporated.
Member of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Member of the Liberal Party of British Columbia.
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106262] |
Thu, 05 August 2004 11:51 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Shut up, you imbusiile. The fact that you would so rudely attack someone who really is not such a bad person, like Teresa, shows you have little comprehension of anything. Go be stupid somewhere else.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106266] |
Thu, 05 August 2004 12:23 |
|
Pak
Messages: 19
Registered: February 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Teresa Heinz Kerry is a Bitch Plain And Simple!
As for Kerry He Isn't President Material, Hes a Flip Flop.
Bush is More Straight Forth President You Know His Agenda.
Bush is Better Than Kerry!
Chairman and CEO of Pak Incorporated.
Member of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Member of the Liberal Party of British Columbia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106280] |
Thu, 05 August 2004 13:52 |
|
Pak
Messages: 19
Registered: February 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
I'm Canadian Eh?
Chairman and CEO of Pak Incorporated.
Member of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Member of the Liberal Party of British Columbia.
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106281] |
Thu, 05 August 2004 13:53 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Pak |
Teresa Heinz Kerry is a Bitch Plain And Simple!
|
Why?
| Pak |
As for Kerry He Isn't President Material, Hes a Flip Flop.
|
Tell me, why do you think John Kerry is a flip-flopper? Which bills did he flip-flop on?
| Pak |
Bush is More Straight Forth President You Know His Agenda.
|
Lower taxes and screw the economy?
| Pak |
Bush is Better Than Kerry!
|
Kerry is Better Than Bush!
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106351] |
Fri, 06 August 2004 07:24 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Reagan lowered taxes too, but it screwed the economy rather badly, considering how his tax breaks went straight in to the national deficit. They say he made 3 trillion dollars of growth in the economy, but that's really a lie, because the deficit increased 3 trillion dollars. Thst's not a good tax cut.
George Bush lowered taxes, but at what expense? Cutting tons of funding for after-school programs, medicare, just about everything that helps people got cut so people can have their tax cuts. So, when everyone but the rich thinks that they have gotten some more money in their pockets, they end up spending more money to care for their children and themselves than if they hadn't gotten their tax cut. Whereas, the rich get to sit high and mighty.
Oh, and has everyone heard? The terror alert for the banking district was based on intelligence that was captured 3 years ago. 3 Years ago, they captured some drawings of the financial district, and sheets with time shifts on them from a suspected pakistani terrorist. So, they set off an alert a couple days ago. Doesn't make much sense to me, especially when each alert costs millions of dollars.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106387] |
Fri, 06 August 2004 10:43 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Oh you ARE a bright one, aren't you? I think you need to read up on that story a bit more. Even the media has retracted most of what they said about it. The information was 3 years old, then it was UPDATED recently, which is exactly the same thing that happened in the 9/11 attack. Apparently we captured someone with a LOT of knowledge about the communication methods of Al Qaeda and he's been quite a wealth of information for us.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Litmus test for liberals [message #106472] |
Sat, 07 August 2004 08:00 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Disclaimer: the following statement is extremely biased, inflammatory, politically incorrect, and based entirely on the author's own opinions, which hopefully are not in the least bit like anyone else's.
Wow. I'm beginning to think that this country has almost completely outgrown its entire political system. It's time for a change- a really big one, and one that I'm sure will never be made because it would upset our precious status quo.
The problem is not that either party is any worse than the other- it's that few people can see past their own rediculous party loyalty to actually sit down and think (yeah, that's right- a little logic, a little creativity, and some good old fashioned reason!) about what's actually best for America. That means (gasp!) looking at both sides of the issue- something which is rarer than a seaworthy russian submarine.
Even worse are the retards who vote for a particular candidate simply because they aren't the other guy- nevermind that they don't know a fucking thing about who they just gave their vote to! That particular brand of stupidity is showing its ugly face in this election- does anyone realize that Kerry and Bush are really not all that different in their private opinions on various controversial issues? The only difference is that one has already shown his hand and has to play it out- the other can straddle the issues all he pleases. If their positions were reversed, I'm not so sure the same damn thing wouldn't be happening.
I think I'll look for a third-party choice that actually supports the same things I do. Neither one of the major parties do that right now. And if such a candidate doesn't exist- well, there's always a write-in. The only way anything is ever going to change in this country is if people start voicing their own damn opinions, instead of someone else's.
[/OPINION]
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
