|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 A*C*K? [message #103571] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 12:10   |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
No, you aren't incorrect in that belief.
A manager of any type irregardless of what situation is supposed to be impartial. That's why BHS has a disclaimer stating that only the three managers are to be considered as the absolute authority in BHS communications. They have members that can't behave themselves and attack each other and other mods on the very forums they are supposed to support. I particularly like ack stating JW is full of it, and SK's nice little "you can't trust JW" blurb in his signature.
And then there's the whole REBORN thing...
And we're the children?
They are supposed to be impartial and communicate to all members the community impartially. So, you see, you aren't incorrect in that assumption.
Blazer is a very good example of impartiallity
Deleted
[Updated on: Fri, 23 July 2004 12:12] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A*C*K? [message #103590] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 12:26 |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Yes, I must say JW is a very professional man, as well as mac.
They never espouse any emnity at all.
Deleted
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A*C*K? [message #103604] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 12:49 |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Crimson |
There's no pleasing you, is there? Guess I'm wasting my money.
|
Then shut them down.
Deleted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A*C*K? [message #103635] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 13:49 |
 |
Fabian
Messages: 821
Registered: April 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Crimson |
You missed the entire point...
2) Waking up to this huge thread full of complaining that you can't call him ACK anymore (if I left it on) PROVES HIS POINT that you are using it to insult him and you resent not being able to insult him anymore!
|
Wow...Crimson, you missed the entire point. That proves nothing.
People were using "ACK" as an insult after it was being filtered as a way of protesting our censorship.
[Updated on: Fri, 23 July 2004 13:51] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A*C*K? [message #103655] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 14:42 |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Just wanted to add my 2 cents...
What's so bad about the filter anyways? Why is it so important that you'd HAVE to say ACK, and have it stay like that rather than be changed to aircraftkiller, as thats what is inferred anyways?
It would be the same as the filter replacing "u" with "you", and "r" with "are", and I doubt that people would complain about it. heck, I'm sure that if Crimson were to put in place a filter that replaced, "lol" with "laughing out loud" I doubt anyone would complain.
Simply put, grow up people. Those who are complaining about this are probably the same type of people who cry injustice when they get caught cheating on a test and are failed for it.
Ask yourself this: is it REALLY so bad that "ACK" is replaced with "Aircraftkiller"? It's the same word, isn't it? I could understand if a filter was put in place were if something like "Crimson's fat" were changed to "I'm stupid" or something like that, but changing one word for another when it's EXACTLY the SAME word and then complaining about it is so childish, wouldn't you say?
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
